Here are a few predictions:
1. The Dow Jones Industrials will drop hundreds of points in a day, very soon, losing at least 3,000 points within the next few weeks.
2. The Shanghai stock market will lose half its value, dropping from 5,800 to under 3,000.
3. Major banks will be declared insolvent.
4. Major lay-offs will occur as U.S. retail, auto and house sales plummet.
5. The tech high-fliers (RIMM), (GOOG) and (AAPL) will fall precipitously

Level 3 assets have only unobservable inputs to measure value and are thus valued by reference to the banks’ own models.

There has been no rush to disclose Level 3 assets in advance of the first quarter in which it becomes compulsory, probably that ending in February or March 2008. Figures that have been disclosed show Lehman with $22 billion in Level 3 assets, 100% of capital, Bear Stearns with $20 billion, 155% of capital and J.P. Morgan Chase with about $60 billion, 50% of capital.

MBIA, the world's largest bond insurer, with nearly $3 billion in revenues, is at the center of the growing mess. In late October the Armonk (N.Y.) firm announced a $36.6 million loss for the third quarter.

Many income investors are looking for monthly dividend payments to support their income during retirement. Other pre-retirement investors want monthly dividend stocks for their IRAs for faster compounding.

This list is now up to 150 different stocks, CEFs, REITs, floating rate funds, and oil income funds [such as Canadian royalty trusts], all of which are traded on the New York Stock Exchange or the American Stock Exchange. I've added over twenty new securities since the year-end update, reposted the yields, kept the readers' recommendations of sorting by yield with the highest first, and identifying the Canadian companies [due to tax withholding issues].

Due to requests from readers, I have sorted the list by yield, from highest to lowest. In addition, I have identified the Canadian trusts due to the tax withholding issue which can significantly affect the yield, especially with regard to holding these Canadian Oil Income Trusts in retirement plans (they all trade in the U.S.). The list shows the name of the stock, the stock market symbol, the yield, and if the stock is Canadian.

For anyone who researches their own investments, the closed-end funds would probably be preferable because they won’t have the big sales charge and the recurring 12b-1 fees of the Van Kampen fund. Plus, once again, closed-end funds have the advantage of a stable asset base on which the calls can be written.

Nature of the beast: Closed-end funds are offered at a premium to NAV at their IPOs; the premium represents the compensation to the underwriters, although few retail buyers understand this. Afterward, closed-ends frequently fall to discounts in the aftermarket.

Lack of investor understanding: Wachovia Securities analyst Mariana Bush says, "We think investors are selling their funds regardless of their NAV performance, to get rid of holdings whose behavior they cannot fully understand."

Wall Street maneuvers: A 1994 study by the Wharton School of Finance suggested that "enterprising" pros sell these funds to a "less informed" public. More often than not, these premiums disappeared when the underwriters withdrew so-called price support techniques after the offering, leaving the small investors holding the bag... Thomas J. Herzfeld places the blame for the current depressed prices squarely on Wall Street. "The underwriters pumped out whatever they could sell leaving no demand for these shares in the aftermarket."

Overly-high risk in pursuit of high yields: "Most of these funds have little or no chance of returning their eight, nine, ten percent yields without depleting their respective net-asset values," says another Chicago options trader.