Limelight Networks, Inc. (LLNW)

All Comments on LLNW

  • commenter
    GKM
    Oct 11 10:32 AM
    Nasdaq Perks Up via Bottom Fishing [view article]
    Sucker rallies are always encouraging by definition. A rally that is met with skepticism will denote a change in trend. Reply
  • commenter
    azman
    Aug 23 03:49 PM
    My Website
    What Does Quality Online Video Look Like? [view article]
    Hey, the market is changing so fast, you should look a bit deeper. First, High quality video is available from more than just the major networks. Using CDNs (Content Delivery Networks) like BitGravity, designed to distribute video, and even adjust the quality based on the bandwidth available, HD is more than 'here', it is prevalent. You can almost consider YouTube to be the 'old guard' vs. the folks out there now continuing the Internet tradition of re-invention and improvement. Look at sites like Revision3, an entire TV station on the net, creating custom content. It will all redefine how we even consider this medium... Reply
  • commenter
    ksmithdc
    Aug 23 09:41 AM
    My Website
    Akamai and the BBC: News Reporting on CDNs Getting Shoddy [view article]
    Interesting read. Reply
  • commenter
    Dan Rayburn
    Aug 22 07:27 PM
    My Website
    Akamai and the BBC: News Reporting on CDNs Getting Shoddy [view article]
    Sorry, I no longer track KIT Digital and have no interest in the company. Reply
  • commenter
    PizzaRater
    Aug 22 02:33 PM
    Akamai and the BBC: News Reporting on CDNs Getting Shoddy [view article]
    I would like your opinion about KIT digital and their delivery of mobile content throughout Europe and Asia. You argued against KIT in favor of Brightcove last May on the NewTeeVee Blog and since then the company closed the deal with Kamera and added new clients.
    Your opinion would be appreciated.     Reply
  • commenter
    Dan Rayburn
    Aug 20 07:22 PM
    My Website
    Digging Deeper Into Limelight's Earnings Call [view article]
    I agree, the wording could be better, the downside of not having an editor for my blog.

    What I was trying to say was that Limelight is building out their CDN for partial business customers have give them, with the idea that if their build out is successful, they could win more of the customers business from other competitors or from in-house solutions.     Reply
  • commenter
    Brown
    Aug 19 04:09 PM
    Digging Deeper Into Limelight's Earnings Call [view article]
    Roger is right on. The statement is confusing because it is grammatically incorrect. If the word "but" was removed and "to accomodate" appeared instead the sentence and staetment would make sense. I just don't know if that is what Dan meant and so, I am left guessing like the rest of you. Reply
  • commenter
    Richard
    Lanham
    Aug 16 08:42 AM
    My Website
    Amazon's AWS Won't Compete With CDNs [view article]
    Wowza Media Server, a streaming Flash media server, does have an EC2 offering, an AWS devpay product. And Wowza has origin/edge configuration. Here is a link:
    wowzamedia.com/ec2.php     Reply
  • commenter
    BillytheKid
    Aug 14 08:58 PM
    Digging Deeper Into Limelight's Earnings Call [view article]
    Dan, I have to agree with Roger -- that sentence doesn't seem to make sense. Can you just clarify that statement? Are you trying to say it is simply building out to support new organic business or taking share from competitors/in-house or both? If you read it carefully, the "but" statement is what is confusing . . . Reply
  • commenter
    Dan Rayburn
    Aug 14 04:28 PM
    My Website
    Digging Deeper Into Limelight's Earnings Call [view article]
    Hi Roger, not sure what you are asking to clarify? Reply
  • commenter
    halfacat
    Aug 14 04:21 PM
    My Website
    Digging Deeper Into Limelight's Earnings Call [view article]
    Hi Dan,

    Great article, as always your insight for this industry is helpful for everyone selling it and buying it.

    I am a little confused by this sentence though:
    "The most interesting thing Limelight said on the call, with very little details, is that it would spend more in the second half of the year to build out its network for business it had won, but traffic it would have to take away from competitors or from in-house."

    Specifically:
    "but traffic it would have to take away from competitors or from in-house." - this seems to be a grammatical error. Can you clarify what this means?

    Roger     Reply
  • commenter
    kkin365
    Aug 13 09:16 AM
    My Website
    Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [view article]
    Suggest you add crude oil price at the time of your posting your daily news. You have provided a most valuable service. Reply
  • commenter
    fatcat
    Aug 13 09:02 AM
    Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [view article]
    Eli,the new page design is great..one suggestion,add author name and date in the Dashboard section...Thanks Reply
  • commenter
    Dan Rayburn
    Aug 01 03:53 PM
    My Website
    Same CDN Major Players Getting All Live Business [view article]
    The numbers I am going on are the numbers the providers give me. I have yet to hear from any distribution provider of any live event this year, other than sports, that did over 50,000 simultaneous streams. They may be out there, and if so are very few, but so far, none of the numbers I am getting back from those delivering the content are very big as compared to the events in the U.S. Reply
  • commenter
    Ludolf
    Aug 01 11:24 AM
    Same CDN Major Players Getting All Live Business [view article]
    Good news then. Finally, some hard numbers on Europe. I am curious to see that later.

    Regarding live-events: that's not correct, live-events in China and Korea do have definitely more than 20.000 viewers. That's not a unique number to US events.

    Eurovision? European broadband penetration is roughly 50% out of 320 million people = 160 million, take 1% or even 0.1% of that and you have a number which is bigger than 20.000 viewers, I would say.     Reply
Loading...
Symbols:
Authors:
Quick Links: