<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>LOOK - News and Analysis from Seeking Alpha</title>
    <description>'LOOK' Tag RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <author>
      <name>SeekingAlpha.com</name>
    </author>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/look</link>
    <item>
      <title>How to Fix Microsoft for $5 Billion</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/141090-how-to-fix-microsoft-for-5-billion?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">141090</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>) recently made Bing.com available to the masses.  I personally love it...it will be my number 2 search engine after Duperoo.com (my own search engine that is currently being redesigned).</p><p>I am about to propose that if Microsoft gave me $5 billion from its war chest, I could make its online venture be positioned better and maybe even profitable.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 08:23:15 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Thomas Jowers</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>) recently made Bing.com available to the masses.  I personally love it...it will be my number 2 search engine after Duperoo.com (my own search engine that is currently being redesigned).</p><p>I am about to propose that if Microsoft gave me $5 billion from its war chest, I could make its online venture be positioned better and maybe even profitable.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/141090-how-to-fix-microsoft-for-5-billion?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/amzn">AMZN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog">GOOG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/iaci">IACI</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/look">LOOK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mchx">MCHX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/miva">MIVA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tscm">TSCM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vclk">VCLK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/yhoo">YHOO</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/thomas-jowers">Thomas Jowers</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EBay: Unwinding and Adding On</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/131373-ebay-unwinding-and-adding-on?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">131373</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>by Brenon Daly</em></p><p>For a company that essentially matches buyers and sellers, eBay (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ebay' title='More opinion and analysis of EBAY'>EBAY</a>) has been doing a lot of dealing of its own this week. It has picked up a controlling stake in Gmarket (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gmkt' title='More opinion and analysis of GMKT'>GMKT</a>), the South Korean online auction house. When <a href="http://www.the451group.com/report_view/report_view.php?entity_id=54592" target="_blank" >we  wrote about</a> this possible deal in mid-August, we noted that eBay was willing to pay a not-insignificant premium for Gmarket. Makes sense, given that international sales have been growing more than twice as fast as US sales in recent quarters. (Ebay reports first-quarter earnings next Wednesday.)</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 03:04:42 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>The 451 Group: Inorganic Growth</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://blogs.the451group.com/techdeals/'>The 451 Group: Inorganic Growth</a> submits: </strong><p><em>by Brenon Daly</em></p><p>For a company that essentially matches buyers and sellers, eBay (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ebay' title='More opinion and analysis of EBAY'>EBAY</a>) has been doing a lot of dealing of its own this week. It has picked up a controlling stake in Gmarket (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gmkt' title='More opinion and analysis of GMKT'>GMKT</a>), the South Korean online auction house. When <a href="http://www.the451group.com/report_view/report_view.php?entity_id=54592" target="_blank" >we  wrote about</a> this possible deal in mid-August, we noted that eBay was willing to pay a not-insignificant premium for Gmarket. Makes sense, given that international sales have been growing more than twice as fast as US sales in recent quarters. (Ebay reports first-quarter earnings next Wednesday.)</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/131373-ebay-unwinding-and-adding-on?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ebay">EBAY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gmkt">GMKT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/look">LOOK</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/the-451-group-inorganic-growth">The 451 Group: Inorganic Growth</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Time for Interactive to Go Shopping?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/101417-time-for-interactive-to-go-shopping?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">101417</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal">Interactive's (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/iaci' title='More opinion and analysis of IACI'>IACI</a>) Barry Diller has uncanny timing.  Little more than a month before October's bloodletting in the stock market began in earnest, he completed a spin off of the multiple divisions that formerly comprised the IACI conglomerate.  Many of those divisions were seen as low growth and / or a drag on earnings that kept IACI from achieving the kind of valuation it deserved.  This has proven to be quite fortuitous timing, as it is hard to imagine that the financing necessary to complete these spin offs could have occured if attempted this month instead.</p> <p class="MsoNormal">Interactive is now in the enviable position of sitting on a cash hoard of nearly $1.6 Billion that it can use to &quot;go shopping&quot; for technology and content that will add to the potential of the smaller, sleeker and ready to grow Interactive.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 07:53:51 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>John Gilliam</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.pointclearstrategiccapital.com/">John Gilliam</a> submits:</strong>
<p class="MsoNormal">Interactive's (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/iaci' title='More opinion and analysis of IACI'>IACI</a>) Barry Diller has uncanny timing.  Little more than a month before October's bloodletting in the stock market began in earnest, he completed a spin off of the multiple divisions that formerly comprised the IACI conglomerate.  Many of those divisions were seen as low growth and / or a drag on earnings that kept IACI from achieving the kind of valuation it deserved.  This has proven to be quite fortuitous timing, as it is hard to imagine that the financing necessary to complete these spin offs could have occured if attempted this month instead.</p> <p class="MsoNormal">Interactive is now in the enviable position of sitting on a cash hoard of nearly $1.6 Billion that it can use to &quot;go shopping&quot; for technology and content that will add to the potential of the smaller, sleeker and ready to grow Interactive.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/101417-time-for-interactive-to-go-shopping?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/iaci">IACI</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/look">LOOK</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/john-gilliam">John Gilliam</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Internet No Longer Immune to Economic Slowdown</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/85687-internet-no-longer-immune-to-economic-slowdown?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">85687</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Sorry to disappointing everyone, but the evidence today is piling up: the Internet really is a part of the overall economy. While the optimists had hoped that the efficiency of Internet-based advertising would make it a more appealing place to buy ads in a downturn, it is increasingly obvious that the current economic straits are too widespread for Internet businesses to avoid. Companies of almost every description are feeling the pain. They are cutting spending. And one thing they are trimming back on is spending on Internet advertising.</p> <p>While it never made too much sense to imagine that Net companies could avoid feeling the pinch of a weaker economy, over the last 24 hours the market has received a wealth of new data points that prove the case:</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 09:05:42 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Eric Savitz</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/esavitz70px.jpg' align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" width="70" height="95" border='1' /><strong><a href="http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/">Eric Savitz</a> (Barron's) submits: </strong><p>Sorry to disappointing everyone, but the evidence today is piling up: the Internet really is a part of the overall economy. While the optimists had hoped that the efficiency of Internet-based advertising would make it a more appealing place to buy ads in a downturn, it is increasingly obvious that the current economic straits are too widespread for Internet businesses to avoid. Companies of almost every description are feeling the pain. They are cutting spending. And one thing they are trimming back on is spending on Internet advertising.</p> <p>While it never made too much sense to imagine that Net companies could avoid feeling the pinch of a weaker economy, over the last 24 hours the market has received a wealth of new data points that prove the case:</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/85687-internet-no-longer-immune-to-economic-slowdown?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ebay">EBAY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog">GOOG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/look">LOOK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/twx">TWX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vclk">VCLK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/yhoo">YHOO</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/eric-savitz">Eric Savitz</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ValueClick, LookSmart: Trouble in Online Ad Market?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/85470-valueclick-looksmart-trouble-in-online-ad-market?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">85470</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>ValueClick (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vclk' title='More opinion and analysis of VCLK'>VCLK</a>) this morning is sending a shudder through the online advertising market.<br /> <a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/080717/20080717005365.html?.v=1" target="_blank"><br /> The company warned</a> that it now sees Q2 revenue of $163 million to $164 million, down from its previous guidance of $166 million to $170 million. VCLK, an oft-rumored takeover target that is one the largest remaining independent online advertising companies, actually raised its EPS guidance to 17-18 cents from 15-16 cents; but the top-line problem is troubling the Street.</p> <p>More troubling: for the full year, VCLK cut its revenue guidance to $655 million to $675 million, from $730 million to $745 million. EPS guidance drops to 69-71 cents, from 81-83 cents.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 10:36:11 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Eric Savitz</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/esavitz70px.jpg' align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" width="70" height="95" border='1' /><strong><a href="http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/">Eric Savitz</a> (Barron's) submits: </strong><p>ValueClick (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vclk' title='More opinion and analysis of VCLK'>VCLK</a>) this morning is sending a shudder through the online advertising market.<br /> <a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/080717/20080717005365.html?.v=1" target="_blank"><br /> The company warned</a> that it now sees Q2 revenue of $163 million to $164 million, down from its previous guidance of $166 million to $170 million. VCLK, an oft-rumored takeover target that is one the largest remaining independent online advertising companies, actually raised its EPS guidance to 17-18 cents from 15-16 cents; but the top-line problem is troubling the Street.</p> <p>More troubling: for the full year, VCLK cut its revenue guidance to $655 million to $675 million, from $730 million to $745 million. EPS guidance drops to 69-71 cents, from 81-83 cents.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/85470-valueclick-looksmart-trouble-in-online-ad-market?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog">GOOG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/look">LOOK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vclk">VCLK</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/eric-savitz">Eric Savitz</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>B.Riley's 29 Tech Steals - Barron's</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/59170-b-riley-s-29-tech-steals-barron-s?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">59170</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://online.barrons.com/article/SB119949050213868843.html">Barron's Tech Trader previews</a> investment boutique B. Riley's Cash-Rich Technology Stock [CRTS] index</strong>, which seeks out small and mid-size tech companies trading at or near net cash per share. B. Riley doesn't make calls often, but its CRTS has a remarkable, if brief, track record: In 2002, 15 picks gained 326% over 18 months. In 2005, 13 stocks gained 18.6% over 13 months. CRTS III consists of 29 stocks.</p>

<p>"In recent months, the credit crunch, the subprime meltdown and the accompanying uncertain economic environment has resulted in significant losses in U.S. stock indexes," it writes, noting small-caps took the biggest hit. The firm believes now is the time to grab cheap, under-appreciated tech stocks.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 11:22:28 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>SA Editor Eli Hoffmann</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://online.barrons.com/article/SB119949050213868843.html">Barron's Tech Trader previews</a> investment boutique B. Riley's Cash-Rich Technology Stock [CRTS] index</strong>, which seeks out small and mid-size tech companies trading at or near net cash per share. B. Riley doesn't make calls often, but its CRTS has a remarkable, if brief, track record: In 2002, 15 picks gained 326% over 18 months. In 2005, 13 stocks gained 18.6% over 13 months. CRTS III consists of 29 stocks.</p>

<p>"In recent months, the credit crunch, the subprime meltdown and the accompanying uncertain economic environment has resulted in significant losses in U.S. stock indexes," it writes, noting small-caps took the biggest hit. The firm believes now is the time to grab cheap, under-appreciated tech stocks.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/59170-b-riley-s-29-tech-steals-barron-s?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/call">CALL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/camd">CAMD</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ctlm">CTLM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ditc">DITC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dtlk">DTLK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/enwv">ENWV</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/esst">ESST</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/exar">EXAR</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/extr">EXTR</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fsii">FSII</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gsit">GSIT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hill">HILL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/insp">INSP</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/issi">ISSI</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/look">LOOK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/maxy">MAXY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/optv">OPTV</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pdii">PDII</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pvsw">PVSW</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rnwk">RNWK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/scmr">SCMR</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/simg">SIMG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ssti">SSTI</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tlgd">TLGD</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tmta">TMTA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/trid">TRID</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wstl">WSTL</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/eli-hoffmann">SA Editor Eli Hoffmann</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is There Any Money in Second Tier Internet Search Stocks?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/58775-is-there-any-money-in-second-tier-internet-search-stocks?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">58775</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>
One of the first stocks I owned was Ask Jeeves [formerly ASKJ, bought out by IAC/InterActiveCorp (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/iaci' title='More opinion and analysis of IACI'>IACI</a>)] which I bought after the tech bubble collapsed. It was trading at a little over a dollar and the company was quickly growing revenues and earnings. I sold the stock too early but I still made over ten times my money in that stock, a ten bagger in Lynch speak.
</p>
<p>Ever since then I have followed the internet search sector to see if another small player could follow a similar path as Ask Jeeves. I've followed the second tier search companies for a couple of years and frankly I don't think there is any money to be made investing in these companies (from a fundamental perspective).
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 03:47:08 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Phillip Lyon</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.intelligentspeculator.net/'>Phillip Lyon</a> submits:</strong><p>
One of the first stocks I owned was Ask Jeeves [formerly ASKJ, bought out by IAC/InterActiveCorp (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/iaci' title='More opinion and analysis of IACI'>IACI</a>)] which I bought after the tech bubble collapsed. It was trading at a little over a dollar and the company was quickly growing revenues and earnings. I sold the stock too early but I still made over ten times my money in that stock, a ten bagger in Lynch speak.
</p>
<p>Ever since then I have followed the internet search sector to see if another small player could follow a similar path as Ask Jeeves. I've followed the second tier search companies for a couple of years and frankly I don't think there is any money to be made investing in these companies (from a fundamental perspective).
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/58775-is-there-any-money-in-second-tier-internet-search-stocks?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cnic">CNIC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/iaci">IACI</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/locm">LOCM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/look">LOOK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/miva">MIVA</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/phillip-lyon">Phillip Lyon</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>LookSmart News Ignored by Market</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/57931-looksmart-news-ignored-by-market?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">57931</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>
LookSmart Ltd.'s (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/look' title='More opinion and analysis of LOOK'>LOOK</a>) board has approved a modified Dutch auction self-tender offer for up to $20 million of its common stock.
</p>

<p>
<img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2007/12/20/look.gif" style="float: right; margin-left: 5px" />
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 05:30:14 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Amar Singh</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://scalptrading.blogspot.com'>Amar Singh</a> submits:</strong><p>
LookSmart Ltd.'s (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/look' title='More opinion and analysis of LOOK'>LOOK</a>) board has approved a modified Dutch auction self-tender offer for up to $20 million of its common stock.
</p>

<p>
<img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2007/12/20/look.gif" style="float: right; margin-left: 5px" />
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/57931-looksmart-news-ignored-by-market?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/look">LOOK</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/amar-singh">Amar Singh</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Didn't CNET Just Buy All of LookSmart?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/53975-why-didn-t-cnet-just-buy-all-of-looksmart?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">53975</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>CNET (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cnet' title='More opinion and analysis of CNET'>CNET</a>) paid $20.5M for FindArticles two weeks ago and bought it from LookSmart (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/look' title='More opinion and analysis of LOOK'>LOOK</a>), who made it official last <a href="http://investor.shareholder.com/looksmart/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=274673">Thursday</a>.</p>
<p>CNET
has about $50M in cash and has set up a $250M credit facility to buy
more assets I presume. They also just sold Webshots to American
Greetings (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/am' title='More opinion and analysis of AM'>AM</a>) from some $45M.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 05:11:53 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Ashkan Karbasfrooshan</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/ashpicture.jpg' title='ashkan' alt='ashkan' width="80" height="95" align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" border='1' /><strong><a href="http://www.watchmojo.com/web/blog/">Ashkan Karbasfrooshan</a> submits: </strong><p>CNET (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cnet' title='More opinion and analysis of CNET'>CNET</a>) paid $20.5M for FindArticles two weeks ago and bought it from LookSmart (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/look' title='More opinion and analysis of LOOK'>LOOK</a>), who made it official last <a href="http://investor.shareholder.com/looksmart/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=274673">Thursday</a>.</p>
<p>CNET
has about $50M in cash and has set up a $250M credit facility to buy
more assets I presume. They also just sold Webshots to American
Greetings (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/am' title='More opinion and analysis of AM'>AM</a>) from some $45M.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/53975-why-didn-t-cnet-just-buy-all-of-looksmart?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cnet">CNET</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/look">LOOK</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/ashkan-karbasfrooshan">Ashkan Karbasfrooshan</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>LookSmart Trading at Less Than Half its True Value?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/53702-looksmart-trading-at-less-than-half-its-true-value?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">53702</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>
Regardless of what you think of LookSmart's historical missteps and
its recent tendency to fall short of analyst's expectations, a
confluence of events the past few days leads us to believe that
LookSmart (Nasdaq: <a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/look' title='More opinion and analysis of LOOK'>LOOK</a>) is severely undervalued and that it should command a market valuation more than double current levels.
</p>
<p>Looksmart closed Friday at $2.35 per share, just a little higher than its 52 week low of $2.16 per share.  After the close of trading Thursday, the company released Q3 results that were not particularly sterling, but did indicate that the company finished the Q with $37.4 million in cash on the balance sheet, or about $1.63 per share.  The bigger news was that LookSmart also announced  a contract for the sale of FindArticles.com to Cnet (Nasdaq: <a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cnet' title='More opinion and analysis of CNET'>CNET</a>) for $20.5 million.  Adding the proceeds of this sale to its current cash hoard will result in a balance sheet with somewhere in the range of $56 -  $57 million in cash, equal to about $2.45 - $2.49 per share.
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 03:27:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>John Gilliam</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.pointclearstrategiccapital.com/">John Gilliam</a> submits:</strong>
<p>
Regardless of what you think of LookSmart's historical missteps and
its recent tendency to fall short of analyst's expectations, a
confluence of events the past few days leads us to believe that
LookSmart (Nasdaq: <a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/look' title='More opinion and analysis of LOOK'>LOOK</a>) is severely undervalued and that it should command a market valuation more than double current levels.
</p>
<p>Looksmart closed Friday at $2.35 per share, just a little higher than its 52 week low of $2.16 per share.  After the close of trading Thursday, the company released Q3 results that were not particularly sterling, but did indicate that the company finished the Q with $37.4 million in cash on the balance sheet, or about $1.63 per share.  The bigger news was that LookSmart also announced  a contract for the sale of FindArticles.com to Cnet (Nasdaq: <a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cnet' title='More opinion and analysis of CNET'>CNET</a>) for $20.5 million.  Adding the proceeds of this sale to its current cash hoard will result in a balance sheet with somewhere in the range of $56 -  $57 million in cash, equal to about $2.45 - $2.49 per share.
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/53702-looksmart-trading-at-less-than-half-its-true-value?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/look">LOOK</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/john-gilliam">John Gilliam</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sidus Investment Management Takes An 'Active' Role in LookSmart  </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/45533-sidus-investment-management-takes-an-active-role-in-looksmart?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">45533</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[In a <a href="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1077866/000089457907000318/sidus33466413d.htm">13D filing</a> on LookSmart Ltd. (Nasdaq: <a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/look' title='More opinion and analysis of LOOK'>LOOK</a>), 10.3% holder Sidus Investment Management noted they changed their filing status from 13G 'passive' to 13D 'active'.
</p>
<p>In a pretty standard disclosure, Sidus did not make any direct requests on the company. The firm said they reserve the right to discuss various views and opinions with members of the company's senior management.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 04:05:25 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Lon Juricic</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/lonjuricic.jpg' align='left' width="62" height="82" hspace="6" vspace"6" border='1' /> <strong><a href="http://13dtracker.blogspot.com/">Lon Juricic</a> submits: </strong> In a <a href="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1077866/000089457907000318/sidus33466413d.htm">13D filing</a> on LookSmart Ltd. (Nasdaq: <a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/look' title='More opinion and analysis of LOOK'>LOOK</a>), 10.3% holder Sidus Investment Management noted they changed their filing status from 13G 'passive' to 13D 'active'.
</p>
<p>In a pretty standard disclosure, Sidus did not make any direct requests on the company. The firm said they reserve the right to discuss various views and opinions with members of the company's senior management.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/45533-sidus-investment-management-takes-an-active-role-in-looksmart?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/look">LOOK</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/lon-juricic">Lon Juricic</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Google Challenger Wikia Acquires Grub Web Crawler</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/42794-google-challenger-wikia-acquires-grub-web-crawler?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">42794</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://seekingalpha.com/by/type/wall-street-breakfast"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/SACoffeeCup80.jpg" vspace="1" border="0" height="66" hspace="1" align="right" alt="" width="80" /></a>
</p>
<p>Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales announced Friday that Wikia, the open-source Internet search service he is setting up to rival Google and Yahoo, has acquired the Web crawler Grub from LookSmart Ltd. Terms of the deal were not disclosed. "If we can get good quality search results, I think it will really change the balance of power from the search companies back to the publishers." Wales said. "I could be wrong about this, but it seems like a likely outcome." He is planning to launch the search engine at the end of 2007. The Wikia search service will use algorithms and human editors to deliver its results, which will be generated through Lucerne, another open-source software product. Unlike previous challengers to search giants Google and Yahoo, Wikia is already affiliated with a site with a massive audience: Wikipedia is the ninth-most visited website in the U.S. and had 47 million unique visitors in June. 
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 04:26:02 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>SA Editor Judith Levy</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://seekingalpha.com/by/type/wall-street-breakfast"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/SACoffeeCup80.jpg" vspace="1" border="0" height="66" hspace="1" align="right" alt="" width="80" /></a>
</p>
<p>Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales announced Friday that Wikia, the open-source Internet search service he is setting up to rival Google and Yahoo, has acquired the Web crawler Grub from LookSmart Ltd. Terms of the deal were not disclosed. "If we can get good quality search results, I think it will really change the balance of power from the search companies back to the publishers." Wales said. "I could be wrong about this, but it seems like a likely outcome." He is planning to launch the search engine at the end of 2007. The Wikia search service will use algorithms and human editors to deliver its results, which will be generated through Lucerne, another open-source software product. Unlike previous challengers to search giants Google and Yahoo, Wikia is already affiliated with a site with a massive audience: Wikipedia is the ninth-most visited website in the U.S. and had 47 million unique visitors in June. 
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/42794-google-challenger-wikia-acquires-grub-web-crawler?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog">GOOG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/look">LOOK</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/judith-levy">SA Editor Judith Levy</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>LookSmart Shareholders Don't Need To Pump S&amp;P Value</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/25301-looksmart-shareholders-don-t-need-to-pump-s-p-value?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">25301</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Latest figures from <a href="http://www.nasdaq.com/asp/Holdings.asp?symbol=LOOK&selected=LOOK&page=holdingssummary">Nasdaq </a> show that institutions now own nearly 61% of the LookSmart's (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/look' title='More opinion and analysis of LOOK'>LOOK</a>) total shares issued. Looksmart's market cap is currently $110.13M, and with Friday's close of $4.80, the total number of shares issued in the company is 22,943,750. Institutions now "own" 13,885,313 of these. 
</p>
<p>Yahoo Finance show that <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/mh?s=LOOK">Major Direct Holders</a> hold some 7,441,139 between them and there hasn't been a SELL from them, since late December, 2005. In fact, they have actually "bought" in recent times. 
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 09:38:06 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Latest figures from <a href="http://www.nasdaq.com/asp/Holdings.asp?symbol=LOOK&selected=LOOK&page=holdingssummary">Nasdaq </a> show that institutions now own nearly 61% of the LookSmart's (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/look' title='More opinion and analysis of LOOK'>LOOK</a>) total shares issued. Looksmart's market cap is currently $110.13M, and with Friday's close of $4.80, the total number of shares issued in the company is 22,943,750. Institutions now "own" 13,885,313 of these. 
</p>
<p>Yahoo Finance show that <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/mh?s=LOOK">Major Direct Holders</a> hold some 7,441,139 between them and there hasn't been a SELL from them, since late December, 2005. In fact, they have actually "bought" in recent times. 
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/25301-looksmart-shareholders-don-t-need-to-pump-s-p-value?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/look">LOOK</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mamma and Looksmart: Buy the Rumor, Sell the News</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/22308-mamma-and-looksmart-buy-the-rumor-sell-the-news?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">22308</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I guess it’s time to roll out the stock market cliches. 

<p>Back in 2000, I used to work at <strong>Mamma.com (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mama' title='More opinion and analysis of MAMA'>MAMA</a>)</strong>, the so-called “Mother of All Search Engines.”  I worked there before the search engine industry took off, before the stock price tripled in price in one day, before Mark Cuban bought and sold his shares in the company.
</p>
<p>Late last year, I bought a few thousands shares in the company.  In January, for some odd reason, volume spiked and I sat on a nice, juicy return. I did not sell. My rationale was the company had some $25M of cash on its books, and the market cap being at $30M, it was a safe investment. Larger companies and old media firms were also looking to invest in search. 
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:38:45 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Ashkan Karbasfrooshan</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/ashpicture.jpg' title='ashkan' alt='ashkan' width="80" height="95" align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" border='1' /><strong><a href="http://www.watchmojo.com/web/blog/">Ashkan Karbasfrooshan</a> submits: </strong>I guess it’s time to roll out the stock market cliches. 

<p>Back in 2000, I used to work at <strong>Mamma.com (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mama' title='More opinion and analysis of MAMA'>MAMA</a>)</strong>, the so-called “Mother of All Search Engines.”  I worked there before the search engine industry took off, before the stock price tripled in price in one day, before Mark Cuban bought and sold his shares in the company.
</p>
<p>Late last year, I bought a few thousands shares in the company.  In January, for some odd reason, volume spiked and I sat on a nice, juicy return. I did not sell. My rationale was the company had some $25M of cash on its books, and the market cap being at $30M, it was a safe investment. Larger companies and old media firms were also looking to invest in search. 
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/22308-mamma-and-looksmart-buy-the-rumor-sell-the-news?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cnic">CNIC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/look">LOOK</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/ashkan-karbasfrooshan">Ashkan Karbasfrooshan</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Doesn't LookSmart (LOOK)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/10284-doesn-t-looksmart-look?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10284</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Results don't seem to be improving at LookSmart (NASD:<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/look' title='More opinion and analysis of LOOK'>LOOK</a>). For the quarter ending March 31, revenue tumbled from $12.0 in Q1 05 to $10.5 million dollars. The company's operating loss was $5 million, slightly above the $4.9 million last year.

<p><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/looksmartlogo.jpg" border="0" vspace="6" height="36" hspace="7" alt="" align="right" width="190" />
</p>
<p>The company put on a brave face. It made all its comparisons to the immediately previous quarter instead of going back a year. For example: "Traffic acquisition costs [TAC] were within the Company's guidance range at approximately 59% of total advertising revenue in the first quarter, up from 57% in the fourth quarter of 2005." It's a nice touch, but it does leave something out.
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 06:27:17 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Douglas McIntyre</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Results don't seem to be improving at LookSmart (NASD:<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/look' title='More opinion and analysis of LOOK'>LOOK</a>). For the quarter ending March 31, revenue tumbled from $12.0 in Q1 05 to $10.5 million dollars. The company's operating loss was $5 million, slightly above the $4.9 million last year.

<p><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/looksmartlogo.jpg" border="0" vspace="6" height="36" hspace="7" alt="" align="right" width="190" />
</p>
<p>The company put on a brave face. It made all its comparisons to the immediately previous quarter instead of going back a year. For example: "Traffic acquisition costs [TAC] were within the Company's guidance range at approximately 59% of total advertising revenue in the first quarter, up from 57% in the fourth quarter of 2005." It's a nice touch, but it does leave something out.
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/10284-doesn-t-looksmart-look?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/look">LOOK</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/douglas-mcintyre">Douglas McIntyre</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>LookSmart, Look For A Viable Business (LOOK)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/8443-looksmart-look-for-a-viable-business-look?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8443</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[LookSmart (NASD:<a href="http://seekingalpha.com/by/symbol/look">LOOK</a>), the search engine company, has made a big move this year from $2.75 to $5.50. It's hard to figure out why.

<p>LookSmart's revenue has dropped every year for the past three years, and its quarterly numbers for 2005 didn't move much. The first quarter revenue was slightly above $12 million and Q4 05 was just below $10 million. The company showed an operating loss in excess of $4 million in each quarter of the year.
</p>
<p>LookSmart guided to a meager 3% to 5% sequential growth for Q1 06.
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 03:28:46 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Douglas McIntyre</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[LookSmart (NASD:<a href="http://seekingalpha.com/by/symbol/look">LOOK</a>), the search engine company, has made a big move this year from $2.75 to $5.50. It's hard to figure out why.

<p>LookSmart's revenue has dropped every year for the past three years, and its quarterly numbers for 2005 didn't move much. The first quarter revenue was slightly above $12 million and Q4 05 was just below $10 million. The company showed an operating loss in excess of $4 million in each quarter of the year.
</p>
<p>LookSmart guided to a meager 3% to 5% sequential growth for Q1 06.
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/8443-looksmart-look-for-a-viable-business-look?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/look">LOOK</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/douglas-mcintyre">Douglas McIntyre</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Marchex Mania on Mad Money (MCHX)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/8009-marchex-mania-on-mad-money-mchx?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8009</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Jim Cramer took a breather from pumping Marchex’s stock (<a href="http://seekingalpha.com/by/symbol/MCHX/">MCHX</a>) and on 3/7/06 gave some airtime to the often insightful Herb Greenberg. Herb was bearish on MCHX and made some of the same points I’ve made.&#160; He said that their core business isn’t growing, domain names are their one good asset (and in perpetual beta), the domains business is not a long term growth business, and that Marchex is a “manana story]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 03:45:15 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Kevin Berk</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://berk.typepad.com/bshaw/">Kevin Berk</a> submits: </strong>Jim Cramer took a breather from pumping Marchex’s stock (<a href="http://seekingalpha.com/by/symbol/MCHX/">MCHX</a>) and on 3/7/06 gave some airtime to the often insightful Herb Greenberg. Herb was bearish on MCHX and made some of the same points I’ve made.&#160; He said that their core business isn’t growing, domain names are their one good asset (and in perpetual beta), the domains business is not a long term growth business, and that Marchex is a “manana story<br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/8009-marchex-mania-on-mad-money-mchx?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/incx">INCX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/insp">INSP</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/look">LOOK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mchx">MCHX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/miva">MIVA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tfsm">TFSM</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/kevin-berk">Kevin Berk</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gross Margins for Internet Search Companies</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/7339-gross-margins-for-internet-search-companies?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7339</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/SearchGrossMargins530.jpg" alt="" />
<br />
<center><em>(Note: Some companies may have other significant businesses.)</em></center>
</p>
<p><strong>Data in table version:</strong><table border><tr><th>Ticker</th> <th>Stock</th> <th>Gross  Margins</th><th>Quarter Ending</th></tr>
<br />
<tr><td><a href="http://mediastockblog.com/by/symbol/GOOG">GOOG</a></td><td>GOOGLE INC</td> <td>59.6%</td> </tr><td>12/31/05
<br />
</td><tr><td><a href="http://mediastockblog.com/by/symbol/IACI">IACI</a></td><td>IAC/INTERACTIVECORP</td> <td>47.3%</td> </tr><td>12/31/05
<br />
</td><tr><td><a href="http://mediastockblog.com/by/symbol/INSP">INFSP</a></td><td>INFOSPACE INC</td> <td>48.6%</td> </tr><td>12/31/05
<br />
</td><tr><td><a href="http://mediastockblog.com/by/symbol/LOOK">LOOK</a></td><td>LOOKSMART LTD</td> <td>34.0%</td> </tr><td>12/31/05
<br />
</td><tr><td><a href="http://mediastockblog.com/by/symbol/MSFT">MSFT</a></td><td>MICROSOFT CORP</td> <td>81.1%</td> </tr><td>12/31/05
<br />
</td><tr><td><a href="http://mediastockblog.com/by/symbol/YHOO">YHOO</a></td><td>YAHOO INC</td> <td>61.8%</td> </tr><td>12/31/05
<br />
</td></table>
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 21:09:15 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>SA Editors</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/SearchGrossMargins530.jpg" alt="" />
<br />
<center><em>(Note: Some companies may have other significant businesses.)</em></center>
</p>
<p><strong>Data in table version:</strong><table border><tr><th>Ticker</th> <th>Stock</th> <th>Gross  Margins</th><th>Quarter Ending</th></tr>
<br />
<tr><td><a href="http://mediastockblog.com/by/symbol/GOOG">GOOG</a></td><td>GOOGLE INC</td> <td>59.6%</td> </tr><td>12/31/05
<br />
</td><tr><td><a href="http://mediastockblog.com/by/symbol/IACI">IACI</a></td><td>IAC/INTERACTIVECORP</td> <td>47.3%</td> </tr><td>12/31/05
<br />
</td><tr><td><a href="http://mediastockblog.com/by/symbol/INSP">INFSP</a></td><td>INFOSPACE INC</td> <td>48.6%</td> </tr><td>12/31/05
<br />
</td><tr><td><a href="http://mediastockblog.com/by/symbol/LOOK">LOOK</a></td><td>LOOKSMART LTD</td> <td>34.0%</td> </tr><td>12/31/05
<br />
</td><tr><td><a href="http://mediastockblog.com/by/symbol/MSFT">MSFT</a></td><td>MICROSOFT CORP</td> <td>81.1%</td> </tr><td>12/31/05
<br />
</td><tr><td><a href="http://mediastockblog.com/by/symbol/YHOO">YHOO</a></td><td>YAHOO INC</td> <td>61.8%</td> </tr><td>12/31/05
<br />
</td></table>
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/7339-gross-margins-for-internet-search-companies?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog">GOOG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/iaci">IACI</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/insp">INSP</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/look">LOOK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/yhoo">YHOO</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/sa-editors">SA Editors</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Quarterly Revenue Growth For Internet Search Companies</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/7219-quarterly-revenue-growth-for-internet-search-companies?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7219</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/SearchRevGrowth530.jpg" alt="" />
<br />
<center><em>(Note: Some companies may have other significant businesses.)</em></center>
</p>
<p><strong>Data in table version:</strong><table border><tr><th>Ticker</th> <th>Stock</th> <th>Revenue Growth</th><th>Quarter Ending</th></tr>
<br />
<tr><td><a href="http://mediastockblog.com/by/symbol/BIDU">BIDU</a></td><td>BAIDU.COM, INC.</td> <td>169.8%</td> </tr><td>12/31/05
<br />
</td><tr><td><a href="http://mediastockblog.com/by/symbol/GOOG">GOOG</a></td><td>GOOGLE INC</td> <td>86.0%</td> </tr><td>12/31/05
<br />
</td><tr><td><a href="http://mediastockblog.com/by/symbol/IACI">IACI</a></td><td>IAC/INTERACTIVECORP</td> <td>45.1%</td> </tr><td>12/31/05
<br />
</td><tr><td><a href="http://mediastockblog.com/by/symbol/INSP">INSP</a></td><td>INFOSPACE INC</td> <td>8.5%</td> </tr><td>12/31/05
<br />
</td><tr><td><a href="http://mediastockblog.com/by/symbol/LOOK">LOOK</a></td><td>LOOKSMART LTD</td> <td>-39.4%</td> </tr><td>12/31/05
<br />
</td><tr><td><a href="http://mediastockblog.com/by/symbol/MSFT">MSFT</a></td><td>MICROSOFT CORP</td> <td>9.4%</td> </tr><td>12/31/05
<br />
</td><tr><td><a href="http://mediastockblog.com/by/symbol/YHOO">YHOO</a></td><td>YAHOO INC</td> <td>39.3%</td> </tr><td>12/31/05
<br />
</td></table>	
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 02:37:04 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/SearchRevGrowth530.jpg" alt="" />
<br />
<center><em>(Note: Some companies may have other significant businesses.)</em></center>
</p>
<p><strong>Data in table version:</strong><table border><tr><th>Ticker</th> <th>Stock</th> <th>Revenue Growth</th><th>Quarter Ending</th></tr>
<br />
<tr><td><a href="http://mediastockblog.com/by/symbol/BIDU">BIDU</a></td><td>BAIDU.COM, INC.</td> <td>169.8%</td> </tr><td>12/31/05
<br />
</td><tr><td><a href="http://mediastockblog.com/by/symbol/GOOG">GOOG</a></td><td>GOOGLE INC</td> <td>86.0%</td> </tr><td>12/31/05
<br />
</td><tr><td><a href="http://mediastockblog.com/by/symbol/IACI">IACI</a></td><td>IAC/INTERACTIVECORP</td> <td>45.1%</td> </tr><td>12/31/05
<br />
</td><tr><td><a href="http://mediastockblog.com/by/symbol/INSP">INSP</a></td><td>INFOSPACE INC</td> <td>8.5%</td> </tr><td>12/31/05
<br />
</td><tr><td><a href="http://mediastockblog.com/by/symbol/LOOK">LOOK</a></td><td>LOOKSMART LTD</td> <td>-39.4%</td> </tr><td>12/31/05
<br />
</td><tr><td><a href="http://mediastockblog.com/by/symbol/MSFT">MSFT</a></td><td>MICROSOFT CORP</td> <td>9.4%</td> </tr><td>12/31/05
<br />
</td><tr><td><a href="http://mediastockblog.com/by/symbol/YHOO">YHOO</a></td><td>YAHOO INC</td> <td>39.3%</td> </tr><td>12/31/05
<br />
</td></table>	
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/7219-quarterly-revenue-growth-for-internet-search-companies?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bidu">BIDU</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog">GOOG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/iaci">IACI</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/insp">INSP</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/look">LOOK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/yhoo">YHOO</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Google Music Search -- Impact on Amazon, Apple, eBay, LookSmart, Answers.com and Scripps (AAPL, AMZN, EBAY, GOOG, ANSW, LOOK, SSP)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/5131-google-music-search-impact-on-amazon-apple-ebay-looksmart-answers-com-and-scripps-aapl-amzn-ebay-goog-answ-look-ssp?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5131</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/coldplay.jpg" border="1" hspace="8" alt="coldplay" align="left" width="110" />Google yesterday announced the introduction of a music search feature on its general search engine. Type in "<a href="http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=coldplay&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8">Coldplay</a>", for example, and a box at the top of the search page gives you links to Coldplay's music, bios, photos and stores that sell CDs and downloads. In announcing the feature, Google Search Quality Product Manager David Alpert <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2005/12/searching-for-music.html">wrote</a>:
</p>
<blockquote><p>We do this sort of thing a lot -- adding a bit of special information to results for important searches. For example, we have movie showtimes and stock quotes. The more information we can make easily accessible with a simple search, the better.
</p></blockquote>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 02:41:30 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/coldplay.jpg" border="1" hspace="8" alt="coldplay" align="left" width="110" />Google yesterday announced the introduction of a music search feature on its general search engine. Type in "<a href="http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=coldplay&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8">Coldplay</a>", for example, and a box at the top of the search page gives you links to Coldplay's music, bios, photos and stores that sell CDs and downloads. In announcing the feature, Google Search Quality Product Manager David Alpert <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2005/12/searching-for-music.html">wrote</a>:
</p>
<blockquote><p>We do this sort of thing a lot -- adding a bit of special information to results for important searches. For example, we have movie showtimes and stock quotes. The more information we can make easily accessible with a simple search, the better.
</p></blockquote><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/5131-google-music-search-impact-on-amazon-apple-ebay-looksmart-answers-com-and-scripps-aapl-amzn-ebay-goog-answ-look-ssp?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/amzn">AMZN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/answ">ANSW</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ebay">EBAY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog">GOOG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/look">LOOK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ssp">SSP</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
