LifePoint Hospitals (LPNT)
Trading Center
Loading...
Symbols:
LPNT Forum Topics
- All Comments on LPNT
- General Discussion on LPNT
- Buying Into the Global Infrastructure Build [view article]
- Tuesday's Options Report: RSTO, CPN, LPNT, YHOO, V [view article]
- 6 Questions From Universal Health Services' Latest Earnings Conference Call [view article]
- 20 Winners During a Painful Week [view article]
loading ...Recent LPNT Articles
Trading Center
Hedge Fund Jobs
Job Seekers: Search jobs by category, get job alerts by email or live feed, apply online See full list of jobs »
Employers: See all recruitment options, get applications online or by email Post a job »
vestor
Buying Into the Global Infrastructure Build [view article]
Look at MDU Resources (MDU) for the US infrastructure build & fix with an energy hedge built in. They will benefit from the highway spending bill. MDU has a long track record, good dividend growth, and E&P assets in the Bakken.NuStar (NS) is an energy infrastructure MLP with an 8% yield. They operate in the US and parts of Europe and just bought into asphalt refining on the US East coast. Road paving asphalt sales will account for up to 20% of revenues and the rest of their biz is regulated storage/pipelines with inflation protection. All MLP's require access to credit and equity issuances for growth. Fear here combined with hedge funds and CEF's dumping MLP PIPE and common shares has provided a timely opportunity to buy into these assets as credit fears subside.
I agree that American Tower (AMT) is a great infrastructure play. AMT operates in the US, Mexico, and Brazil, and continues to grow. I would expect that AMT will eventually run out of growth opportunities and begin to pay out dividends - as a cash cow. Until then AMT has been consistently buying back shares in addition to expanding their towers. They also just increased the expected lifetime estimates for their towers.
Also, you seemed to miss the standards, such as CBI, FLUOR, BGC, ABB, etc. Perhaps you could even pair BGC with PCU for a hedge on copper pricing.
Reply
Buying Into the Global Infrastructure Build [view article]
i think the wireless carriers themselves in developing economies are a good place to play. people seem to prefer a cell phone to running water in developing econonmies. ReplyBuying Into the Global Infrastructure Build [view article]
I'm looking for an ETF that captures the Infrastructure theme via the global construction and engeneering firms that are going to build all these roads, power plants, airports...etc. The closest I have found is half of PKN. Anybody got a better way ?Thanks
Reply
Buying Into the Global Infrastructure Build [view article]
I would also take a look at both MasTec (MTZ) and Macquarie (MIC).MasTec operations include building, installation, maintenance, and upgrade of communications and utility infrastructure. The company primarily builds underground and overhead distribution systems, such as trenches, conduits, power lines, and pipelines that are used in its customers' networks that provide communications and power delivery. It also installs buried and aerial fiber optic cables, coaxial cables, copper lines, electrical and other energy distribution systems, transmission systems, and satellite dishes. It's a great play on Verizon's FIOS as well as the upcomming hurricane season. Servicing both Florida Power & Light and Oncor (Texas) utility lines any hurricane in these areas will benefit MasTec. Recently MasTec was trading at a 12 p/e which represents a 54% discount valuation to its peers.
Macquarie Infrastructure Co. Trust (MIC) is a great trade on a variety of infrastructure plays. With MIC you get airport services business, an airport parking business, a district energy business, a gas production and distribution business, and a 50% interest in a company that owns and operates a bulk liquid storage terminal business. MIC continues to increase their dividend, which today stands at a comfortable 8% yield. Reply
Energy for
Prosperity
Buying Into the Global Infrastructure Build [view article]
Your article raises many of the right issues to consider given the so-called "global infrastructure" boom. Within each macro trend, there are many ways to go wrong, so breaking this down by sector is a good way to evaluate it.For example, the "water" sector has received a lot of hype recently - to the extent that many ETFs have been developed to capitalize on it. Unfortunately, investors and ETF marketers have not been disciplined about what "water" actually means. Moreover, in the rush to jump on the bandwagon, we've seen a lot of press about the inevitability of a water spending boom - but little discussion of where the funds will come from in a time of reduced tax revenues and national/global recession.
I prefer to maintain the integrity of a macro-trend analysis by identifying companies that I don't believe will be able to capitalize on the trend. For example, in water infrastructure, many have argued that the utility companies will be able to raise water rates to pay for needed upgrades. Let's think about that. These companies are certainly monopolies - but when we see the wrath that even cable television operators get for raising rates, why do we think water utilities will be able to do so successfully? I would argue you can't go wrong betting that people will put off repairs until tomorrow that should be done today, especially in a recession.
Conversely, Insituform (INSU) provides an almost-literal "band aid" solution for broken water infrastructure, with a technology that allows them to repair water mains & pipes internally, without costly digging. There is some hair on this stock for other non-fundamental reasons (governance, hedge fund involvement, etc) but I believe the primary thesis plays well during a recession.
Cable television and fiber optic / broadband internet is also an infrastructure play, but this sector highlights a similar issue as water utilities: Be careful when the companies that may benefit from end-user demand are also the ones that must spend massive amounts of capital. More than likely, there is another supplier one step removed from the utility (or cable company) that stands to benefit from that infrastructure spending being passed through - from higher cable bills to the cable operator to the equipment provider. Cisco (CSCO) would be one example. Moreover, its the company dealing directly with the consumer that takes the *political* heat for the rate increase! Avoid rock-and-hard-place situations.
Your recommendation of the tower companies (AMT, CCI) plays nicely to this thesis, given that it is the wireless companies (Verizon, AT&T) who have to spend money on the infrastructure.
Within cable, I would point out that Mediacom Communications (MCCC) operates in areas where the large phone companies are *not* building out competitive fiber networks. So unlike Comcast and Time Warner Cable, who will face intense competition, Mediacom (MCCC) is actually improving its market position (particularly with competitive DSL offerings raising their prices in light of recent FCC decisions).
Within energy infrastructure, there are many issues to address. One I would highlight is solar power. We periodically read about the idea of a "Manhattan Project" to promote various clean energy technologies. Although I don't agree that the Manhattan Project is the right analogy to use, the idea that a certain Big Bang catalyst is necessary is gaining credibility.
One gold ring for solar companies would be a concerted government effort to develop large-scale solar projects in the Southwest. These projects are beginning on a small scale. And clearly, with every advance in solar cell efficiency and cost reduction, the price tag for a multi-gigawatt "Marshall Plan" (I prefer this analogy) is improved.
Solar continues to benefit from rapid but incremental growth. If a Federal government program to develop truly utility-scale solar is launched, the PV manufacturers are positioned for a home run. Silicon makers may benefit, but may be left out if a thin-film or non-silicon technology is capable of yielding the efficiency necessary to make large-scale buildout economic. Longer term, however, the entire industry would benefit as manufacturing plants would expand and economies of scale would lower costs across the board.
There are many risks to juggle here: technology improvement, Federal energy policy, local & state land restrictions, and oil prices, to name a few.
From water to television to solar, a macro infrastructure boom will still result in losers as well as winners. Reply
Tuesday's Options Report: RSTO, CPN, LPNT, YHOO, V [view article]
Interesting. cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayIS... Reply6 Questions From Universal Health Services' Latest Earnings Conference Call [view article]
Loved your discussion on UHS. ReplyEditors
General Discussion on LPNT
Is this a buy or a sell? ReplyShinnick
20 Winners During a Painful Week [view article]
DKS? Why? Curious. ReplyL. Johnson
6 Questions From Universal Health Services' Latest Earnings Conference Call [view article]
CORRECTION: The sentence: "This is why Morningstar is predicting UHS will see its pretax margins cut almost in half over the next five years or so."Should read: "This is why Morningstar is predicting UHS will see its acute care operating margins decline."
Sorry for this misquote, which I caught after I submitted the article. Reply