Medis Technologies Ltd. (MDTL)

All Comments on MDTL

  • commenter
    Aug 18 11:08 PM
    Best and Worst Performing Stocks Seven Months Into 2008 [view article]
    I agree with helsi. The last seven months for RDN was looking pretty bad, but all it took was a little legislation to be passed for it to soar. This stock deserves to be on the other chart now. Who would have guessed an 80 cent stock would hit $5 in such a short time period?! Timing is everything. Reply
  • commenter
    Aug 05 10:39 AM
    Best and Worst Performing Stocks Seven Months Into 2008 [view article]
    Nice article, but more informative would be using the same criteria for the last 6 - 7 weeks. Reply
  • commenter
    Aug 04 01:30 PM
    Best and Worst Performing Stocks Seven Months Into 2008 [view article]
    Banks and Broker firms wrapped toxic waste i.e.: subprime, credit card debt, car loans, etc. into structured finance vehicles i.e.: CDO-ABS-MBS-SIVs and misled the market into buying them and bond insurers into insure them and now they have to clear their books from this toxic waste which is going to take time quarter after quarter but without a doubt will improve their book value. Reply
  • commenter
    Jul 28 12:40 PM
    Stocks Covered by The Energy Stock Blog [view article]
    ABP synbol has been changed to AXAS. I tried changing the symbol, but it doesn't recognize the new symbol. I enjoy reading Alpha Stock Alerts. Thank you. Reply
  • commenter
    Jul 21 05:33 PM
    Mother of All Short Squeezes? [view article]
    It has always mystified me that the SEC will let naked shorting occur as this would be defined as selling of unregistered and unissued shares which is illegal and forbidden under the Securities Act of 1933. A technicality--I don't think so. Until these shares are borrowed or covered the company's capitalization increases. Reply
  • commenter
    Jul 21 07:11 AM
    Mother of All Short Squeezes? [view article]
    excellent writing! been saying its only a matter of time before the berlin boys find the bigboy stocks far more liquid and profitable on naked shorting. and with the reg sho factor, it shows the fed/sec only cares when it impacts their stock options lmao. we are gonna get to witness a market without shorts waiting for bull exhaustion to wipe out down the road. next the berlin boys will just move to other sectors,,,,,our fed/sec can not control 'the global markets',,, oil has proven that.

    Reply
  • commenter
    Jul 21 02:46 AM
    Mother of All Short Squeezes? [view article]
    Not that I am a big fan of his, but didn't the CEO of Overstock.com complain about this ad nauseum and all he got was ridiculed, maybe he was right? Reply
  • commenter
    Jul 21 02:15 AM
    Mother of All Short Squeezes? [view article]
    Its obvious the banking crisis is way overdone...stocks like Banner Bank in Seattle for example has had less problems and is profitable and the stock took a great hit for no reason...by the way the dividend is over 8 percent and probably will remain so...take that in your pipe and smoke it.. Reply
  • commenter
    Jul 21 01:31 AM
    Mother of All Short Squeezes? [view article]
    The Fed along with the Government did everything they could to engender capitulation last week. As far as the the whole short-selling debacle goes, where do you draw the line. I was reading this piece over the weekend wondering what happens next?

    www.greenfaucet.com/th...
    Reply
  • commenter
    Jul 21 12:53 AM
    My Website
    Mother of All Short Squeezes? [view article]
    i think the actual "ban" is just for one week, with the option to extend for 30 calender days. Reply
  • commenter
    Jul 21 12:45 AM
    Mother of All Short Squeezes? [view article]
    Yes , why does the unlawful naked short selling being allowed openly by SEC ?

    Even at emergency , SEC offers policing to only 19 investment banks for 30 days .

    How about the regional banks where they have already been hurt by naked short sellings .

    The naked short sellers can short sell unlimited quantity of shares of any bank by not having to borrow the same .

    Such short sellers then have the " privilege " to command an unlimited supply of shares .

    Such short sellers are naturally invincible since they have been well fed financially in expense of the economy of USA .

    Yet , SEC would only police for 19 investment banks .

    Why does the lawmakers tolerate such notorious violation of the law ?

    Further , banks are often required to shore up their balance sheet forcing them to sell newly issued stocks at depleted pricing .

    An article indicated that the same short sellers who depleted the banks' pricing would buy the newly issued stocks for covering their position .

    Magic ! short selling " nothing " at a high price and buying back the tremendous quantity of new issues at a dirt cheap price .

    A small group of short sellers make huge profit on the misery of a very large number of innocent people .

    Is this vicious cycle of selling phantom stocks at high prices while covering the position with cheap new issues , really happening under the eyes of lawmakers ?

    Just in case , Banks should have a grace time to shore up their balance sheet until the naked short selling is limited .

    Reply
  • commenter
    Jul 20 11:56 PM
    Mother of All Short Squeezes? [view article]
    Great article, Matt. Lots of interesting responses from people too. Reply
  • commenter
    Jul 20 11:39 PM
    My Website
    Mother of All Short Squeezes? [view article]
    I remmber when the SEC said that Naked shorting was just some BS story made up by losers.

    They they said it exists but had no impact.

    Then the implemented reg SHO

    Now they are saying it is destroying the banks.

    Now we have a huge rally.

    SOO now the king has no cloths. Hw re they ever going back to the past when Naked Shorting does not exist.

    Remember after the short squeeze then the bottom will fall out like a rock
    Reply
  • commenter
    Jul 20 11:19 PM
    Mother of All Short Squeezes? [view article]
    If you been around Wall Street any length of time you will come to realize there is no such animal as a "free market". Wall Street is a well-oiled machine controlled by very few players. You and I ride on those coattails for good or for bad. Reply
  • commenter
    Jul 20 10:45 PM
    My Website
    Mother of All Short Squeezes? [view article]
    Naked shorting Legal?? What? Crazzzyyy....It has nothing to do with the "free markets", essentially people could sell short more shares in a company than actually exsist...Thats not good for anyone in the "free markets". shorting is a good, naked shorting = bad. Reply