<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>MSFT - News and Analysis from Seeking Alpha</title>
    <description>'MSFT' Tag RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <author>
      <name>SeekingAlpha.com</name>
    </author>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft</link>
    <item>
      <title>Dethroning Google: Competition for the King</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/172316-dethroning-google-competition-for-the-king?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">172316</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://calacanis.com/2009/11/09/how-to-kill-google-or-take-10-points-of-search-search-share-in-six-months/">Jason Calcanis</a> and others are out with posts talking about Ruport Murdoch's comments suggesting he will opt out of Google (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='More opinion and analysis of GOOG'>GOOG</a>) Search. Jason amplifies the comments and talks about doing a deal offering WSJ articles for a premium.</p><p>Every internet age (which last about 5 years) has a king. Right now it's Google, and it can be a difficult company to deal with. The bottom line for me, though, is that I love what Google does in terms of making the internet useful and interesting, especially for mobile users. I've been using Google Maps and Gmail for years and they are the best in class in terms of usability and usefulness.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:31:36 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>BlindReason</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.blindreason.org/'>BlindReason</a> submits: </strong><p><a href="http://calacanis.com/2009/11/09/how-to-kill-google-or-take-10-points-of-search-search-share-in-six-months/">Jason Calcanis</a> and others are out with posts talking about Ruport Murdoch's comments suggesting he will opt out of Google (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='More opinion and analysis of GOOG'>GOOG</a>) Search. Jason amplifies the comments and talks about doing a deal offering WSJ articles for a premium.</p><p>Every internet age (which last about 5 years) has a king. Right now it's Google, and it can be a difficult company to deal with. The bottom line for me, though, is that I love what Google does in terms of making the internet useful and interesting, especially for mobile users. I've been using Google Maps and Gmail for years and they are the best in class in terms of usability and usefulness.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/172316-dethroning-google-competition-for-the-king?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog">GOOG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nws">NWS</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/blindreason">BlindReason</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Insider Buying Still Lopsided, But Better</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/172250-insider-buying-still-lopsided-but-better?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">172250</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><div><div><div><p>Total insider buying picked up in the latest week with a total of $118MM in buying.   Selling continues to overshadow the buying, however, with insiders selling $739MM in stock.  <a href="http://pragcap.com/insider-buying-remains-a-sign-of-little-confidence-in-the-market">Both buying and selling jumped from the latest week&rsquo;s data</a>.   Buying increased by $73MM for the week while selling increased by $284MM.</p> <p>After the brief decline in the markets it&rsquo;s encouraging to see some insiders buying the dip, however, the selling continues to overshadow the buying.  As we&rsquo;ve previously noted it&rsquo;s important not to overemphasize the insider selling.  Insiders sell for a number of reasons, but they only buy their own shares when they have confidence that those shares will rise in the future.  For now, the latest data on insider buying is encouraging, but whether this turns into a trend or not is still very much in doubt.  The low historical level of buying can only be seen as a continuing vote of no confidence in stocks going forward.</p></div></div></div></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:48:25 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>The Pragmatic Capitalist</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<div><div><div><div><p>Total insider buying picked up in the latest week with a total of $118MM in buying.   Selling continues to overshadow the buying, however, with insiders selling $739MM in stock.  <a href="http://pragcap.com/insider-buying-remains-a-sign-of-little-confidence-in-the-market">Both buying and selling jumped from the latest week&rsquo;s data</a>.   Buying increased by $73MM for the week while selling increased by $284MM.</p> <p>After the brief decline in the markets it&rsquo;s encouraging to see some insiders buying the dip, however, the selling continues to overshadow the buying.  As we&rsquo;ve previously noted it&rsquo;s important not to overemphasize the insider selling.  Insiders sell for a number of reasons, but they only buy their own shares when they have confidence that those shares will rise in the future.  For now, the latest data on insider buying is encouraging, but whether this turns into a trend or not is still very much in doubt.  The low historical level of buying can only be seen as a continuing vote of no confidence in stocks going forward.</p></div></div></div></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/172250-insider-buying-still-lopsided-but-better?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aph">APH</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog">GOOG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/odsy">ODSY</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/the-pragmatic-capitalist">The Pragmatic Capitalist</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Netflix's Sony PS3 Streaming Is Slow and Painful</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/172126-netflix-s-sony-ps3-streaming-is-slow-and-painful?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">172126</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Last week, Netflix (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nflx' title='More opinion and analysis of NFLX'>NFLX</a>) started mailing out the discs that Sony PS3 users must insert in their console each time they want to stream a movie. <a href="http://blog.streamingmedia.com/the_business_of_online_vi/2009/10/netflix-coming-to-ps3-next-month-will-require-bluray-disc-to-stream.html">While the disc is a temporary measure</a> until there is a dedicated Netflix app for the PS3, the solution is very slow and painful. The disc takes about 20 seconds to load and once a movie is selected, it takes almost 30 seconds before the movie starts streaming. While the quality of the stream is good and looks the same to me when compared to streaming on the Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>) Xbox 360, Roku or TiVo (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tivo' title='More opinion and analysis of TIVO'>TIVO</a>), the controls that allow you to do things like fast-forward the video are also very slow.</p><p>For those PS3 users who have never streamed Netflix to any other device, they may not even notice or care. But for anyone like myself who has used one of the many other Netflix enabled devices for streaming,the PS3 experience really suffers when it comes to the user experience.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:15:42 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Dan Rayburn</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.BusinessOfVideo.com">Dan Rayburn</a> submits:</strong> <p>Last week, Netflix (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nflx' title='More opinion and analysis of NFLX'>NFLX</a>) started mailing out the discs that Sony PS3 users must insert in their console each time they want to stream a movie. <a href="http://blog.streamingmedia.com/the_business_of_online_vi/2009/10/netflix-coming-to-ps3-next-month-will-require-bluray-disc-to-stream.html">While the disc is a temporary measure</a> until there is a dedicated Netflix app for the PS3, the solution is very slow and painful. The disc takes about 20 seconds to load and once a movie is selected, it takes almost 30 seconds before the movie starts streaming. While the quality of the stream is good and looks the same to me when compared to streaming on the Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>) Xbox 360, Roku or TiVo (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tivo' title='More opinion and analysis of TIVO'>TIVO</a>), the controls that allow you to do things like fast-forward the video are also very slow.</p><p>For those PS3 users who have never streamed Netflix to any other device, they may not even notice or care. But for anyone like myself who has used one of the many other Netflix enabled devices for streaming,the PS3 experience really suffers when it comes to the user experience.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/172126-netflix-s-sony-ps3-streaming-is-slow-and-painful?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nflx">NFLX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sne">SNE</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tivo">TIVO</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/dan-rayburn">Dan Rayburn</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What's Wrong with the Gaming Industry?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/172102-what-s-wrong-with-the-gaming-industry?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">172102</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/11/8/saupload_normandie_sinking_new_york.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/11/8/saupload_normandie_sinking_new_york_thumb1.jpg" alt="Normandie sinking, New York" /></a></p> <p>There are a lot of doom and gloom headlines around at the moment. Lots of development staff being laid off, games selling far less than expected, <a href="http://www.bruceongames.com/2009/08/05/why-electronics-arts-losses-doubled/">major publishers making massive losses</a> and release schedules that look a little thin. What is happening here?:</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 11:09:55 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Bruce Everiss</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.bruceongames.com/'>Bruce Everiss</a> submits:</strong<<p><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/11/8/saupload_normandie_sinking_new_york.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/11/8/saupload_normandie_sinking_new_york_thumb1.jpg" alt="Normandie sinking, New York" /></a></p> <p>There are a lot of doom and gloom headlines around at the moment. Lots of development staff being laid off, games selling far less than expected, <a href="http://www.bruceongames.com/2009/08/05/why-electronics-arts-losses-doubled/">major publishers making massive losses</a> and release schedules that look a little thin. What is happening here?:</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/172102-what-s-wrong-with-the-gaming-industry?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/atvi">ATVI</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/erts">ERTS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ntdoy.pk">NTDOY.PK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sne">SNE</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/bruce-everiss">Bruce Everiss</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Growth in Local Online Advertising Expected to Slow</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/171861-growth-in-local-online-advertising-expected-to-slow?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">171861</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Though this year has been dismal for advertising overall, local online advertising is expected to hit $14.2 billion by year&rsquo;s end, a 12% increase over 2008, <a href="http://www.borrellassociates.com/component/virtuemart/?page=shop.product_details&amp;flypage=garden_flypage.tpl&amp;product_id=451">according to a report</a> and five-year forecast from Borrell Associates.</p><p><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/11/6/saupload_borrell_associates_local_online_marketing_spend_forecast_advertising_promotions_october_2009_thumb1.jpg" hspace="6" vspace="6" />Despite this growth, however, Borrell predicts that things will get tougher in 2010, when local online sales will hit only $14.9 billion, or 5% higher than 2009 figures. This slowdown will likely occur because the market is approaching saturation and &quot;the wave many locally focused media companies have been riding for the past several years has peaked,&rdquo; the report said.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 13:07:15 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Marketing Charts</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
<strong><a href='http://www.MarketingCharts.com'>Marketing Charts</a> submits: </strong>
<p>Though this year has been dismal for advertising overall, local online advertising is expected to hit $14.2 billion by year&rsquo;s end, a 12% increase over 2008, <a href="http://www.borrellassociates.com/component/virtuemart/?page=shop.product_details&amp;flypage=garden_flypage.tpl&amp;product_id=451">according to a report</a> and five-year forecast from Borrell Associates.</p><p><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/11/6/saupload_borrell_associates_local_online_marketing_spend_forecast_advertising_promotions_october_2009_thumb1.jpg" hspace="6" vspace="6" />Despite this growth, however, Borrell predicts that things will get tougher in 2010, when local online sales will hit only $14.9 billion, or 5% higher than 2009 figures. This slowdown will likely occur because the market is approaching saturation and &quot;the wave many locally focused media companies have been riding for the past several years has peaked,&rdquo; the report said.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/171861-growth-in-local-online-advertising-expected-to-slow?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/yhoo">YHOO</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/marketing-charts">Marketing Charts</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>4 Earnings Season Option Strategies</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/171844-4-earnings-season-option-strategies?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">171844</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>In my last three blog posts, I listed some stocks which I would be willing to go long by selling the puts right before the stock reported earnings. Keep in mind, these were companies which I believed would have a positive reaction to the earnings. However, if the stock moved sideways on the number. this strategy would still likely return a gain the following day. This is because I am taking advantage of the increased levels of implied volatility factored into the option premium before earnings.</p><p>If you missed them, be sure to check out my October 19 blog post <a href="http://optionmaestro.blogspot.com/2009/10/earnings-season-option-strategy-sell.html">here</a>, October 21 blog post <a href="http://optionmaestro.blogspot.com/2009/10/more-earnings-season-option-strategies.html">here</a> and my October 26 blog post <a href="http://optionmaestro.blogspot.com/2009/10/earnings-season-option-plays-for.html">here</a>. So far this earnings season, the overall results have been very positive, even on eBay (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ebay' title='More opinion and analysis of EBAY'>EBAY</a>), which sold off nearly 10% after earnings. I was able to purchase back the put options (closed the position) for a $4 per contract gain the following day. The best results are of course when the stock has a very positive reaction to the report and pops.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 11:41:45 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Marco Hickey</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://optionmaestro.blogspot.com/'>Marco Hickey</a> submits:</strong><p>In my last three blog posts, I listed some stocks which I would be willing to go long by selling the puts right before the stock reported earnings. Keep in mind, these were companies which I believed would have a positive reaction to the earnings. However, if the stock moved sideways on the number. this strategy would still likely return a gain the following day. This is because I am taking advantage of the increased levels of implied volatility factored into the option premium before earnings.</p><p>If you missed them, be sure to check out my October 19 blog post <a href="http://optionmaestro.blogspot.com/2009/10/earnings-season-option-strategy-sell.html">here</a>, October 21 blog post <a href="http://optionmaestro.blogspot.com/2009/10/more-earnings-season-option-strategies.html">here</a> and my October 26 blog post <a href="http://optionmaestro.blogspot.com/2009/10/earnings-season-option-plays-for.html">here</a>. So far this earnings season, the overall results have been very positive, even on eBay (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ebay' title='More opinion and analysis of EBAY'>EBAY</a>), which sold off nearly 10% after earnings. I was able to purchase back the put options (closed the position) for a $4 per contract gain the following day. The best results are of course when the stock has a very positive reaction to the report and pops.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/171844-4-earnings-season-option-strategies?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/amzn">AMZN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bni">BNI</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bwld">BWLD</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cat">CAT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ebay">EBAY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog">GOOG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/kwk">KWK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nsc">NSC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pcln">PCLN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pwrd">PWRD</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rax">RAX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sndk">SNDK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/txn">TXN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/v">V</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/yhoo">YHOO</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/marco-hickey">Marco Hickey</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How Apple's Market Share Will Propel Stock to $500, Part 2</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/171759-how-apple-s-market-share-will-propel-stock-to-500-part-2?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">171759</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><span>Back on December 5, 2007 I sent the following note to investors (economictiming.com): </span></p>   <blockquote class="quote"><p><span>The rate of change of economic data is worsening so it&rsquo;s time to short the following group of downside leadership: Financial Sector SPDR (</span><span>XLF) at $30.60, MGIC Investment Corp (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mtg' title='More opinion and analysis of MTG'>MTG</a>) at $23.75, Amabac (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/abk' title='More opinion and analysis of ABK'>ABK</a>) at $23.70, Countrywide Financial at $10.45, Freddie Mac (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fre' title='More opinion and analysis of FRE'>FRE</a>) at $33.30, Beazer Homes (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bzh' title='More opinion and analysis of BZH'>BZH</a>) at $8.13, PMI Group (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pmi' title='More opinion and analysis of PMI'>PMI</a>) at $12.65, and Citigroup (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/c' title='More opinion and analysis of C'>C</a>) at $33.40.  </span></p></blockquote>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 04:54:57 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Jason Schwarz</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://web.mac.com/jzapple'>Jason Schwarz</a> submits:</strong><p><span>Back on December 5, 2007 I sent the following note to investors (economictiming.com): </span></p>   <blockquote class="quote"><p><span>The rate of change of economic data is worsening so it&rsquo;s time to short the following group of downside leadership: Financial Sector SPDR (</span><span>XLF) at $30.60, MGIC Investment Corp (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mtg' title='More opinion and analysis of MTG'>MTG</a>) at $23.75, Amabac (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/abk' title='More opinion and analysis of ABK'>ABK</a>) at $23.70, Countrywide Financial at $10.45, Freddie Mac (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fre' title='More opinion and analysis of FRE'>FRE</a>) at $33.30, Beazer Homes (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bzh' title='More opinion and analysis of BZH'>BZH</a>) at $8.13, PMI Group (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pmi' title='More opinion and analysis of PMI'>PMI</a>) at $12.65, and Citigroup (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/c' title='More opinion and analysis of C'>C</a>) at $33.40.  </span></p></blockquote><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/171759-how-apple-s-market-share-will-propel-stock-to-500-part-2?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/amzn">AMZN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bidu">BIDU</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/csco">CSCO</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog">GOOG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ibm">IBM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/intc">INTC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mot">MOT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/jason-schwarz">Jason Schwarz</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ballmer: Windows 7 Sales 'Fantastic' So Far</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/171631-ballmer-windows-7-sales-fantastic-so-far?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">171631</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Windows 7 has only been <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=26432&amp;tag=col1;post-26432">out for a couple of weeks</a> but sales so far have been &ldquo;fantastic,&rdquo; Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer said at a news briefing in Tokyo Thursday, noting that sales in the first 10 days have exceeded the initial sales of any previous release of a Windows OS.</p> <p>A <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601204&amp;sid=agwiAcPELfqM#">Bloomberg report</a> looked at historical numbers and found that Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>) sold more than triple the number of Windows 7 operating systems than it did with Vista and that revenue was 82 percent higher in that time frame. In addition, Microsoft is now more bullish on the PC market that it was earlier this year. At the news briefing, Ballmer said:</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:28:53 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Sam Diaz</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/'>Sam Diaz</a> submits: </strong>
<p>Windows 7 has only been <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=26432&amp;tag=col1;post-26432">out for a couple of weeks</a> but sales so far have been &ldquo;fantastic,&rdquo; Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer said at a news briefing in Tokyo Thursday, noting that sales in the first 10 days have exceeded the initial sales of any previous release of a Windows OS.</p> <p>A <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601204&amp;sid=agwiAcPELfqM#">Bloomberg report</a> looked at historical numbers and found that Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>) sold more than triple the number of Windows 7 operating systems than it did with Vista and that revenue was 82 percent higher in that time frame. In addition, Microsoft is now more bullish on the PC market that it was earlier this year. At the news briefing, Ballmer said:</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/171631-ballmer-windows-7-sales-fantastic-so-far?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/sam-diaz">Sam Diaz</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is the Game Over for Wii?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/171494-is-the-game-over-for-wii?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">171494</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>When Nintendo first introduced the <a href="http://www.nintendo.com/wii">Wii </a>in 2006, they did so with a lower price point than the competition and a focus on capturing interest from all demographics.  Demand for the Wii was so high that finding a Wii in a store was a rarity until earlier this year.  Since then, Nintendo has <a href="http://vgsales.wikia.com/wiki/NPD_Seventh_generation">dominated </a>in sales of consoles leaving both the <a href="http://www.us.playstation.com/PS3">Sony Playstation 3</a> (PS3) and the <a href="http://www.xbox.com/en-US/">Microsoft Xbox360</a> in the dust.  In August, both Sony (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sne' title='More opinion and analysis of SNE'>SNE</a>) and Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>) lowered the price of their consoles to $300, but the PS3 came out victorious in September with monthly console <a href="http://arstechnica.com/gaming/news/2009/10/npd-playstation-3-takes-the-console-lead-beatles-beat-gh5.ars">sales </a>surpassing Wii for the first time.  Interestingly, Nintendo retaliated and lowered the price of the Wii to $200 in September.</p> <p><span></p></span>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 10:59:22 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Compete</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://compete.com">Compete</a> submits: </strong><p>When Nintendo first introduced the <a href="http://www.nintendo.com/wii">Wii </a>in 2006, they did so with a lower price point than the competition and a focus on capturing interest from all demographics.  Demand for the Wii was so high that finding a Wii in a store was a rarity until earlier this year.  Since then, Nintendo has <a href="http://vgsales.wikia.com/wiki/NPD_Seventh_generation">dominated </a>in sales of consoles leaving both the <a href="http://www.us.playstation.com/PS3">Sony Playstation 3</a> (PS3) and the <a href="http://www.xbox.com/en-US/">Microsoft Xbox360</a> in the dust.  In August, both Sony (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sne' title='More opinion and analysis of SNE'>SNE</a>) and Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>) lowered the price of their consoles to $300, but the PS3 came out victorious in September with monthly console <a href="http://arstechnica.com/gaming/news/2009/10/npd-playstation-3-takes-the-console-lead-beatles-beat-gh5.ars">sales </a>surpassing Wii for the first time.  Interestingly, Nintendo retaliated and lowered the price of the Wii to $200 in September.</p> <p><span></p></span><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/171494-is-the-game-over-for-wii?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ntdoy.pk">NTDOY.PK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sne">SNE</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/compete">Compete</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Asian Tech Stock Weekly Review (October 26 &#8211; November 1, 2009) </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/171194-asian-tech-stock-weekly-review-october-26-november-1-2009?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">171194</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><b><font size="5"><font size="3">Japan</font></font></b></p> <p><i>Hardware</i></p> <p>&bull; <span><b>With a stronger yen and sluggish sales of copiers and laser printers, Canon's (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/caj' title='More opinion and analysis of CAJ'>CAJ</a>) quarterly operating profit might be halved from the previous year</b> <b>despite brisk sales of its recently launched EOS Kiss X3 camera and cost cuts.</b> But reports said that Canon is unlikely to change its annual forecast despite having to grapple with a stronger yen than it first estimated. The company will gain 60 billion yen (US$657 million) in July-September. Canon has forecast a 60 percent fall in annual operating profit to 190 billion yen (US$2.1 billion).</span></p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:58:39 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>IRG</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><b><font size="5"><font size="3">Japan</font></font></b></p> <p><i>Hardware</i></p> <p>&bull; <span><b>With a stronger yen and sluggish sales of copiers and laser printers, Canon's (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/caj' title='More opinion and analysis of CAJ'>CAJ</a>) quarterly operating profit might be halved from the previous year</b> <b>despite brisk sales of its recently launched EOS Kiss X3 camera and cost cuts.</b> But reports said that Canon is unlikely to change its annual forecast despite having to grapple with a stronger yen than it first estimated. The company will gain 60 billion yen (US$657 million) in July-September. Canon has forecast a 60 percent fall in annual operating profit to 190 billion yen (US$2.1 billion).</span></p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/171194-asian-tech-stock-weekly-review-october-26-november-1-2009?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/auo">AUO</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bidu">BIDU</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/caj">CAJ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cha">CHA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/chl">CHL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/chu">CHU</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/csiq">CSIQ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/csun">CSUN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cyou">CYOU</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dcm">DCM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ga">GA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/jaso">JASO</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/kddif.pk">KDDIF.PK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/lgerf.pk">LGERF.PK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/lnvgy.pk">LNVGY.PK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nelty.pk">NELTY.PK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nok">NOK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nsany">NSANY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ntdoy.pk">NTDOY.PK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sne">SNE</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sohu">SOHU</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ssnlf.pk">SSNLF.PK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ssumy.pk">SSUMY.PK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tef">TEF</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tlsnf.pk">TLSNF.PK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tosbf.pk">TOSBF.PK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tsl">TSL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tsm">TSM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/umc">UMC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ztcof.pk">ZTCOF.PK</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/irg">IRG</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ask.com, Microsoft and AOL - Internet Love Triangle?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/171158-ask-com-microsoft-and-aol-internet-love-triangle?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">171158</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>I remember hearing a few weeks ago that <span>Diller</span> would consider selling Ask.com (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/iaci' title='More opinion and analysis of IACI'>IACI</a>) (formally <span>AskJeeves</span>.com). I immediately thought of 2 suitors, Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>) (Bing) and <span>AOL</span>.com (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/twx' title='More opinion and analysis of TWX'>TWX</a>). <br><br>Both companies have made deals to increase their reach. Microsoft is making a deal with Yahoo (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/yhoo' title='More opinion and analysis of YHOO'>YHOO</a>) and <span>Aol</span> purchased <span>Bebo</span>. <span>AOL</span> will be out of TWX soon and will need some kind of growth since its <span>ISP</span> business is all but dead.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:20:41 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Thomas Jowers</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>I remember hearing a few weeks ago that <span>Diller</span> would consider selling Ask.com (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/iaci' title='More opinion and analysis of IACI'>IACI</a>) (formally <span>AskJeeves</span>.com). I immediately thought of 2 suitors, Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>) (Bing) and <span>AOL</span>.com (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/twx' title='More opinion and analysis of TWX'>TWX</a>). <br><br>Both companies have made deals to increase their reach. Microsoft is making a deal with Yahoo (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/yhoo' title='More opinion and analysis of YHOO'>YHOO</a>) and <span>Aol</span> purchased <span>Bebo</span>. <span>AOL</span> will be out of TWX soon and will need some kind of growth since its <span>ISP</span> business is all but dead.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/171158-ask-com-microsoft-and-aol-internet-love-triangle?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/iaci">IACI</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/twx">TWX</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/thomas-jowers">Thomas Jowers</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The DJIA's Dangerous Indexing Philosophy</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/171075-the-djia-s-dangerous-indexing-philosophy?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">171075</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>While doing some research on the Dow Jones Industrial Average, I was disappointed to discover how skewed it is toward just a few of its components and how dangerous it is for the world to use it as a benchmark for the American markets.  The DJIA is a price weighted index, which simply means that the weighting of the index is based on the price of each component.  By price I do not mean Market Capitalization but I mean the actual price it is trading at.   Please look at the table below to see what I mean:</p><table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="368"><col width="176">  <col width="125">  <col width="67">  <tr>   <td width="368" height="42" align="42" colspan="3"><span>Dow Jones Industrial   Average Components</span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="42" align="42">STOCK</td>   <td width="125">% WEIGHTING</td>   <td width="67">PRICE</td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>IBM</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>9.31</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$120.56 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>Chevron</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>5.92</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>76.64 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>3M</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>5.73</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>74.28 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>ExxonMobil</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>5.57</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>72.15 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>United Technologies</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>4.84</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>62.66 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>Johnson &amp; Johnson</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>4.59</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>59.49 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>McDonalds</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>4.57</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>59.16 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>Procter &amp; Gamble</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>4.55</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>58.95 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>Caterpillar</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>4.28</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>55.49 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>Coca-Cola</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>4.15</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>53.72 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>Wal Mart</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>3.88</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>50.28 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>Travelers</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>3.88</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>50.20 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>Boeing</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>3.73</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>48.27 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>Hewlett Packard</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>3.72</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>48.16 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>JPMorgan Chase</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>3.29</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>42.58 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>American Express</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>2.75</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>35.68 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>Dupont</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>2.49</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>32.27 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>Merck</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>2.41</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>31.26 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>Verizon Communications</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>2.27</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>29.41 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>Microsoft</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>2.15</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>27.88 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>Kraft Foods</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>2.13</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>27.64 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>Disney</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>2.12</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>27.41 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>AT&amp;T</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>1.98</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>25.59 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>Home Depot</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>1.93</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>25.06 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>Cisco Systems</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>1.78</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>23.00 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>Intel</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>1.47</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>19.01 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>Pfizer</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>1.31</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>16.95 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>Bank of America</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>1.13</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>14.63 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>General Electric</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>1.12</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>14.47 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>Alcoa</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>0.96</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>12.48 </span></td>  </tr> </table><p>As you can see from the table above, the top 10 companies on the list represent 53.51% of the Index , so  for example if all those 10 companies have a terrible day and the rest of the 20 have a decent day, the DJIA Index will still show a large loss.</p></col></col></col>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:01:32 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Peter Mycroft Psaras</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>While doing some research on the Dow Jones Industrial Average, I was disappointed to discover how skewed it is toward just a few of its components and how dangerous it is for the world to use it as a benchmark for the American markets.  The DJIA is a price weighted index, which simply means that the weighting of the index is based on the price of each component.  By price I do not mean Market Capitalization but I mean the actual price it is trading at.   Please look at the table below to see what I mean:</p><table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="368"><col width="176">  <col width="125">  <col width="67">  <tr>   <td width="368" height="42" align="42" colspan="3"><span>Dow Jones Industrial   Average Components</span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="42" align="42">STOCK</td>   <td width="125">% WEIGHTING</td>   <td width="67">PRICE</td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>IBM</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>9.31</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$120.56 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>Chevron</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>5.92</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>76.64 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>3M</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>5.73</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>74.28 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>ExxonMobil</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>5.57</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>72.15 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>United Technologies</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>4.84</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>62.66 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>Johnson &amp; Johnson</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>4.59</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>59.49 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>McDonalds</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>4.57</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>59.16 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>Procter &amp; Gamble</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>4.55</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>58.95 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>Caterpillar</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>4.28</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>55.49 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>Coca-Cola</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>4.15</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>53.72 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>Wal Mart</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>3.88</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>50.28 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>Travelers</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>3.88</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>50.20 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>Boeing</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>3.73</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>48.27 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>Hewlett Packard</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>3.72</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>48.16 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>JPMorgan Chase</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>3.29</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>42.58 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>American Express</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>2.75</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>35.68 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>Dupont</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>2.49</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>32.27 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>Merck</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>2.41</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>31.26 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>Verizon Communications</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>2.27</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>29.41 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>Microsoft</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>2.15</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>27.88 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>Kraft Foods</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>2.13</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>27.64 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>Disney</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>2.12</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>27.41 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>AT&amp;T</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>1.98</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>25.59 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>Home Depot</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>1.93</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>25.06 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>Cisco Systems</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>1.78</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>23.00 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>Intel</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>1.47</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>19.01 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>Pfizer</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>1.31</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>16.95 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>Bank of America</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>1.13</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>14.63 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>General Electric</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>1.12</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>14.47 </span></td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td width="176" height="20" align="20"><span>Alcoa</span></td>   <td width="125"><span>0.96</span></td>   <td width="67"><span><span> </span>$<span>  </span>12.48 </span></td>  </tr> </table><p>As you can see from the table above, the top 10 companies on the list represent 53.51% of the Index , so  for example if all those 10 companies have a terrible day and the rest of the 20 have a decent day, the DJIA Index will still show a large loss.</p></col></col></col><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/171075-the-djia-s-dangerous-indexing-philosophy?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aa">AA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/axp">AXP</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ba">BA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bac">BAC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cat">CAT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/csco">CSCO</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cvx">CVX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dd">DD</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dia">DIA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dis">DIS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ge">GE</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hd">HD</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hpq">HPQ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ibm">IBM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/intc">INTC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/jnj">JNJ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/jpm">JPM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/kft">KFT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ko">KO</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mcd">MCD</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mmm">MMM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mrk">MRK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nyc">NYC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pfe">PFE</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pg">PG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/t">T</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/trv">TRV</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/utx">UTX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vz">VZ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wmt">WMT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xom">XOM</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/peter-mycroft-psaras">Peter Mycroft Psaras</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple Leads October Sentiment for Technology</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/171060-apple-leads-october-sentiment-for-technology?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">171060</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>The month of October ended last Saturday. As many people analyze the performance of securities for the month, I&rsquo;d like to look at sentiment and change in sentiment for the technology sector.</p>  <p>Sentiment is a measure of how people feel a stock will perform and is captured by a voting mechanism that indicates a strong buy, buy, neutral, sell, and strong sell.<span>  </span>The value of sentiment is based on the &lsquo;Wisdom of Crowds&rsquo; where the many will in most cases make better decisions than the individual. Higher sentiment stocks are considered higher quality stocks, while lower sentiment stocks are considered lower quality stocks.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 05:21:24 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Jett Winter</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.winteradvisors.com/'>Jett Winter</a> submits: </strong><p>The month of October ended last Saturday. As many people analyze the performance of securities for the month, I&rsquo;d like to look at sentiment and change in sentiment for the technology sector.</p>  <p>Sentiment is a measure of how people feel a stock will perform and is captured by a voting mechanism that indicates a strong buy, buy, neutral, sell, and strong sell.<span>  </span>The value of sentiment is based on the &lsquo;Wisdom of Crowds&rsquo; where the many will in most cases make better decisions than the individual. Higher sentiment stocks are considered higher quality stocks, while lower sentiment stocks are considered lower quality stocks.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/171060-apple-leads-october-sentiment-for-technology?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/amzn">AMZN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/csco">CSCO</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog">GOOG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hpq">HPQ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/intc">INTC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/jett-winter">Jett Winter</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NBC Prepares for the Winter Olympics with High-Tech and Social Networking</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/170925-nbc-prepares-for-the-winter-olympics-with-high-tech-and-social-networking?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">170925</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/11/3/saupload_nbcvancouverlogo.png" align="right" class="shot2" hspace="6" vspace="6" width="200" height="207" /></p> <p>NBC is gearing up for the 2010 Winter Olympics with some changes to its mainstay site, <a href="http://www.nbcolympics.com/index.html">NBCOlympics.com</a>, scheduled to go live Wednesday.  (See screenshots below).  Once again, just as it <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/06/microsoft-silverlight-gets-a-high-profile-win-2008-bejing-olympics/">did with the 2008 Summer Olympics</a>, NBC will be using a video player based on Microsoft Silverlight technology to offer full HD videos. Except this time, the video player will have DVR-like functionality, with the ability to rewind the video, highlight clips and save them.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 15:14:28 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Erick Schonfeld</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/">Erick Schonfeld</a> submits: </strong><p><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/11/3/saupload_nbcvancouverlogo.png" align="right" class="shot2" hspace="6" vspace="6" width="200" height="207" /></p> <p>NBC is gearing up for the 2010 Winter Olympics with some changes to its mainstay site, <a href="http://www.nbcolympics.com/index.html">NBCOlympics.com</a>, scheduled to go live Wednesday.  (See screenshots below).  Once again, just as it <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/06/microsoft-silverlight-gets-a-high-profile-win-2008-bejing-olympics/">did with the 2008 Summer Olympics</a>, NBC will be using a video player based on Microsoft Silverlight technology to offer full HD videos. Except this time, the video player will have DVR-like functionality, with the ability to rewind the video, highlight clips and save them.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/170925-nbc-prepares-for-the-winter-olympics-with-high-tech-and-social-networking?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ge">GE</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/erick-schonfeld">Erick Schonfeld</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Microsoft: Free Cash Flow Analysis </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/170773-microsoft-free-cash-flow-analysis?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">170773</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><span>The following is a Free Cash Flow Analysis of Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>) from 1993-2011. The key ratios that I will use in the analysis are price to free cash flow &#40;PFCF&#41; and Free Cash Flow Return on Invested Capital &#40;FROIC&#41; as well as debt to equity.</span></p> <p><span>When investing I look for PFCF below 15 times and FROIC above 20%+. When you are lucky enough to find a combination of the two you find a perfect balance of growth + value and you get capital appreciation through capital preservation. </span></p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 06:24:38 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Peter Mycroft Psaras</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><span>The following is a Free Cash Flow Analysis of Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>) from 1993-2011. The key ratios that I will use in the analysis are price to free cash flow &#40;PFCF&#41; and Free Cash Flow Return on Invested Capital &#40;FROIC&#41; as well as debt to equity.</span></p> <p><span>When investing I look for PFCF below 15 times and FROIC above 20%+. When you are lucky enough to find a combination of the two you find a perfect balance of growth + value and you get capital appreciation through capital preservation. </span></p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/170773-microsoft-free-cash-flow-analysis?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/askj">ASKJ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/atvi">ATVI</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bidu">BIDU</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/csco">CSCO</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog">GOOG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ntdoy.pk">NTDOY.PK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/orcl">ORCL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sap">SAP</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sne">SNE</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/yhoo">YHOO</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/peter-mycroft-psaras">Peter Mycroft Psaras</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tech Sector: Is Conventional Wisdom Wrong?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/170737-tech-sector-is-conventional-wisdom-wrong?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">170737</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><p><a href="http://panzner.typepad.com/.a/6a00d83451591e69e20120a64a37e2970b-pi"><img src="http://panzner.typepad.com/.a/6a00d83451591e69e20120a64a37e2970b-800wi" alt="Nasdaq" /></a> <br> As evidenced by the above (courtesy of <a href="http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=$COMPQ&amp;p=W&amp;b=5&amp;g=0&amp;id=p34527591902">StockCharts.com</a>), the technology-laden Nasdaq Composite index has been on a tear since March and has outperformed the S&amp;P 500 since last November.</p> <p>According to the conventional wisdom, that would indicate that stock investors see a much brighter future ahead for the technology sector, right?</p></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 04:20:23 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Michael Panzner</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/PanznerPhotoColor2.75.jpg' title='michael panzner' alt='michael panzner' width="75" height="110" border='1' align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6"/><strong><a href="http://www.financialarmageddon.com/">Michael Panzner</a> submits: </strong><div><p><a href="http://panzner.typepad.com/.a/6a00d83451591e69e20120a64a37e2970b-pi"><img src="http://panzner.typepad.com/.a/6a00d83451591e69e20120a64a37e2970b-800wi" alt="Nasdaq" /></a> <br> As evidenced by the above (courtesy of <a href="http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=$COMPQ&amp;p=W&amp;b=5&amp;g=0&amp;id=p34527591902">StockCharts.com</a>), the technology-laden Nasdaq Composite index has been on a tear since March and has outperformed the S&amp;P 500 since last November.</p> <p>According to the conventional wisdom, that would indicate that stock investors see a much brighter future ahead for the technology sector, right?</p></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/170737-tech-sector-is-conventional-wisdom-wrong?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/michael-panzner">Michael Panzner</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Weekly Shorts Review: Garmin, TomTom, Nintendo, Palm</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/170696-weekly-shorts-review-garmin-tomtom-nintendo-palm?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">170696</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>The technology sector is seeing some major upheavals. Google (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='More opinion and analysis of GOOG'>GOOG</a>) has teamed up with Motorola (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mot' title='More opinion and analysis of MOT'>MOT</a>) to create the Droid-Android phone &ndash; there is speculation that it could dislodge Nokia (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nok' title='More opinion and analysis of NOK'>NOK</a>) from the top spot. Google also announced free GPS software - which the market took as a major negative for Garmin (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/grmn' title='More opinion and analysis of GRMN'>GRMN</a>) and TomTom (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tmoaf.pk' title='More opinion and analysis of TMOAF.PK'>TMOAF.PK</a>). Both share prices dropped sharply last week and their short bases have been rising steadily.</p><p>Nintendo (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ntdoy.pk' title='More opinion and analysis of NTDOY.PK'>NTDOY.PK</a>) reported disappointing sales for the Wii, which hit the share price; Sony (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sne' title='More opinion and analysis of SNE'>SNE</a>) also reported earnings but the market took them well. There is some speculation that [Microsoft's (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>)] XboX and PS3 might be making a comeback.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 02:19:17 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Data Explorers</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://shortstories.typepad.com/'>Jessica Johnson</a> submits:</strong>
<p>The technology sector is seeing some major upheavals. Google (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='More opinion and analysis of GOOG'>GOOG</a>) has teamed up with Motorola (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mot' title='More opinion and analysis of MOT'>MOT</a>) to create the Droid-Android phone &ndash; there is speculation that it could dislodge Nokia (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nok' title='More opinion and analysis of NOK'>NOK</a>) from the top spot. Google also announced free GPS software - which the market took as a major negative for Garmin (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/grmn' title='More opinion and analysis of GRMN'>GRMN</a>) and TomTom (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tmoaf.pk' title='More opinion and analysis of TMOAF.PK'>TMOAF.PK</a>). Both share prices dropped sharply last week and their short bases have been rising steadily.</p><p>Nintendo (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ntdoy.pk' title='More opinion and analysis of NTDOY.PK'>NTDOY.PK</a>) reported disappointing sales for the Wii, which hit the share price; Sony (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sne' title='More opinion and analysis of SNE'>SNE</a>) also reported earnings but the market took them well. There is some speculation that [Microsoft's (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>)] XboX and PS3 might be making a comeback.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/170696-weekly-shorts-review-garmin-tomtom-nintendo-palm?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog">GOOG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/grmn">GRMN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mot">MOT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nok">NOK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ntdoy.pk">NTDOY.PK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/palm">PALM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sne">SNE</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tmoaf.pk">TMOAF.PK</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/data-explorers">Data Explorers</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Plenty of Upside Remaining for Microsoft</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/170657-plenty-of-upside-remaining-for-microsoft?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">170657</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Imagine a plain-vanilla stock that that trades at a forward P/E of 13 and pays a 2% dividend. Sounds kind of average, right?</p><p>Next, I tell you that the company is a software company. It has a 34% operating margin, a 37% return on equity, holds $33 billion in cash, and a history of being one of the leading companies in the world for the last 20 years. Your ears would perk up.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 15:55:03 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>R. Scott Raynovich</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.contentinople.com/'>R. Scott Raynovich</a> submits:</strong><p>Imagine a plain-vanilla stock that that trades at a forward P/E of 13 and pays a 2% dividend. Sounds kind of average, right?</p><p>Next, I tell you that the company is a software company. It has a 34% operating margin, a 37% return on equity, holds $33 billion in cash, and a history of being one of the leading companies in the world for the last 20 years. Your ears would perk up.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/170657-plenty-of-upside-remaining-for-microsoft?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/r-scott-raynovich">R. Scott Raynovich</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>October Overview: The Goblins Came Home to Roost</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/170660-october-overview-the-goblins-came-home-to-roost?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">170660</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/11/2/saupload_roller_coaster_monks.jpg" align="right" hspace="6" vspace="6" width="240" height="171" />What a crazy month we had!</p><p>The Dow began the month of October at 9,712 and finished the month of October at EXACTLY 9,712.  Now I don&rsquo;t want to say the market is manipulated but&hellip;  No, I&rsquo;ve got nothing, there are no buts - the market is totally manipulated!  Either that or you believe that the random outcome of tens of millions of traders around the globe trading hundreds of billions of shares of stock would just so happen to begin and end the month within .50 after going as low as 9,378.77 (on the 5th) and as high as 10,157.94 (on the 21st).  So that is literally a 1 out of the 779-point swing coincidence to hit that 9,712 nail on the head.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 08:23:33 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Philip Davis</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/pdavis_photo.jpg' align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6 width="70" height="83" border='1' /><strong><a href="http://philstockworld.com/">Phil Davis</a> submits: </strong><p><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/11/2/saupload_roller_coaster_monks.jpg" align="right" hspace="6" vspace="6" width="240" height="171" />What a crazy month we had!</p><p>The Dow began the month of October at 9,712 and finished the month of October at EXACTLY 9,712.  Now I don&rsquo;t want to say the market is manipulated but&hellip;  No, I&rsquo;ve got nothing, there are no buts - the market is totally manipulated!  Either that or you believe that the random outcome of tens of millions of traders around the globe trading hundreds of billions of shares of stock would just so happen to begin and end the month within .50 after going as low as 9,378.77 (on the 5th) and as high as 10,157.94 (on the 21st).  So that is literally a 1 out of the 779-point swing coincidence to hit that 9,712 nail on the head.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/170660-october-overview-the-goblins-came-home-to-roost?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/am">AM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/amzn">AMZN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bidu">BIDU</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bke">BKE</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bmy">BMY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cal">CAL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cat">CAT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cern">CERN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cof">COF</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cree">CREE</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cs">CS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cvx">CVX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cy">CY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dd">DD</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ddm">DDM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dia">DIA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dxd">DXD</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ebay">EBAY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/eln">ELN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/emc">EMC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/erx">ERX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/faz">FAZ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fslr">FSLR</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fxp">FXP</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ge">GE</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gmcr">GMCR</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ibm">IBM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ice">ICE</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/intc">INTC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/iyt">IYT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/jpm">JPM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ko">KO</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ms">MS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nflx">NFLX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/palm">PALM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pcln">PCLN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pfe">PFE</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pot">POT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/qld">QLD</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rimm">RIMM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/skf">SKF</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/so">SO</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spg">SPG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/srs">SRS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/swm">SWM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/t">T</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tna">TNA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/trlg">TRLG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/txn">TXN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tza">TZA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/uhs">UHS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/urbn">URBN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/usb">USB</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/utx">UTX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/v">V</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vz">VZ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wfmi">WFMI</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xom">XOM</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/philip-davis">Philip Davis</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Capitalist Distribution</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/170538-the-capitalist-distribution?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">170538</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>At CGI Las Vegas I listened to a presentation by John Del Vecchio from <a href="http://www.rangeralternatives.com/">Ranger Alternatives</a>. John manages the Ranger <a href="http://www.rangershortonly.com/">short book</a> and has a strong background in accounting forensics. Specifically, finding companies with low earnings quality before the market does and building &ldquo;short&rdquo; positions based on that information.</p> <p>In his presentation he referenced some stats from a <a href="http://www.blackstarfunds.com/files/TheCapitalismDistribution.pdf">Blackstar Funds paper</a> on the <a href="http://www.russell.com/Indexes/characteristics_fact_sheets/us/Russell_3000_Index.asp">Russell 3000</a> index between the years 1983-2006.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 08:20:47 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Ken Caruso</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://compoundinglife.com'>Ken Caruso/a> submits: </strong><p>At CGI Las Vegas I listened to a presentation by John Del Vecchio from <a href="http://www.rangeralternatives.com/">Ranger Alternatives</a>. John manages the Ranger <a href="http://www.rangershortonly.com/">short book</a> and has a strong background in accounting forensics. Specifically, finding companies with low earnings quality before the market does and building &ldquo;short&rdquo; positions based on that information.</p> <p>In his presentation he referenced some stats from a <a href="http://www.blackstarfunds.com/files/TheCapitalismDistribution.pdf">Blackstar Funds paper</a> on the <a href="http://www.russell.com/Indexes/characteristics_fact_sheets/us/Russell_3000_Index.asp">Russell 3000</a> index between the years 1983-2006.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/170538-the-capitalist-distribution?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aig">AIG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/c">C</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/csco">CSCO</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/f">F</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fnm">FNM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ge">GE</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/intc">INTC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/iwv">IWV</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/ken-caruso">Ken Caruso</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
