Petro-Canada (PCZ)

All Comments on PCZ

  • commenter
    mbiernat
    Oct 08 02:04 PM
    My Website
    Natural Gas Bargain Justifies Obama's Stance [view article]
    PCZ or Petro-Canada and the others have taken a big fall, but more from speculation as a P/E that low, even in a down market, for a diversified companies which is has vertical and horizontal integration is not based on fundamentals or reality. I think the Obama/Palin political situation combined with the uncertainty in general about the direction of America's energy goals, ie oil or gas or other drive this gyrations. Reply
  • commenter
    Witzy
    Sep 30 02:05 AM
    Seven Canadian Energy Stock Picks [view article]
    By "Canroys" Beabaggage above meant Canadian Royalty Trusts, or Income Trusts, which throw off a lot of cash, and most can maintain their payments at current prices of less that $100/barrel. Beyond these cash machines, look carefully at TSX (Toronto's) Connacher (CLL-T) which is a rare oilsands producer that stays on time and under budget. If you want to stay home, Suncor (SU) may be temporarily beaten up enough by recent production issues to offer some additional value. Reply
  • commenter
    widicusf
    Sep 24 02:41 PM
    Natural Gas Bargain Justifies Obama's Stance [view article]
    Currently the U.S. is not a net importer of NG. This will not be the case if we make a dramatic shift to NG powered vehicles...newly discovered shale gas will not come cheap. Reply
  • commenter
    dbjn
    Sep 24 12:42 PM
    Natural Gas Bargain Justifies Obama's Stance [view article]
    Obama's stance? Obama's plan? Has he actually offered any concrete ideas besides his hollow message for "change"? Reply
  • commenter
    paultaut
    Sep 23 11:01 AM
    Natural Gas Bargain Justifies Obama's Stance [view article]
    hey paulk, how are you doing? You have to cheer up.

    Remember its always darkest before the storm begins.     Reply
  • commenter
    paulk8756
    Sep 23 09:34 AM
    Natural Gas Bargain Justifies Obama's Stance [view article]
    Let me try to understand your premise -

    Obama, Biden and the Democrats are better for domestic energy exploration and production than McCain and Palin?

    So, what's next? Let me guess -

    The sun will rise in the west. The Saudis want to sell oil for $20 a barrel. And Iran is really trying to promote world peace.

    These examples make just as much sense as your premise!     Reply
  • commenter
    paultaut
    Sep 23 04:27 AM
    Natural Gas Bargain Justifies Obama's Stance [view article]
    So, I guess the people of the State of Alaska are also unstable and insane since she has an 86% approval rating on the job she has done.

    People in glass houses shouldn't cast stones.

    The current financial crisis started with the Switch in control of Congress or isn't control of both Senate and House considered to be a majority.

    Unstable and Insane? Where does the Speaker of the House rank? Bush has a very low approval rating, the rest of Congress has vastly underperfomed him.     Reply
  • commenter
    Chubbs
    Sep 22 11:14 PM
    Natural Gas Bargain Justifies Obama's Stance [view article]
    On the other side, the presumptive Republican nominee has picked a vice presidential running mate who has been unfriendly to oil producers."
    -- More to the point she is clearly unstable and insane.     Reply
  • commenter
    paultaut
    Sep 22 02:23 PM
    Natural Gas Bargain Justifies Obama's Stance [view article]
    There is a lot of money to be made in conserving.

    I had a problem in the Past with TBoone's crusade, I don't any longer. If it adds to the electricity avaiable, Great! From my standpoint, the only type of alt. Energy that won't involve a massive infrastructure buildup to support its usage is All Electric Transportation. The more research, the better. I personally believe we are close to solving the range and recharge problems.

    All CNG does is replace one fossil fuel with another.     Reply
  • commenter
    User 199792
    Sep 22 01:14 PM
    Natural Gas Bargain Justifies Obama's Stance [view article]
    There seems to be little money in conserving Reply
  • commenter
    finmah
    Sep 22 01:10 PM
    Natural Gas Bargain Justifies Obama's Stance [view article]
    Indicating a preference for nat gas has absolutely nothing with the actualization of a gas plan. Obama is a liberal senator from the party that has thwarted every conceivable type of energy - natural gas distributors were investigated in several years ago because of high prices. Any energy bill will come with alot of collective socialist strings -just like the bill being held up today. Along with cyncial election year tactic of global warming - obama has embraced ethanol for votes, and his party has demonized LNG terminals, nuclear, oil drilling -, oil transport, car manuf.. royalty trusts.
    Scaring precious capital out of the country that would pursue energy independance is the real threat with all branches of government -overwhelmingly socialist. T

    he rest of the developing world is moving toward capitailism while we are moving left of France (which at least allows nuclear). Follow how they vote and where their campaign money is- not a little vapid utterance to carry them through the national debate (like rescinding his tax increase - for the time being).     Reply
  • commenter
    John Egan
    Sep 22 12:55 PM
    Natural Gas Bargain Justifies Obama's Stance [view article]
    As much as I have a cynical view of T. Boone pushing his own book of business, according to a recent article, his wife sold shares of CLNE. She also had an acceptable reason to do so.... Can't remember what it was... Just more noise...

    Anyway! Novocain/Pain in 2009!
    More Republicans! That's the ticket!

    jegan ;-)     Reply
  • commenter
    paultaut
    Sep 22 12:48 PM
    Natural Gas Bargain Justifies Obama's Stance [view article]
    I don't have a clue where you are getting your figures from: as of 09/15/2008 T Boone held 16.5 mil directly
    and 3.3 mil indirectly, in September he sold 1.1 mil from his indirectly owned shares. (about 25%).

    Madeleine Pickens: Held 1.9 mil as of 09/15/2008 directly having sold 1.1 mil and owns 17.9 indirectly.

    Between the two of them they hold 39.8 both directly and indirectly.

    My point is they sold.

    The Wind Corridor he talks about can also be used as a solar corridor. TBoone isn't making squat out of Nat. Gas. He is an Oil Trader.

    We have 150 years of coal, so what. Other countries liquify it. The Nat. Gas you talk about has to be gathered using many more pipelines than your normal punch a hole in the ground oil. It will be many years before we will be self sufficient in Nat. Gas.

    With the current ongoing crisis and associated expenditures, what will be avaiable to subsidize the scale of activity needed to use Nat. Gas as a fuel for cars?

    TBoone needs Billions to purchase his Turbines, where is he going to get the funding to complete their purchase? Certainly not from the earnings of CLNE.     Reply
  • commenter
    bluesmoke
    Sep 22 11:24 AM
    Natural Gas Bargain Justifies Obama's Stance [view article]
    We all know the benefits of natural gas. I think Kurt's point was that Obama is more pro-nat gas than Palin. Reply
  • commenter
    Ozarker
    Sep 22 10:58 AM
    Natural Gas Bargain Justifies Obama's Stance [view article]
    Our reserves for Natural Gas are good for somewhere in the neighborhood of 100 years. We are busy kissing the behinds of the world oil producers at present, which includes Hugo Chavez in Venezuela, who just signed a pact with China to the one of their largest oil suppliers. Why wouldn't we want to use a fuel that was abundant, clean burning, and made in America, than keep sending our money to people who hate us? I hope T. Boone makes gazillions off of wind energy and natural gas, because I'd rather see him make it than some sheik or tin horn dictator. Reply
Loading...
Symbols:
Authors:
Quick Links: