QLogic Corp. (QLGC)
Loading...
Symbols:
QLGC Forum Topics
- All Comments on QLGC
- General Discussion on QLGC
- Stocks At or Near 52-Week Highs [view article]
- Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [view article]
- Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [view article]
- 20 Winners During a Painful Week [view article]
- Jim Cramer's Mad Money Lightning Round Picks, 8/16/07 [view article]
- Semiconductors Prepared to Knock Your SOX Off [view article]
- QLogic: Cash Rich, Debt-Free, Undervalued [view article]
- Cash-Rich Companies: Watch Out for the Siren’s Song [view article]
- Recent Earnings Strength Tied to International Exposure [view article]
- Chart: Digital Logic Semiconductor Manufacturers - Gross Profit Margins [view article]
Recent QLGC Articles
- Stocks At or Near 52-Week Highs
- Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News
- Earnings Preview: QLogic
- Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News
- 20 Winners During a Painful Week
- QLogic Earnings Preview
- Bear Cuts Hardware Targets
- Semiconductors Prepared to Knock Your SOX Off
- Wednesday's Options Report: MCO, MER, XLF, QLGC, CBS, CFC, AMZN
- A Look At Tech Stocks By Relative P/E and PEG
- Full List of Articles »
Trading Center
Hedge Fund Jobs
Job Seekers: Search jobs by category, get job alerts by email or live feed, apply online See full list of jobs »
Employers: See all recruitment options, get applications online or by email Post a job »
loading ...
Stocks At or Near 52-Week Highs [view article]
A Better Place: Almost everything you said is utter nonsense. If you voted for Bush you are partly responsible for the current Bush Recession. ReplyStocks At or Near 52-Week Highs [view article]
First of all, I am not a Democrat and will not vote for a Democrat.I think most investors had a strong feeling that between now and election time, the Republicans would apply extreme pressure anywhere and in anyway they could to boost the market. They are having some success it seems. However, they can do the most in controlling commodity prices. Getting them down as we see happening now. Low and high estimates as needed to influence commodity prices, along with personal pressures applied to those in most control of the targeted commodities. No telling how low we will see some go in the near, but hold on after 2008. Reply
Stocks At or Near 52-Week Highs [view article]
I realize that IBM is not in the S&P, but it is a Dow component and near its 5 year high. It has had a great run. ReplyWall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [view article]
ISV worth a look, good fundamentals, there were spikes on Thursday and Friday despite a bad market. A cup and handle was formed maybe in anticipation of good earnings. ReplyEli Hoffmann
Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [view article]
PJ568, thanks for your feedback. We largely report adjusted earnings. This is due to the fact that analyst consensus estimates, which are the gauge by which many judge whether a given company has beaten or missed expectations, are formulated based on adjusted earnings. ReplyWall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [view article]
Many of the numbers referenced above appear to be adjusted and not actual. WB and BSX are two that jumped out as being off. One would expect adequate disclosure from the SA Editor about the numbers being referenced. Constantly reporting and discussing adjusted numbers is a sign of weakness that shouldn't be ignored. Replyancisco
Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [view article]
It is amazing that so much of the financial health of the western world hinges on the performance of these public / private entities Fannie and Freddie. I was once a stockholder (liked the dividend), but sold when it became apparent to me a few years ago that I did not understand who the management worked for. If they are a cornerstone of the economy, the performance of their management needs to be judged by a standard of security, not growth of EPS, which drove them away from their government mission toward chasing the returns of sub-prime loans. Then the government wanted them to broaden the size of loans that they would handle. Despite hating a larger role for government, I have reluctantly come to the conclusion that they neeed to be publicly owned and directed. Ugh. I can't believe that I said that. ReplyWall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [view article]
why pay attention to moody,s? why pay attention to anybody? all have an agenda & its not to put money in your pocket.once you know that selfserving lying & greed is the game you should think for yourself. ReplyWall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [view article]
well looks like Moody's go unlished playing the rating game again without foundation or facts and just based on speculation. They need to reinstate triple A ratings on some of the bond insurers that were downgraded unjustifiably ReplyWall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [view article]
Correcting a myth - regarding GM and Toyota Motor (TM).Many believe that GM is no. 1 globally as recently published it outsold Toyota by 1000 or 3000 cars in 2007.
In reality, GM's revenue was $181B in 2007 (01/2007-12/2007) down considerably on YOY. Toyota's revenue was $252B in FY2007 (04/2007-03/2008) up nearly 10%.
It is high time the U.S. auto industry started dealing with the harsh reality before it is too late. Hype and spin can go just so far...
CrossProfit Reply
Netratings
Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [view article]
Wow - even we are impressed with comScore's numbers! Good job comScore! ReplyWall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [view article]
I'm really liking the earnings reports tacked onto the Wall Street Breakfast. Thanks. ReplyEli Hoffmann
Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [view article]
Thanks. Fixed. ReplyWall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [view article]
Market climbed in Asia Friday. Nikkei +20.5% to 14,049. Is +20.5% a typo? ReplyEditors
General Discussion on QLGC
Is this a buy or a sell? Reply