Robbins & Myers Inc (RBN)
Loading...
Symbols:
RBN Forum Topics
loading ...Recent RBN Articles
Trading Center
Hedge Fund Jobs
Job Seekers: Search jobs by category, get job alerts by email or live feed, apply online See full list of jobs »
Employers: See all recruitment options, get applications online or by email Post a job »
Robbins & Myers Up 20% on Surprise Earnings [view article]
Robbins & Myers Cost Basis from Feb 1988 is $1.06/share - up 47 times to $49.87/share June 30, 2008 - - lots of bumps over the past two decades.So much for hedge funds and traders - - 'select long-term investments' can provide great reward at lower cost and much less tax liability.
Reply
Colfax IPO Should Get Your Liquids Flowing [view article]
Mr. Gold,Your analysis is pure "GOLD". All too many will simply "take a flyer"
thinking of nothing but someone else ( CFX ) doing the work as
they fall into a great space these days.
Many thanks and I would be further indebted if you cared to
share your latest ideas........
Prosper,
Tom Durkin / TomD728@gmail.com
Great work and many thanks.... Reply
Colfax IPO Should Get Your Liquids Flowing [view article]
asbestos litigation is sure death. It caused fluor corp to go belly up during the peak of their hey days when they got involved with john mansville. It has taken fluor almost 20 years to recover ReplyColfax IPO Should Get Your Liquids Flowing [view article]
It's better to let some opportunities pass than put yourself in a highly risky position. I had just exited a position the day before and figured based upon the summary and the hype and the over sold nature of the IPO that I could grab a quick and small gain and be out. Today it is back up in the $22's based solely on Crammer's advise I would speculate. I have since done my homework as I typically do before entering a deal even for a small grab. This thing could go to $70/share but I personally don't see how and don't understand it. There exist many better deals than this one out there currently. The Rails brothers (the owners of CFX) have pieced this company together by acquisitions. Unfortunately they made some of the same mistakes I made by not doing there homework and ended up buying some entities with significant asbestos exposure which has killed the cash flow on CFX from 2003 till 2006. 2007 they received this big 50m reimbursement and decided it was time to get there money back. They currently have no downside with nothing in the deal but pure free equity thanks to the IPO.Here is a better explanation that I dropped on Yahoo's Finance Board yesterday.
I may short this deal once I understand it better. More than likely I will leave it alone and go on to deals that I have a more complete understanding of.
>>>>>&g...
Here is what any Colfax investor should know.
Colfax has exposure to asbestos claims which its insurance company would not pay. This has been killing earnings for years. Over the years from 2003 to 2006 Colfax paid $100m for legal expenses and asbestos claims. This is not over. They still carry more claims than coverage.
After the IPO Colfax will still owe $246m in debt (loans). Most of the IPO proceeds go to pay off owners that are selling out. It was a very clever deal and the prospectus boarders on fraud in regards to novice investors.
Net earnings presented in the Prospectus are as follows:
2003 = EPS -0.52 (yes negative)
2004 = EPS -0.62
2005 = EPS -0.09
2006 = EPS 0.07 (first year of profit)
Just for perspective and your math I remind you that Colfax issued 40m shares or 43m with the green shoe (additional shares sold by the underwriter when a deal is hot). I am not sure how the deal got so hot other than hype created by a fake/misleading $1.79/eps for 2007.
Here is what 2007 earnings look like if you remove the 50m insurance reimbursement from there insurance company which has resisted paying until recently.
Sales 506m, CGS 330m, gen expenses 98m, R&D 4m,
$506-$330-$98-$4 = 74m Income before taxes and interest payments.
Subtract out 19m in interest payments (lets use 14m to reflect the re-payment of some debt)
$74m - $14m = $60m
Now subtract out corporate tax of 40% or $24m.
$60m - $24m = $36m (NET INCOME FOR 2007 !)
eps = net income / shares outstanding
EPS = $36m / 43m (or $0.84EPS.)
Thats pretty good but its not $1.79 eps.
.84 x 20pe = $16.80 per share. Low Range
.84 x 22pe = $18.48 per share. High Range
PE's were arrived at by comparing to FLS (competitor)
Nice job underwriters. Bad job investors.
If someone disagrees please make a positive case using income to show me why CFX is worth more.
Once again I am not short. This is my understanding of the deal but I am open to clarification.
Also Q1 estimates in the prospectus of $15m Gross income (not net income) including $3m charge for more asbestos claims.
They sold an old rusty Chevy with a new Mercedes price.
Sentiment : Strong Sell Reply
Colfax IPO Should Get Your Liquids Flowing [view article]
Hey Gold, I almost made the same mistake as you. I was going to invest until I read the prospectus and found the asbestos issue. Take that out and they made $0.40 a share giving a P/E of roughly 50. Kind of expensive for a 'boring' stock. Of course, last night Jim Cramer gushed all over this stock so it will likely go up in the short term. Maybe I should have bought anyway! ReplyColfax IPO Should Get Your Liquids Flowing [view article]
CFX is a typical pump and dump. I bought this dog and was out the same day. I read the prospectus after I bought it (very very stupid). 1st time I have done this. I went with the summery info and the hype. Here is what I discovered.The inclusion of a 50m dollar payment from their insurance company for an asbestos judgment reimbursement presented a misleading EPS. Also no place in the prospectus other than the exact income sheet do they reference net income. They speak of sales and gross income only due to the fact that the price the underwriters placed on the deal is not supported by real (future) net income. They have made significant improvements in their overall sales revenues by acquisitions (Q1 estimates don't show an increase for 2008) However, their debt has increased each year and if you remove the special insurance payments from their income statement you see that they earned around $30M for 2007 or yearly EPS of $0.70. (2004,2005 and 2006 are all less) The current asbestos asset on the balance sheet does not coverage asbestos liabilities. On top of all this negative information the owners are taking this opportunities to sell many of their shares (always a bad sign I would think).
1. Many asbestos claims (I think the word asbestos is used 20 times in the prospectus)
2. Their insurance company has not wanted to pay the claims and therefore they have had to sue their insurance company cost millions in legal fees.
3. The main venture capitalist gets to sell his shares at a huge premium paid for by the IPO (I think its around $65/share).
4. The companies real EPS for 2007 for real operations and including some onetime insurance settlement is around $30M or eps of $0.70.
5. Many other insiders sold there shares see Sec recent filings.
6. Company has only grown through acquisitions which means more debt to grow.
7. The company is not paying down all of its short and long term debt.
8. Most of the IPO proceeds go to insiders trying to jump out of this burning ship.
The only good thing about this company is that they provide a real product to a real market but with little profits for 2007 and no real growth for 2008 based upon Q108 sales estimates included in the Prospectus.
Additionally, they have unlimited asbestos liability.
Best of luck - short sell this dirty dog and get some of your money back !!!!!! Reply
Short Interest at Record Levels [view article]
SEARS IS FINISHED AS IS LAMPERT.HE MADE MONEY WHEN EVERYONE WAS MAKING MONEY IN THE MARKET EVEN MY GRANDMOTHER.
HIS BOY FRIEND CRAMER QUIT COMPLETELY.
''LOSE MONEY'' WITH JIM CRAMER Reply
Short Interest at Record Levels [view article]
Re CALM: I also have read about it (see Marketwatch listed articles), including one guy saying it will be "the mother of all short squeezes." Certainly seems like it should -- but it's been dropping, and fast -- WHY?! Help! Need to understand.Gaucho: What is the average short price now? % short? And time to cover? Surely not still $8, and I'm afraid they will cover before it has to go it.
Disclosure: Long on CALM. Don't want to lose money on it. Am off to check on shortsqueeze.com, but first:
Trading Goddess: Nope; sorry! 1) Can't afford that for shoes. 2) Don't like them. (Why? Because I said so! So there!) Reply
Jacome
Short Interest at Record Levels [view article]
We did it again:March 30th we said:
"1) CROX is dead: someone out there knows something, otherwise the stock wouldn't be trading at such a low PEG ratio; also don't expect a pop unless sales pick up drastically and as we all know, they are DECELERATING....."...
Today -- CROX - 30% in after hrs on nasty guidance, we expected nothing less from arguably the creepiest management in the footwear space
Reply
Editors
General Discussion on RBN
Is this a buy or a sell? ReplyGoddess
Short Interest at Record Levels [view article]
I love CROX! A shoe fit for a Goddess! Go buy a pair. Do it! Because I said so! Replyl
Short Interest at Record Levels [view article]
Gaucho is accurate on most of his comments! The dividend though is estimated at 0.67 this quarter in the article I read... They are truly pulling a wedgee on the shorts:) Yes I am long on CALM. ReplyShort Interest at Record Levels [view article]
PS - Long CROX...if that wasn't obvious. Initiated position at 18.95 and have been accumulating. ReplyShort Interest at Record Levels [view article]
shortsqueeze.com has a lot of helpful short information available for free, and a subscription service with even more info.Is CROX dead, or is it being murdered? Personally, I think its the latter. I could understand the skepticism if it were still in the $70s, but at $17 it seems this short is over.
40% short interest in a stock that has 30% forward earnings growth? 6.5x forward earnings? Chairman just bought $5m worth of stock at $20/share? Rampant international growth...I just fail to see the justification for an OVERWHELMINGLY bearish view of this company.
Are the shoes ugly? Yeah, but they're really comfortable and extremely versatile and functional.
The decelerating growth rate was a valid argument when the stock was in the 60s and 70s, but at $17 with its current valuations, the decelerating growth is irrelevant if they continue to grow at 20-30%.
Anyway, just my $.02
MM Reply
Short Interest at Record Levels [view article]
I short that I am now accumulating is CALM. IT currently has 78% of the float shorted and the price action is amazing. LOOK AT THE MONTH GRAPH They are due to report Monday. If this news is as good as many people expect then the top could fly off this one.Management has gotten aggressive recently in fighting the shorts.
First they have announced that they will pay 1/3 of all profits as dividends!! The latest earnings estimate is well over 2.00 this quarter.
Second they have announced a 4 million shares buy back!!
Third they are making it clear that they are taking on the shorts by making news announcement about the dividend and the buyback.
Fourth They have a huge growth rate..
Fifth The shorts were under water after 8.00 per share!! It is now 38 per share. With over 12 million short they are looking at being under water over 300 million dollars!!
This is not a pump please conduct your own due diligence. Do a Google search these guys could go is to a short squeeze of epic proportions. No my works but those of a recent news commentator.
Reply