ProShares UltraShort Technology (REW)

Loading...
Symbols:
Authors:

All Comments on REW

  • commenter
    cc
    Jul 18 04:21 PM
    ProShares UltraShort and UltraLong ETFs [view article]
    I wish you would look into QID and why it is never and I mean NEVER 2X the inverse.. I checked out Rydex shares and all their inverse etf's perform grea on a daily basis.. THIS piece of $@^$ is so bad.. Check out what the underlying was when this was trading 57.. THe ndx is lower now and this should be trading close 49 to 52,, Do we have any recourse against Proshares?

    Reply
  • commenter
    Ames
    Tiedeman
    Jul 15 07:22 PM
    My Website
    ProShares ETFs: Why Volume Trading Makes a Difference [view article]
    John, That is a great question. I do not have the answer, but I suspect they are using some kind of derivative to produce this. I have found that the Ultra's are fantastic to trade. Good luck. Reply
  • commenter
    Ames
    Tiedeman
    Jul 15 07:20 PM
    My Website
    ProShares UltraShort and UltraLong ETFs [view article]
    QID and QLD have been very reliable at 2x.


     Reply
  • commenter
    User 149845
    Jul 15 05:06 PM
    ProShares UltraShort and UltraLong ETFs [view article]
    Thanks for the article.

    I think the Proshares ETF are not reliable.

    Let's take the example of FXP. They are not double short but only 1.7 short.

    The prices are very inconsistent.

    For example:

    I bought FXP on March 6th at 99. That day, FXI closed 135.66.

    On March 24th, FXP was at 106.92 and FXI 128.35 (same as today).

    Today FXP closed at 87.98 and FXI closed at 128.66

     Reply
  • commenter
    Ames
    Tiedeman
    Jul 13 10:59 PM
    My Website
    ProShares UltraShort and UltraLong ETFs [view article]
    Great list. Thanks for the data. Reply
  • commenter
    sunrises
    Jul 09 12:49 AM
    Culling Strong Tech Names [view article]
    Hi Mark:

    Why doesn't Google just go up to $600plus before dropping back to $460? The volatility benefits more in these times.     Reply
  • commenter
    mythreecents
    Jul 09 12:40 AM
    Culling Strong Tech Names [view article]
    TRADER MARK u said:

    "I am holding Research in Motion (RIMM) simply because I was adding around these levels and it has taken some pain of late"

    after that comment (above), ur 'technical' analysis was met with deaf ears, namely mine, and pretty much cuz u apparently don't eat ur own cooking. but maybe ur a dog, maybe u were trying to post on Seeking Alpo.

    woof     Reply
  • commenter
    peewee
    Jul 09 12:29 AM
    Culling Strong Tech Names [view article]
    Trader Mark,
    I hope you don't do too much trading.
    Fundamentally, the reason GOOG was @ $460 was due to the "click counting", if you recall.
    Q1's results negated the perception of a problem and the lid was blown.
    There is a staff and flag formation since that event (Q1).
    When GOOG was around $585, I suggested that we would not see $520, again.
    Well..., for a period of about 76 minutes, over two days, it was below that mark. My bad!
    Assuming that we don't have a greater general market meltdown, GOOG should be sitting around $630 by Jan 2009.

    Enjoy,

    Michael Z.     Reply
  • commenter
    User 223567
    Jul 08 11:18 PM
    Culling Strong Tech Names [view article]
    I have seen numerous instances where gaps filling did not occur instead double gaps happened which was a bery bullish indicator. Reply
  • commenter
    User 223567
    Jul 08 11:16 PM
    Culling Strong Tech Names [view article]
    What does this article try to prove....?All this gap thesis does not work all the time. Reply
  • commenter
    saltymoney
    Jul 06 12:39 AM
    More Woes Ahead for U.S. Stocks [view article]
    Rick, if you think there are going to be a lot of rallies on the way down, you couldn't be more wrong than to recommend the UltraShort funds long-term. Read the SAI or do the math. Volatility will always drag these funds down. If you're looking to get in for the long haul, pony up and buy a non-leveraged inverse fund like SH. Reply
  • commenter
    johnthebear
    Jun 30 06:41 PM
    ProShares ETFs: Why Volume Trading Makes a Difference [view article]
    John the bear wrote on June 28:

    I am amazed that there is a way to get a 2:1 ratio against an index, and I admit to investing without knowing all the facts.

    I would appreciate it if you could explain how the process works so that I will have greater confidence in the future as my profit keeps expanding my holdings.

    Please try to find an answer for me.

    Have you asked ProShares to explain it to you?     Reply
  • commenter
    adan
    Jun 28 06:22 PM
    My Website
    ProShares ETFs: Why Volume Trading Makes a Difference [view article]
    really good info, very interesting, thanks! Reply
  • commenter
    johnthebear
    Jun 28 09:02 AM
    ProShares ETFs: Why Volume Trading Makes a Difference [view article]
    I invest in ultra short FXP (China) and SRS (Dow Jones RE index) and have done very well with both. Trades have executed quickly and I chart each in Yahoo and include the FXI and IYR to compare trends as to which is moving up faster.

    I am amazed that there is a way to get a 2:1 ratio against an index, and I admit to investing without knowing all the facts.

    I would appreciate it if you could explain how the process works so that I will have greater confidence in the future as my profit keeps expanding my holdings.

    I appreciate ProShares and the opportunity they have provided to the small investor.     Reply
  • commenter
    alphameister
    May 24 12:32 PM
    A Warning for Tech [view article]
    Your chart, limited as it is, would suggest that tech stocks are ready to rally after becoming oversold. Reply

Trading Center