<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>RYT - News and Analysis from Seeking Alpha</title>
    <description>'RYT' Tag RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <author>
      <name>SeekingAlpha.com</name>
    </author>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ryt</link>
    <item>
      <title>Analyst Tech Upgrades: Which Parties Are Over?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/148595-analyst-tech-upgrades-which-parties-are-over?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">148595</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><p>Last week, Goldman Sachs analyst David Bailey raised his rating for the hardware sector to attractive from neutral. He remains cautious &quot;although we are not calling for an immediate improvement in corporate IT spending&quot; but he does expect &quot;greater upside than downside to estimates into the seasonally stronger half of the year and in 2010.&quot; Next year he forecasts increased IT spending and corporate tech upgrades. With an eye towards the glass being half full rather than empty he states &quot;This, combined with a 25% decline in the Goldman Sachs Technology Index since the peak in August 2008, creates a compelling buying opportunity&quot;.</p></div>    <p>Also last week, Goldman Sachs software analyst Sarah Friar ups her rating on the U.S. software industry to attractive from neutral. She feels that the worse of the IT spending cuts or restraints is over ; IT spending surveys indicate software is a priority; and, like the other analyst, that the second on half of this year and 2010 will be see increased IT spending. And specific to software she sees that software has lagged telecom and media performance year-to-date &#40;YTD&#41;; software valuations are in-line with the average S&amp;P valuations where they usually carry a premium; currency headwinds should abate or at least be less of a factor in year-over-year comparisons; and finally, M&amp;A activity in software is heating up.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 05:31:17 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Rick Sherman</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<div><p>Last week, Goldman Sachs analyst David Bailey raised his rating for the hardware sector to attractive from neutral. He remains cautious &quot;although we are not calling for an immediate improvement in corporate IT spending&quot; but he does expect &quot;greater upside than downside to estimates into the seasonally stronger half of the year and in 2010.&quot; Next year he forecasts increased IT spending and corporate tech upgrades. With an eye towards the glass being half full rather than empty he states &quot;This, combined with a 25% decline in the Goldman Sachs Technology Index since the peak in August 2008, creates a compelling buying opportunity&quot;.</p></div>    <p>Also last week, Goldman Sachs software analyst Sarah Friar ups her rating on the U.S. software industry to attractive from neutral. She feels that the worse of the IT spending cuts or restraints is over ; IT spending surveys indicate software is a priority; and, like the other analyst, that the second on half of this year and 2010 will be see increased IT spending. And specific to software she sees that software has lagged telecom and media performance year-to-date &#40;YTD&#41;; software valuations are in-line with the average S&amp;P valuations where they usually carry a premium; currency headwinds should abate or at least be less of a factor in year-over-year comparisons; and finally, M&amp;A activity in software is heating up.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/148595-analyst-tech-upgrades-which-parties-are-over?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/athn">ATHN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ign">IGN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/infa">INFA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nz">NZ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/orcl">ORCL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/qtec">QTEC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ryt">RYT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sap">SAP</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tdc">TDC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tibx">TIBX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vgt">VGT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/rick-sherman">Rick Sherman</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Questioning Current Assumptions for Business Intelligence and On-Demand Indexes</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/144732-questioning-current-assumptions-for-business-intelligence-and-on-demand-indexes?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">144732</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><p><span>The Business Intelligence (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bi' title='More opinion and analysis of BI'>BI</a>) and On-Demand Software indexes continue to outpace the broader market indexes with YTD returns of 27.8% and 35.3% respectively as of June 19. The attached chart (clink on to see a larger version) compares these indexes with broader market indexes along with a select set of high tech ETFs that have also outpaced. </span></p><p><strong><em>BI &amp; On-Demand Software Indexes versus Broader Market Indexes &amp; High Tech ETFs</em><em> </em></strong><em>(Click to enlarge)</em></p></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 04:00:49 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Rick Sherman</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<div><p><span>The Business Intelligence (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bi' title='More opinion and analysis of BI'>BI</a>) and On-Demand Software indexes continue to outpace the broader market indexes with YTD returns of 27.8% and 35.3% respectively as of June 19. The attached chart (clink on to see a larger version) compares these indexes with broader market indexes along with a select set of high tech ETFs that have also outpaced. </span></p><p><strong><em>BI &amp; On-Demand Software Indexes versus Broader Market Indexes &amp; High Tech ETFs</em><em> </em></strong><em>(Click to enlarge)</em></p></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/144732-questioning-current-assumptions-for-business-intelligence-and-on-demand-indexes?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dia">DIA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ign">IGN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/igv">IGV</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/qqqq">QQQQ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/qtec">QTEC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ryt">RYT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vgt">VGT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/rick-sherman">Rick Sherman</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple and the QQQ ETF: High-Beta, Growth-Oriented, Tech-Driven Exposure</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/132545-apple-and-the-qqq-etf-high-beta-growth-oriented-tech-driven-exposure?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">132545</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>By Matthew Hougan</em></p><p>After markets closed on Wednesday, Apple (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>) trounced expectations by reporting a 15% jump in its second-quarter earnings from a year earlier. That had to come as particularly good news for investors in the PowerShares QQQ (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/qqqq' title='More opinion and analysis of QQQQ'>QQQQ</a>).</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 05:06:20 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Index Universe</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://indexuniverse.com">IndexUniverse</a> submits: </strong><p><em>By Matthew Hougan</em></p><p>After markets closed on Wednesday, Apple (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>) trounced expectations by reporting a 15% jump in its second-quarter earnings from a year earlier. That had to come as particularly good news for investors in the PowerShares QQQ (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/qqqq' title='More opinion and analysis of QQQQ'>QQQQ</a>).</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/132545-apple-and-the-qqq-etf-high-beta-growth-oriented-tech-driven-exposure?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/amzn">AMZN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bbby">BBBY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/biib">BIIB</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cost">COST</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/csco">CSCO</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dtv">DTV</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/expe">EXPE</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fxl">FXL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/genz">GENZ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gild">GILD</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog">GOOG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/grmn">GRMN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/igm">IGM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/intc">INTC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/isrg">ISRG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/iyw">IYW</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pcar">PCAR</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ptf">PTF</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/qqqq">QQQQ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/qtec">QTEC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ryt">RYT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sbux">SBUX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/teva">TEVA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vgt">VGT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xlk">XLK</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/index-universe">Index Universe</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Technology ETFs: The Safest Stock Market Sector?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/121388-technology-etfs-the-safest-stock-market-sector?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">121388</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><p>Some argue that stocks can't go higher until there are signs of a real estate bottom. Others maintain that the markets will be handcuffed as long as unemployment is rising. And most seem to concur that stocks will suffer for as long as bad debt remains on the books of the country's largest banks.</p> <p>All of these arguments sound good in theory. Then again, the mere fact that there are few who share any optimism for stock prices is instructive in and of itself; specifically, prices may go much higher much sooner... simply because the masses do not see light at the tunnel's end.</p></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 04:31:54 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Gary Gordon</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/garygordon75px.jpg' title='gary gordon' alt='gary gordon' width="75" height="96" border='1' align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6"/><strong><a href="http://www.etfexpert.com/">Gary Gordon</a> submits: </strong> <div><p>Some argue that stocks can't go higher until there are signs of a real estate bottom. Others maintain that the markets will be handcuffed as long as unemployment is rising. And most seem to concur that stocks will suffer for as long as bad debt remains on the books of the country's largest banks.</p> <p>All of these arguments sound good in theory. Then again, the mere fact that there are few who share any optimism for stock prices is instructive in and of itself; specifically, prices may go much higher much sooner... simply because the masses do not see light at the tunnel's end.</p></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/121388-technology-etfs-the-safest-stock-market-sector?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ign">IGN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/igw">IGW</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ryt">RYT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/smh">SMH</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/gary-gordon">Gary Gordon</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dave Fry's Market Outlook for Wednesday</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/53127-dave-fry-s-market-outlook-for-wednesday?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">53127</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[ <img src="http://www.etfdigest.com/members/davesdaily/davesdaily1106072_files/image002.jpg" height="403" width="323" />
 
<p>One headline reads, “Blame China if Oil Hits $100”.
 Given the US has had no domestic energy or
 proactive drilling policy for three decades while Chinese demand has grown, I
 suppose that’s “sort of” right.
 
 </p>
 
<p>
 But who cares today with oil pushing $100 when the DJIA is
 up 100 points?
 Not too many evidently. </p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 01:26:14 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>David Fry</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/frynew.jpg' title='david fry' alt='david fry' width="75" height="78" border='1' align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" /><strong>David Fry (<a href="http://www.etfdigest.com/" target="_blank">ETF Digest</a>) submits: </strong> <img src="http://www.etfdigest.com/members/davesdaily/davesdaily1106072_files/image002.jpg" height="403" width="323" />
 
<p>One headline reads, “Blame China if Oil Hits $100”.
 Given the US has had no domestic energy or
 proactive drilling policy for three decades while Chinese demand has grown, I
 suppose that’s “sort of” right.
 
 </p>
 
<p>
 But who cares today with oil pushing $100 when the DJIA is
 up 100 points?
 Not too many evidently. </p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/53127-dave-fry-s-market-outlook-for-wednesday?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dba">DBA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dbe">DBE</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ewz">EWZ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fxi">FXI</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gdx">GDX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gld">GLD</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ief">IEF</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/igm">IGM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ign">IGN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/inp">INP</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rsx">RSX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ryt">RYT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/udn">UDN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/uso">USO</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/david-fry">David Fry</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dave Fry's Market Outlook for Wednesday</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/52957-dave-fry-s-market-outlook-for-wednesday?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">52957</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<br />
 <img src="http://www.etfdigest.com/members/davesdaily/davesdaily110507_files/image001.jpg" height="222" width="300" />
 <br/>
 
 <br/>
<p>The above message and image could be applied to boardrooms from
 Citigroup to Merrill Lynch.
 We thought
 over the weekend that if C ousted Prince [gone] and "came clean" [not really] about
 its mortgage related exposure investors might be happy since all the bad news
 was out.
 But C took what could be just an
 incremental step in writing off another $11B of subprime mortgages out of $55B
 still on the books.
 The company
 basically stated that further write offs were dependent on economic conditions through the first quarter 2008.
 That sounds
 rather "iffy", or to borrow a phrase from the Fed, "data dependent".
 Further, it"s reported that the company has
 $136B of unpriced securities on its books.
 These are securities that don't trade "frequently" [like never] and are
 priced to someone's "model".
 So
 investors are left to scratch their heads.
 </p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 04:51:49 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>David Fry</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/frynew.jpg' title='david fry' alt='david fry' width="75" height="78" border='1' align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" /><strong>David Fry (<a href="http://www.etfdigest.com/" target="_blank">ETF Digest</a>) submits: </strong><br />
 <img src="http://www.etfdigest.com/members/davesdaily/davesdaily110507_files/image001.jpg" height="222" width="300" />
 <br/>
 
 <br/>
<p>The above message and image could be applied to boardrooms from
 Citigroup to Merrill Lynch.
 We thought
 over the weekend that if C ousted Prince [gone] and "came clean" [not really] about
 its mortgage related exposure investors might be happy since all the bad news
 was out.
 But C took what could be just an
 incremental step in writing off another $11B of subprime mortgages out of $55B
 still on the books.
 The company
 basically stated that further write offs were dependent on economic conditions through the first quarter 2008.
 That sounds
 rather "iffy", or to borrow a phrase from the Fed, "data dependent".
 Further, it"s reported that the company has
 $136B of unpriced securities on its books.
 These are securities that don't trade "frequently" [like never] and are
 priced to someone's "model".
 So
 investors are left to scratch their heads.
 </p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/52957-dave-fry-s-market-outlook-for-wednesday?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ewz">EWZ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fxi">FXI</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gld">GLD</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ief">IEF</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/igm">IGM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/inp">INP</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rsx">RSX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ryt">RYT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/udn">UDN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/uso">USO</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/david-fry">David Fry</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Technology ETFs</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/30071-technology-etfs?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">30071</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong><font color="#800517">Technology ETFs List</font></strong>
<br />
(click on symbol for data and articles)
</p>
<blockquote><p>
<strong>Global Technology ETFs</strong>
<br />
iShares S&P Global Technology Sector Index Fund (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ixn' title='More opinion and analysis of IXN'>IXN</a>)
</p></blockquote>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 06:33:34 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>SA Editors</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong><font color="#800517">Technology ETFs List</font></strong>
<br />
(click on symbol for data and articles)
</p>
<blockquote><p>
<strong>Global Technology ETFs</strong>
<br />
iShares S&P Global Technology Sector Index Fund (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ixn' title='More opinion and analysis of IXN'>IXN</a>)
</p></blockquote><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/30071-technology-etfs?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bdh">BDH</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bhh">BHH</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fdn">FDN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fxl">FXL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hhh">HHH</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/iah">IAH</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/igm">IGM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ign">IGN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/igv">IGV</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/igw">IGW</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/iih">IIH</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ixn">IXN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/iyw">IYW</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mtk">MTK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/phw">PHW</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/prfq">PRFQ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/psi">PSI</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/psj">PSJ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ptf">PTF</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pxn">PXN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pxq">PXQ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/qtec">QTEC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rew">REW</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rom">ROM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ryt">RYT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/smh">SMH</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/swh">SWH</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vgt">VGT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xlk">XLK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xsd">XSD</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/sa-editors">SA Editors</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Equal Weight Sector ETFs</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/31095-equal-weight-sector-etfs?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">31095</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong><font color="#800517">Equal Weight Sector ETFs List</font></strong>
<br />
(click on symbol for data and articles)
</p>
<blockquote><p>
<strong>Rydex Equal Weight Sector ETFs</strong>
<br />
Rydex S&P Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rcd' title='More opinion and analysis of RCD'>RCD</a>)
<br />
Rydex S&P Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rhs' title='More opinion and analysis of RHS'>RHS</a>)
<br />
Rydex S&P Equal Weight Energy ETF (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rye' title='More opinion and analysis of RYE'>RYE</a>)
<br />
Rydex S&P Equal Weight Financials ETF (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ryf' title='More opinion and analysis of RYF'>RYF</a>)
<br />
Rydex S&P Equal Weight Health Care ETF (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ryh' title='More opinion and analysis of RYH'>RYH</a>)
<br />
Rydex S&P Equal Weight Industrials ETF (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rgi' title='More opinion and analysis of RGI'>RGI</a>)
<br />
Rydex S&P Equal Weight Materials ETF (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rtm' title='More opinion and analysis of RTM'>RTM</a>)
<br />
Rydex S&P Equal Weight Technology ETF (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ryt' title='More opinion and analysis of RYT'>RYT</a>)
<br />
Rydex S&P Equal Weight Utilities ETF (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ryu' title='More opinion and analysis of RYU'>RYU</a>)<br />
</blockquote><p><font color="#800517"><strong>What Are They?</strong></font>
</p></p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 00:39:55 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>SA Editors</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong><font color="#800517">Equal Weight Sector ETFs List</font></strong>
<br />
(click on symbol for data and articles)
</p>
<blockquote><p>
<strong>Rydex Equal Weight Sector ETFs</strong>
<br />
Rydex S&P Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rcd' title='More opinion and analysis of RCD'>RCD</a>)
<br />
Rydex S&P Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rhs' title='More opinion and analysis of RHS'>RHS</a>)
<br />
Rydex S&P Equal Weight Energy ETF (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rye' title='More opinion and analysis of RYE'>RYE</a>)
<br />
Rydex S&P Equal Weight Financials ETF (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ryf' title='More opinion and analysis of RYF'>RYF</a>)
<br />
Rydex S&P Equal Weight Health Care ETF (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ryh' title='More opinion and analysis of RYH'>RYH</a>)
<br />
Rydex S&P Equal Weight Industrials ETF (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rgi' title='More opinion and analysis of RGI'>RGI</a>)
<br />
Rydex S&P Equal Weight Materials ETF (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rtm' title='More opinion and analysis of RTM'>RTM</a>)
<br />
Rydex S&P Equal Weight Technology ETF (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ryt' title='More opinion and analysis of RYT'>RYT</a>)
<br />
Rydex S&P Equal Weight Utilities ETF (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ryu' title='More opinion and analysis of RYU'>RYU</a>)<br />
</blockquote><p><font color="#800517"><strong>What Are They?</strong></font>
</p></p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/31095-equal-weight-sector-etfs?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rcd">RCD</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rgi">RGI</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rhs">RHS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rtm">RTM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rye">RYE</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ryf">RYF</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ryh">RYH</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ryt">RYT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ryu">RYU</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/sa-editors">SA Editors</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>David Fry's Daily Market Outlook</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/26413-david-fry-s-daily-market-outlook?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">26413</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[

<p><img title="D Fry Market Outlook 08 02 2007" src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/DFryMarketOutlook08022007.jpg" border="0" height="171" alt="D Fry Market Outlook 08 02 2007" width="148" />
<br />
<strong>Fed Jawboning</strong>
</p>
<p>As we’ve been saying: “Expect some tough talk from officialdom” regarding inflation and a desire to frighten gold bulls and dollar bears. But, tough talk followed by little action will only make gold’s reaction worse for them ultimately. Today Fed Governor Plosser said that the Fed might have to raise interest rates again to dampen inflation expectations. That produced a mild sell-off in gold but didn’t do much for the dollar.
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 07:45:04 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>David Fry</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/frynew.jpg' title='david fry' alt='david fry' width="75" height="78" border='1' align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" /><strong>David Fry (<a href="http://www.etfdigest.com/" target="_blank">ETF Digest</a>) submits: </strong>

<p><img title="D Fry Market Outlook 08 02 2007" src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/DFryMarketOutlook08022007.jpg" border="0" height="171" alt="D Fry Market Outlook 08 02 2007" width="148" />
<br />
<strong>Fed Jawboning</strong>
</p>
<p>As we’ve been saying: “Expect some tough talk from officialdom” regarding inflation and a desire to frighten gold bulls and dollar bears. But, tough talk followed by little action will only make gold’s reaction worse for them ultimately. Today Fed Governor Plosser said that the Fed might have to raise interest rates again to dampen inflation expectations. That produced a mild sell-off in gold but didn’t do much for the dollar.
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/26413-david-fry-s-daily-market-outlook?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dbb">DBB</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ewm">EWM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gld">GLD</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ief">IEF</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ign">IGN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/iwm">IWM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mdy">MDY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mvv">MVV</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pho">PHO</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pzj">PZJ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ryt">RYT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/smh">SMH</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/uwm">UWM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xhb">XHB</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/david-fry">David Fry</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Earnings Season Performance By Sector: Healthcare, Tech Companies Tops</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/25631-earnings-season-performance-by-sector-healthcare-tech-companies-tops?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">25631</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Monday, we highlighted how the S&P 500 as a whole is performing <a href="http://usmarket.seekingalpha.com/article/25423">this earnings season</a>.  Below we break it down by the ten major sectors.  

<p>As shown, health care and technology (which from the consensus has a lot to live up to) are beating estimates the most, while financials, consumer staples and industrials are beating the least.  Telecom shows that 100% have beaten estimates but that was based on just one company. 
</p>
<p>We also look at how the stocks within the sectors are reacting to earnings beats and misses.  Materials and technology stocks have had the largest one-day gains on earnings beats, while health care, materials and energy stocks that miss are getting pummeled.
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 06:11:43 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>TickerSense</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Monday, we highlighted how the S&P 500 as a whole is performing <a href="http://usmarket.seekingalpha.com/article/25423">this earnings season</a>.  Below we break it down by the ten major sectors.  

<p>As shown, health care and technology (which from the consensus has a lot to live up to) are beating estimates the most, while financials, consumer staples and industrials are beating the least.  Telecom shows that 100% have beaten estimates but that was based on just one company. 
</p>
<p>We also look at how the stocks within the sectors are reacting to earnings beats and misses.  Materials and technology stocks have had the largest one-day gains on earnings beats, while health care, materials and energy stocks that miss are getting pummeled.
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/25631-earnings-season-performance-by-sector-healthcare-tech-companies-tops?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/igm">IGM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ihf">IHF</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/iyw">IYW</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ryt">RYT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vht">VHT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xlk">XLK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xlv">XLV</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/tickersense">TickerSense</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Time To Sell Tech Stocks Based On Seasonality?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/24889-time-to-sell-tech-stocks-based-on-seasonality?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">24889</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Last Tuesday night, Jim Cramer told his Mad Money viewers that they should sell tech based on the calendar.  His recommendation was based on the premise that historically speaking, the sector is entering its weakest part of the year.  As the chart below shows, he has a point.  

<p>Based on the last five years of trading (green line), from now (red dot) until August the sector generally doesn't do well.  However, if we take a longer time horizon going back to 1990 (blue line), the first half of the year hasn't been so bad.
</p>
<p><em>click to enlarge</em>
<br />
<a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/sp_500_tech_sector_average_daily_return.jpg"><img title="tech returns" src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/thumb-sp_500_tech_sector_average_daily_return.jpg" border="0" height="168" alt="tech returns" width="350" /></a>
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:55:55 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>TickerSense</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Last Tuesday night, Jim Cramer told his Mad Money viewers that they should sell tech based on the calendar.  His recommendation was based on the premise that historically speaking, the sector is entering its weakest part of the year.  As the chart below shows, he has a point.  

<p>Based on the last five years of trading (green line), from now (red dot) until August the sector generally doesn't do well.  However, if we take a longer time horizon going back to 1990 (blue line), the first half of the year hasn't been so bad.
</p>
<p><em>click to enlarge</em>
<br />
<a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/sp_500_tech_sector_average_daily_return.jpg"><img title="tech returns" src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/thumb-sp_500_tech_sector_average_daily_return.jpg" border="0" height="168" alt="tech returns" width="350" /></a>
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/24889-time-to-sell-tech-stocks-based-on-seasonality?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/igm">IGM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/iyw">IYW</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ryt">RYT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xlk">XLK</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/tickersense">TickerSense</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rydex's New Equal Weight Sector ETFs</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/20260-rydex-s-new-equal-weight-sector-etfs?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">20260</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/nussbaum1.jpg" border="1" hspace="7" align="left" /><b><a href="http://randomroger.blogspot.com/" target="blank">Roger Nusbaum</a> submits:</b> Rydex issued nine sector ETFs that are equal-weighted. This differs from the other sector ETFs that weight by market cap or some fundamental screen. The result of market cap weighting or most fundamental weighting is that the largest stocks have the heaviest exposure, even in the fundamental funds. For example Exxon Mobil makes up 23% of the RAFI Energy ETF (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/prfe' title='More opinion and analysis of PRFE'>PRFE</a>), GE is 20% of the RAFI Industrial ETF (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/prfn' title='More opinion and analysis of PRFN'>PRFN</a>), although I will say that the RAFI Financial ETF (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/prff' title='More opinion and analysis of PRFF'>PRFF</a>) is not lopsided in this manner.
</p>
<p>The equal-weight funds offer access to sectors in a way that should be different than what exists now. I wrote an article for TheStreet.com <a href="http://www.thestreet.com/_rms/funds/etf/10320593.html">that you can read here</a> without a subscription that goes into more detail about the composition method.
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 12:54:37 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Roger Nusbaum</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/nusbaum75px.gif' title='roger nusbaum' alt='roger nusbaum' width="75" height="80" border='1' align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" /><strong><a href="http://randomroger.blogspot.com/" target="blank">Roger Nusbaum</a> submits: </strong><p><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/nussbaum1.jpg" border="1" hspace="7" align="left" /><b><a href="http://randomroger.blogspot.com/" target="blank">Roger Nusbaum</a> submits:</b> Rydex issued nine sector ETFs that are equal-weighted. This differs from the other sector ETFs that weight by market cap or some fundamental screen. The result of market cap weighting or most fundamental weighting is that the largest stocks have the heaviest exposure, even in the fundamental funds. For example Exxon Mobil makes up 23% of the RAFI Energy ETF (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/prfe' title='More opinion and analysis of PRFE'>PRFE</a>), GE is 20% of the RAFI Industrial ETF (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/prfn' title='More opinion and analysis of PRFN'>PRFN</a>), although I will say that the RAFI Financial ETF (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/prff' title='More opinion and analysis of PRFF'>PRFF</a>) is not lopsided in this manner.
</p>
<p>The equal-weight funds offer access to sectors in a way that should be different than what exists now. I wrote an article for TheStreet.com <a href="http://www.thestreet.com/_rms/funds/etf/10320593.html">that you can read here</a> without a subscription that goes into more detail about the composition method.
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/20260-rydex-s-new-equal-weight-sector-etfs?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rcd">RCD</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rhs">RHS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rsp">RSP</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rtm">RTM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rye">RYE</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ryf">RYF</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ryh">RYH</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ryt">RYT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ryu">RYU</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/roger-nusbaum">Roger Nusbaum</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
