Sprint Nextel Corp. (S)

Loading...
Symbols:
Authors:

All Comments on S

  • commenter
    User 232752
    Jul 25 05:00 PM
    Just What the Telcos Didn't Want to Hear [view article]
    Have you ever overheard some of those very public conversations...Some of those cell phone users are already suffering from brain damage... Reply
  • commenter
    willking
    Jul 25 01:58 PM
    Just What the Telcos Didn't Want to Hear [view article]
    Cell phone users can contract brain tumors, kidney stones, diarreah and a host of other maladies. I think there are more cases of diahreah than brain tumors among cell phone users. Therefore, cell phone users should be cautioned to carry Immodium just in case. I'm not an MD or pHD but this is as profound as I can get. Reply
  • commenter
    Nextel
    Accessories
    Jul 24 08:58 PM
    My Website
    Just What the Telcos Didn't Want to Hear [view article]
    this is all rubbish Reply
  • commenter
    COCOViper
    Jul 24 02:04 PM
    Just What the Telcos Didn't Want to Hear [view article]
    There is simply no scientific basis for this. Not only do virtually all studies demonstrate little to no correlation of cell phone use to cancer, it scientifically doesn't even make sense.

    If non-ionizing RF energy is dangerous, why are we not also warning people to stay away from WiFi, cell towers, radio towers, and tractor trailers (via their communication systems) ? All of these sources put out far more RF energy than a cell phone does. And it's not like it's a different "kind" of energy, some of them are in virtually the same frequency bands as CDMA and GSM. I love how this scientist when pushed says "well...better safe than sorry." Seriously? Do you know how many things we should get rid of if that's our criteria?
    Reply
  • commenter
    Umm, yeah
    Jul 24 11:50 AM
    Just What the Telcos Didn't Want to Hear [view article]
    Someone needs to change his meds... Reply
  • commenter
    SgtDave
    Jul 24 10:02 AM
    Just What the Telcos Didn't Want to Hear [view article]
    Comparing the telcoms to the tobacco industry has me scratching my head in confusion. The uses for cell phones are many and obvious where nobody needs a cigarett. Cigaretts can't call the police or roadside help and you can't locate family/friends with one. Tobacco companies spent years denying the facts and trying to confuse everyone by claiming there was no link between smoking and cancer, heart disease, etc. when it was plain that there was. I can see where people may limit cell phone usage but probably everyone who has a cell phone now will continue to at least carry one about. That means they'll still have active accounts with the telecoms and still be paying for them. With decreased use, however, the telecoms will find themselves not having to build out their networks as fast as they are now. I don't mean to make light of people's misfortunes but I don't foresee a catastrophe to telecoms bottom lines that you do. Reply
  • commenter
    Tom B
    Jul 24 09:41 AM
    Just What the Telcos Didn't Want to Hear [view article]
    Well, what's the LEVEL of risk? Is it comparable to smoking or more like eating peanut butter (aflotoxin exposure)? Reply
  • commenter
    mattymystiqu
    e
    Jul 24 09:18 AM
    Just What the Telcos Didn't Want to Hear [view article]
    Funny your "article" doesn't mention he urged them to use wireless headsets. Reply
  • commenter
    SalC
    Jul 24 08:35 AM
    Just What the Telcos Didn't Want to Hear [view article]
    You should have consulted your Horoscope before making changes in your investment strategy. It might have been more accurate than using a baseless Chicken Little memo. Better sell off the stocks of companies that make microwave ovens while you're at it. Reply
  • commenter
    SalC
    Jul 24 08:30 AM
    Just What the Telcos Didn't Want to Hear [view article]
    I think you should have consulted your Horoscope before making any changes in your investment strategy. It might have been more accurate than using a baseless Chicken Little memo. Reply
  • commenter
    petroc
    Jul 22 09:44 AM
    Crazy Dividends [view article]
    Another great Dividend Stock is Hersha Hospitality HT. Hersha has paid dividend of $.18 per share per quarter for 37 consecutive quarters.
    Stock price as of 9:43 AM on 7-22 is $6.60. That's a sweet 10.9%.
    Reply
  • commenter
    notsosmart
    Jul 22 09:37 AM
    My Website
    Crazy Dividends [view article]
    i think WB is now a .05 @ share.take a look @ FRO &NAT.im happy i have those. Reply
  • commenter
    jamesa40
    Jul 21 04:37 PM
    Crazy Dividends [view article]
    Given that we still have several banks to report, we could still have some volatility and some retracement of financials that could pose some investment opportunities. Reply
  • commenter
    Geddy
    Jul 19 08:01 PM
    Wireless War: 4G Battle Lines Have Been Drawn [view article]
    And Pakistan having ANYTHING is supposed to influence me? They can't even control their own citizens & I'm to be impressed? They're lucky they're still not using smoke signals! Reply
  • commenter
    Ames
    Tiedeman
    Jul 19 07:48 AM
    My Website
    Sprint: Color on Recent SK Telecom M&A Chatter [view article]
    If Sprint can grow its earnings by 20% in 2009 then the stock is a buy. The question is, can they? Can they really become profitable? Does Sk think they can? This is the question. Reply

Trading Center