Seabridge Gold Inc. (SA)
Loading...
Symbols:
SA Forum Topics
- All Comments on SA
- General Discussion on SA
- Chart: Gold Stocks - Annual Revenue Growth [view article]
- Mines' Eyes Have Not Seen The Glory [view article]
- 70% of Seabridge Gold's Resources 'Inferred' - I'm Not Holding My Breath [view article]
- Our Favorite Stocks to Watch as the Gold Bull Kicks Back into Action [view article]
- Chart: Gold Stocks - Gross Profit Margins [view article]
loading ...Recent SA Articles
- Chart: Gold Stocks - Annual Revenue Growth
- Chart: Gold Stocks - Gross Profit Margins
- Chart: Gold Stocks - Annual Earnings Growth
- Chart: Gold Stocks - SG&A Margin (MRQ)
- Chart: Gold Stocks - Normalized Net Profit Margins
- Chart: Gold Stocks - Revenue Per Employee
- Chart: Gold Stocks - Net Income Per Employee
- Mines' Eyes Have Not Seen The Glory
- 70% of Seabridge Gold's Resources 'Inferred' - I'm Not Holding My Breath
- Newmont Grabs Miramar: Who's Next on the Gold Takeover List?
- Full List of Articles »
Trading Center
Hedge Fund Jobs
Job Seekers: Search jobs by category, get job alerts by email or live feed, apply online See full list of jobs »
Employers: See all recruitment options, get applications online or by email Post a job »
Chart: Gold Stocks - Annual Revenue Growth [view article]
This information has dust on it ReplyChart: Gold Stocks - Annual Revenue Growth [view article]
This information is 2+ years out of date. ReplyChart: Gold Stocks - Annual Revenue Growth [view article]
2004 vs 2005? ReplyEditors
General Discussion on SA
Is this a buy or a sell? ReplyMines' Eyes Have Not Seen The Glory [view article]
Good advice for someone who is not now in the gold market but is thinking about taking a position. A lower risk position would be to buy GDX, the miners ETF based on the Amex Gold Miners Index. You won't hit a home run with it like buying Seabridge in 2003 but it won't be a Bre-X or a dot.com either. Because the gold bull market likely has a few years to run, I am buying GDX 100 shares at a time each time it pulls back 5 to 10%. This has worked well since it was at $34. When gold hits 1600, I'll start thinking about selling some at certain percentage point increases from there. Regarding the rest of the economy and financial system, good luck to us all. We are going to need it. Reply70% of Seabridge Gold's Resources 'Inferred' - I'm Not Holding My Breath [view article]
Read it and weep "Shorty" -Drill Program Completed at Seabridge Gold's Mitchell Deposit
Wednesday November 7, 10:22 am ET
New 43-101 Resource Report Commissioned for Completion in Early 2008
biz.yahoo.com/iw/07110...
...The 2007 drill program was designed to upgrade much of the existing 13.1 million ounce inferred gold resource (564 million tonnes grading 0.72 grams per tonne gold and 0.18% copper) to the measured and indicated categories and to pursue extensions of the deposit to the south, north and at depth.
Of the 37 holes drilled in 2007: (i) 14 holes (totaling 6,607 meters) were drilled as in-fill holes within the limits of the known deposit; (ii) 16 holes (totaling 5,135 meters) were drilled to test for extensions to the south; and (iii) six holes (totaling 3,196 meters) were drilled to test for extensions to the north. In addition, all six of the holes drilled to test the northern extension and all 14 of the infill holes were extended beneath the limits of the previous resource estimate to test for depth extensions of the deposit. Finally, one hole was drilled to test for a southwest offset of the deposit...
Here, let my give you back your head. Maybe now is a good time to go out on that ledge and...
Reply
70% of Seabridge Gold's Resources 'Inferred' - I'm Not Holding My Breath [view article]
It realy makes me wonder who the author is, since there's no Bio, no company name and no further articles by him/her. Very cloudy and a typical approach from the shorts that have gotten a beating over the last couple of years. Reply70% of Seabridge Gold's Resources 'Inferred' - I'm Not Holding My Breath [view article]
I really enjoyed the disclosure at the end of the article. Why doesn't the author just start his article by saying that much of it is fictional. You just have to love the internet....please do your own research and don't depend on people such as this author. Reply70% of Seabridge Gold's Resources 'Inferred' - I'm Not Holding My Breath [view article]
Why is their no biography about this author ??? What kind of background does he have ??Normally, when well respected authors are writing an article like this, they are mentioning their biography.
So why was this not done in this case ???
This report is a sharp contract with the Dutton Report, which I really trust. Last year, I first heard from them and I read a "STRONG BUY" advise for Medivation.
The stock was at that time at 4.49$ and their target was 9$ ! I bought it at 4.55$ and sold it about 3 weeks ago for.... 22$ !!!
This is what we called "an outstanding advise" !
That is the reason why I bought this stock, based on Dutton's report, but also on a number of other authors, which were writing about the same positive comments !
About Mitchell, the author gets the point totally wrong.
Falconbridge never drilled the mitchell zone, they missed it literally by inches. He is mixing up the different deposits on this property. Its not sea boosting the 2 million ounces to 13 miillion - its a totally new discovery.
The author gets ridiculous, when he complains about the lack of indicated resources or pre feasability studies - mitchell is a last year discovery. The author shows an incredible lack of understanding of exploration business, if he wants to read a pre feasability some 12 month after the discovery.
I would advice him also to check the boards of other companies. If he doesn't like people to sit in different boards, he should not invest in miners and explorers. This is just usual. Its quite contrary: Sea has a pretty "clean" management and board. There are people in this business with far more different seats than sea?s. Check a certain Henk van Alphen if you like.
Let me say that I don´t share your conclusion inferred Resources are not valued (and therefore worthless?). Inferred resources are always the first step, there is always a necessity of upgrading the bigger part of them, but look at Miramars resourcetable: Newmont didn´t bother.
www.miramarmining.com/......
I agree that CL is a clear cut case for upgrading. Also you will see, that mitchell last years inferred Resources will move to indicated.
GM. Reply
70% of Seabridge Gold's Resources 'Inferred' - I'm Not Holding My Breath [view article]
Why is their no biography about this author ??? What kind of background does he have ??Normally, when well respected authors are writing an article like this, they are mentioning their biography.
So why was this not done in this case ???
This report is a sharp contract with the Dutton Report, which I really trust. Last year, I first heard from them and I read a "STRONG BUY" advise for Medivation.
The stock was at that time at 4.49$ and their target was 9$ ! I bought it at 4.55$ and sold it about 3 weeks ago for.... 22$ !!!
This is what we called "an outstanding advise" !
That is the reason why I bought this stock, based on Dutton's report, but also on a number of other authors, which were writing about the same positive comments !
About Mitchell, the author gets the point totally wrong.
Falconbridge never drilled the mitchell zone, they missed it literally by inches. He is mixing up the different deposits on this property. Its not sea boosting the 2 million ounces to 13 miillion - its a totally new discovery.
The author gets ridiculous, when he complains about the lack of indicated resources or pre feasability studies - mitchell is a last year discovery. The author shows an incredible lack of understanding of exploration business, if he wants to read a pre feasability some 12 month after the discovery.
I would advice him also to check the boards of other companies. If he doesn't like people to sit in different boards, he should not invest in miners and explorers. This is just usual. Its quite contrary: Sea has a pretty "clean" management and board. There are people in this business with far more different seats than sea?s. Check a certain Henk van Alphen if you like.
Let me say that I don´t share your conclusion inferred Resources are not valued (and therefore worthless?). Inferred resources are always the first step, there is always a necessity of upgrading the bigger part of them, but look at Miramars resourcetable: Newmont didn´t bother.
www.miramarmining.com/......
I agree that CL is a clear cut case for upgrading. Also you will see, that mitchell last years inferred Resources will move to indicated.
GM. Reply
70% of Seabridge Gold's Resources 'Inferred' - I'm Not Holding My Breath [view article]
Why is their no biography about this author ??? What kind of background does he have ??Normally, when well respected authors are writing an article like this, they are mentioning their biography.
So why was this not done in this case ???
This report is a sharp contract with the Dutton Report, which I really trust. Last year, I first heard from them and I read a "STRONG BUY" advise for Medivation.
The stock was at that time at 4.49$ and their target was 9$ ! I bought it at 4.55$ and sold it about 3 weeks ago for.... 22$ !!!
This is what we called "an outstanding advise" !
That is the reason why I bought this stock, based on Dutton's report, but also on a number of other authors, which were writing about the same positive comments !
About Mitchell, the author gets the point totally wrong.
Falconbridge never drilled the mitchell zone, they missed it literally by inches. He is mixing up the different deposits on this property. Its not sea boosting the 2 million ounces to 13 miillion - its a totally new discovery.
The author gets ridiculous, when he complains about the lack of indicated resources or pre feasability studies - mitchell is a last year discovery. The author shows an incredible lack of understanding of exploration business, if he wants to read a pre feasability some 12 month after the discovery.
I would advice him also to check the boards of other companies. If he doesn't like people to sit in different boards, he should not invest in miners and explorers. This is just usual. Its quite contrary: Sea has a pretty "clean" management and board. There are people in this business with far more different seats than sea?s. Check a certain Henk van Alphen if you like.
Let me say that I don´t share your conclusion inferred Resources are not valued (and therefore worthless?). Inferred resources are always the first step, there is always a necessity of upgrading the bigger part of them, but look at Miramars resourcetable: Newmont didn´t bother.
www.miramarmining.com/......
I agree that CL is a clear cut case for upgrading. Also you will see, that mitchell last years inferred Resources will move to indicated.
GM. Reply
70% of Seabridge Gold's Resources 'Inferred' - I'm Not Holding My Breath [view article]
You make some fair comments, and personally I appreciate getting a short view on stocks though I may or may not agree with the analysis.How long has your company had its short in place, may we know? Reply
Polheimer
70% of Seabridge Gold's Resources 'Inferred' - I'm Not Holding My Breath [view article]
"Disclosure: The firm with which the Author is affiliated is short Seabridge Gold. The information contained within, although believed to be reliable, has not been independently verified and its completeness and accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The opinions expressed are for informational purposes only."Hmmm...
Reply
Our Favorite Stocks to Watch as the Gold Bull Kicks Back into Action [view article]
I am not avoiding silver. I am a huge fan of Silver Wheaton, which is a pure play on silver and included in our list of recommended stocks. I read both Ted Butler and Jason Hommel and agree that silver has some promising fundamentals. However, I expect gold to outperform silver during recessionary periods, which we should be approaching soon (despite rate cuts). Gold is more widely seen as a store of value and hedge against a declining dollar, while silver's price rise may be somewhat suppressed by declining industrial demand from a cooling economy, particularly developing nations. I could be wrong, but those are my thoughts. ReplyOur Favorite Stocks to Watch as the Gold Bull Kicks Back into Action [view article]
Why are you avoiding silver and Ted Butlers' work and credit to him? Last week the gold silver ratio was 56/1 this week it is less as expected and on the way to 1/1 over the next 8 to 15 years. Why not feature SIL, Apex Silver ? It is like a mutual fund of junior mining stocks that just begun producing silver,lead & zinc from a very major mine in Bolivia and has great political support in shakey suroundings. Those surroundings have overly depressed the stock into an addtional bargain beyond currancy and silvers low ball price. Reply