State Street Corp. (STT)
Trading Center
Loading...
Symbols:
STT Forum Topics
- All Comments on STT
- General Discussion on STT
- Dividend Analysis: State Street Corporation [view article]
- Bank Executive Compensation and the Bailout [view article]
- State Street Corp Should Be Falling, not Rising [view article]
- Large Banks' Net Income History [view article]
- Mid-Caps Are Outperforming Large- and Small-Caps [view article]
- The Facts Behind the Coming Congressional Mortgage Bailout Bill [view article]
- ETF Industry Data Summary: 1H'08 [view article]
- Next Week Is a Big One for Bank Reports [view article]
- Options Trader: Tuesday Outlook [view article]
- U.S. Bank Dividend Yields Revisited [view article]
- Why Have Most Investment Advisers Been Slow to Adopt ETFs? [view article]
- Zoltek Blowing in the Wind, Cramer's Lightning Round (4/23/08) [view article]
loading ...Recent STT Articles
- PFI: PowerShares Dynamic Financials Outperforms Its Peers
- Dividend Analysis: State Street Corporation
- Large Banks' Net Income History
- Large Banks' Yield and Price-to-Book
- ETF Industry Data Summary: 1H'08
- The Facts Behind the Coming Congressional Mortgage Bailout Bill
- Bank Executive Compensation and the Bailout
- Next Week Is a Big One for Bank Reports
- Options Trader: Tuesday Outlook
- Earnings Preview: State Street
- Full List of Articles »
Trading Center
Hedge Fund Jobs
Job Seekers: Search jobs by category, get job alerts by email or live feed, apply online See full list of jobs »
Employers: See all recruitment options, get applications online or by email Post a job »
Dividend Aristocrats: Top Dividend Growers [view article]
Due to exposure to sub-prime CDO's, SIV's etc, and thier pending take-over bid for Country Wide, Bank of America would be the last stock I would own. ReplyDividend Aristocrats: Top Dividend Growers [view article]
I wouldn't own Bank of America stock if you paid me to accept it as a gift, and it paid a 100% dividend. They are the most arrogant, hateful, self-serving bunch of louts I have ever done business with. They could not care less if you deposit money with them. They charge fees no other bank would even consider charging. It would not surprise me if they installed pay water fountains and pay toilets for their customers to use!I took $300,000 out of their bank to open an account with a competitor and it didn't bother them one bit. What's a peanut account to them? Of course, there just might have been a lot more money to deposit later on, but that doesn't matter to their elitist mind set. Reply
Dividend Aristocrats: Top Dividend Growers [view article]
i cant c the future but FRO has been great for dividends. seems well run &nobody has figured out a way to pave over the ocean.i am not connected to wall st or this co. ReplyDividend Aristocrats: Top Dividend Growers [view article]
I feel that SGP is a better drug company than PFE because it has patent protection out several years. ReplyDividend Aristocrats: Top Dividend Growers [view article]
Well, PFE with it's rather (non) robust pipeline is in trouble and I don't see it in the Aristocrat field. ReplyDividend Aristocrats: Top Dividend Growers [view article]
By 'index performance' I mean the Dividend Investors Index ReplyDividend Aristocrats: Top Dividend Growers [view article]
Take a look at www.dividendachievers..../. In particular, take a look at the list of "licensed products". Compare the Powershares PFM with Vanguard's VIG. Note also the comparison of the index performance with that of the S&P 500 over 10 years. S&P wins. ReplyDividend Aristocrats: Top Dividend Growers [view article]
.Can anyone give me a link to and ETF/ETFs, that have all the 12 companies above listed in their portfolio.
If you can't, give me a link to a site that I can find out this information.
Thank You
Cajun
. Reply
Dividend Aristocrats: Top Dividend Growers [view article]
3 of these companies are Buffett picks. ReplyTemnpe AZ
Dividend Aristocrats: Top Dividend Growers [view article]
I work for a Nucor subsidiary and I can't say enough good things about upper management and how well this company is run. The treatment of employees is extremely fair and done with a great deal of integrity. I personally can see why Nucor is the top player in many of its downstream operations. We strive to "Take Care of Our Customers". I do own company stock and recommend the stock to everyone I know. ReplyDividend Aristocrats: Top Dividend Growers [view article]
THANKS. MOST ALWAYS FIND UNEXPECTED GOODIES ON ALPHA.HELPS ME FEEL 'INFORMED'. Reply
Dividend Aristocrats: Top Dividend Growers [view article]
Very informative. Thanks for it. ReplyWall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [view article]
Waxman is a communist. If you quoet him you lose all credibility ReplyWall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [view article]
No wonder why - There so many insider that think they can do as they will - and break all the rules - and make-up there own rules - and make a mess of the United States...~ Experience – To Vote For 273 Lies About Iraq~
I don't know if Clinton and McCain - Have all that Much experience - But I do know if they had a bunch of Experience – They would not have vote for 237 lies - That got us into Iraq!!!!
That Iraq vote – Fooled them both over 237 times.
Now that’s the Kind of experience – I can do with-out !!!
About Iraq on the Record
Presented by Rep. Henry A. Waxman
On March 19, 2003, U.S. forces began military operations in Iraq. Addressing the nation about the purpose of the war on the day the bombing began, President Bush stated: “The people of the United States and our friends and allies will not live at the mercy of an outlaw regime that threatens the peace with weapons of mass murder.” Two years later, many doubts have been raised regarding the Administration’s assertions about the threat posed by Iraq.
Prepared at the direction of Rep. Henry A. Waxman, Iraq on the Record is a searchable collection of 237 specific misleading statements made by Bush Administration officials about the threat posed by Iraq. It contains statements that were misleading based on what was known to the Administration at the time the statements were made. It does not include statements that appear mistaken only in hindsight. If a statement was an accurate reflection of U.S. intelligence at the time it was made, it was excluded even if it now appears erroneous. For more information on how the statements were selected, see the full methodology. The Iraq on the Record Report is a comprehensive examination of these statements.
Topics of the Statements. The 237 misleading statements can be divided into
four categories. The five officials made 11 statements that claimed that Iraq
posed an urgent threat; 81 statements that exaggerated Iraq’s nuclear activities; 84
statements that overstated Iraq’s chemical and biological weapons capabilities;
and 61 statements that misrepresented Iraq’s ties to al Qaeda.
Statements by President Bush. Between September 12, 2002, and July 17,
2003, President Bush made 55 misleading statements about the threat posed by
Iraq in 27 separate public appearances. On October 7, 2002, three days before the
oversight.house.gov/Ir...
Reply
Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [view article]
Could you pls include Indian markets - BSE or NSE in your Todays markets - Asia section? I see it sometimes and omitted other times. Also the closing price and not just the % change would be good.Awesome summary - i read this first thing every morning. Reply