T Forum Topics
- All Comments on T
- General Discussion on T
- Dow 30 Performance Since 7/15 [view article]
- Just What the Telcos Didn't Want to Hear [view article]
- AT&T Comments on Apple's 3G iPhone [view article]
- Seven High-Yielding ETFs [view article]
- Fiber: To Own or Not to Own [view article]
- Investing in Dividend Paying Companies [view article]
- Financial Focus - Fast Money Recap (7/22/08) [view article]
- 3G iPhone Impact on AT&T and Verizon [view article]
- Options Trader: Wednesday Outlook [view article]
- This Week's Key Earnings Reports [view article]
- Earnings Preview: AT&T [view article]
- Weak Earnings After Hours - Fast Money Recap (7/21/08) [view article]
loading ...Recent T Articles
- Dow 30 Performance Since 7/15
- Just What the Telcos Didn't Want to Hear
- AT&T Stays Ahead of the Curve in a Dynamic Industry
- Seven High-Yielding ETFs
- Dollar Back? - Fast Money Recap (7/23/08)
- AT&T Earnings Boost Telecommunications ETFs
- AT&T Comments on Apple's 3G iPhone
- AT&T Meets Estimates, iPhone 3G Selling Well
- Options Trader: Wednesday Outlook
- Financial Focus - Fast Money Recap (7/22/08)
- Full List of Articles »
Dow 30 Performance Since 7/15 [view article]
America has officially entered the 'Age of Insanity'. ReplyJust What the Telcos Didn't Want to Hear [view article]
There is simply no scientific basis for this. Not only do virtually all studies demonstrate little to no correlation of cell phone use to cancer, it scientifically doesn't even make sense.If non-ionizing RF energy is dangerous, why are we not also warning people to stay away from WiFi, cell towers, radio towers, and tractor trailers (via their communication systems) ? All of these sources put out far more RF energy than a cell phone does. And it's not like it's a different "kind" of energy, some of them are in virtually the same frequency bands as CDMA and GSM. I love how this scientist when pushed says "well...better safe than sorry." Seriously? Do you know how many things we should get rid of if that's our criteria?
Reply
A
Dow 30 Performance Since 7/15 [view article]
It is amazing when the lender and buyer of last resort ... the FEDERAL GOV'T OF THE UNITED STATES ... decides to begin buying equities, i.e., FNM, FRE, etc. We are going to look back on this time a era of extremely bad judgement. How can BAC and C show stuning performance when they announced huge losses?? Just boggles the mind. ReplyAT&T Comments on Apple's 3G iPhone [view article]
What no Neoreader? Why doesn't AT&T and Apple offer consumers and web users the ability to get information from products or objects in one click?Reply
Seven High-Yielding ETFs [view article]
Income is fine. But has the market priced in the possibility of an Obamba presidency, where dividends would be taxed much higher than they are today?If not would any strictly dividend play not be a risky play over the next couple of months, at least until we find out which bum will have Air Force One for the next four years? Reply
Robison
Fiber: To Own or Not to Own [view article]
I can't help but wonder if Internap isn't ripe for a buy-out because their stock has tanked and they are losing customers left and right since the bought VitalStream for $217 million - an amazing 8 times the projected value. Internap's problem isn't their network, it's their customer service. If someone as efficient as Google bought them, they could easily do a better job managing this valuable asset. ReplyJust What the Telcos Didn't Want to Hear [view article]
Someone needs to change his meds... ReplySeven High-Yielding ETFs [view article]
Another ETF is the S&P Dividend Aristocrats, consisting of companies that have consistently raised their dividends. I read about it in an article written by an S&P advisor. But the S&P website only has an 8-digit symbol (which doesn't work) and S&P in New York did not know what the regular symbol is. If anyone does, please add it to comments. ReplySeven High-Yielding ETFs [view article]
With inflation for this year predicted in the low 4% range you need at least 5 1/2% to break even after taxes. Of course a Roth Ira could get by on 5%. ReplyAT&T Comments on Apple's 3G iPhone [view article]
the apps store is amazing. as long as the lines were for people waiting to buy the iphone on the first day, that's the line for apps developers. gone are the days when no one wanted to develop for apple.to the guy who's car was towed...um, i don't actually know a nice phone company...they aren't exactly known for heart. Apple, on the other hand, treats it's customers very well. and their 'exclusive' with AT & T isn't forever. Reply
Seven High-Yielding ETFs [view article]
Great article, it was very informative. If you check out www.etfmarketpro.com/h... you can see three more high-yield ETFs that you did not mention. Thanks! ReplyJust What the Telcos Didn't Want to Hear [view article]
Comparing the telcoms to the tobacco industry has me scratching my head in confusion. The uses for cell phones are many and obvious where nobody needs a cigarett. Cigaretts can't call the police or roadside help and you can't locate family/friends with one. Tobacco companies spent years denying the facts and trying to confuse everyone by claiming there was no link between smoking and cancer, heart disease, etc. when it was plain that there was. I can see where people may limit cell phone usage but probably everyone who has a cell phone now will continue to at least carry one about. That means they'll still have active accounts with the telecoms and still be paying for them. With decreased use, however, the telecoms will find themselves not having to build out their networks as fast as they are now. I don't mean to make light of people's misfortunes but I don't foresee a catastrophe to telecoms bottom lines that you do. ReplyJust What the Telcos Didn't Want to Hear [view article]
Well, what's the LEVEL of risk? Is it comparable to smoking or more like eating peanut butter (aflotoxin exposure)? Replye
Just What the Telcos Didn't Want to Hear [view article]
Funny your "article" doesn't mention he urged them to use wireless headsets. ReplyJust What the Telcos Didn't Want to Hear [view article]
You should have consulted your Horoscope before making changes in your investment strategy. It might have been more accurate than using a baseless Chicken Little memo. Better sell off the stocks of companies that make microwave ovens while you're at it. Reply