Time Warner Cable, Inc. (TWC)

Symbols:
Authors:

All Comments on TWC

  • commenter
    fireball
    Jul 05 03:53 PM
    GM on the Skids - Fast Money Recap (7/2/08) [view article]
    so merrillynch thinks gm may go bankrupt. that is enough to make me at least put them on a watch list with ford as a potential long term comeback. oh mer is further down the list along with citi and the other major financials. probably a very longterm watch. the financials will go much lower before i will even consider them. Reply
  • commenter
    kurt walter
    Jul 04 08:07 PM
    GM on the Skids - Fast Money Recap (7/2/08) [view article]
    The fast money TV show is around for one reason to make money from advertising. Reply
  • commenter
    User 56457
    Jul 04 03:13 PM
    GM on the Skids - Fast Money Recap (7/2/08) [view article]
    In the global markets, is there ANYTHING that is not impossible, seeing that that exciting really is a double or tripple negative! Reply
  • commenter
    helplessobse
    rver
    Jul 04 01:00 PM
    GM on the Skids - Fast Money Recap (7/2/08) [view article]
    The Fast Money Guys are pure and simple momentum players. Their recommendations are for investors who keep careful tabs on the market. Following them you can make huge gains, but must be able to take losses and shift to the new group, either long or shortl. Long term investors are advised to beware of the Fast Money Guys. Stocks like GE, Emerson Electric and Air Products and Chemicals are seldom on their radar screen. Reply
  • commenter
    notsosmart
    Jul 04 10:22 AM
    My Website
    GM on the Skids - Fast Money Recap (7/2/08) [view article]
    people,people-dont believe anybody. think for yourself.this is no longer business but a game & everybody in it has their own agenda.who looks out for #1-you do & only you. Reply
  • commenter
    CodeCritic
    Jul 03 12:03 AM
    My Website
    The Yahoo-Microsoft Soap Opera Continues [view article]
    Well, not sure why there is so much of see-saw when both microsoft and yahoo made it very clear that they have moved on from the point of negotiations... anyways... lets see how future unfolds. Reply
  • commenter
    StrictNon-Co
    nformist
    Jul 02 01:41 PM
    The Yahoo-Microsoft Soap Opera Continues [view article]
    220881, you're a complete and utter twit: they're not restricting your rights of free speech in the least, but they are being perhaps discriminating against twits like you that think that because they've got a free way to post to someone else's posting place (whether it be on a wall they own in the brick and mortar sense, or servers they run in the internet sense) that they have the right to post whatever they please, all in the name of "free speech" which is bogus. Even disregarding the fact that there's no such thing as protection to screaming "fire!" in a crowded theatre when it's not on fire, fact of the matter is that no site is obligated to post anything that they don't want to post, and aren't obligated to service any particular poster, which is definitely true with the subset of the webizens you represent: that of being an unpaid commentator on a site dedicated to its own views. If you want your "Free speech" go and post your own blog on your own paid-for (however that's arranged) server, and spew forth all your hatred there: there's no limits to that except your will and way of getting access to such servers. Be aware, though, that there's many ISP's and web hosting services that have these pesky things known as TOS's which may get in your self-proclaimed right (but misunderstanding of what it really means) of free speech. I'm sure you're completely against any idiot coming into your house and screaming "You're nothing but a piece of sh!t not worth bothering with, and I'm going to kill you!" and yet, from the way you tirade online, you seem to think you have exactly the same right to go into the domains of others and do it, all under the guise of "free speech" which, in reality, is a subset of all utterances possible, and always has been, and always will be.

    As to your username choice? Keep in mind, once again, this is the internet, and things are largely automated. Based on the comments I see here, chances are you were again being a total twit and spouting off beyond reason, and they decided you weren't worth bothering with.

    When you're working within the confines of some country conducting business, you're stuck having to deal with the law enforcement of that particular country if you wish to do business. If you don't, you're still stuck with the consequences. Those Chinese dissidents that had their information handed over, and as a result they were dealt with according to the government's whims? Well, once again, that demonstrates the point that just because you want to state "I have free speech!" and you do it on someone else's domain, doesn't mean you're protected, and according to the laws of China, they were determined to be guilty of something. "But that's not fair!" I can see you screaming with an idiotic expression, well, be that as it may, surely if someone went running into your house and screaming a death threat at you, you'd also say "Get out of here, or get the crap beaten out of you, you're violating my rights!" but then again, it isn't reasonable to expect stupid hypocrites to recognize themselves for what they are. The only solution any multinational country has to the problem of following the laws of a given country and remaining in business is to not have any presence at all within those countries: if you actually check, most large corporations are distinctly multinational, and have to play by the rules of their associated countries, or be seized by the local government. The biggest difference just happens to be in the case of internet giants like Google, Yahoo! and Microsoft is that it's more feasible to use them as digital meeting places, printing presses and hideouts, at least until they're found by their governments. In effect, Yahoo!, Google and Microsoft as online entities are stuck in much the same place as accessories to crimes as defined by the local governments as phone companies are when meetings and conversations of a subversive nature are done over the phone: they're stuck having to deal with turning over the information to the authorities when they demand them. If you think China and the Yahoo! or Google incidents are an isolated thing, I strongly encourage you to research the PATRIOT act, which is the US's currently standing bit of legislation that makes it harder to expect protection by carriers of similar actions and "speech" as in China. Oh, now there's an inconvenient truth! Before you whine about how one company treats citizens in another country according to its laws, first make sure your own country changes its own laws to match your ideals, so you don't look like the idiot you clearly are.     Reply
  • commenter
    220881
    Jul 02 12:53 PM
    The Yahoo-Microsoft Soap Opera Continues [view article]
    the last time I checked my email box to see if my comment was published, that I had posted on your site regarding yahoo, there wasn't one. Is this because yahoo controlls your site? So much for free speech, huh?

    The yahoo employees dislike any comments that speak the truth about them or their company and will delete these comments every chance they get, maybe they are taking after their CEO's actions when he was denying that yahoo had willfully cooperated with the Chinese government regarding the dissidents that were arrested because of the information that yahoo has supplied to them. Maybe the yahoo employees feel that if their leader can do this, (even though he got caught red-handed by the senate committee) they can at least try to follow in his footsteps, afterall, if they get caught, what could possibly happen to them?     Reply
  • commenter
    220881
    Jul 02 12:31 PM
    The Yahoo-Microsoft Soap Opera Continues [view article]
    Buying yahoo, lock, stock and barrel, then carving them up between their new partners sounds terrific. The shareholders get the money they want for the sale of yahoo and I get rid of this pesky hacker that has been disrupting my computer operations for the past 12 months, unless, of course, he gets busted for committing these illegal crimes over the internet, then, there might be a pause happening between MSFT and YHOO. This is my intention.

    Reply
  • commenter
    RightinSanFr
    ancisco
    Jun 24 11:00 AM
    My Website
    Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [view article]
    On the congressional hearings on oil speculation:
    - The claim that speculation is doubling the cost of oil seems way out of line. Was this a reputable industry source, or a political one?
    - The US continues to attack our successful industries. Much manufacturing is gone; pharma will be a target; now the financial industry - or at least the commodity exchanges. We need to attract $2 billion per day to cover our balance of payments deficit. Help!!!     Reply
  • commenter
    Brewer
    Jun 24 10:55 AM
    Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [view article]
    Any stock has 'potential' to go down 50-75%, but Apple's big (and quite temporary) 'crash' in January was actually about about a 40% decline from 200 to 119.

    When other stocks lose ground, mutual fund managers have to sell the ones that have done well, such as Apple, to take up the slack and give the suckers their 2% interest for the year. Then they have other stocks such as MSFT, that never increase, but they stupidly refuse to sell based on religious reasons. :-) You have often heard of the Microsoft 'faithfull'? When will we? I think that would make a greeat story.

    You could talk about Gate's reality distortion field, etc... it would be a good read.

     Reply
  • commenter
    whidbey
    Jun 24 10:25 AM
    Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [view article]
    Eli
    Always worth the time. Thanks much     Reply
  • commenter
    jlounsbury59
    Jun 24 09:36 AM
    My Website
    Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [view article]
    tom 1234 - - -

    Why is Apple down? Try valuation. Expected 2008 earnings are $5.20; 5 year expected annual growth rate 24%; high volatility (Beta = 2.88). If I assign 5% annual growth starting in six years and continuing forever, fair value today for AAPL is $44.

    By the way, I own Apple. However, I do put short position hedges on that holding at every pullback. The potential for Apple to double keeps me an owner. The potential for Apple to go down 50-75% keeps me guarded.     Reply
  • commenter
    leo123
    Jun 24 09:31 AM
    Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [view article]
    aapl still a bit over priced. i believe it will go to 160 before i bounces back... but just to be clear, it will bounce back! Reply
  • commenter
    tom1234
    Jun 24 08:44 AM
    Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [view article]
    why is apple down so much ---all it does is make money and is debt free ---what does the street have against them --- Reply

Trading Center