ProShares Ultra Utilities (UPW)
-
Quote & Analysis
-
Forum
Loading...
Symbols:
UPW Forum Topics
- All Comments on UPW
- General Discussion on UPW
- ProShares UltraShort and UltraLong ETFs [view article]
- The Case Against Leveraged ETFs [view article]
- ProShares ETFs: Why Volume Trading Makes a Difference [view article]
- ProShares Ultra and UltraShort Sector ETFs: Does 2 = 2? [view article]
- Leveraged ETFs: A Value Destruction Trap? [view article]
- Leveraged Sector ETFs [view article]
Recent UPW Articles
- ProShares UltraShort and UltraLong ETFs
- ProShares ETFs: Why Volume Trading Makes a Difference
- ProShares Ultra and UltraShort Sector ETFs: Does 2 = 2?
- Utilities ETFs
- ETF Performance Over the Past Week: Four Metrics of Comparison
- The Case Against Leveraged ETFs
- Leveraged Sector ETFs
- Leveraged ETFs: A Value Destruction Trap?
- Market-Neutral Strategy Using Ultra Sector ETFs
- ProShares Launches 22 New Leveraged and Inverse Leveraged Sector ETFs
- Full List of Articles »
Trading Center
Hedge Fund Jobs
Job Seekers: Search jobs by category, get job alerts by email or live feed, apply online See full list of jobs »
Employers: See all recruitment options, get applications online or by email Post a job »
loading ...
Leveraged ETFs: A Value Destruction Trap? [view article]
Hi Tristan,Thanks for commenting on my blog at stockadventures.wordpr.../ .
I will have to double-check how these ETFs are actually invested, but my suspicion is that they rely heavily on index futures. If this is the case, then most of the assets are ostensibly invested in T-Bills - used as margin for the futures, with enough index futures purchased to mimic the 2X movement of the index. A 2:1 leverage can be maintained with relatively minor adjustments to the weighting of the index futures being used (the maximum leverage of these contracts can go to 50:1 or more - depending on the prevailing futures exchange margin requirements - so 2:1 is very conservative for index futures.)
The T-bills will generate income, so I doubt there is a net interest "cost-of-money&qu... Where it gets interesting is what happens when the index drops by 50%? The 2:1 leverage will in theory cause the capital to wiped out.
Either way, you can monitor the net asset value of these ETFs on a daily basis. If the market value begins to adversely diverge from the net asset value, then that would be your warning flag to get out. The net asset value should track %-wise the daily movement of the underlying index (2X if it is leveraged).
This may not apply to leveraged ETFs that could not take advantage of index futures. The dynamic then would be closer to what you have described, if the buying and selling of shares is required.
Cheers,
Allocator Reply
Yates
Leveraged ETFs: A Value Destruction Trap? [view article]
A reader just let me know about an older ProShares mutual fund that tracked the NASDAQ with constant leverage.The ticker is UOPIX, and the long-term chart is pretty scary and illustrates the constant leverage trap very well. And if you're thinking of profiting from the constant value trap by shorting the leveraged long, the chart shows that it would likely be successful eventually, but it that it could be a very wild ride.
As for David's brain teaser - is it better to be long the leveraged short or short the leveraged long? Well, you could go quadruple short if you buy the leveraged short on 50% margin. How does that sound? Reply
Jackson
Leveraged ETFs: A Value Destruction Trap? [view article]
Fascinating. Question for you, Tristan: If an investor is looking for a bearish strategy, expecting an impending downturn in the market, which is better: shorting a leveraged Rydex ETF, buying a Rydex leveraged short ETF ("UltraShort"... or shorting a simple ETF? Reply