Whirlpool Corp. (WHR)
Loading...
Symbols:
WHR Forum Topics
- All Comments on WHR
- General Discussion on WHR
- Jim Cramer's 10 Predictions for 2008 [view article]
- Nuclear Winter Pick - Cramer's Mad Money (9/24/08) [view article]
- What's Happening In the Related - To - Home - Building Space [view article]
- When Energy Goes Lower - Fast Money Recap (9/10/08) [view article]
- Ready To Roar - Cramer's Mad Money (9/12/08) [view article]
- Fuld to Wall of Shame - Cramer's Mad Money (9/9/08) [view article]
- Google and Apple Defy Declining Customer-Satisfaction Trends [view article]
- Options Trader: Friday Outlook [view article]
- Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [view article]
- More Replacement Tickers for Reshaping David Merkel's Portfolio [view article]
- U.S. Seeing More Inflation Than Anyone: See Whirlpool For Proof [view article]
- Moderation of Revolving Credit Is Not Good News [view article]
Recent WHR Articles
- What's Happening In the Related - To - Home - Building Space
- When Energy Goes Lower - Fast Money Recap (9/10/08)
- Google and Apple Defy Declining Customer-Satisfaction Trends
- Options Trader: Friday Outlook
- Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News
- Earnings Preview: Whirlpool Corp.
- More Replacement Tickers for Reshaping David Merkel's Portfolio
- U.S. Seeing More Inflation Than Anyone: See Whirlpool For Proof
- Wednesday's Options Outlook: BEAV, XLV, SMH, MER, ORCL, GS, WHR
- Moderation of Revolving Credit Is Not Good News
- Full List of Articles »
Trading Center
Hedge Fund Jobs
Job Seekers: Search jobs by category, get job alerts by email or live feed, apply online See full list of jobs »
Employers: See all recruitment options, get applications online or by email Post a job »
loading ...
Tracking Jim Cramer: Stellar February 2007 Performance [view article]
Sorry Michael. I now saw that your entry was February 8th 2007. The annual return figures are now more relevant to me. ReplyTracking Jim Cramer: Stellar February 2007 Performance [view article]
Michael, you are right. Cramer frequently changes his opinions. But I went back and checked. Seeking Alpha does not have any references to Cramer discussing MPEL between January 25th and February 8th where he would have announced a change in his opinion. ReplyTracking Jim Cramer: Stellar February 2007 Performance [view article]
Peter Lynch: No, it is only one month. Beside, he had a dismal performance on Jan.neverenuff: The data is from seekingalpha. Jim Cramer does change his mind often.
sniper6: Leonard the Monkey should do better over the long run than most people including Jim Cramer, because he is not emotional. I have no data to support the above statement though.
ED: I am indeed in trouble if I only write about Jim Cramer. That's well taken.
Steve: You can do that research and enlighten us. However, it is probably not worth your time if you are a serious investor. Reply
Fidelity
Tracking Jim Cramer: Stellar February 2007 Performance [view article]
Cramer rarely advocates such a blind "buy and hold for 1 year" strategy. His usual holding period is much less. What does his record look like when measured over just a few months? ReplyTracking Jim Cramer: Stellar February 2007 Performance [view article]
IF CRAMER IS ALL YOU CAN WRITE ABOUT YOU ARE IN DIRE STRAIGHTS.AN ARTICLE I READ STATED THAT CRAMERS PICKS FOR 2007 WERE IN THE LOW 30%,THE AFOREMENTIONED LEONARD THE MONKEY CAN DO BETTER THAN THAT.DID YOU EVER HEAR OF INFORMATIVE JOURNALISM? ReplyTracking Jim Cramer: Stellar February 2007 Performance [view article]
How did Leonard the Monkey make out? Last I checked he had the upper hand on Cramer. ReplyTracking Jim Cramer: Stellar February 2007 Performance [view article]
Are you sure of your facts? I do not have a transcript of the February 8th broadcast but the week of January 25th Cramer was advising viewers to "sell, sell, sell" MPEL. ReplyTracking Jim Cramer: Stellar February 2007 Performance [view article]
It is one month out of 12 in one year. Does this mean that I should only listen to Cramer in February? How about a study on his overall record since the beginning? ReplyEditors
General Discussion on WHR
Is this a buy or a sell? ReplySchmeidler
Jim Cramer's 10 Predictions for 2008 [view article]
Stop bashing on this Cramer guy. It's pointless and not contributing to any direction on how to treat his stock predictions. If my opnion about him helps, I see him as someone who is simply motivated by his fearlessness of the markets. He survived hell when he was working professionally as a hedge fund manager, and now, he lingers around as a quasi semi-retiree because he feels that this is the kind of enjoyment (for him, at least) that he should have had in the first place when he worked on wall street. He also seems to have some kind of obsession with trading, which he readily would admit to. If you read his book "Confessions of a Street Addict", he will formulate to you $ by $ on how he made his millions. He gives you all the trades (generally by sector, or the maket as a whole), the time, and even the payout $$. This guy had a lot of guts (or the stupidity of a dare devil). He would borrow VERY heavily and cash in on big one or two day payoffs. His timing of the market was everything. Plus the fact that he is probably crazy helps him. ReplyJim Cramer's 10 Predictions for 2008 [view article]
I find it amusing that anyone would be tracking the Lightning Round as if it were presumed that it would be anywhere near accurate. Maybe I am missing something, but I thought the whole purpose of the Lighting Round was not to make accurate predictions upon which any sane individual would make an investment, but rather to give off-the-cuff advice within a few seconds, from which one might start to do some basic research. As much as Jim preaches homework, I take the Lightning Round to be pure entertainment and not much more.I would suspect that if he had the time to research each Lightning round stock thrown at him as he does other stocks which he has spent time researching, his hit rate would rise considerably. But then, we would actually be researching his real advice, as opposed to his entrertainment, off-the-cuff remarks, wouldn't we. And who knows, maybe we just wouldn't have as much ammunition with which to take pot shots at him, would we...
I am sure there is ample room for anyone to stand up in public and advise us poor simpletons of better stocks to invest in that Mr. Cramer; instead of taking shots, let's here your choices; then we can take shots at you, instead of simply letting you sit back and sound so wise by denigrating his comments. Reply
Jim Cramer's 10 Predictions for 2008 [view article]
You getting all excited about Cramer's predictions. You might want to check our how his stock picks panned out. I studied the accuracy and one year returns of his Jan 2007 picks. ReplyJim Cramer's 10 Predictions for 2008 [view article]
I would think that both stocks should trade by year end at roughly a resonable 25x 09 earnings or 160 for AAPL and 600-620 for GOOG - Cramer I am sure has since disavowed his predictions! ReplyJim Cramer's 10 Predictions for 2008 [view article]
GOOG at 1000 and AAPL at 300 - doesn't look promising - my predictions: GOOG 620 and AAPL 160 - we'll see... ReplyTuesday's Options Report: WHR, KBH, XHB, AIG, XLF, SIRF, XLP, HMY, MOT, GOOG [view article]
whr profit margins were exaggerated by Brazilian tax credits. The conference call did not mention this. According to Herb Greenburg, the tax credits are about 26%. The stock price does not have this priced in yet. Reply