WINDSTREAM CORP (WIN)
Loading...
Symbols:
WIN Forum Topics
- All Comments on WIN
- General Discussion on WIN
- Dividend Yields Soar [view article]
- Bearish on RIMM (Today) - Cramer's Lightning Round (9/25/08) [view article]
- No Relationship To Reality - Cramer's Mad Money (9/10/08) [view article]
- The Pelosi Factor - Cramer's Mad Money (8/25/08) [view article]
- The Top Dividend Paying ETFs and Stocks [view article]
- 10 Top Dividend Stocks of the S&P 500 [view article]
- Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [view article]
- Stocks That Yield - Barron's [view article]
- Telecom Stocks: Dialing for Dollars [view article]
loading ...Recent WIN Articles
- Earnings Preview: Windstream Corp.
- Dividend Yields Soar
- 10 Top Dividend Stocks of the S&P 500
- Nine High Yield Telephone Stocks Calling
- Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News
- Telecom Stocks: Dialing for Dollars
- Earnings Preview: Windstream Corp.
- Deep Value: Highest Yielding Largecaps
- Windstream Corporation: Stable Income for Conservative Investors
- Top 40 Dividend Paying Stocks In the S&P 1500
- Full List of Articles »
Trading Center
Hedge Fund Jobs
Job Seekers: Search jobs by category, get job alerts by email or live feed, apply online See full list of jobs »
Employers: See all recruitment options, get applications online or by email Post a job »
Dividend Yields Soar [view article]
10% ReplyBearish on RIMM (Today) - Cramer's Lightning Round (9/25/08) [view article]
All these years cramer was a big backer of =rimm=.Now he doesn't like =Rimm.
Cramer == is a front runner.
THAT'S WHY I WATCH =FAST MONEY= INSTEAD OF CRAMER. Reply
Bearish on RIMM (Today) - Cramer's Lightning Round (9/25/08) [view article]
He never said he was now bearish on Rimm, He said maybe at 140 it was a short but it isn't one now. He stated it's a hold ReplyBearish on RIMM (Today) - Cramer's Lightning Round (9/25/08) [view article]
He never said to short it, get your headline correct. ReplyNo Relationship To Reality - Cramer's Mad Money (9/10/08) [view article]
HAVE 4 STOCKS, TWO ATTI AND EGLE, ATTENDING JEFFERIERS SECOND AND FIFTH ANNUAL,AND ERF'S WEBCAST AND WIN' BOSS SPEAKING AT GOLDMAN SACHS..DO THESE VENTURES HURT STOCK PRICES... ReplyNo Relationship To Reality - Cramer's Mad Money (9/10/08) [view article]
Actually morningstar had wfr as a short at around $70 ReplyIt
No Relationship To Reality - Cramer's Mad Money (9/10/08) [view article]
Sometimes Cramer adds value with his perspective and information but you can't put much weight on his buys & sells because he comments on every stock anyone asks about. When someone like Ken Hebner, Warren Buffett or Jim Rogers makes a strong buy or sell recommendation you can put a lot of weight into it because they are extreamly selective.Reply
No Relationship To Reality - Cramer's Mad Money (9/10/08) [view article]
why sell wfr. at 80 crammer loved it. also liked fslr at 300 now 200.please dont post crammer anymore. he is never right. Reply
No Relationship To Reality - Cramer's Mad Money (9/10/08) [view article]
Putting the words "GM" and "No Relationship to Reality" in the same sentence is EXACTLY on target.They would seemingly rather count on the Congress for a bailout instead of building the highly fuel efficient gasoline and natural gas fueled vehicles they build elsewhere here.
Is it any wonder we have an energy crisis with the corporate and political leadership we have in America? As Cramer would say, "They DO Nothing!" Reply
The Pelosi Factor - Cramer's Mad Money (8/25/08) [view article]
let me explain the markets.......1) little thought given to underlying fundamentals;
2) too much pressure on boosting stock prices;
3) mathematical theory is king.
the markets will take off again too early and fall like a rock. Reply
The Pelosi Factor - Cramer's Mad Money (8/25/08) [view article]
This just in:CNBC reports the Schumer IndyMac closing cost FDIC not $8 B as previously reported, but $32 B, leaving FDIC reserves below legal mandates. A CNBC commentator claims FDIC funds are less than 1% of Federally Guaranteed deposits, that FDIC will raise premium assessments on surviving banks. What insurance company would insure highly leveraged financial institutions today? Berkshire Hathaway and Korea apparently passed on Lehman, and Merrill investments trashed Singapore's Retirement Funds. In 1933 FDR, a one-time banker, and leading bankers opposed FDIC for fear of moral hazard.
plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose! Reply
The Pelosi Factor - Cramer's Mad Money (8/25/08) [view article]
Let's get real here folks.Cramer an amnesiac manic depressive misanthropic hyper psychopathic promoter whose hidden complete track record trails passive index fund performance. JC erroneously called bottoms since at least January of this year. JC calls himself the best trader on Wall Street. Wonder what Buffett, Heebner, Rogers, Soros, the late Templeton and others would say?
Re Pelosi and CLNE, let us not forget Feinstein and PCR, Rumsfeld and GILD, Cheney and HAL, Bush and oil, Chuck Schumer causing a run on IndyMac with his hedge fund buddies short IMB, and Harry Reid with his tribal gaming money and land deals benefited by legislation.
The Pickens Plan includes further picking the taxpayer pocket to leverage his windpower and natural gas deals. Meanwhile his investments, along with CHK, are heading south.
Am I the only one who finds something curious about FNM and FRE GSE equities going higher while their balance sheets head south? How many times can Merrill come to the trough? Are $560 T in derivative leveraged institutions too big to fail, or too big to rescue?
Most bankruptcy bailouts wipe out common shareholders.
Is it possible the 6 Trillion dollar scale of just the FNM and FRE GSEs is beyond taxpayer revenues and the $10 T Treasury market to rescue?
How many CDOs and other falling assets can the private Federal Reserve put on its balance sheet before insolvency or hyperinflation?
FDIC went from $50 B available for $6 T deposits to $42 B after the IndyMac closing. FSLIC and RTC cost taxpayers $150 B, with the choicest properties going to cronies.
And what about all the other unfunded liabilities with social security, the Iraq War and other GSEs? Can we paper them over too, or will we raise taxes to 89% and default on government IOUs?
Interesting times indeed.
Maybe it's time we return to the Constitutional definition of money or write in Ron Paul for President.
Reply
The Pelosi Factor - Cramer's Mad Money (8/25/08) [view article]
It looks to me like Cramer can no longer be trusted as he is in tank for for the Democrats... Everytime Jim goes political, it's so shallow and superficial, I doubt that he fools anyone?Jim apparently sees no conflict of interest with speaker Pelosi holding up all voting on drilling projects while at the same time investing her money in competing products.
Pelosi should be impeached! Reply
The Pelosi Factor - Cramer's Mad Money (8/25/08) [view article]
Pelosi recently stated on national television that we needed to move away from fossil fuels and move toward alternative energy like natural gas. I am not sure that I would want to follow the lead on energy of anyone who is so ignorant about energythat theydo not know that natural gas is a fossil fuel. It certinaly make clear why we do not have an intelligent enrgy policy if the leader of the majority party is that ignorant about energy. ReplyThe Pelosi Factor - Cramer's Mad Money (8/25/08) [view article]
Hmmmm.I thought Jim's bottom call on July 15th had "no reservations". Now, it seems that only the Fed and Treasury can save the market. Let me see--- Fan and Fred have somewhere in the range of 5 trillion on their balance sheets. The Fed/Treasury step in. Now that 5 trillion is onthe taxpayers' balance sheet. How did all that action help the homeowner pay his mortgage, insurance and property taxes.
Also, please explain how the Fan-Fred problem weighs on the "4 horsemen". Or is it now the "2 housemen"?
Jim, we don't need lower interest rates. We need higher incomes and/or lower house prices. Which do you think we'll see first? Reply