<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Seeking Alpha Internet Infrastructure stocks</title>
    <description>'Internet Infrastructure' Tag RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <author>
      <name>SeekingAlpha.com</name>
    </author>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/tag/internet-infrastructure</link>
    <item>
      <title>Akamai Launches iPhone Video Streaming and Showcase Portal</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/146856-akamai-launches-iphone-video-streaming-and-showcase-portal?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">146856</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, Akamai (AKAM) &quot;officially&quot; announced support for variable bit rate streaming of live and on-demand video content for the iPhone and iPod touch and has launched a new showcase site at <a href="http://iphone.akamai.com/">iphone.akamai.com</a>. The site which has been live for about a month, showcases content from about a dozen content providers including FOX News, MTV and USA Today amongst others.</p><p>Akamai's new iPhone streaming service is based on the standard HTTP delivery protocol which for Akamai, means they can utilize more of their HTTP network infrastructure as opposed to proprietary based streaming protocols. Earlier in the week I came across the showcase site and tested the quality and while it looks pretty good, there were times when the video appeared choppy. Hard to know what exactly caused that as the videos as they play now, don't give you any performance or quality indicators in the player to know if your connection is having problems. That's one feature I'd like to see in the player and one that most PC based video players already have built in.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 07:00:47 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Dan Rayburn</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.BusinessOfVideo.com">Dan Rayburn</a> submits:</strong> <p>Yesterday, Akamai (AKAM) &quot;officially&quot; announced support for variable bit rate streaming of live and on-demand video content for the iPhone and iPod touch and has launched a new showcase site at <a href="http://iphone.akamai.com/">iphone.akamai.com</a>. The site which has been live for about a month, showcases content from about a dozen content providers including FOX News, MTV and USA Today amongst others.</p><p>Akamai's new iPhone streaming service is based on the standard HTTP delivery protocol which for Akamai, means they can utilize more of their HTTP network infrastructure as opposed to proprietary based streaming protocols. Earlier in the week I came across the showcase site and tested the quality and while it looks pretty good, there were times when the video appeared choppy. Hard to know what exactly caused that as the videos as they play now, don't give you any performance or quality indicators in the player to know if your connection is having problems. That's one feature I'd like to see in the player and one that most PC based video players already have built in.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/146856-akamai-launches-iphone-video-streaming-and-showcase-portal?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/akam">AKAM</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/dan-rayburn">Dan Rayburn</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Akamai Technologies: Traders Snap Up Calls</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/146708-akamai-technologies-traders-snap-up-calls?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">146708</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>By Jon &quot;DRJ&quot; Najarian</em></p><p>Akamai Technologies (AKAM) has fallen sharply in recent weeks but popped more than 5.5 percent yesterday as options traders rushed into upside calls.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 11:19:50 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>optionMONSTER</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.optionmonster.com'>optionMONSTER</a> submits: </strong><p><em>By Jon &quot;DRJ&quot; Najarian</em></p><p>Akamai Technologies (AKAM) has fallen sharply in recent weeks but popped more than 5.5 percent yesterday as options traders rushed into upside calls.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/146708-akamai-technologies-traders-snap-up-calls?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/akam">AKAM</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/optionmonster">optionMONSTER</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Level 3 Is a Must Own</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/146615-why-level-3-is-a-must-own?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">146615</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><b>Level 3 (LVLT) poised for major broadband demand.</b> A bullish analyst view from Mike Sapien, a principal analyst for Ovum, a telecommunications, software and IT analysis company with offices worldwide.</p><p>As a result of LVLT's nine acquisitions in the last five years, the company not only supplies fiber optics network infrastructure to companies like Comcast Corp. (CMCSA), AT&amp;T Inc. (T), Sprint Nextel Corp. (S) and EarthLink Inc. (ELNK), but it is moving into the &quot;enterprise&quot; sector, which LVLT calls its Business Markets Group.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 07:29:17 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Jeremy Richards</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Jeremy Richards submits:</strong><p><b>Level 3 (LVLT) poised for major broadband demand.</b> A bullish analyst view from Mike Sapien, a principal analyst for Ovum, a telecommunications, software and IT analysis company with offices worldwide.</p><p>As a result of LVLT's nine acquisitions in the last five years, the company not only supplies fiber optics network infrastructure to companies like Comcast Corp. (CMCSA), AT&amp;T Inc. (T), Sprint Nextel Corp. (S) and EarthLink Inc. (ELNK), but it is moving into the &quot;enterprise&quot; sector, which LVLT calls its Business Markets Group.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/146615-why-level-3-is-a-must-own?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/lvlt">LVLT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/s">S</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/t">T</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vz">VZ</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/jeremy-richards">Jeremy Richards</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Akamai, Limelight to Deploy P2P for Higher Quality, Not Cost Savings</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/146550-akamai-limelight-to-deploy-p2p-for-higher-quality-not-cost-savings?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">146550</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><p>While there's been a lot of hype about peer-assisted technology [P2P] over the past few years, in reality, the technology has gotten very little adoption when it comes to being used to distribute video, let alone streaming. Today, most of the content being delivered via P2P is for software and gaming downloads and so far we haven't seen any of the major CDNs offer a real peer-assisted solution on their network. Later this year, that is going to change.</p><p>Within the next two quarters, both Akamai (AKAM) and Limelight (LLNW) are going to bring to the market peer-assisted delivery services on their network. And unlike previous deals where some of the CDNs were simply reselling a third party P2P platform, these solutions are going to be their own, deeply deployed and integrated directly into their networks.</p></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 01:55:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Dan Rayburn</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.BusinessOfVideo.com">Dan Rayburn</a> submits:</strong> <div><p>While there's been a lot of hype about peer-assisted technology [P2P] over the past few years, in reality, the technology has gotten very little adoption when it comes to being used to distribute video, let alone streaming. Today, most of the content being delivered via P2P is for software and gaming downloads and so far we haven't seen any of the major CDNs offer a real peer-assisted solution on their network. Later this year, that is going to change.</p><p>Within the next two quarters, both Akamai (AKAM) and Limelight (LLNW) are going to bring to the market peer-assisted delivery services on their network. And unlike previous deals where some of the CDNs were simply reselling a third party P2P platform, these solutions are going to be their own, deeply deployed and integrated directly into their networks.</p></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/146550-akamai-limelight-to-deploy-p2p-for-higher-quality-not-cost-savings?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/akam">AKAM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/llnw">LLNW</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/dan-rayburn">Dan Rayburn</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is Cisco Spreading Itself Too Thin?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/145941-is-cisco-spreading-itself-too-thin?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">145941</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Through the '90s, <strong>Cisco Systems (CSCO) </strong>was known as one of the &ldquo;4 Horsemen of IT&rdquo; and was even the largest company by market cap ($500 B) at the peak of the tech bubble in early 2000.   The web is the driver of all information worldwide over the past two decades, thus all recent tech trends revolve around the internet: <img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/6/29/saupload_csco.png" align="right" hspace="6" vspace="6" />mobilization, cloud computing, virtualization, social networking and much more.  Consequently, Cisco is the dominant provider of the networking gear that runs the internet.  More specifically, Cisco&rsquo;s bread and butter has been the ethernet switches and overall router markets with approximately 70% and 50% of the market share, respectively.  To sustain revenue growth, companies like CSCO must adapt to tech trends and enter new markets outside of its core business.</p> <p><span><strong>Breaking Ties</strong></span></p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 08:13:42 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Bullish Bankers</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
<strong><a href='http://www.bullishbankers.com/'>Bullish Bankers</a> submits: </strong><p>Through the '90s, <strong>Cisco Systems (CSCO) </strong>was known as one of the &ldquo;4 Horsemen of IT&rdquo; and was even the largest company by market cap ($500 B) at the peak of the tech bubble in early 2000.   The web is the driver of all information worldwide over the past two decades, thus all recent tech trends revolve around the internet: <img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/6/29/saupload_csco.png" align="right" hspace="6" vspace="6" />mobilization, cloud computing, virtualization, social networking and much more.  Consequently, Cisco is the dominant provider of the networking gear that runs the internet.  More specifically, Cisco&rsquo;s bread and butter has been the ethernet switches and overall router markets with approximately 70% and 50% of the market share, respectively.  To sustain revenue growth, companies like CSCO must adapt to tech trends and enter new markets outside of its core business.</p> <p><span><strong>Breaking Ties</strong></span></p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/145941-is-cisco-spreading-itself-too-thin?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/csco">CSCO</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/bullish-bankers">Bullish Bankers</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Rapid Decline in Bandwidth Costs Since 2005</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/145871-the-rapid-decline-in-bandwidth-costs-since-2005?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">145871</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>While going through some of my old files, I came across a bunch of my pricing data from 2005. This was around the time I started collecting CDN pricing a couple of times a year and the charts below show pricing from the market in 2005 based on per MB sustained, per GB delivered and includes pricing on storage as well.</p><p>While no one who follows the space will be shocked to see just how far pricing has dropped over the past five years, it's also funny to look at the buckets of volume that were being priced back then and what was considered to be a large volume customer, <a href="http://www.cdnpricing.com/">compared to today.</a></p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 01:40:04 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Dan Rayburn</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.BusinessOfVideo.com">Dan Rayburn</a> submits:</strong> <p>While going through some of my old files, I came across a bunch of my pricing data from 2005. This was around the time I started collecting CDN pricing a couple of times a year and the charts below show pricing from the market in 2005 based on per MB sustained, per GB delivered and includes pricing on storage as well.</p><p>While no one who follows the space will be shocked to see just how far pricing has dropped over the past five years, it's also funny to look at the buckets of volume that were being priced back then and what was considered to be a large volume customer, <a href="http://www.cdnpricing.com/">compared to today.</a></p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/145871-the-rapid-decline-in-bandwidth-costs-since-2005?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/akam">AKAM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/llnw">LLNW</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/lvlt">LVLT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/dan-rayburn">Dan Rayburn</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Akamai Selected to Broadcast 2010 Winter Olympics for NBC</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/145220-akamai-selected-to-broadcast-2010-winter-olympics-for-nbc?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">145220</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><div><p><a href="http://www.nbcolympics.com/"><img src="http://blog.streamingmedia.com/.a/6a00d834518e1c69e20115705cdff8970c-800wi" class="at-xid-6a00d834518e1c69e20115705cdff8970c" style="margin: 0px 5px 1px 0px; width: 98px; height: 107px;" alt="Nbc" /></a> Based on numerous sources I have spoken to, I can now confirm that Akamai (AKAM) has been selected to stream the <a href="http://www.nbcolympics.com/">2010 Winter Olympics</a> for the NBC Olympics website. While Akamai and Microsoft (MSFT) did not provide any comments for this story, Akamai is already in the planning stages to handle the broadcast. <strong>(Updated:</strong> Akamai says it can now confirm that &quot;<em>they are involved in streaming the event next year</em>.&quot;)</p><p>While it may seem surprising to some that Akamai was selected considering Limelight Networks (LLNW) successfully streamed the Olympics last year, there are some key factors that helped Akamai get this business. The Olympics will be using Silverlight and Microsoft's new Smooth Streaming technology, <a href="http://blog.streamingmedia.com/the_business_of_online_vi/2008/10/microsoftakami.html">a technology that Microsoft worked with Akamai on</a> and that Akamai paid to have the exclusive license to for a couple of months, before other CDNs were given access to it. Smooth Streaming is going to play such a big role in the Olympics and will dictate the quality that the user will get that it's really no surprise that Akamai would be selected, since the company has the most experience working with the technology.</p></div></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 03:19:55 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Dan Rayburn</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.BusinessOfVideo.com">Dan Rayburn</a> submits:</strong> <div><div><p><a href="http://www.nbcolympics.com/"><img src="http://blog.streamingmedia.com/.a/6a00d834518e1c69e20115705cdff8970c-800wi" class="at-xid-6a00d834518e1c69e20115705cdff8970c" style="margin: 0px 5px 1px 0px; width: 98px; height: 107px;" alt="Nbc" /></a> Based on numerous sources I have spoken to, I can now confirm that Akamai (AKAM) has been selected to stream the <a href="http://www.nbcolympics.com/">2010 Winter Olympics</a> for the NBC Olympics website. While Akamai and Microsoft (MSFT) did not provide any comments for this story, Akamai is already in the planning stages to handle the broadcast. <strong>(Updated:</strong> Akamai says it can now confirm that &quot;<em>they are involved in streaming the event next year</em>.&quot;)</p><p>While it may seem surprising to some that Akamai was selected considering Limelight Networks (LLNW) successfully streamed the Olympics last year, there are some key factors that helped Akamai get this business. The Olympics will be using Silverlight and Microsoft's new Smooth Streaming technology, <a href="http://blog.streamingmedia.com/the_business_of_online_vi/2008/10/microsoftakami.html">a technology that Microsoft worked with Akamai on</a> and that Akamai paid to have the exclusive license to for a couple of months, before other CDNs were given access to it. Smooth Streaming is going to play such a big role in the Olympics and will dictate the quality that the user will get that it's really no surprise that Akamai would be selected, since the company has the most experience working with the technology.</p></div></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/145220-akamai-selected-to-broadcast-2010-winter-olympics-for-nbc?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/akam">AKAM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/dan-rayburn">Dan Rayburn</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What Is the Barrier to Entry in the CDN Business? A Few Hundred Million</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/144951-what-is-the-barrier-to-entry-in-the-cdn-business-a-few-hundred-million?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">144951</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><div><p>One of the most common questions I get asked from those who track public CDNs in the industry is what the barriers to entry are for new CDNs who enter the space. With so many <a href="http://www.cdnlist.com/">new content delivery networks popping up in the last 24 months</a> and the technology having evolved quite a bit over the past ten years, it's a fair question.</p><p>Today, the online video platforms and the necessary hardware that is required to run a CDN are completely commoditized and delivering video on the web is not as hard as many CDNs make it out to be. That said, it's pretty easy to enter the CDN market with an investment of tens of millions of dollars and offer a solution in the market that gets some decent customers. But that alone is not enough to seriously compete with any of the major CDNs in terms of scale or revenue.</p></div></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 02:15:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Dan Rayburn</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.BusinessOfVideo.com">Dan Rayburn</a> submits:</strong> <div><div><p>One of the most common questions I get asked from those who track public CDNs in the industry is what the barriers to entry are for new CDNs who enter the space. With so many <a href="http://www.cdnlist.com/">new content delivery networks popping up in the last 24 months</a> and the technology having evolved quite a bit over the past ten years, it's a fair question.</p><p>Today, the online video platforms and the necessary hardware that is required to run a CDN are completely commoditized and delivering video on the web is not as hard as many CDNs make it out to be. That said, it's pretty easy to enter the CDN market with an investment of tens of millions of dollars and offer a solution in the market that gets some decent customers. But that alone is not enough to seriously compete with any of the major CDNs in terms of scale or revenue.</p></div></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/144951-what-is-the-barrier-to-entry-in-the-cdn-business-a-few-hundred-million?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/akam">AKAM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/llnw">LLNW</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/lvlt">LVLT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/dan-rayburn">Dan Rayburn</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Level 3: Shares Rally on Debt Exchange Deal</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/144637-level-3-shares-rally-on-debt-exchange-deal?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">144637</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><p><strong><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/6/22/saupload_lvlt.png" align="right" hspace="6" vspace="6" />Level 3</strong> (LVLT) shares are trading sharply higher after <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Level-3-Signs-Debt-Exchange-prnews-1787870206.html?x=0&amp;.v=1">the company announced</a> a deal to exchange a combination of cash an a new issue of 7% convertible senior notes due March 15, 2015 for a portion of its 6% convertible subordinated notes due 2010 and its 2.875% convertible senior notes due 2010. The deals clearly give the debt-heavy company some badly needed breathing room.</p> <p>The company will issue $200 million in new notes and pay out $78,208,900 in cash for the $142,079,000 of 6% notes and $139,820,000 of 2.875% notes.</p></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:59:02 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Eric Savitz</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/esavitz70px.jpg' align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" width="70" height="95" border='1' /><strong><a href="http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/">Eric Savitz</a> (Barron's) submits: </strong><div><p><strong><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/6/22/saupload_lvlt.png" align="right" hspace="6" vspace="6" />Level 3</strong> (LVLT) shares are trading sharply higher after <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Level-3-Signs-Debt-Exchange-prnews-1787870206.html?x=0&amp;.v=1">the company announced</a> a deal to exchange a combination of cash an a new issue of 7% convertible senior notes due March 15, 2015 for a portion of its 6% convertible subordinated notes due 2010 and its 2.875% convertible senior notes due 2010. The deals clearly give the debt-heavy company some badly needed breathing room.</p> <p>The company will issue $200 million in new notes and pay out $78,208,900 in cash for the $142,079,000 of 6% notes and $139,820,000 of 2.875% notes.</p></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/144637-level-3-shares-rally-on-debt-exchange-deal?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/lvlt">LVLT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/eric-savitz">Eric Savitz</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Intercloud: Where Computing Needs to Go</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/144626-the-intercloud-where-computing-needs-to-go?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">144626</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>There has been plenty of confusion about what cloud computing is thanks to a multitude of ways in which virtualization and IT services can be deployed and marketed. This has contributed to a vast array of papers and articles and blogs defining cloud computing.</p> <p>Underneath the haze of &ldquo;everything becomes cloud because cloud is a hot topic&rdquo; confusion, a new term is rising on the horizon; and its pretty interesting. There are no doubt others using the term &ldquo;intercloud&rdquo;, but I think Cisco (CSCO) has really stepped up the discussion.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:09:30 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Gregory Ness</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.bluelane.com/'>Gregory Ness</a> submits:</strong><p>There has been plenty of confusion about what cloud computing is thanks to a multitude of ways in which virtualization and IT services can be deployed and marketed. This has contributed to a vast array of papers and articles and blogs defining cloud computing.</p> <p>Underneath the haze of &ldquo;everything becomes cloud because cloud is a hot topic&rdquo; confusion, a new term is rising on the horizon; and its pretty interesting. There are no doubt others using the term &ldquo;intercloud&rdquo;, but I think Cisco (CSCO) has really stepped up the discussion.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/144626-the-intercloud-where-computing-needs-to-go?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/amzn">AMZN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/csco">CSCO</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog">GOOG</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/gregory-ness">Gregory Ness</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Limelight and Brightcove Expected to Announce Deal Shortly</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/143597-limelight-and-brightcove-expected-to-announce-deal-shortly?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">143597</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><div><p>Over the past few months, I've been hearing more talk about Brightcove teaming up with Limelight (LLNW) to enable Limelight to move up the stack and offer more solutions in the video ecosystem. While neither company <span>would comment on the rumor</span>, (<em>Updated: Brightcove says the agreement as I have described it does not exist</em>) I've since learned that this deal is in fact taking place and that for the past few months, the companies have been working together to put it in place. While details of what the offering will look like are not being discussed, it would make most sense for Brightcove to license a customized white label version of their platform to Limelight, thereby enabling Limelight's customers to have direct access to the functionality that Brightcove provides.</p><p>While some might suggest this does not provide a lot of value as anyone can just go directly to Brigthcove if they need this type of solution, a customized version of the Brightcove system running on Limelight's network would be beneficial to many customers. It would also give Limelight immediate new offerings at scale like transcoding, professional services support for things like custom player builds and I'd like to think that working together, the data that Brightcove and Limelight already collect could be used to provide customers with a very robust reporting and analytics package. We'll have to wait to see exactly what the deal looks like when it is announced, but there is a lot of synergy between the two companies and this is a natural progression of where CDNs are headed.</p></div></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 01:55:04 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Dan Rayburn</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.BusinessOfVideo.com">Dan Rayburn</a> submits:</strong> <div><div><p>Over the past few months, I've been hearing more talk about Brightcove teaming up with Limelight (LLNW) to enable Limelight to move up the stack and offer more solutions in the video ecosystem. While neither company <span>would comment on the rumor</span>, (<em>Updated: Brightcove says the agreement as I have described it does not exist</em>) I've since learned that this deal is in fact taking place and that for the past few months, the companies have been working together to put it in place. While details of what the offering will look like are not being discussed, it would make most sense for Brightcove to license a customized white label version of their platform to Limelight, thereby enabling Limelight's customers to have direct access to the functionality that Brightcove provides.</p><p>While some might suggest this does not provide a lot of value as anyone can just go directly to Brigthcove if they need this type of solution, a customized version of the Brightcove system running on Limelight's network would be beneficial to many customers. It would also give Limelight immediate new offerings at scale like transcoding, professional services support for things like custom player builds and I'd like to think that working together, the data that Brightcove and Limelight already collect could be used to provide customers with a very robust reporting and analytics package. We'll have to wait to see exactly what the deal looks like when it is announced, but there is a lot of synergy between the two companies and this is a natural progression of where CDNs are headed.</p></div></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/143597-limelight-and-brightcove-expected-to-announce-deal-shortly?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/akam">AKAM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/llnw">LLNW</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/dan-rayburn">Dan Rayburn</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cisco Says Video Traffic Is Growing, But Where's the Business Going to Come From?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/142796-cisco-says-video-traffic-is-growing-but-where-s-the-business-going-to-come-from?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">142796</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><div><p>This week, Cisco (CSCO) released its  <a href="http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/2009/prod_060909.html" target="_blank">second annual visual networking index</a> which predicts that by 2013, all forms of video will account for almost 90% of the total consumer traffic on the Internet. While that sounds like a big percentage, I'd like to know how Cisco came up with these numbers. Cisco's website shows a lot of charts and numbers, but then says the source for the data is themselves.</p> <p>Where is Cisco getting these numbers? How did they come up with them? What are they based off of? What is their methodology? Come on Cisco, show us the data behind this. More importantly, if Cisco's predictions are right, that's not necessarily a good thing for the industry.</p></div></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 01:41:07 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Dan Rayburn</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.BusinessOfVideo.com">Dan Rayburn</a> submits:</strong> <div><div><p>This week, Cisco (CSCO) released its  <a href="http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/2009/prod_060909.html" target="_blank">second annual visual networking index</a> which predicts that by 2013, all forms of video will account for almost 90% of the total consumer traffic on the Internet. While that sounds like a big percentage, I'd like to know how Cisco came up with these numbers. Cisco's website shows a lot of charts and numbers, but then says the source for the data is themselves.</p> <p>Where is Cisco getting these numbers? How did they come up with them? What are they based off of? What is their methodology? Come on Cisco, show us the data behind this. More importantly, if Cisco's predictions are right, that's not necessarily a good thing for the industry.</p></div></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/142796-cisco-says-video-traffic-is-growing-but-where-s-the-business-going-to-come-from?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/csco">CSCO</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/dan-rayburn">Dan Rayburn</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Five Stocks to Watch</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/142765-five-stocks-to-watch?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">142765</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>By Dr. Declan Fallon</em></p><p>These picks are from a scan looking for stocks making new highs on heavier volume:</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:01:54 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Zignals</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
<strong><a href='http://www.zignals.com/'>Zignals</a> submits: </strong><p><em>By Dr. Declan Fallon</em></p><p>These picks are from a scan looking for stocks making new highs on heavier volume:</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/142765-five-stocks-to-watch?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cbak">CBAK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/csun">CSUN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ctdc">CTDC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/lvlt">LVLT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/zeus">ZEUS</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/zignals">Zignals</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Level 3 Launches New CDN Focused Website </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/142269-level-3-launches-new-cdn-focused-website?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">142269</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>For the past few months, Level 3 (LVLT) has been working on building a brand new video based website dedicated to showcasing its content delivery offering in the market. Yesterday, the site <a href="http://www.level3delivers.com/" target="_blank">Level3Delivers.com</a> went live with nearly 75 video clips that do a really great job of telling the Level 3 CDN story.</p><p>The mini video portal has interviews with Level 3 executives, customers and features a whole bunch of case studies and shows logos from such customers as Netflix (NFLX), Microsoft (MSFT), Comcast (CMCSA) and Yahoo! (YHOO) amongst others. The videos provide a great insight into Level 3's entire CDN ecosystem including Vyvx and <span>its </span><a href="http://blog.streamingmedia.com/the_business_of_online_vi/2008/11/level-3-opens-broadcast-encoding-centers-ecosystem-offering-now-in-play.html" target="_blank">broadcast operations services</a> and it's great to see Level 3 really focus an entire website to its CDN offering. The new site is well thought out, provides answers to a lot of technical questions about their ecosystem and will be a valuable sales tool for Level 3 when pitching content owners.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 01:48:12 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Dan Rayburn</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.BusinessOfVideo.com">Dan Rayburn</a> submits:</strong> <p>For the past few months, Level 3 (LVLT) has been working on building a brand new video based website dedicated to showcasing its content delivery offering in the market. Yesterday, the site <a href="http://www.level3delivers.com/" target="_blank">Level3Delivers.com</a> went live with nearly 75 video clips that do a really great job of telling the Level 3 CDN story.</p><p>The mini video portal has interviews with Level 3 executives, customers and features a whole bunch of case studies and shows logos from such customers as Netflix (NFLX), Microsoft (MSFT), Comcast (CMCSA) and Yahoo! (YHOO) amongst others. The videos provide a great insight into Level 3's entire CDN ecosystem including Vyvx and <span>its </span><a href="http://blog.streamingmedia.com/the_business_of_online_vi/2008/11/level-3-opens-broadcast-encoding-centers-ecosystem-offering-now-in-play.html" target="_blank">broadcast operations services</a> and it's great to see Level 3 really focus an entire website to its CDN offering. The new site is well thought out, provides answers to a lot of technical questions about their ecosystem and will be a valuable sales tool for Level 3 when pitching content owners.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/142269-level-3-launches-new-cdn-focused-website?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/lvlt">LVLT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/dan-rayburn">Dan Rayburn</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cisco: By 2013 Annual IP Traffic Will Be 2/3 of a Zettabyte </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/142215-cisco-by-2013-annual-ip-traffic-will-be-2-3-of-a-zettabyte?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">142215</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>By 2013, annual global IP traffic will reach two-thirds of a <em>zettabyte</em>, according to a new <a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/collateral/ns341/ns525/ns537/ns705/ns827/white_paper_c11-481360_ns827_Networking_Solutions_White_Paper.html">forecast of IP traffic</a> issued by Cisco Tuesday. What is a zettabyte? It is a trillion gigabytes, dummy. (I had to look that up too). And that number represents more than a fivefold increase in IP traffic from today.</p>  <p>What is driving this growth is video. Cisco forecasts that 90 percent of consumer IP traffic (which makes up the majority of total IP traffic) will be video in 2013. Cisco also predicts that mobile data traffic will also be overtaken by video, reaching 64 percent of total <a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/collateral/ns341/ns525/ns537/ns705/ns827/white_paper_c11-520862.html">mobile IP traffic</a> by 2013. Part of this might be wishful thinking on Cisco&rsquo;s part, which needs broadband usage growth to continue apace in order to sell its networking gear. But part of it is also the fact that these numbers are based on the percentage of bits traveling over those broadband pipes, and it doesn&rsquo;t take a lot of fat video files to fill those up.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 12:13:06 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Erick Schonfeld</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/">Erick Schonfeld</a> submits: </strong><p>By 2013, annual global IP traffic will reach two-thirds of a <em>zettabyte</em>, according to a new <a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/collateral/ns341/ns525/ns537/ns705/ns827/white_paper_c11-481360_ns827_Networking_Solutions_White_Paper.html">forecast of IP traffic</a> issued by Cisco Tuesday. What is a zettabyte? It is a trillion gigabytes, dummy. (I had to look that up too). And that number represents more than a fivefold increase in IP traffic from today.</p>  <p>What is driving this growth is video. Cisco forecasts that 90 percent of consumer IP traffic (which makes up the majority of total IP traffic) will be video in 2013. Cisco also predicts that mobile data traffic will also be overtaken by video, reaching 64 percent of total <a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/collateral/ns341/ns525/ns537/ns705/ns827/white_paper_c11-520862.html">mobile IP traffic</a> by 2013. Part of this might be wishful thinking on Cisco&rsquo;s part, which needs broadband usage growth to continue apace in order to sell its networking gear. But part of it is also the fact that these numbers are based on the percentage of bits traveling over those broadband pipes, and it doesn&rsquo;t take a lot of fat video files to fill those up.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/142215-cisco-by-2013-annual-ip-traffic-will-be-2-3-of-a-zettabyte?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/csco">CSCO</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/erick-schonfeld">Erick Schonfeld</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Microsoft XBox 360: 1080p Streaming Will Require 8-10 Mbps Connection for Full Quality</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/142041-microsoft-xbox-360-1080p-streaming-will-require-8-10-mbps-connection-for-full-quality?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">142041</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><div><p><a href="http://blog.streamingmedia.com/.a/6a00d834518e1c69e2011570d983bc970b-pi"><img src="http://blog.streamingmedia.com/.a/6a00d834518e1c69e2011570d983bc970b-800wi" class="at-xid-6a00d834518e1c69e2011570d983bc970b" style="margin: 0px 5px 1px 0px; width: 138px; height: 83px;" alt="Images" /></a> Last week at E3, Microsoft (MSFT) <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/01/xbox-live-gets-live-tv-streaming-netflix-browsing/" target="_blank">announced</a> that later in the fall, 1080p streaming will come to the Xbox 360 using Zune video technology. While full details of the technology and how it works are not ready to be released by Microsoft, the company did share some additional details on the service which I can make public.</p><p>Zune video on Xbox LIVE was built from the ground-up for Xbox 360 to take full advantage of the Xbox platform and is built on top of Smooth Streaming. It features what Microsoft is calling a &quot;state-of-the-art encoder&quot; for the highest level of fidelity and a high performance decoder capable of full-framerate 1080p playback, which enables Smooth Streaming playback, smooth fast-forward and smooth rewind functionality. Microsoft says its 1080p instant on technology will offer a level of quality and performance only previously seen with downloadable or physical media.</p></div></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 02:50:26 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Dan Rayburn</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.BusinessOfVideo.com">Dan Rayburn</a> submits:</strong> <div><div><p><a href="http://blog.streamingmedia.com/.a/6a00d834518e1c69e2011570d983bc970b-pi"><img src="http://blog.streamingmedia.com/.a/6a00d834518e1c69e2011570d983bc970b-800wi" class="at-xid-6a00d834518e1c69e2011570d983bc970b" style="margin: 0px 5px 1px 0px; width: 138px; height: 83px;" alt="Images" /></a> Last week at E3, Microsoft (MSFT) <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/01/xbox-live-gets-live-tv-streaming-netflix-browsing/" target="_blank">announced</a> that later in the fall, 1080p streaming will come to the Xbox 360 using Zune video technology. While full details of the technology and how it works are not ready to be released by Microsoft, the company did share some additional details on the service which I can make public.</p><p>Zune video on Xbox LIVE was built from the ground-up for Xbox 360 to take full advantage of the Xbox platform and is built on top of Smooth Streaming. It features what Microsoft is calling a &quot;state-of-the-art encoder&quot; for the highest level of fidelity and a high performance decoder capable of full-framerate 1080p playback, which enables Smooth Streaming playback, smooth fast-forward and smooth rewind functionality. Microsoft says its 1080p instant on technology will offer a level of quality and performance only previously seen with downloadable or physical media.</p></div></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/142041-microsoft-xbox-360-1080p-streaming-will-require-8-10-mbps-connection-for-full-quality?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/dan-rayburn">Dan Rayburn</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CDNs Delivered 95% of Microsoft's Traffic in '07, But Only 40% by Next Year</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/141453-cdns-delivered-95-of-microsoft-s-traffic-in-07-but-only-40-by-next-year?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">141453</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>During his keynote at the <a href="http://www.cdnsummit.com/" target="_blank">Content Delivery Summit</a> last month, Jeff Cohen, GM of Microsoft's (MSFT) Edge Computing Network gave out a lot of interesting data as it pertains to Microsoft's CDN business. While the theme of his presentation covered a lot of great topics, one of the points that really stood out was how quickly Microsoft is moving away from relying on third party CDNs for delivery and instead, using their own internal CDN. While this trend by Microsoft is something that has been widely known about to anyone who closely follows the CDN space, this is the first time I have seen Microsoft break out numbers that shows the split in traffic. (<em>Note: Jeff's slides can be <a href="http://www.streamingmedia.com/east/presentations/CDNSummit09-Keynote-Microsoft.pdf" target="_blank">downloaded here</a>, video of his presentation <a href="http://link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpid24348653001?bclid=24491648001&amp;bctid=24522337001" target="_blank">can be seen here</a></em>)</p><p>Over the past two years, Microsoft has quickly started bringing a lot of its traffic for video, software downloads and small object delivery in-house. In 2007, third party CDNs delivered 95% of Microsoft's traffic. Based on Jeff's estimate, third party CDNs will only account for 40% of Microsoft's delivery business by next year.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 01:39:23 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Dan Rayburn</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.BusinessOfVideo.com">Dan Rayburn</a> submits:</strong> <p>During his keynote at the <a href="http://www.cdnsummit.com/" target="_blank">Content Delivery Summit</a> last month, Jeff Cohen, GM of Microsoft's (MSFT) Edge Computing Network gave out a lot of interesting data as it pertains to Microsoft's CDN business. While the theme of his presentation covered a lot of great topics, one of the points that really stood out was how quickly Microsoft is moving away from relying on third party CDNs for delivery and instead, using their own internal CDN. While this trend by Microsoft is something that has been widely known about to anyone who closely follows the CDN space, this is the first time I have seen Microsoft break out numbers that shows the split in traffic. (<em>Note: Jeff's slides can be <a href="http://www.streamingmedia.com/east/presentations/CDNSummit09-Keynote-Microsoft.pdf" target="_blank">downloaded here</a>, video of his presentation <a href="http://link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpid24348653001?bclid=24491648001&amp;bctid=24522337001" target="_blank">can be seen here</a></em>)</p><p>Over the past two years, Microsoft has quickly started bringing a lot of its traffic for video, software downloads and small object delivery in-house. In 2007, third party CDNs delivered 95% of Microsoft's traffic. Based on Jeff's estimate, third party CDNs will only account for 40% of Microsoft's delivery business by next year.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/141453-cdns-delivered-95-of-microsoft-s-traffic-in-07-but-only-40-by-next-year?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/akam">AKAM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/llnw">LLNW</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/lvlt">LVLT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/dan-rayburn">Dan Rayburn</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Video CDN Pricing Drops Slightly in Q1, Other Contract Trends Noticed</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/141185-video-cdn-pricing-drops-slightly-in-q1-other-contract-trends-noticed?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">141185</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpid24348653001?bclid=24491648001&amp;bctid=24641584001"><img src="http://blog.streamingmedia.com/.a/6a00d834518e1c69e201156fc41f23970c-320wi" align="left" class="at-xid-6a00d834518e1c69e201156fc41f23970c" style="margin: 0px 5px 1px 0px;" alt="Dan-photo" hspace="6" vspace="6" width="157" height="132" /></a> Last month I completed my review of all the contracts and RFPs I saw in the market for the first quarter of 2009 and presented these findings at the <a href="http://www.contentdeliverysummit.com/" target="_blank">Content Delivery Summit</a> in NYC two weeks ago. (click on the video window for the presentation or go here <a href="http://www.streamingmedia.com/videos" target="_blank">here</a>. you can download my slides <a href="http://www.streamingmedia.com/east/presentations/CDNSummit09-CDNPricing.pdf" target="_blank">here</a>) Overall, pricing for delivery services from the major CDNs changed very little from Q4 2008 to Q1 2009, although some price erosion was seen at some of the mid-tier and higher level customers pushing a lot of traffic. (<strong><em>note: you can always find my latest pricing post at <a href="http://www.cdnpricing.com/">www.cdnpricing.com</a></em></strong> - Previous Quarters: <a href="http://blog.streamingmedia.com/the_business_of_online_vi/2009/01/video-cdn-pricing-stable-in-q4-with-discounts-being-given-at-lower-volume-levels.html" target="_blank">Q4 08</a>, <a href="http://blog.streamingmedia.com/the_business_of_online_vi/2008/10/cdn-pricing-in.html" target="_blank">Q3 08</a>, <a href="http://blog.streamingmedia.com/the_business_of_online_vi/2008/07/cdn-pricing-rem.html" target="_blank">Q2 08</a>, <a href="http://blog.streamingmedia.com/the_business_of_online_vi/2008/05/cdn-pricing-sta.html" target="_blank">Q1 08</a>.)</p><p>While I continue to see a lot of analysts reports still talking about the &quot;pricing pressure&quot; in the CDN market, I still don't see anyone giving examples of what the &quot;pressure&quot; is. I think it is important to keep that in perspective as many in the market make the pricing declines sound bigger than they actually are. While Limelight did mention some pricing pressure with some of their largest customers on their Q1 earnings call, after the call they told me the pricing reduction for these customers was typically fractions of a penny, on per GB delivered contracts. While a company like Limelight has more exposure to pricing reductions since roughly 20 of their customers make up 50% of their revenue, fractions of a penny is not a huge drop in the market. And for customers who are already pushing a ton of volume and continue to grow their traffic, they expect to get some discount based on growth.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 17:09:43 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Dan Rayburn</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.BusinessOfVideo.com">Dan Rayburn</a> submits:</strong> <p><a href="http://link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpid24348653001?bclid=24491648001&amp;bctid=24641584001"><img src="http://blog.streamingmedia.com/.a/6a00d834518e1c69e201156fc41f23970c-320wi" align="left" class="at-xid-6a00d834518e1c69e201156fc41f23970c" style="margin: 0px 5px 1px 0px;" alt="Dan-photo" hspace="6" vspace="6" width="157" height="132" /></a> Last month I completed my review of all the contracts and RFPs I saw in the market for the first quarter of 2009 and presented these findings at the <a href="http://www.contentdeliverysummit.com/" target="_blank">Content Delivery Summit</a> in NYC two weeks ago. (click on the video window for the presentation or go here <a href="http://www.streamingmedia.com/videos" target="_blank">here</a>. you can download my slides <a href="http://www.streamingmedia.com/east/presentations/CDNSummit09-CDNPricing.pdf" target="_blank">here</a>) Overall, pricing for delivery services from the major CDNs changed very little from Q4 2008 to Q1 2009, although some price erosion was seen at some of the mid-tier and higher level customers pushing a lot of traffic. (<strong><em>note: you can always find my latest pricing post at <a href="http://www.cdnpricing.com/">www.cdnpricing.com</a></em></strong> - Previous Quarters: <a href="http://blog.streamingmedia.com/the_business_of_online_vi/2009/01/video-cdn-pricing-stable-in-q4-with-discounts-being-given-at-lower-volume-levels.html" target="_blank">Q4 08</a>, <a href="http://blog.streamingmedia.com/the_business_of_online_vi/2008/10/cdn-pricing-in.html" target="_blank">Q3 08</a>, <a href="http://blog.streamingmedia.com/the_business_of_online_vi/2008/07/cdn-pricing-rem.html" target="_blank">Q2 08</a>, <a href="http://blog.streamingmedia.com/the_business_of_online_vi/2008/05/cdn-pricing-sta.html" target="_blank">Q1 08</a>.)</p><p>While I continue to see a lot of analysts reports still talking about the &quot;pricing pressure&quot; in the CDN market, I still don't see anyone giving examples of what the &quot;pressure&quot; is. I think it is important to keep that in perspective as many in the market make the pricing declines sound bigger than they actually are. While Limelight did mention some pricing pressure with some of their largest customers on their Q1 earnings call, after the call they told me the pricing reduction for these customers was typically fractions of a penny, on per GB delivered contracts. While a company like Limelight has more exposure to pricing reductions since roughly 20 of their customers make up 50% of their revenue, fractions of a penny is not a huge drop in the market. And for customers who are already pushing a ton of volume and continue to grow their traffic, they expect to get some discount based on growth.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/141185-video-cdn-pricing-drops-slightly-in-q1-other-contract-trends-noticed?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/akam">AKAM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cmcsa">CMCSA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nflx">NFLX</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/dan-rayburn">Dan Rayburn</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Level 3's Share Price Is Headed Higher</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/138908-level-3-s-share-price-is-headed-higher?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">138908</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><span>Level 3 Communications (LVLT) just had its annual meeting this week and it went very well. </span></p><p>Chief executive Jim Crowe, said the company's financial performance is on track to improve with increased cash flow and lower debt ratios.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 06:23:01 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Jeremy Richards</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Jeremy Richards submits:</strong><p><span>Level 3 Communications (LVLT) just had its annual meeting this week and it went very well. </span></p><p>Chief executive Jim Crowe, said the company's financial performance is on track to improve with increased cash flow and lower debt ratios.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/138908-level-3-s-share-price-is-headed-higher?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/lvlt">LVLT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rfmd">RFMD</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/jeremy-richards">Jeremy Richards</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How's Pay TV Handling This Downturn?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/138842-how-s-pay-tv-handling-this-downturn?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">138842</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div>It's interesting to listen to the differing takes coming out of companies in Q1 on just how defensive pay TV might be in the economic downturn. It seemed to me that UPC, for example, showed much stronger performance in its pay TV numbers than in broadband, and for my money Virgin Media also performed better than I had expected.</div><div> </div><div>Then again, maybe it's a matter of degrees. What might things look like if the economy got really bad, as is the case in Spain? GDP run-rate decline of nearly 8% (<a href="http://www.ine.es/en/prensa/cntr0109_en.pdf">quarterly decline</a>, annualized), unemployment heading for 20%, that sort of degree of badness.</div><div> </div><div>Well, a picture is emerging from Spain which is not particularly encouraging for pay TV bulls. I concede there are likely to be all sorts of drivers at work here, such as household creation, repossession rates, etc., which could cloud the numbers, and we may see something different in next quarter's results. However, on the basis of the numbers reported by key players in the Spanish market, pay TV no esta caliente.</div><div> </div><div>Telefonica's <a href="http://info.telefonica.es/accionistaseinversores/ing/pdf/rdos09t1-eng.pdf">numbers</a> showed that ULL and wholesale DSL in Spain grew by 119k, which is 5.6% sequential growth. Telefonica's own retail base grew by 46k, and Orange was flat. ONO, which reported <a href="http://www.ono.es/pdfs/pdfsinvestor/2008%20Q4%20Presentation.pdf">today</a>, added 12k broadband customers in the quarter, which is sequential growth of a little under 1%. However, in pay TV, Telefonica's <a href="http://www.telefonica.es/on/pub/servicios/onTOEntrada/0,,entrada%2Brd_imagenio%2Bv_segmento%2BAHOG%2Bv_idioma%2Bes%2Bmenu_izq%2B1%2Bmenu_cab_sup%2Btelevision%2BambitoAcceso%2Bpub,00.html?v_segmento=AHOG&amp;v_idioma=es&amp;v_segest=AHOG&amp;v_pagina=HO&amp;v_hueco=MSP&amp;v_posicion=2&amp;v_procede=home">Imagenio</a> lost 7,700 customers, ONO lost 23k, Orange claims to have grown IPTV subs by 12k (but as it looks like 6Mbps and national calls is <a href="http://internet.orange.es/adsl_y_llamadas/adsl_6_mb_y_llamadas/index.html">priced</a> the <a href="http://internet.orange.es/adsl_y_llamadas_y_tv/index.html">same</a> as the above plus IPTV after the special offer period, does this really count?), and Prisa's Digital + satellite offering <a href="http://www.prisa.com/upload/ficheros/ficheros/200905/results_1q09.pdf">lost 24k</a> and suffered a 30% decline in pay-per-view ARPU.</div><div> </div><div>So in summary, on the basis of these numbers it looks as though broadband overall grew by 177k, and pay TV contracted by over 43k, at least among the companies cited here.</div><div> </div><div>I'm cautious about trying to draw too many conclusions from one quarter, nor am I sure that anyone should really care, except that, in snapshot form, it appears to confirm my own suspicions about consumer behavior when forced by events to confront what they really can and can't live without.</div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 03:29:35 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>James Enck</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<div>It's interesting to listen to the differing takes coming out of companies in Q1 on just how defensive pay TV might be in the economic downturn. It seemed to me that UPC, for example, showed much stronger performance in its pay TV numbers than in broadband, and for my money Virgin Media also performed better than I had expected.</div><div> </div><div>Then again, maybe it's a matter of degrees. What might things look like if the economy got really bad, as is the case in Spain? GDP run-rate decline of nearly 8% (<a href="http://www.ine.es/en/prensa/cntr0109_en.pdf">quarterly decline</a>, annualized), unemployment heading for 20%, that sort of degree of badness.</div><div> </div><div>Well, a picture is emerging from Spain which is not particularly encouraging for pay TV bulls. I concede there are likely to be all sorts of drivers at work here, such as household creation, repossession rates, etc., which could cloud the numbers, and we may see something different in next quarter's results. However, on the basis of the numbers reported by key players in the Spanish market, pay TV no esta caliente.</div><div> </div><div>Telefonica's <a href="http://info.telefonica.es/accionistaseinversores/ing/pdf/rdos09t1-eng.pdf">numbers</a> showed that ULL and wholesale DSL in Spain grew by 119k, which is 5.6% sequential growth. Telefonica's own retail base grew by 46k, and Orange was flat. ONO, which reported <a href="http://www.ono.es/pdfs/pdfsinvestor/2008%20Q4%20Presentation.pdf">today</a>, added 12k broadband customers in the quarter, which is sequential growth of a little under 1%. However, in pay TV, Telefonica's <a href="http://www.telefonica.es/on/pub/servicios/onTOEntrada/0,,entrada%2Brd_imagenio%2Bv_segmento%2BAHOG%2Bv_idioma%2Bes%2Bmenu_izq%2B1%2Bmenu_cab_sup%2Btelevision%2BambitoAcceso%2Bpub,00.html?v_segmento=AHOG&amp;v_idioma=es&amp;v_segest=AHOG&amp;v_pagina=HO&amp;v_hueco=MSP&amp;v_posicion=2&amp;v_procede=home">Imagenio</a> lost 7,700 customers, ONO lost 23k, Orange claims to have grown IPTV subs by 12k (but as it looks like 6Mbps and national calls is <a href="http://internet.orange.es/adsl_y_llamadas/adsl_6_mb_y_llamadas/index.html">priced</a> the <a href="http://internet.orange.es/adsl_y_llamadas_y_tv/index.html">same</a> as the above plus IPTV after the special offer period, does this really count?), and Prisa's Digital + satellite offering <a href="http://www.prisa.com/upload/ficheros/ficheros/200905/results_1q09.pdf">lost 24k</a> and suffered a 30% decline in pay-per-view ARPU.</div><div> </div><div>So in summary, on the basis of these numbers it looks as though broadband overall grew by 177k, and pay TV contracted by over 43k, at least among the companies cited here.</div><div> </div><div>I'm cautious about trying to draw too many conclusions from one quarter, nor am I sure that anyone should really care, except that, in snapshot form, it appears to confirm my own suspicions about consumer behavior when forced by events to confront what they really can and can't live without.</div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/138842-how-s-pay-tv-handling-this-downturn?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/lbtya">LBTYA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tem">TEM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vmed">VMED</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/james-enck">James Enck</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
