William Taylor

On EESAT and Energy Storage Opportunities on the Smart Grid

As you know, John, I am a fan of BCON but I am getting a bit hesitant as I don't see much progress. I am wondering if they have a chance in this game based on their low carbon footprint and the fact that they seeming require virtually no maintenance as opposed to battery systems which degrade, need replacement and maintenance.

I think that grid operators are conservative buyers, particularly of any new technology like flywheels, and that the path to acceptance will be difficult for BCON but I am hoping that the fact that they are probably the "greenest" technology will overrule cost difficulties.
As you sure that, factoring in maintenance and replacement costs for batteries, that flywheels are not in the financial ballpark? Thanks for your work, it helps push away some of the fog of uncertainly for many of us.

Energy Storage on the Smart Grid: 99.45% Cheap and 0.55% Cool

I am with BCON too. I have seen their wheels work and it is really something. Their almost zero carbon footprint and 20 year life will be a big plus. Batteries are a toxic mess, dirty to make and dirty to get rid of with a limited working life.


On Jul 19 06:18 PM flywheel niche wrote:

> BCON flywheels are the most niche and have the most upside.

Are Energy Storage Investors Chasing Their Own Tails?

Batteries may be developed that can serve almost any need but they all have a large carbon footprint, a feature that may drive their price higher. Shortage of materials may also drive prices up and manufacturing costs associated with materials contamination and remediation will also be a cost factor.