<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Helix Investment Research's Comments</title>
    <description>Helix Investment Research's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/1007049/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>Why We Bought Microsoft: Because 2013 Should Determine Whether Ballmer Stays Or Goes</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1416341/comments?source=feed#comment-18606141</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18606141</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The question is how to define &quot;eventually.&quot; At some point, if there is a disconnect between a company's financial results on paper and its stock price, someone needs to be held accountable. It would be one thing if Ballmer was a new CEO who needed time to reshape his company. But he has been CEO for over 13 years, and since then Microsoft has underperformed all its relevant comparisons. Arguments can be made that Microsoft was overvalued when Ballmer took control of the company, but so were the NASDAQ and S&amp;P 500. <br/><br/>As for Ballmer's behavior, we agree that it has a key influence onf Microsoft's revenues and profits. And it is precisely that behavior that has caused Microsoft to leave billions on the table, as the company continued to pour money into online services and R&amp;D, with little to show for either.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 21:35:23 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The question is how to define &quot;eventually.&quot; At some point, if there is a disconnect between a company's financial results on paper and its stock price, someone needs to be held accountable. It would be one thing if Ballmer was a new CEO who needed time to reshape his company. But he has been CEO for over 13 years, and since then Microsoft has underperformed all its relevant comparisons. Arguments can be made that Microsoft was overvalued when Ballmer took control of the company, but so were the NASDAQ and S&amp;P 500. <br/><br/>As for Ballmer's behavior, we agree that it has a key influence onf Microsoft's revenues and profits. And it is precisely that behavior that has caused Microsoft to leave billions on the table, as the company continued to pour money into online services and R&amp;D, with little to show for either.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why We Bought Microsoft: Because 2013 Should Determine Whether Ballmer Stays Or Goes</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1416341/comments?source=feed#comment-18605911</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18605911</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[We would hesitate to compare Microsoft's board to that of HP (but to be fair, there has been a great deal of turnover within HP's board, given the fact that the level of value destruction at HP far exceeds that of Microsoft. That being said, we do believe that the board has given Ballmer and his lieutenants too much latitude in managing Microsoft, and that it should take on a more vocal role in addressing the challenges facing the company.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 21:27:36 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[We would hesitate to compare Microsoft's board to that of HP (but to be fair, there has been a great deal of turnover within HP's board, given the fact that the level of value destruction at HP far exceeds that of Microsoft. That being said, we do believe that the board has given Ballmer and his lieutenants too much latitude in managing Microsoft, and that it should take on a more vocal role in addressing the challenges facing the company.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why We Bought Microsoft: Because 2013 Should Determine Whether Ballmer Stays Or Goes</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1416341/comments?source=feed#comment-18605741</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18605741</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[A so-so holiday season could also cause further pressure on Ballmer, due to the fact that it will serve as a highlight of MSFT's continued malaise, and that is something we doubt ValueAct will simply ignore. It could draw in other investors to become more vocal as well, for it takes only 1 to start the discussion in earnest.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 21:24:19 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[A so-so holiday season could also cause further pressure on Ballmer, due to the fact that it will serve as a highlight of MSFT's continued malaise, and that is something we doubt ValueAct will simply ignore. It could draw in other investors to become more vocal as well, for it takes only 1 to start the discussion in earnest.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Clearwire Update: Bankruptcy And Default As Clearwire's Ace In The Hole</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1340011/comments?source=feed#comment-17607751</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17607751</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[It's not as simple as pretending vs. not pretending. In its proxy statements, Clearwire has repeatedly recommended that shareholders vote for the Spring deal, while reiterating that talks with DISH (and now Party J) are continuing. Clearwire, likely at the recommendation of its lawyers, is urging shareholders to vote yes because that represents the lowest risk situation. $2.97 is on the table, and all shareholders have to do to claim it is vote yes. Attempting to extract higher offers can lead to higher profits, but it also has higher risk. Clearwire's June 1 interest payment will likely be the deadline by which a deal will be complete, for we doubt that Sprint wishes to open the Pandora's box of a Clearwire default. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Apr 2013 15:37:40 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[It's not as simple as pretending vs. not pretending. In its proxy statements, Clearwire has repeatedly recommended that shareholders vote for the Spring deal, while reiterating that talks with DISH (and now Party J) are continuing. Clearwire, likely at the recommendation of its lawyers, is urging shareholders to vote yes because that represents the lowest risk situation. $2.97 is on the table, and all shareholders have to do to claim it is vote yes. Attempting to extract higher offers can lead to higher profits, but it also has higher risk. Clearwire's June 1 interest payment will likely be the deadline by which a deal will be complete, for we doubt that Sprint wishes to open the Pandora's box of a Clearwire default. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Clearwire Update: Bankruptcy And Default As Clearwire's Ace In The Hole</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1340011/comments?source=feed#comment-17607691</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17607691</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[They could indeed end all of this by simply raising the offer to a price that more accurately reflects the value of Clearwire's spectrum]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Apr 2013 15:33:12 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[They could indeed end all of this by simply raising the offer to a price that more accurately reflects the value of Clearwire's spectrum]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>First Solar: Long-Term Guidance Shows That Its Potential And Long-Term Upside Remain Intact</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1331511/comments?source=feed#comment-17447971</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17447971</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[It is true that First Solar's EPS is set to slide from historic levels, with projected EPS set to reach &quot;just&quot; $5 in 2015. But, First Solar's multiples have come down far more than its EPS, and at present levels, shares of First Solar are not expensive, at least on traditional P/E metrics. First Solar's P/E (comparing its P/E to the rest of the sector is meaningless because the rest of the sector isn't generating profits) is lower than it would be in a vacuum in part because of the discount assigned to solar companies, which is understandable given the situation most companies in the sector are in. First Solar's shares should have never traded at $300 in 2008, but neither should they have fallen to below $12 in 2012. And at under $40, we still believe that they are undervaleud. Will the gains happen overnight? No, and we do not expect more rallies like the 45% rally on the back of the company's analyst day. But, if an investor is bullish on solar energy in general, then First Solar is, in our view, the best way to gain exposure to it, and in the long-term, continued growth in solar energy around the world should lead to continued growth in First Solar's share price]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:01:14 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[It is true that First Solar's EPS is set to slide from historic levels, with projected EPS set to reach &quot;just&quot; $5 in 2015. But, First Solar's multiples have come down far more than its EPS, and at present levels, shares of First Solar are not expensive, at least on traditional P/E metrics. First Solar's P/E (comparing its P/E to the rest of the sector is meaningless because the rest of the sector isn't generating profits) is lower than it would be in a vacuum in part because of the discount assigned to solar companies, which is understandable given the situation most companies in the sector are in. First Solar's shares should have never traded at $300 in 2008, but neither should they have fallen to below $12 in 2012. And at under $40, we still believe that they are undervaleud. Will the gains happen overnight? No, and we do not expect more rallies like the 45% rally on the back of the company's analyst day. But, if an investor is bullish on solar energy in general, then First Solar is, in our view, the best way to gain exposure to it, and in the long-term, continued growth in solar energy around the world should lead to continued growth in First Solar's share price]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>First Solar: Long-Term Guidance Shows That Its Potential And Long-Term Upside Remain Intact</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1331511/comments?source=feed#comment-17447461</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17447461</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Setting aside financial reasons to be bullish, we are bullish on First Solar because of our belief in the long-term growth of solar energy. There are many markets around the world, such as Chile and Saudi Arabia where local dynamics make solar a meaningful proposition when it comes to power generation. Will solar simply replace fossil fuels? That is unlikely to happen, given that the technology is simply not there yet. But, the solar market will continue to grow, and the only company that has been able to consistently profit from that growth is First Solar. Until there is a much more meaningful amount of consolidation in the global solar sector, we would be hard-pressed to find another solar company (perhaps other than SunPower, given its American presence and relatively decent financial profile, and SolarCity, which is exposed to different trends in the solar market) that is worth investing in at this point in time. Another point to consider is First Solar's balance sheet. Their position as the financially healthiest company in the sector allows them to invest in the business at levels other solar companies cannot. In the long-term, this will help the company establish footholds in new markets, as well as win the confidence of utility customers, who are interested in much more than simply finding the lowest cost panels.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 10:53:24 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Setting aside financial reasons to be bullish, we are bullish on First Solar because of our belief in the long-term growth of solar energy. There are many markets around the world, such as Chile and Saudi Arabia where local dynamics make solar a meaningful proposition when it comes to power generation. Will solar simply replace fossil fuels? That is unlikely to happen, given that the technology is simply not there yet. But, the solar market will continue to grow, and the only company that has been able to consistently profit from that growth is First Solar. Until there is a much more meaningful amount of consolidation in the global solar sector, we would be hard-pressed to find another solar company (perhaps other than SunPower, given its American presence and relatively decent financial profile, and SolarCity, which is exposed to different trends in the solar market) that is worth investing in at this point in time. Another point to consider is First Solar's balance sheet. Their position as the financially healthiest company in the sector allows them to invest in the business at levels other solar companies cannot. In the long-term, this will help the company establish footholds in new markets, as well as win the confidence of utility customers, who are interested in much more than simply finding the lowest cost panels.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>First Solar: Long-Term Guidance Shows That Its Potential And Long-Term Upside Remain Intact</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1331511/comments?source=feed#comment-17442241</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17442241</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[LDK has yet to report its Q4 (last year it reported on April 30), but as of Q3 2012 it had over $2 billion in net debt, and Citigroup has been hired to help the company restructure its debt. Given that LDK has the highest overall debt levels in the Chinese solar sector, they are likely to update their progress in dealing with it within the next month, when Q4 2012 earnings are likely to be released]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 08:45:45 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[LDK has yet to report its Q4 (last year it reported on April 30), but as of Q3 2012 it had over $2 billion in net debt, and Citigroup has been hired to help the company restructure its debt. Given that LDK has the highest overall debt levels in the Chinese solar sector, they are likely to update their progress in dealing with it within the next month, when Q4 2012 earnings are likely to be released]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>First Solar: Long-Term Guidance Shows That Its Potential And Long-Term Upside Remain Intact</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1331511/comments?source=feed#comment-17441831</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17441831</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[JinkoSolar posted Q4 2012 results this morning, net debt now stands at $482.681 million. The good news (for Jinko) is that they were cash flow positive in Q4. But they have over $360 million in debt due this year, and their cash balance is not enough to make the payments. It remains to be seen what happens with that repayment. And Yingli has $1.2 billion of debt due in the next 12 months, and less than $500 million in cash &amp; investments. We believe that 2013 will be an important year in terms of helping to remove weaker players from the Chinese solar sector, which will, as Trina Solar said, help ease excess capacity in the market]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 08:32:06 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[JinkoSolar posted Q4 2012 results this morning, net debt now stands at $482.681 million. The good news (for Jinko) is that they were cash flow positive in Q4. But they have over $360 million in debt due this year, and their cash balance is not enough to make the payments. It remains to be seen what happens with that repayment. And Yingli has $1.2 billion of debt due in the next 12 months, and less than $500 million in cash &amp; investments. We believe that 2013 will be an important year in terms of helping to remove weaker players from the Chinese solar sector, which will, as Trina Solar said, help ease excess capacity in the market]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple Q2 Earnings Preview: Scrutinizing Negative Media Coverage, And Watching R&amp;D Expenses</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1326121/comments?source=feed#comment-17359701</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17359701</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[It is true that Apple's R&amp;D expenses are less as a percentage of revenue than many of its Silicon Valley peers. But what we believe is more important is what Apple has been able to produce with that budget. Unlike many companies, Apple's R&amp;D budget is, for the most part, focused on creating marketable products and as a result its R&amp;D department is much more efficient than that of many other top-tier technology companies. As for market share, Apple may not be growing unit share, but its profit share is foretasted either to hold steady or increase, and we believe that this is the metric that truly matters in the long-term.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 12:12:49 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[It is true that Apple's R&amp;D expenses are less as a percentage of revenue than many of its Silicon Valley peers. But what we believe is more important is what Apple has been able to produce with that budget. Unlike many companies, Apple's R&amp;D budget is, for the most part, focused on creating marketable products and as a result its R&amp;D department is much more efficient than that of many other top-tier technology companies. As for market share, Apple may not be growing unit share, but its profit share is foretasted either to hold steady or increase, and we believe that this is the metric that truly matters in the long-term.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why The Best Investment In Salesforce Is None At All</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1258551/comments?source=feed#comment-16051141</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16051141</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[But the question to ask is this: how long should capital be tied up waiting for the inevitable? The short thesis for CRM, while valid in theory, has been argued for years already, with little to show for it except occasional pullbacks; CRM is less than $2 away from all time highs as of this writing. Another point that should be noted is that the comparison with Enron, Worldcom, etc... serves to highlight our point about the need to remove hyperbole from the debate. Enron and Worldcom committed pure accounting fraud, and misrepresented their financial condition to shareholders and regulators. And this misrepresentation was not just their CEO's talking about &quot;adjusted EPS.&quot; The financial statements were falsified, something that is not happening at CRM. The company's GAAP losses are easy to see for anyone who looks at the company's 10-Q or 10-K filings,. Talking only about non-GAAP EPS may not present the full picture of what is going on at CRM, but it is not fraud in the Enron/Worldcom mold]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 16:22:07 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[But the question to ask is this: how long should capital be tied up waiting for the inevitable? The short thesis for CRM, while valid in theory, has been argued for years already, with little to show for it except occasional pullbacks; CRM is less than $2 away from all time highs as of this writing. Another point that should be noted is that the comparison with Enron, Worldcom, etc... serves to highlight our point about the need to remove hyperbole from the debate. Enron and Worldcom committed pure accounting fraud, and misrepresented their financial condition to shareholders and regulators. And this misrepresentation was not just their CEO's talking about &quot;adjusted EPS.&quot; The financial statements were falsified, something that is not happening at CRM. The company's GAAP losses are easy to see for anyone who looks at the company's 10-Q or 10-K filings,. Talking only about non-GAAP EPS may not present the full picture of what is going on at CRM, but it is not fraud in the Enron/Worldcom mold]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>In Defense Of First Solar: Post-Earnings Decline Creates A Long-Term Buying Opportunity</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1231251/comments?source=feed#comment-15646111</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15646111</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[A few things should be clarified. First Solar issued concrete guidance for Q1 2013, which came in below consensus. Concrete guidance for 2013 will be provided at the company's analyst day in April, and while the company said the 2nd half of 2013 is likely to be weaker than the first, the company will also discuss its longer-term outlook, which is were we believe the opportunity lies. We also think it is important to highlight comments made by CFO Mark Widmar regarding the long-term margin profile, and the opportunities that the company has on that front. While 2013's second half is forecast to be weaker than the first, there may be margin strength that could potentially help mitigate some of the weakness.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 14:19:05 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[A few things should be clarified. First Solar issued concrete guidance for Q1 2013, which came in below consensus. Concrete guidance for 2013 will be provided at the company's analyst day in April, and while the company said the 2nd half of 2013 is likely to be weaker than the first, the company will also discuss its longer-term outlook, which is were we believe the opportunity lies. We also think it is important to highlight comments made by CFO Mark Widmar regarding the long-term margin profile, and the opportunities that the company has on that front. While 2013's second half is forecast to be weaker than the first, there may be margin strength that could potentially help mitigate some of the weakness.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Buy Xerox: An Undervalued And Underappreciated Capital Deployment Opportunity</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1223661/comments?source=feed#comment-15645631</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15645631</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[While we are bullish on XRX at this point in time, a takeover is, for the time being, unlikely. Xerox is in the midst of its transformation, and buyers are unlikely to be willing to make an offer until it is fully complete, as there are many moving parts at Xerox right now. And even then, with a market capitalization of around $10 billion, any deal for the company would be a big undertaking]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 14:11:46 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[While we are bullish on XRX at this point in time, a takeover is, for the time being, unlikely. Xerox is in the midst of its transformation, and buyers are unlikely to be willing to make an offer until it is fully complete, as there are many moving parts at Xerox right now. And even then, with a market capitalization of around $10 billion, any deal for the company would be a big undertaking]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Buy Xerox: An Undervalued And Underappreciated Capital Deployment Opportunity</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1223661/comments?source=feed#comment-15570871</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15570871</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[In our view, it is not a fully equivalent comparison. With Canon, investors need to evaluate many more nuances, such as the effects of a falling yen; YTD the yen has fallen almost 6%, and CAJ has fallen over 8% (<a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/XCgqxW'>http://bit.ly/XCgqxW</a>) Furthermore, CAJ has much more exposure to industrial markets, as well as personal and professional cameras. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 09:13:16 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[In our view, it is not a fully equivalent comparison. With Canon, investors need to evaluate many more nuances, such as the effects of a falling yen; YTD the yen has fallen almost 6%, and CAJ has fallen over 8% (<a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/XCgqxW'>http://bit.ly/XCgqxW</a>) Furthermore, CAJ has much more exposure to industrial markets, as well as personal and professional cameras. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Buy Xerox: An Undervalued And Underappreciated Capital Deployment Opportunity</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1223661/comments?source=feed#comment-15570701</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15570701</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[We own shares of all 3 companies, and believe that the comparison is apt, the reason being that IBM and Cisco both went through prolonged periods where the market doubted their future ability to grow. And both companies eventually proved the markets wrong; IBM was able to succesfully move away from a dependency on commodity hardware (through moves such as the divestiture of its PC business), and Cisco has been able to show that it will not be easy for competitors to dislodge it in the networking business. Xerox, on the other hand, is still going through this period of doubt, but we believe that in time, it will also overcome this. Another thing to remember is that while Xerox may not be where Cisco and IBM are today, neither is its multiple. Cisco trades at over 11x 2013 EPS, and IBM trades at almost 12x. Xerox, however, trades at just over 7x as of this writing.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 09:10:14 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[We own shares of all 3 companies, and believe that the comparison is apt, the reason being that IBM and Cisco both went through prolonged periods where the market doubted their future ability to grow. And both companies eventually proved the markets wrong; IBM was able to succesfully move away from a dependency on commodity hardware (through moves such as the divestiture of its PC business), and Cisco has been able to show that it will not be easy for competitors to dislodge it in the networking business. Xerox, on the other hand, is still going through this period of doubt, but we believe that in time, it will also overcome this. Another thing to remember is that while Xerox may not be where Cisco and IBM are today, neither is its multiple. Cisco trades at over 11x 2013 EPS, and IBM trades at almost 12x. Xerox, however, trades at just over 7x as of this writing.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Buy Xerox: An Undervalued And Underappreciated Capital Deployment Opportunity</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1223661/comments?source=feed#comment-15570341</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15570341</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Apologies for the oversight, the relevant corrections have been submitted.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 09:05:08 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Apologies for the oversight, the relevant corrections have been submitted.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Herbalife: Examining FTC Data And Potential Action</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1155871/comments?source=feed#comment-14621581</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14621581</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[192 complaints in 7 years is an enviable track record in terms of Herbalife's size. As we noted in an earlier comment, that translates to between 0.0274 and 0.056 complaints per 1,000 distributors (depending on where rounding occurs). A level of 0.0274 would be in line with a company such as American Express, which we included due to the ease of data regarding its level of complaints. Our point in including this in our article was to make the argument that the mere presence of FTC complains (or complaints to another government agency) is not a sign of illegitimacy or a lack of integrity, as some critics of Herbalife claim. Any company that deals with ordinary consumers, such as Herbalife or American Express, will likely have dissatisfied customers who wish to express their displeasure to the FTC, or the CFPB (which has taken the lead on financially related consumer complaints). <br/><br/>A local Kentucky station did a story (<a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/XLoASm'>http://bit.ly/XLoASm</a>) on Fortune Hi-Tech and noted that the local Better Business Bureau had received over 40 &quot;recent complaints&quot; regarding the company, but does not specify the definition of recent.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 18:18:01 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[192 complaints in 7 years is an enviable track record in terms of Herbalife's size. As we noted in an earlier comment, that translates to between 0.0274 and 0.056 complaints per 1,000 distributors (depending on where rounding occurs). A level of 0.0274 would be in line with a company such as American Express, which we included due to the ease of data regarding its level of complaints. Our point in including this in our article was to make the argument that the mere presence of FTC complains (or complaints to another government agency) is not a sign of illegitimacy or a lack of integrity, as some critics of Herbalife claim. Any company that deals with ordinary consumers, such as Herbalife or American Express, will likely have dissatisfied customers who wish to express their displeasure to the FTC, or the CFPB (which has taken the lead on financially related consumer complaints). <br/><br/>A local Kentucky station did a story (<a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/XLoASm'>http://bit.ly/XLoASm</a>) on Fortune Hi-Tech and noted that the local Better Business Bureau had received over 40 &quot;recent complaints&quot; regarding the company, but does not specify the definition of recent.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Herbalife: Examining FTC Data And Potential Action</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1155871/comments?source=feed#comment-14620791</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14620791</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[American Express reports in its latest 10-Q for Q3 2012 (its 10-K has not yet been filed) 51.8 million total &quot;cards in force&quot; as of the end of Q3 2012 Capital One does not disclose the explicit size of its card base in its SEC filings, but rather discloses the total amount of credit card loans. For American Express, 870 complaints in 10 months works out to 1,044 complaints per year on an annualized basis. Herbalfie has around 500,000 distributors in the US, and 192 complaints over 7 years equates to 27.43 (let's round up to 28) complaints per year. For Herbalife, that works out to 0.056 complaints per thousand distributors per year (it the number falls to 0.0274 if unrounded). For American Express, 1,044 complaints spread over 51.8 million customers is equivalent to around 0.02 complaints per 1,000 customers. On a relative basis, it is true that American Express receives fewer complaints. But, that section of the article was not meant to argue that legitimacy of Herbalife based solely on a low number of claims. Rather, it was meant to show that the mere receiving of claims does not serve to deligitamize a company, as some critics of HLF have claimed. We included Capital One and American Express not to argue that they treat customers poorly, but because statistics on the number of consumer complaints they received were readily available due to Consumer Financial Protection Bureau statistics. <br/><br/>It should also be noted that FTC complaints can often be directed not at Herbalife, but at its distributors, who, while dependent on Herbalife for their own business, may or may not adhere to the company's standards at all times, and therefore give third parties reason to file a complaint with the FTC]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 18:05:01 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[American Express reports in its latest 10-Q for Q3 2012 (its 10-K has not yet been filed) 51.8 million total &quot;cards in force&quot; as of the end of Q3 2012 Capital One does not disclose the explicit size of its card base in its SEC filings, but rather discloses the total amount of credit card loans. For American Express, 870 complaints in 10 months works out to 1,044 complaints per year on an annualized basis. Herbalfie has around 500,000 distributors in the US, and 192 complaints over 7 years equates to 27.43 (let's round up to 28) complaints per year. For Herbalife, that works out to 0.056 complaints per thousand distributors per year (it the number falls to 0.0274 if unrounded). For American Express, 1,044 complaints spread over 51.8 million customers is equivalent to around 0.02 complaints per 1,000 customers. On a relative basis, it is true that American Express receives fewer complaints. But, that section of the article was not meant to argue that legitimacy of Herbalife based solely on a low number of claims. Rather, it was meant to show that the mere receiving of claims does not serve to deligitamize a company, as some critics of HLF have claimed. We included Capital One and American Express not to argue that they treat customers poorly, but because statistics on the number of consumer complaints they received were readily available due to Consumer Financial Protection Bureau statistics. <br/><br/>It should also be noted that FTC complaints can often be directed not at Herbalife, but at its distributors, who, while dependent on Herbalife for their own business, may or may not adhere to the company's standards at all times, and therefore give third parties reason to file a complaint with the FTC]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Herbalife: Examining FTC Data And Potential Action</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1155871/comments?source=feed#comment-14608261</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14608261</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Consumer laws differ from country to country, and because the FTC issues a ruling does not mean that it will have merit  in other countries, which may have different regulations. As for the Belgian case, it is important to note that while Belgium is part of the EU, the supra-nationalism of the EU does not extend to internal consumer protection laws which are still under the purview of each member state, not the European Commission or European Parliament. Any case against HLF in the EU will have to be tried on the basis of the applicable countries consumer laws, which may differ from those of Belgium.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 14:58:58 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Consumer laws differ from country to country, and because the FTC issues a ruling does not mean that it will have merit  in other countries, which may have different regulations. As for the Belgian case, it is important to note that while Belgium is part of the EU, the supra-nationalism of the EU does not extend to internal consumer protection laws which are still under the purview of each member state, not the European Commission or European Parliament. Any case against HLF in the EU will have to be tried on the basis of the applicable countries consumer laws, which may differ from those of Belgium.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Herbalife: Examining FTC Data And Potential Action</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1155871/comments?source=feed#comment-14598051</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14598051</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[This article's focus was on FTC complaint data, and the possibility of FTC action, not HLF's core business. It was a response to a specific event (the New York Post's article about the data it received from the FTC), and Herbalife's scope to buy back stock.<br/><br/>That being said, there are other factors to consider. On retention, HLF is steadily working to improve that, and recorded a retention rate of 52% for its sales leaders in Q3 2012 versus 48.9% in Q3 2011 (total active sales leaders rose by 22.1% on a global basis, including 15.2% growth in North America) (<a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://1.usa.gov/12qmZHl'>http://1.usa.gov/12qmZHl</a>). As we've noted in prior articles on HLF, the SEC has already investigated the company twice, and both times closed its investigation without filing any complaints or charges against the company. As for the FTC, we have steadily maintained that it should not take 3 decades for the agency to uncover a pyramid scheme of this size. And if all it has is 192 complaints over 7 years, that is a solid track record for a company of HLF's size.<br/><br/>Regarding new markets, Ackman himself has argued that HLF is simply entering new markets to cover up the collapse of business in mature markets. But then how can US sales be growing at almost 16% last quarter (<a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://1.usa.gov/12qmZHl'>http://1.usa.gov/12qmZHl</a>)? As we noted in a prior piece on HLF, sales have been growing in the US by an average of around 15% over the last 8 year. In addition, volume points in North America, HLF's oldest division, grew by 13.6% in Q3 2012. The company is entering new markets so that it can continue to grow its revenues and profits, not to cover up a collapse in the United States or other mature markets.<br/><br/>HLF's margins, which reflect the pricing of its goods and the cost of doing business, are not out of line with its MLM peers. In Q3, its operating margin was 15.82%. NuSkin's was 15.65%, Avon's was 4.16% (reflecting the internal issues Avon is facing), Usana's was 13.08%, and Tupperware's was 15.75% (they've already posted Q4 earnings). HLF's margins are not outrageously higher than those of its peers. As for the company's financials, the assessment of $2 billion in debt as manageable was provided by B. Riley &amp; Co. The company's existing debt is not due until 2016, and as operating cash flow and EBITDA continue to grow, the company will have more room to take on new debt to fund any potential buybacks. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 12:41:52 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[This article's focus was on FTC complaint data, and the possibility of FTC action, not HLF's core business. It was a response to a specific event (the New York Post's article about the data it received from the FTC), and Herbalife's scope to buy back stock.<br/><br/>That being said, there are other factors to consider. On retention, HLF is steadily working to improve that, and recorded a retention rate of 52% for its sales leaders in Q3 2012 versus 48.9% in Q3 2011 (total active sales leaders rose by 22.1% on a global basis, including 15.2% growth in North America) (<a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://1.usa.gov/12qmZHl'>http://1.usa.gov/12qmZHl</a>). As we've noted in prior articles on HLF, the SEC has already investigated the company twice, and both times closed its investigation without filing any complaints or charges against the company. As for the FTC, we have steadily maintained that it should not take 3 decades for the agency to uncover a pyramid scheme of this size. And if all it has is 192 complaints over 7 years, that is a solid track record for a company of HLF's size.<br/><br/>Regarding new markets, Ackman himself has argued that HLF is simply entering new markets to cover up the collapse of business in mature markets. But then how can US sales be growing at almost 16% last quarter (<a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://1.usa.gov/12qmZHl'>http://1.usa.gov/12qmZHl</a>)? As we noted in a prior piece on HLF, sales have been growing in the US by an average of around 15% over the last 8 year. In addition, volume points in North America, HLF's oldest division, grew by 13.6% in Q3 2012. The company is entering new markets so that it can continue to grow its revenues and profits, not to cover up a collapse in the United States or other mature markets.<br/><br/>HLF's margins, which reflect the pricing of its goods and the cost of doing business, are not out of line with its MLM peers. In Q3, its operating margin was 15.82%. NuSkin's was 15.65%, Avon's was 4.16% (reflecting the internal issues Avon is facing), Usana's was 13.08%, and Tupperware's was 15.75% (they've already posted Q4 earnings). HLF's margins are not outrageously higher than those of its peers. As for the company's financials, the assessment of $2 billion in debt as manageable was provided by B. Riley &amp; Co. The company's existing debt is not due until 2016, and as operating cash flow and EBITDA continue to grow, the company will have more room to take on new debt to fund any potential buybacks. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Clearwire: With DISH Entering The Fray, A Higher Offer From Sprint Is On The Way</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1108461/comments?source=feed#comment-14467871</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14467871</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[This is Clearwire's SEC filing outlining its merger with Sprint, standard issue regulatory filings. Incrimentally, this does not alter the landscape vis a vis Dish/Clearwire/Sprint. Clearwire's board continues to &quot;recommend&quot; the Sprint offer, while again choosing not to draw down Sprint's financing, thereby keeping the Dish deal open. The real question that needs to be answered is what exact date will the special meeting of CLWR investors be held to vote on the Sprint deal.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 19:17:54 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[This is Clearwire's SEC filing outlining its merger with Sprint, standard issue regulatory filings. Incrimentally, this does not alter the landscape vis a vis Dish/Clearwire/Sprint. Clearwire's board continues to &quot;recommend&quot; the Sprint offer, while again choosing not to draw down Sprint's financing, thereby keeping the Dish deal open. The real question that needs to be answered is what exact date will the special meeting of CLWR investors be held to vote on the Sprint deal.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bebe Stores: Unloved, Undervalued, And Set To Rally</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1140621/comments?source=feed#comment-14319021</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14319021</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[So far, it appears that compensation details for bebe's new CDO have not been disclosed. But for their new CEO, annual salary is set at $900,000, with a maximum bonus of 100% of salary, assuming performance targets set by the board are met (<a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://1.usa.gov/UAGLLy'>http://1.usa.gov/UAGLLy</a>). Birkhold's compensation package also includes other arrangements, such as life insurance and reimbursement of relocation costs]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 16:10:27 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[So far, it appears that compensation details for bebe's new CDO have not been disclosed. But for their new CEO, annual salary is set at $900,000, with a maximum bonus of 100% of salary, assuming performance targets set by the board are met (<a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://1.usa.gov/UAGLLy'>http://1.usa.gov/UAGLLy</a>). Birkhold's compensation package also includes other arrangements, such as life insurance and reimbursement of relocation costs]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>In Defense Of Apple: Battling The Mounting Hysteria</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1132401/comments?source=feed#comment-14174741</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14174741</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[At $700, Apple traded at around 15-16x earnings, hardly hysterical levels. Microsoft trades at 15x, Cisco trades at under 14, and IBM trades at around 14 as well. Google trades at over 23x, so even at $700, Apple was not that expensive relative to other Tier 1 tech companies. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 18:08:11 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[At $700, Apple traded at around 15-16x earnings, hardly hysterical levels. Microsoft trades at 15x, Cisco trades at under 14, and IBM trades at around 14 as well. Google trades at over 23x, so even at $700, Apple was not that expensive relative to other Tier 1 tech companies. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>In Defense Of Apple: Battling The Mounting Hysteria</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1132401/comments?source=feed#comment-14159561</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14159561</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[In Q1, there were some temporary issues relating to new product ramps, particularly with regards to Mac sales. But as iPad mini's become a larger part of Apple's overall sales mix, and should a lower-priced iPhone become a reality, margins could very well continued to be pressured; offsetting this is the fact that the market for such goods is larger than Apple's existing market]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 13:22:22 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[In Q1, there were some temporary issues relating to new product ramps, particularly with regards to Mac sales. But as iPad mini's become a larger part of Apple's overall sales mix, and should a lower-priced iPhone become a reality, margins could very well continued to be pressured; offsetting this is the fact that the market for such goods is larger than Apple's existing market]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>In Defense Of Apple: Battling The Mounting Hysteria</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1132401/comments?source=feed#comment-14157031</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14157031</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Apple has a pattern of releasing truly new products every 3 years, and 2013 is the year that this pattern implies a new category. With around 11 months to go, there is still ample time for Apple to release a new category]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 12:34:46 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Apple has a pattern of releasing truly new products every 3 years, and 2013 is the year that this pattern implies a new category. With around 11 months to go, there is still ample time for Apple to release a new category]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>In Defense Of Apple: Battling The Mounting Hysteria</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1132401/comments?source=feed#comment-14155771</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14155771</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Investing, at least when based on fundamental, non-technical analysis, always involves a degree of belief. The challenge is to base that belief on an impartial assessment of a company's financials and its product roadmap. Our view is that Apple's financial condition is solid, as based on its balance sheet and earnings, and that its existing product portfolio is performing better than the company's critics believe. There have been many articles that suggest Apple is now the next Microsoft, the next RIM, among other things, and it is that kind of hyperbole that we wish to avoid. There is a difference between forecasting based on how one feels about a company and what an analysis of its financials and its existing/future products &amp; services reveals.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 12:09:54 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Investing, at least when based on fundamental, non-technical analysis, always involves a degree of belief. The challenge is to base that belief on an impartial assessment of a company's financials and its product roadmap. Our view is that Apple's financial condition is solid, as based on its balance sheet and earnings, and that its existing product portfolio is performing better than the company's critics believe. There have been many articles that suggest Apple is now the next Microsoft, the next RIM, among other things, and it is that kind of hyperbole that we wish to avoid. There is a difference between forecasting based on how one feels about a company and what an analysis of its financials and its existing/future products &amp; services reveals.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>In Defense Of Apple: Battling The Mounting Hysteria</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1132401/comments?source=feed#comment-14132021</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14132021</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The iPod mini meant more to Apple in 2004 than the iPad mini did in 2012; it helped place Apple into millions more households than the regular iPod. The iPad mini, while certainly a new product, was not on the same relative level in 2012 as the iPod mini was in 2004]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 22:45:37 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The iPod mini meant more to Apple in 2004 than the iPad mini did in 2012; it helped place Apple into millions more households than the regular iPod. The iPad mini, while certainly a new product, was not on the same relative level in 2012 as the iPod mini was in 2004]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>In Defense Of Apple: Battling The Mounting Hysteria</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1132401/comments?source=feed#comment-14130031</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14130031</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[On the call, CFO Peter Oppenheimer stated that Apple's operating expenses will be between $3.8-$3.9 billion for Q2 2013]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 21:31:57 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[On the call, CFO Peter Oppenheimer stated that Apple's operating expenses will be between $3.8-$3.9 billion for Q2 2013]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>In Defense Of Apple: Battling The Mounting Hysteria</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1132401/comments?source=feed#comment-14124741</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14124741</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[AAPL closed today with a market capitalization of around $423 billion, and is still holds the world's largest market cap. Will it be $4 trillion in 10 years? Probably not, that would imply an almost 10-fold increase over a decade. But Apple will likely be worth much more than $450 per share in 10 years.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 19:10:55 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[AAPL closed today with a market capitalization of around $423 billion, and is still holds the world's largest market cap. Will it be $4 trillion in 10 years? Probably not, that would imply an almost 10-fold increase over a decade. But Apple will likely be worth much more than $450 per share in 10 years.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Netflix Q4 Earnings: Solid Results Confirm The Company's Long-Term Potential</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1130071/comments?source=feed#comment-14106411</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14106411</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Regarding content obligations, we addressed the accounting regarding those liabilities in our last article on NFLX (<a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/mz1x'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a>). As for cash flow, payments for original content are not things that occur every single quarter, but are one-off cash costs that need to be paid when NFLX produces new episodes of a series. Not every quarter will feature such payments, and NFLX forecast that FCF will improve through the remainder of 2013.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 13:02:45 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Regarding content obligations, we addressed the accounting regarding those liabilities in our last article on NFLX (<a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/mz1x'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a>). As for cash flow, payments for original content are not things that occur every single quarter, but are one-off cash costs that need to be paid when NFLX produces new episodes of a series. Not every quarter will feature such payments, and NFLX forecast that FCF will improve through the remainder of 2013.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
