<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Losing Paper While Gaining Money's Comments</title>
    <description>Losing Paper While Gaining Money's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/1007812/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>Record Hedge Fund Short Position In Silver</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1506812/comments?source=feed#comment-20099442</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">20099442</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[It didn't save the economy from a collapse, it just shifted the timeline, and made it so the bubble went elsewhere, with more money printed to make the potential collapse even larger.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 11:17:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[It didn't save the economy from a collapse, it just shifted the timeline, and made it so the bubble went elsewhere, with more money printed to make the potential collapse even larger.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The New York City Employees' Retirement System becomes the third pension fund to sell its stake in gun makers Sturm Ruger (RGR -0.8%) and Smith &amp;amp; Wessen (SWHC -0.3%) following the nightmarish school shooting in Connecticut. CalSTRS and New York's Teacher's Retirement System sold their shares in January and February respectively. Comptroller John Liu says the company's products "tear apart families and shatter communities." ( Reuters )</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1009951?source=feed#comment-18587131</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18587131</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I like how they sold it when it was at $51 rather than when it was significantly lower immediately after the shooting.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 13:52:02 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I like how they sold it when it was at $51 rather than when it was significantly lower immediately after the shooting.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Worldwide Silver Shortage As Premiums On Silver Eagles Reach 40%</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1364961/comments?source=feed#comment-18046191</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18046191</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[In your previous comment you said they're sitting on inventory, and now you say there's an 8 week wait?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:08:38 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[In your previous comment you said they're sitting on inventory, and now you say there's an 8 week wait?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>States aren't waiting around for new federal gun legislation as they take matters into their own hands. The latest: A new South Dakota law will allow teachers to carry guns in schools and Georgia approved a measure which will remove a ban on firearms in college classrooms and churches. About 25 other states have similar bills pending. Meanwhile, gun sellers Sturm Ruger (RGR -1.2%) and Smith &amp;amp; Wesson (SWHC -1.2%) continue to try to keep with robust demand.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/877991?source=feed#comment-16051241</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16051241</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The wild west was far less violent in reality than the films would have you believe. Do you always believe what you see in the films? Do some research into the real number of bank robberies that occurred for example.<br/><br/>You know Lincoln never hunted vampires, right?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 16:23:26 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The wild west was far less violent in reality than the films would have you believe. Do you always believe what you see in the films? Do some research into the real number of bank robberies that occurred for example.<br/><br/>You know Lincoln never hunted vampires, right?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>States aren't waiting around for new federal gun legislation as they take matters into their own hands. The latest: A new South Dakota law will allow teachers to carry guns in schools and Georgia approved a measure which will remove a ban on firearms in college classrooms and churches. About 25 other states have similar bills pending. Meanwhile, gun sellers Sturm Ruger (RGR -1.2%) and Smith &amp;amp; Wesson (SWHC -1.2%) continue to try to keep with robust demand.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/877991?source=feed#comment-16051211</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16051211</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[It's not a perception, it's a very real shortage. Manufacturers have backorders and ammunition is hard to find or very expensive.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 16:22:46 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[It's not a perception, it's a very real shortage. Manufacturers have backorders and ammunition is hard to find or very expensive.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The CME cuts the initial margin for gold (GLD) to $5,940 from $6,600 and silver (SLV) to $10,450 from $12,100. Maintenance margins are cut by a similar ratio for both metals as well.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/815271?source=feed#comment-14852981</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14852981</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Given they raised margin requirements twice in the space of a few days, facilitating the big drop you see in any longer term graph (for silver at least), I wouldn't be so sure.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 14:30:59 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Given they raised margin requirements twice in the space of a few days, facilitating the big drop you see in any longer term graph (for silver at least), I wouldn't be so sure.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Finding overlapping viewpoints from the gun control lobby and the NRA is exceedingly difficult, but one area that stands a fighting chance of seeing some compromised reform could be rules (federal and local) governing gun shows and background checks. Though the NRA won't say publicly it endorses tighter rules, analysts speculate that behind closed doors the issue could be on the table.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/757591?source=feed#comment-13601231</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13601231</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Fair point. Lets hope it never gets to that.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 15:08:53 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Fair point. Lets hope it never gets to that.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Finding overlapping viewpoints from the gun control lobby and the NRA is exceedingly difficult, but one area that stands a fighting chance of seeing some compromised reform could be rules (federal and local) governing gun shows and background checks. Though the NRA won't say publicly it endorses tighter rules, analysts speculate that behind closed doors the issue could be on the table.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/757591?source=feed#comment-13601021</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13601021</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[That's what the amendment states, yes, though more practically you don't really need nukes. They're no good for a rebellion. It doesn't state &quot;may have small arms&quot;.<br/><br/>Private warships, as well as ownership of heavy weaponry, wasn't unknown at that time. If anyone knew how rebellions were run, they did.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 15:03:24 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[That's what the amendment states, yes, though more practically you don't really need nukes. They're no good for a rebellion. It doesn't state &quot;may have small arms&quot;.<br/><br/>Private warships, as well as ownership of heavy weaponry, wasn't unknown at that time. If anyone knew how rebellions were run, they did.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Finding overlapping viewpoints from the gun control lobby and the NRA is exceedingly difficult, but one area that stands a fighting chance of seeing some compromised reform could be rules (federal and local) governing gun shows and background checks. Though the NRA won't say publicly it endorses tighter rules, analysts speculate that behind closed doors the issue could be on the table.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/757591?source=feed#comment-13595541</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13595541</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[As good a point as that is, I'm just going to leave this here:<br/><br/>&quot;A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.&quot;<br/><br/>For those who question what a Militia is, the US Militia code clearly states it to be both organised and unorganised groups, i.e. individuals.<br/><br/>Right, back to investing.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 13:07:06 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[As good a point as that is, I'm just going to leave this here:<br/><br/>&quot;A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.&quot;<br/><br/>For those who question what a Militia is, the US Militia code clearly states it to be both organised and unorganised groups, i.e. individuals.<br/><br/>Right, back to investing.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bernanke:&amp;nbsp;It seems the chairman is less sure about the "efficacy" of QE, making clear decisions on changes will be qualitative, as opposed to the new rule for the Fed Funds rate which is very much quantitative.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/716401?source=feed#comment-12544021</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12544021</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Will this really mean a change or just a different tact at the same thing? What should we be expecting?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 20:12:37 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Will this really mean a change or just a different tact at the same thing? What should we be expecting?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The iPad mini has gone on sale today, but without the long queues and frenzy that normally accompany the launch of a new Apple (AAPL) product. That's possibly because the specifications aren't as good as in the iPad, while the models on sale don't include the chips that support high-speed cellular Internet. Those are due in a couple of weeks.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/635191?source=feed#comment-11184821</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11184821</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I haven't seen numbers that show that google are losing money on nexus devices. Do you have any proof? I'm not saying they're not losing money, and I don't follow it that closely, but now I'm curious to see some evidence that this is the case.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 20:08:30 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I haven't seen numbers that show that google are losing money on nexus devices. Do you have any proof? I'm not saying they're not losing money, and I don't follow it that closely, but now I'm curious to see some evidence that this is the case.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The iPad mini has gone on sale today, but without the long queues and frenzy that normally accompany the launch of a new Apple (AAPL) product. That's possibly because the specifications aren't as good as in the iPad, while the models on sale don't include the chips that support high-speed cellular Internet. Those are due in a couple of weeks.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/635191?source=feed#comment-11167521</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11167521</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Margins aren't the point of the nexus devices and they never have been. They're devices to help get users onto android. Google are making devices they thought were necessary, which the manufacturers might not want to make, possibly because the margins might not have appealed. <br/><br/>Android's not directly about money either, it's a power play to get Android into the mobile (tablet and phone) market so they're not locked out in the future. Tonnes of android phones are being sold, so from that point of view its been successful.<br/><br/>I don't own any google stock, and I'm not a fanboy of anyone, but I would be interested to see what Google's 5/10 year plan is and how all of this fits together. It might be a way to push people to buying cloud storage and apps, combined with some ad revenue, but that's just my speculating. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 12:45:37 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Margins aren't the point of the nexus devices and they never have been. They're devices to help get users onto android. Google are making devices they thought were necessary, which the manufacturers might not want to make, possibly because the margins might not have appealed. <br/><br/>Android's not directly about money either, it's a power play to get Android into the mobile (tablet and phone) market so they're not locked out in the future. Tonnes of android phones are being sold, so from that point of view its been successful.<br/><br/>I don't own any google stock, and I'm not a fanboy of anyone, but I would be interested to see what Google's 5/10 year plan is and how all of this fits together. It might be a way to push people to buying cloud storage and apps, combined with some ad revenue, but that's just my speculating. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"(QE3) is explicitly linked to what happens with the economy," says San Francisco Fed President Williams. The MBS purchases will continue or even expand to include other assets "until the job market looks substantially healthier." Sounding like he believes what he is saying, Williams calls the program an "automatic stabilizer," able to be tweaked depending on the fickle statistics-based surveys of the BLS each month.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/553931?source=feed#comment-9810911</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9810911</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Not only does it go on, it gets exponential. Then you live in a modern day weimar republic. Fun for all. Have you got a wheelbarrow close?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 17:03:33 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Not only does it go on, it gets exponential. Then you live in a modern day weimar republic. Fun for all. Have you got a wheelbarrow close?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bernanke: "Monetary policy cannot cure all economic ills," he argues, before saying the FOMC is convinced further policy accommodation is necessary to bring down the unemployment rate. "The Fed will purchase assets until the economy improves."</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/537921?source=feed#comment-9416311</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9416311</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[What are they going to do? Change something? Their policies are almost exactly the same. They even have the same people when they shuffle leadership between the parties. There is no difference.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 14:57:34 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[What are they going to do? Change something? Their policies are almost exactly the same. They even have the same people when they shuffle leadership between the parties. There is no difference.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bernanke: "Monetary policy cannot cure all economic ills," he argues, before saying the FOMC is convinced further policy accommodation is necessary to bring down the unemployment rate. "The Fed will purchase assets until the economy improves."</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/537921?source=feed#comment-9415431</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9415431</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The economy will improve. It has been decided.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 14:37:53 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The economy will improve. It has been decided.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>John Paulson is no Felix Zulauf or Jim Chanos, writes Josh Brown after listening in on a BAML call in which the ice-cold fund manager talked strategy. One adviser asked Paulson about "crosscurrents within the portfolio," i.e., trades like long gold and short euro which appear to cancel themselves out. "How do I frame this for clients?"</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/513291?source=feed#comment-8902711</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8902711</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[One word: Inflation<br/><br/>Rocket science this isn't.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 12:30:15 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[One word: Inflation<br/><br/>Rocket science this isn't.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple (AAPL) has until tomorrow to outline which Samsung devices it wants to ban from being sold in the U.S. following the U.S. company's massive patent win. A hearing is provisionally set for Sept. 20. Following the verdict, Samsung (SSNLF.PK), might need to postpone introducing new devices so that it can make design changes. Meanwhile, the WSJ, Bloomberg (I,II) and Reuters provide accounts of jury's deliberations.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/507261?source=feed#comment-8854951</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8854951</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I like how, instead of answering the question, you try to imply that my expectation that it would just be a contract suit is somehow wrong because of something I've said in the past, like that's somehow a factor. That's a very cheap shot.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 11:26:48 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I like how, instead of answering the question, you try to imply that my expectation that it would just be a contract suit is somehow wrong because of something I've said in the past, like that's somehow a factor. That's a very cheap shot.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple (AAPL) has until tomorrow to outline which Samsung devices it wants to ban from being sold in the U.S. following the U.S. company's massive patent win. A hearing is provisionally set for Sept. 20. Following the verdict, Samsung (SSNLF.PK), might need to postpone introducing new devices so that it can make design changes. Meanwhile, the WSJ, Bloomberg (I,II) and Reuters provide accounts of jury's deliberations.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/507261?source=feed#comment-8827091</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8827091</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[What law would be broken that it would be anything more than a contract case? <br/><br/>I still don't think it's likely to happen. I'm just not understanding your line of thinking in any way.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 15:25:49 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[What law would be broken that it would be anything more than a contract case? <br/><br/>I still don't think it's likely to happen. I'm just not understanding your line of thinking in any way.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple (AAPL) has until tomorrow to outline which Samsung devices it wants to ban from being sold in the U.S. following the U.S. company's massive patent win. A hearing is provisionally set for Sept. 20. Following the verdict, Samsung (SSNLF.PK), might need to postpone introducing new devices so that it can make design changes. Meanwhile, the WSJ, Bloomberg (I,II) and Reuters provide accounts of jury's deliberations.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/507261?source=feed#comment-8824931</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8824931</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Ronin: Eh? How does government regulation even come into this? That's why I said I had no idea what you're on about when you started talking about Somalia and now with the Lord of the Flies nonsense. <br/><br/>This is a contract between two parties. In any good contract there are clauses about non-delivery. Clauses both parties should understand and would have agreed upon. That was my point. There would be no fireworks, even if it went to court. One party would have failed to deliver. It's pretty cut and dry.<br/><br/>So, 1st comment for DM, 2nd comment for me, right?<br/>yes.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:39:55 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Ronin: Eh? How does government regulation even come into this? That's why I said I had no idea what you're on about when you started talking about Somalia and now with the Lord of the Flies nonsense. <br/><br/>This is a contract between two parties. In any good contract there are clauses about non-delivery. Clauses both parties should understand and would have agreed upon. That was my point. There would be no fireworks, even if it went to court. One party would have failed to deliver. It's pretty cut and dry.<br/><br/>So, 1st comment for DM, 2nd comment for me, right?<br/>yes.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple (AAPL) has until tomorrow to outline which Samsung devices it wants to ban from being sold in the U.S. following the U.S. company's massive patent win. A hearing is provisionally set for Sept. 20. Following the verdict, Samsung (SSNLF.PK), might need to postpone introducing new devices so that it can make design changes. Meanwhile, the WSJ, Bloomberg (I,II) and Reuters provide accounts of jury's deliberations.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/507261?source=feed#comment-8816341</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8816341</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The second comment was for you Ronin. SA's threading is a bit broken.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 11:16:37 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The second comment was for you Ronin. SA's threading is a bit broken.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple (AAPL) has until tomorrow to outline which Samsung devices it wants to ban from being sold in the U.S. following the U.S. company's massive patent win. A hearing is provisionally set for Sept. 20. Following the verdict, Samsung (SSNLF.PK), might need to postpone introducing new devices so that it can make design changes. Meanwhile, the WSJ, Bloomberg (I,II) and Reuters provide accounts of jury's deliberations.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/507261?source=feed#comment-8806551</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8806551</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[What are you talking about? This is why they have contracts. If Samsung were to do it, not that I think they would, then they'd hit the penalty clauses in their contracts. As for the rest of your ranting, I've no idea what you're on about.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 03:11:11 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[What are you talking about? This is why they have contracts. If Samsung were to do it, not that I think they would, then they'd hit the penalty clauses in their contracts. As for the rest of your ranting, I've no idea what you're on about.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple (AAPL) has until tomorrow to outline which Samsung devices it wants to ban from being sold in the U.S. following the U.S. company's massive patent win. A hearing is provisionally set for Sept. 20. Following the verdict, Samsung (SSNLF.PK), might need to postpone introducing new devices so that it can make design changes. Meanwhile, the WSJ, Bloomberg (I,II) and Reuters provide accounts of jury's deliberations.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/507261?source=feed#comment-8806531</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8806531</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[You made the point I was making. The penalties would be known to samsung in advance, and there'd be no reason for them to fight them as they'd clearly be in the wrong with breaching the contract and that's why it wouldn't be all that big of a deal. <br/><br/>It'd be a financial hit to Samsung, and a supply hit to Apple, but if the contract was done right by Samsung then Samsung wouldn't lose any more than the penalties.<br/><br/>I also don't think Samsung will do it.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 03:08:36 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[You made the point I was making. The penalties would be known to samsung in advance, and there'd be no reason for them to fight them as they'd clearly be in the wrong with breaching the contract and that's why it wouldn't be all that big of a deal. <br/><br/>It'd be a financial hit to Samsung, and a supply hit to Apple, but if the contract was done right by Samsung then Samsung wouldn't lose any more than the penalties.<br/><br/>I also don't think Samsung will do it.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple (AAPL) has until tomorrow to outline which Samsung devices it wants to ban from being sold in the U.S. following the U.S. company's massive patent win. A hearing is provisionally set for Sept. 20. Following the verdict, Samsung (SSNLF.PK), might need to postpone introducing new devices so that it can make design changes. Meanwhile, the WSJ, Bloomberg (I,II) and Reuters provide accounts of jury's deliberations.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/507261?source=feed#comment-8806491</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8806491</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[You're right, I'm confused. Mainly about what sending a message might otherwise mean...<br/><br/>As for what the judge may or may not do, I never brought that up in my comment so I've no idea what you're trying to do in bringing it into the discussion.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 03:00:06 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[You're right, I'm confused. Mainly about what sending a message might otherwise mean...<br/><br/>As for what the judge may or may not do, I never brought that up in my comment so I've no idea what you're trying to do in bringing it into the discussion.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple (AAPL) has until tomorrow to outline which Samsung devices it wants to ban from being sold in the U.S. following the U.S. company's massive patent win. A hearing is provisionally set for Sept. 20. Following the verdict, Samsung (SSNLF.PK), might need to postpone introducing new devices so that it can make design changes. Meanwhile, the WSJ, Bloomberg (I,II) and Reuters provide accounts of jury's deliberations.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/507261?source=feed#comment-8798511</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8798511</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[What would be the legal explosion? Sure, failure to meet contract conditions could be one, but I don't see that being all that big.<br/><br/>There's nothing illegal about Samsung not supplying chips to Apple. They're not the only supplier available, so there's no antitrust potential. It'd just be Samsung not supplying to Apple, as is any company's legal right I would hope.<br/><br/>Would it be good for Samsung in financial terms? That I don't know.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2012 18:03:27 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[What would be the legal explosion? Sure, failure to meet contract conditions could be one, but I don't see that being all that big.<br/><br/>There's nothing illegal about Samsung not supplying chips to Apple. They're not the only supplier available, so there's no antitrust potential. It'd just be Samsung not supplying to Apple, as is any company's legal right I would hope.<br/><br/>Would it be good for Samsung in financial terms? That I don't know.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple (AAPL) has until tomorrow to outline which Samsung devices it wants to ban from being sold in the U.S. following the U.S. company's massive patent win. A hearing is provisionally set for Sept. 20. Following the verdict, Samsung (SSNLF.PK), might need to postpone introducing new devices so that it can make design changes. Meanwhile, the WSJ, Bloomberg (I,II) and Reuters provide accounts of jury's deliberations.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/507261?source=feed#comment-8798251</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8798251</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I've never once had any of this. Have you had any kind of screen lock on?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2012 17:45:26 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I've never once had any of this. Have you had any kind of screen lock on?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple (AAPL) has until tomorrow to outline which Samsung devices it wants to ban from being sold in the U.S. following the U.S. company's massive patent win. A hearing is provisionally set for Sept. 20. Following the verdict, Samsung (SSNLF.PK), might need to postpone introducing new devices so that it can make design changes. Meanwhile, the WSJ, Bloomberg (I,II) and Reuters provide accounts of jury's deliberations.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/507261?source=feed#comment-8798211</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8798211</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Nokia needs to actually release competitive devices to be a factor. We haven't seen that. This won't really help them much. They're still way behind in the smartphone market right now.<br/><br/>- A person who happily owned a nokia n900 until very recently.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2012 17:44:13 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Nokia needs to actually release competitive devices to be a factor. We haven't seen that. This won't really help them much. They're still way behind in the smartphone market right now.<br/><br/>- A person who happily owned a nokia n900 until very recently.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple (AAPL) has until tomorrow to outline which Samsung devices it wants to ban from being sold in the U.S. following the U.S. company's massive patent win. A hearing is provisionally set for Sept. 20. Following the verdict, Samsung (SSNLF.PK), might need to postpone introducing new devices so that it can make design changes. Meanwhile, the WSJ, Bloomberg (I,II) and Reuters provide accounts of jury's deliberations.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/507261?source=feed#comment-8798161</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8798161</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The jury were expressly forbidden from punishing Samsung in the instructions given to them, and they were only to compensate for losses. The jury foreman has since said they imposed fees to punish Samsung.<br/><br/>This will be one of many grounds for appeal. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2012 17:42:33 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The jury were expressly forbidden from punishing Samsung in the instructions given to them, and they were only to compensate for losses. The jury foreman has since said they imposed fees to punish Samsung.<br/><br/>This will be one of many grounds for appeal. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Silver Wheaton Corporation: The $100.00 Silver Bullet</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/798821/comments?source=feed#comment-8343021</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8343021</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thanks, will look into them.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2012 21:41:41 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thanks, will look into them.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Silver Wheaton Corporation: The $100.00 Silver Bullet</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/798821/comments?source=feed#comment-8342991</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8342991</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I don't disagree in the slightest. I'm just going off what they said themselves in the article :)]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2012 21:40:22 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I don't disagree in the slightest. I'm just going off what they said themselves in the article :)]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Silver Wheaton Corporation: The $100.00 Silver Bullet</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/798821/comments?source=feed#comment-8324971</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8324971</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Yeah, reading the article it sounds like the miners sell when they can. Shame they can't hold. I, for one, would take the hit on the short term dividend for long term greater gain. Oh well :)]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 21:34:19 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Yeah, reading the article it sounds like the miners sell when they can. Shame they can't hold. I, for one, would take the hit on the short term dividend for long term greater gain. Oh well :)]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
