What Obama Needs to Know about Tim Geithner, the AIG Fiasco and Citigroup [View article]
Why are CDSs are not rolled into an exchange yet? Would this not be a prudent methodology to legitimize the interest and save the taxpayer from bailing out speculators as we speak?
On Nov 26 12:50 PM BerkeleyBob wrote:
> Complex issues here, some of the comments are informative, some not. > Two central points emerge: 1) The damage to US reputation in the > world financial market is incalculable and grave; 2) AIG appears > to have been at the fulcrum of making book on leveraged CDO's and > credit default swaps which were purchased by entities having no > insurable or legitimate hedge interest in the underlying assets. > It was not insurance, not regulated, and required apparently no reserve. > Pure profit for AIG until the Ponzi scheme unraveled. Hank Greenberg > is as unrepentant as Dennis Kowzlowski or any of the Enron gang.
What Obama Needs to Know about Tim Geithner, the AIG Fiasco and Citigroup [View article]
Hypothetically, I borrow $1K to buy $1M in fire insurance on my house that would actually cost $100K to replace. My house burns down and the insurer can't make good because too many houses burned down in such a short period of time with such exorbitant coverage . Should the government fund the insurer with taxpayers money to make good hoping that not many more houses will burn down?
What Obama Needs to Know about Tim Geithner, the AIG Fiasco and Citigroup [View article]
Why fund a leveraged wager of CDSs with taxpayers money?
On Nov 26 10:04 AM Steve Pluvia wrote:
> You, lost me early in this overly-long soap-box stint. > > Are you *seriously* suggesting the U.S. let AIG blow-up? > > So let me see if I get your point... > > Let AIG fail; All foreign held debt insured by AIG blows up... > > -- US treasury and corporate debt immediately has zero credibility; > > -- US corporations and have zero borrowing power for short term trade > and expansion. > -- Trade grinds to a halt as foreign partners no longer honor purchase > orders from US corporations. > -- Run on all banks; > -- The dollar gets crushed; and, > -- The US have very little ability to jump start the US economy with > spending > > Oy freakin vey. Your idea is ridiculous. Clearly you don't understand > the implications of what you propose. >
What Obama Needs to Know about Tim Geithner, the AIG Fiasco and Citigroup [View article]
On Nov 26 12:50 PM BerkeleyBob wrote:
> Complex issues here, some of the comments are informative, some not.
> Two central points emerge: 1) The damage to US reputation in the
> world financial market is incalculable and grave; 2) AIG appears
> to have been at the fulcrum of making book on leveraged CDO's and
> credit default swaps which were purchased by entities having no
> insurable or legitimate hedge interest in the underlying assets.
> It was not insurance, not regulated, and required apparently no reserve.
> Pure profit for AIG until the Ponzi scheme unraveled. Hank Greenberg
> is as unrepentant as Dennis Kowzlowski or any of the Enron gang.
What Obama Needs to Know about Tim Geithner, the AIG Fiasco and Citigroup [View article]
What Obama Needs to Know about Tim Geithner, the AIG Fiasco and Citigroup [View article]
On Nov 26 10:04 AM Steve Pluvia wrote:
> You, lost me early in this overly-long soap-box stint.
>
> Are you *seriously* suggesting the U.S. let AIG blow-up?
>
> So let me see if I get your point...
>
> Let AIG fail; All foreign held debt insured by AIG blows up...
>
> -- US treasury and corporate debt immediately has zero credibility;
>
> -- US corporations and have zero borrowing power for short term trade
> and expansion.
> -- Trade grinds to a halt as foreign partners no longer honor purchase
> orders from US corporations.
> -- Run on all banks;
> -- The dollar gets crushed; and,
> -- The US have very little ability to jump start the US economy with
> spending
>
> Oy freakin vey. Your idea is ridiculous. Clearly you don't understand
> the implications of what you propose.
>