patp1008's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com http://seekingalpha.comuser/104622/comments http://seekingalpha.com/article/119247/comments?source=feed#comment-380349 380349 Sun, 08 Feb 2009 20:35:57 -0500 http://seekingalpha.com/article/112209/comments?source=feed#comment-338122 338122 consumerist.com/511667...]]> Thu, 25 Dec 2008 11:15:55 -0500 consumerist.com/511667...]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/109582/comments?source=feed#comment-334525 334525 > would solve the most important current problem: falling real estate
> prices. Not to mention the cost of the up coming baby boomers Social Security and Medicare and the off budget cost of the recent wars.


On Dec 08 08:02 AM syndicat wrote:

> As investors we are in the midst of something and there is little
> certainty.
>
> The US Treasury bonds and notes are clearly bets on deflation. To
> loan this government money at 3.2% for 30 years doesn't make sense
> under any other scenario.
>
> Gold at $750/oz is a bet on inflation. The US would prefer inflation
> to deflation and is working towards achieving that end. Inflation
> would solve the most important current problem: falling real estate
> prices.
>
> Using Alan's own analysis, there isn't much gold around compared
> to all
> the other forms of money. $211 billion is a lot of money, but I
> think we have already put a greater amount into saving Citigroup.
> About the same amount has gone to try to save AIG. Can you imagine
> the uproar if the US Treasury announced that it was selling all its
> gold to save Citigroup?
>
> If people decide they want to own more gold the price could have
> a significant increase. After all, governments can sell what they
> have but they cannot make it.]]> Sat, 20 Dec 2008 09:28:16 -0500 > would solve the most important current problem: falling real estate
> prices. Not to mention the cost of the up coming baby boomers Social Security and Medicare and the off budget cost of the recent wars.


On Dec 08 08:02 AM syndicat wrote:

> As investors we are in the midst of something and there is little
> certainty.
>
> The US Treasury bonds and notes are clearly bets on deflation. To
> loan this government money at 3.2% for 30 years doesn't make sense
> under any other scenario.
>
> Gold at $750/oz is a bet on inflation. The US would prefer inflation
> to deflation and is working towards achieving that end. Inflation
> would solve the most important current problem: falling real estate
> prices.
>
> Using Alan's own analysis, there isn't much gold around compared
> to all
> the other forms of money. $211 billion is a lot of money, but I
> think we have already put a greater amount into saving Citigroup.
> About the same amount has gone to try to save AIG. Can you imagine
> the uproar if the US Treasury announced that it was selling all its
> gold to save Citigroup?
>
> If people decide they want to own more gold the price could have
> a significant increase. After all, governments can sell what they
> have but they cannot make it.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/46138/comments?source=feed#comment-94843 94843 DO YOUR RESEARCH--FED BANKERS ARE NOT GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES

PAT]]> Fri, 31 Aug 2007 08:50:26 -0400 DO YOUR RESEARCH--FED BANKERS ARE NOT GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES

PAT]]>