Seeking Alpha

dieuwer » Comments » BAC

  • Banks and Delinquent Borrowers: The Chickens Are Coming Home to Roost [View article]
    For example: Short SHY, buy GLD. Or use short SHY to get cheap loan.


    On Oct 14 03:52 PM Mark Anthony wrote:

    > Dieuwer:

    > I am not a big fan of shorting anything nowadays. When you short,
    > you hold a negative position of the equity you short, and a positive
    > position of US dollar cash. Your cash holding should be NEGATIVE,
    > not positive. Assume you short $1M worth of something and that something
    > goes to zero, your initial $1M investment becomes $2M. But by then
    > your $2M could only buy you a loaf of bread, on top of that you still
    > need to pay the US government your "capital gain". So do you make
    > money or lose money in such a case?
    >
    > Why would any one short anything in a hyper-inflation environment?
    >
    >
    > On Oct 14 03:42 PM dieuwer wrote:
    Oct 14 16:04 pm |Rating: 0 -1 |Link to Comment
  • Banks and Delinquent Borrowers: The Chickens Are Coming Home to Roost [View article]
    I'm not so sure about house prices going up. Besides, people always "conveniently forget" that it is not just the mortgage payments that have to be made. You also have to pay SKY HIGH property taxes, upkeep and insurance.
    Here in Boston where I live, property taxes, upkeep and insurance is sometimes MORE than the rent! And don't forget: cash strapped local governments will INCREASE taxes on your home to pay for their lavish programs.

    With respect to a cheap loan: shorting SHY would do the job?


    On Oct 14 02:19 PM Mark Anthony wrote:

    > Dieuwer:
    >
    > Good question you asked. Both answers are affirmative. Banks did
    > lend $500K to people with no money down and no income. They are not
    > that foolish any more. But there are still the equivalent. Let say
    > I do put 20% down, it does not change my argument.
    >
    > Second question, who is going to lease $500K worth of gold to me?
    > Gold is being leased at ridiculously low lease rate. That is a fact.
    > I use my house as mortgage to lease the gold, so it is secured loan
    > there is no reason why they are not willing to lease it to me. Particularly
    > if I do put 20% down on the house.
    >
    > Your final question: "> Why would anyone lend $500K if he/she knows
    > the money will be repaid with depreciated dollars? You think people
    > are that stupid??"
    >
    > The answer is ABSOLUTELY YES. People ARE that stupid. 99% of people
    > are that stupid and it is even worse than that. Look at all these
    > people who buy US treasury bonds at ridiculous low yield. They know
    > they will be paid back in depreciated dollar, but they put trillion
    > dollars to lend the money to the US government any way. At least
    > the people who lend money to allow me to buy a house at 6% interest
    > rate and 20% down payment are smarter. They get paid more interest
    > rate and their loans are secured by the physical house. But they,
    > too, are paid back in depreciated dollar. So they too are foolish.
    Oct 14 15:42 pm |Rating: +2 0 |Link to Comment
  • Banks and Delinquent Borrowers: The Chickens Are Coming Home to Roost [View article]
    1) Who would be willing to lend you $500K with no money down?
    2) Who would be willing to lease you $500K worth of gold?

    Why would anyone lend $500K if he/she knows the money will be repaid with depreciated dollars? You think people are that stupid??

    On Oct 14 01:01 PM Mark Anthony wrote:

    > Even that is not true. The housing affordability has nothing to do
    > with treasury bond yield. The dollar could collapse and the treasury
    > bond yield can go to the moon, but you can still pretty much afford
    > a decent house, if you understand that a house retains its intrinsic
    > value while your debt will become worth less and less.
    >
    > Buy a house, rent it out. Chances are that the rent probably pays
    > for the mortgage payment. From economic principle, the rent should
    > ALWAYS be higher than the carrying cost of the house, otherwise there
    > will be no house rental business.
    >
    > Alternatively, buy a house at $500K on a $500K loan. Then lease $500K
    > worth of gold, using the house as mortgage. Use the gold to pay off
    > the loan. And then from that point on you only needs to pay the lease
    > rate of the gold. At 0.5325% one year lease rate, it costs you only
    > $2662 per year, or $222 per month. How about owning a half million
    > dollar house for a cost of only $222 per month?
    >
    > The rease rate of gold reflect the REAL interest rate, inflation
    > adjusted.
    >
    > On Oct 14 08:34 AM Andrew Butter wrote:
    Oct 14 13:29 pm |Rating: +2 0 |Link to Comment
  • Mid-Year Picks and Pans From Barron's Roundtable [View article]
    In 1982: Oil at $40, DOW at 1000.
    In 2008: Oil at $140, DOW at 12,000.

    In 26 years, oil increased 3.5 times, DOW increased 12 times! You tell me where the bubble is...
    Jun 15 21:03 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
More on BAC by dieuwer
Comments by Ticker
AA, AAPL, ABAT, ABX, ACI, ACWI, ADM, AEM, AGPPY.PK, AGU, AIG, ALTI, AMP, AMR, ANDE, ANR, APA, APC, ASIA, AU, AUREF.PK, AUY, AXL, AXPW.OB, BA, BAC, BAESY.PK, BCON, BCS, BDC, BHP, BIK, BIV, BK, BKF, BND, BNI, BNPQY.PK, BOLT, BP, BRF, BRK.A, BRK.B, BSC, BSV, BTU, CAF, CAT, CBAK, CCTYQ.PK,
dieuwer's
Comments Stats
346 comments
Rating: 320 (441 - 121 )