Murdoch’s Bing Bluster Will Hurt News Corp, Not Google [View article]
MSFT fails to understand that an antitrust trial under Obama is not likely to result in a "slap on the wrist", like it did in the Netscape case under Bush.
But, the Android is a dog. And the network, though big, is CDMA. And the CEO's an idiot. I'm not a huge T fan, but I like it over VZ. And my TEF has been doing better than either.
On Nov 27 10:15 AM skrummydummy wrote:
> I definitely agree about T, VZ, and BP, especially VZ. I really like > Verizon the best of all because it's no longer a widows-and-orphans > stock. Instead, VZ has become a major growth story with the introduction > of the new Android smart phone. The release is perfect for the holidays. > And just think about all of those lucrative new service contracts! > Vodaphone should be added to the list since it shares much of the > same revenue stream. It too pays a great dividend. > > Skrummy
What if Steve Jobs Hadn’t Returned to Apple in 1997? [View article]
Superb post.
On Nov 27 10:55 AM Old Hand wrote:
> Spot on, dude. > > Your comments about getting the NeXT deal are very interesting.<br/> > > When the history of the computer industry is written, Steve Jobs > will occupy a position of importance well above Gates. Not that > Gates has not been important. Gates has been important, in a very > negative way. > > The pivotal decision in the PC industry was IBM's product strategy > of putting an open hardware architecture on the market. The killer > app was Lotus 1-2-3. > > Gates has been an outstanding monopolist. He managed to get away > with inflicting a piece of junk on the market, getting hundreds of > millions of users hooked on this junk. His junk has been bug-ridden > and glacially slow to evolve. Gates' junk is based on an incoherent > theory of OS design that has been wide open to hackers. Very importantly, > the defects in the junk Gates has pushed on the world have caused > untold costs for end users and OEMs. > > I believe that Gates and Microsh*t should rightfully have been the > targets of the largest class action products liability and antitrust > case in the history of the world -- past and future.
Whatever Happened to Those Ethanol Companies? [View article]
Betting against the Laws of Thermodynamics is like betting against the casino-- you may win for a short time, and if you do, leave the table while you are still ahead!
On Nov 24 09:06 AM John Bowman wrote:
> Serves them right. What a waste of natural resources and no added > benefit to auto drivers or to the American public in general. > > It's a lose-lose situation no matter how you look at it.
Whatever Happened to Those Ethanol Companies? [View article]
Ethanol was heavily promoted by BUSH. I'll grant you Obama did not "kill" it, being from a corn state, but put the blame where it belongs.
On Nov 24 03:11 AM sako shooter wrote:
> Government loves green energy, the market does not. So, at the > central planner’s behest, we shocked grain markets, drove the price > of food higher, funneled scarce resources into ethanol production > capability, and the ethanol refiners are declaring bankruptcy. > Central planning at its finest. The Obama administration tells us > we need more central energy planning. Wonder how long it will take > windmills to go the way of ethanol?
"Rupert Murdoch is pointing a gun to Google’s head, and Microsoft (MSFT) is helping him pull back the trigger."
Murdoch and Ballmer are pointing a gun at their own feet.
If they pull a transparent stunt like this, the DoJ will shut them down faster than you can spell A-N-T-I-T-R-U-S-T. We don't have a mama's-boy, like Bush, sitting in the White House now, like we did for the first MSFT DoJ trial.
Dell's Lack of Innovation Disappoints [View article]
I don't see hard drives going away, but I expect weaker players, like Seagate, will get shaken out.
On Nov 23 01:47 PM ryanclarke wrote:
> Dell is only a few steps behind Gateway ... to the grave. I go as > far to say this, and to save the reader twenty pages of analysis, > for a very simple reason. > > Dell, just like Gateway, just like Compaq, just like all the other > "computer" companies ... relied on other manufacturers to actually > do the "hard work" ... such as Intel, Microsoft, and Seagate .. and > actually build the factories that make the components of a Dell box. > > > Assembly work isn't very profitable ... just ask the "mom and pop" > computer stores that boomed in the earlier 90's which called it quits > with the tech bust in 2000. > > I mentioned Seagate in my list ... because it bought Maxtor, another > hard drive maker ... a few years back. Seagate is simply a mess. > Soon only Western Digital will be around ... and I don't see them > surviving the move to "flash hard drives" which is where the Koreans > are going to make all their money.
10 Reasons to Believe That We're in a Depression [View article]
AND Obama has to show SOME positive improvement in the economy by next November or he could lose seats in the House and Senate-- nevermind the whole deprsesion is "W's" fault; people have short memories. So far, we have lots of stim, money spent with NO really obvious results--employment still sucks and that's the biggest number in people's consciousness.
On Nov 19 11:52 AM Mad Hedge Fund Trader wrote:
> bdc I know what keeps Obama awake at night. Let’s say we spend our > $2 trillion in stimulus and get a couple of quarters of weak growth. > Then once the effects of the stimulus wear off, we slip back into > a deep recession, setting up a classic “W.” Unemployment never does > stop climbing. This happened to Roosevelt in the thirties. So congress > passes another $2 trillion reflationary budget. Everybody gets wonderful > new mass transit upgrades, alternative energy infrastructure, and > bridges to nowhere. But with $4 trillion in spending packed into > two years, inflation really takes off. The bond market collapses, > the dollar tanks big time, gold goes ballistic to $5,000, and silver > explodes to $50. Ben Bernanke has no choice but to engineer an interest > rate spike, taking the Fed funds rate up to a Volkeresque 18%. Housing, > having never recovered, drops by half again. This all happens in > the 2012 election year. Obama is burned in effigy, a Mormon is elected > president, and the Republicans, reinvigorated by new leadership, > retake both houses of congress. We invade Iran. Crude hits $500. > This is not exactly a low probability scenario. Remember Jimmy Carter? > This is why junk bond yields are still stubbornly high at 12.5%, > and credit default swaps live at lofty levels. Are the equity markets > pricing in this possibility? No chance. The risk of Armageddon is > still out there. Personally, I give it a one in three chance. Pass > the Xanax.
Should Microsoft Be Scared of ChromeOS? [View article]
"A desktop/netbook that does less than the average smartphone will by the time it hits the streets."
This is why the iPhone is the "REAL" "net book".
On Nov 19 04:30 PM jack dee wrote:
> yep, its just what everyone has been waiting for. > > A desktop/netbook that does less than the average smartphone will > by the time it hits the streets. > > good luck with that. Goog is taking its eye off the ball. > > > (long goog msft)
Yes, they are a fad. If you REALLY want ultra portable and cheap, get an iPhone. You can put those right in your pocket. And they are no-compromise, solid hardware; not junk.
Apple to Open 50 More Stores - Let's Be Careful, Steve [View article]
The reality is that: 1) everybody uses computers. That is likely to remain true. 2) about 90% of people in the US (more overseas) are still mired in Windows-world. This represents a HUGE potential upside for Apple 3) Apple stores are great for seeing Macs, pre-purchase, and for service and support. Sharper Image sold gadgets (electric back rubbers and such); computers are largely utilitarian.
On Nov 16 02:12 PM Techtrader10 wrote:
> I'm not an Apple hater. I'm just trying to keep people like you in > reality mode! People get into these "euphoric stupors" and have no > fear of the market and find themselves in trouble because of it. >
China: Consequences of the Sleeping Lion Awakened [View article]
You are exactly right. Japan had a lot more going for it, and in the 1980's than China does now, and yet, it proved to be a bubble.
Having said that, I wouldn't short China over the next 24 months.....
On Nov 16 09:14 AM China Interest wrote:
> The similarities between China now and Japan in the late 1980s have > substantial overlap. Be cautious folks! I live in China and not all > things are what they seem.
Sort by:
Latest | Highest ratedMurdoch’s Bing Bluster Will Hurt News Corp, Not Google [View article]
5 Good Dividend Plays [View article]
On Nov 27 10:15 AM skrummydummy wrote:
> I definitely agree about T, VZ, and BP, especially VZ. I really like
> Verizon the best of all because it's no longer a widows-and-orphans
> stock. Instead, VZ has become a major growth story with the introduction
> of the new Android smart phone. The release is perfect for the holidays.
> And just think about all of those lucrative new service contracts!
> Vodaphone should be added to the list since it shares much of the
> same revenue stream. It too pays a great dividend.
>
> Skrummy
What if Steve Jobs Hadn’t Returned to Apple in 1997? [View article]
On Nov 27 10:55 AM Old Hand wrote:
> Spot on, dude.
>
> Your comments about getting the NeXT deal are very interesting.<br/>
>
> When the history of the computer industry is written, Steve Jobs
> will occupy a position of importance well above Gates. Not that
> Gates has not been important. Gates has been important, in a very
> negative way.
>
> The pivotal decision in the PC industry was IBM's product strategy
> of putting an open hardware architecture on the market. The killer
> app was Lotus 1-2-3.
>
> Gates has been an outstanding monopolist. He managed to get away
> with inflicting a piece of junk on the market, getting hundreds of
> millions of users hooked on this junk. His junk has been bug-ridden
> and glacially slow to evolve. Gates' junk is based on an incoherent
> theory of OS design that has been wide open to hackers. Very importantly,
> the defects in the junk Gates has pushed on the world have caused
> untold costs for end users and OEMs.
>
> I believe that Gates and Microsh*t should rightfully have been the
> targets of the largest class action products liability and antitrust
> case in the history of the world -- past and future.
HP vs. Dell: Showdown at the Windows 7 Corral [View article]
Whatever Happened to Those Ethanol Companies? [View article]
On Nov 24 09:06 AM John Bowman wrote:
> Serves them right. What a waste of natural resources and no added
> benefit to auto drivers or to the American public in general.
>
> It's a lose-lose situation no matter how you look at it.
Whatever Happened to Those Ethanol Companies? [View article]
On Nov 24 03:11 AM sako shooter wrote:
> Government loves green energy, the market does not. So, at the
> central planner’s behest, we shocked grain markets, drove the price
> of food higher, funneled scarce resources into ethanol production
> capability, and the ethanol refiners are declaring bankruptcy.
> Central planning at its finest. The Obama administration tells us
> we need more central energy planning. Wonder how long it will take
> windmills to go the way of ethanol?
Bing Tries to Buy the News [View article]
Murdoch and Ballmer are pointing a gun at their own feet.
If they pull a transparent stunt like this, the DoJ will shut them down faster than you can spell A-N-T-I-T-R-U-S-T. We don't have a mama's-boy, like Bush, sitting in the White House now, like we did for the first MSFT DoJ trial.
Dell's Lack of Innovation Disappoints [View article]
On Nov 23 01:47 PM ryanclarke wrote:
> Dell is only a few steps behind Gateway ... to the grave. I go as
> far to say this, and to save the reader twenty pages of analysis,
> for a very simple reason.
>
> Dell, just like Gateway, just like Compaq, just like all the other
> "computer" companies ... relied on other manufacturers to actually
> do the "hard work" ... such as Intel, Microsoft, and Seagate .. and
> actually build the factories that make the components of a Dell box.
>
>
> Assembly work isn't very profitable ... just ask the "mom and pop"
> computer stores that boomed in the earlier 90's which called it quits
> with the tech bust in 2000.
>
> I mentioned Seagate in my list ... because it bought Maxtor, another
> hard drive maker ... a few years back. Seagate is simply a mess.
> Soon only Western Digital will be around ... and I don't see them
> surviving the move to "flash hard drives" which is where the Koreans
> are going to make all their money.
Google's Android: Emerging as a Legitimate Mobile OS [View article]
On Nov 20 04:17 PM Nextel Accessories wrote:
> It is a sweet OS, I expect is to gain market share at Apple's expense
10 Reasons to Believe That We're in a Depression [View article]
On Nov 19 11:52 AM Mad Hedge Fund Trader wrote:
> bdc I know what keeps Obama awake at night. Let’s say we spend our
> $2 trillion in stimulus and get a couple of quarters of weak growth.
> Then once the effects of the stimulus wear off, we slip back into
> a deep recession, setting up a classic “W.” Unemployment never does
> stop climbing. This happened to Roosevelt in the thirties. So congress
> passes another $2 trillion reflationary budget. Everybody gets wonderful
> new mass transit upgrades, alternative energy infrastructure, and
> bridges to nowhere. But with $4 trillion in spending packed into
> two years, inflation really takes off. The bond market collapses,
> the dollar tanks big time, gold goes ballistic to $5,000, and silver
> explodes to $50. Ben Bernanke has no choice but to engineer an interest
> rate spike, taking the Fed funds rate up to a Volkeresque 18%. Housing,
> having never recovered, drops by half again. This all happens in
> the 2012 election year. Obama is burned in effigy, a Mormon is elected
> president, and the Republicans, reinvigorated by new leadership,
> retake both houses of congress. We invade Iran. Crude hits $500.
> This is not exactly a low probability scenario. Remember Jimmy Carter?
> This is why junk bond yields are still stubbornly high at 12.5%,
> and credit default swaps live at lofty levels. Are the equity markets
> pricing in this possibility? No chance. The risk of Armageddon is
> still out there. Personally, I give it a one in three chance. Pass
> the Xanax.
Should Microsoft Be Scared of ChromeOS? [View article]
This is why the iPhone is the "REAL" "net book".
On Nov 19 04:30 PM jack dee wrote:
> yep, its just what everyone has been waiting for.
>
> A desktop/netbook that does less than the average smartphone will
> by the time it hits the streets.
>
> good luck with that. Goog is taking its eye off the ball.
>
>
> (long goog msft)
Are Netbooks Just a Fad? [View article]
Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [View article]
And even if they stuck to civilian aircraft-- would YOU personally fly on some Chinese-built tinn can?
On Nov 16 12:00 PM Socialism cannot compete! wrote:
> So...no national security concerns there with GE "joint venturing"
> with AVIC. :( How in h#ll have we allowed this to continue???<br/>
Apple to Open 50 More Stores - Let's Be Careful, Steve [View article]
On Nov 16 02:12 PM Techtrader10 wrote:
> I'm not an Apple hater. I'm just trying to keep people like you in
> reality mode! People get into these "euphoric stupors" and have no
> fear of the market and find themselves in trouble because of it.
>
China: Consequences of the Sleeping Lion Awakened [View article]
Having said that, I wouldn't short China over the next 24 months.....
On Nov 16 09:14 AM China Interest wrote:
> The similarities between China now and Japan in the late 1980s have
> substantial overlap. Be cautious folks! I live in China and not all
> things are what they seem.