<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Jon Crowley's Comments</title>
    <description>Jon Crowley's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/1069212/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>A Detailed Look At Abbvie</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1135561/comments?source=feed#comment-14808311</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14808311</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Another company that looks to profit from biosimilars is Novartis.  Their generic unit Sandoz already has a few biosimilars available in Europe and they are looking to expand as well.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2013 10:26:45 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Another company that looks to profit from biosimilars is Novartis.  Their generic unit Sandoz already has a few biosimilars available in Europe and they are looking to expand as well.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Questcor's Growth Could Lead To Its Downfall</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1161411/comments?source=feed#comment-14699031</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14699031</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Michael,<br/>So are you saying it is impossible for a generic version of Acthar to be produced?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 11:20:19 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Michael,<br/>So are you saying it is impossible for a generic version of Acthar to be produced?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Questcor's Growth Could Lead To Its Downfall</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1161411/comments?source=feed#comment-14690671</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14690671</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[-Your second point I agree with, I even say in my article that manufacturing a generic will be difficult so I'm not sure what we disagree about.  If you think a generic is impossible then we disagree.  To say a drug that has been around for 60 years can't be duplicated is a bit of a reach. <br/>-Your third point, I don't really care if my reputation took a hit.  Nothing in my article is incorrect factually.  <br/>-Orphan drug prices. I'm well aware of what orphan drugs cost, thats why I didn't bring it up, I have no problem with the price they charge for  Acthar.  When I brought up the large margins I meant that in a positive note. <br/>-Lastly my opinion was based on research.  My opinion is that a decade ago  Acthar had basically a few million in sales and no generic company cared about it.  Now Questcor has a drug that could approach a billion in sales in a few years if growth continues and that generic companies will start to take notice.  It is a fact that that Questcor has no pipeline what so ever and it is a fact that they rely 100% on  Acthar for their revenues, so if a generic does get approved Questcor would take a hit.  I'm just urging people to be cautious and to take this into consideration.  I don't see why this is causing such uproar.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 09:00:59 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[-Your second point I agree with, I even say in my article that manufacturing a generic will be difficult so I'm not sure what we disagree about.  If you think a generic is impossible then we disagree.  To say a drug that has been around for 60 years can't be duplicated is a bit of a reach. <br/>-Your third point, I don't really care if my reputation took a hit.  Nothing in my article is incorrect factually.  <br/>-Orphan drug prices. I'm well aware of what orphan drugs cost, thats why I didn't bring it up, I have no problem with the price they charge for  Acthar.  When I brought up the large margins I meant that in a positive note. <br/>-Lastly my opinion was based on research.  My opinion is that a decade ago  Acthar had basically a few million in sales and no generic company cared about it.  Now Questcor has a drug that could approach a billion in sales in a few years if growth continues and that generic companies will start to take notice.  It is a fact that that Questcor has no pipeline what so ever and it is a fact that they rely 100% on  Acthar for their revenues, so if a generic does get approved Questcor would take a hit.  I'm just urging people to be cautious and to take this into consideration.  I don't see why this is causing such uproar.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Questcor's Growth Could Lead To Its Downfall</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1161411/comments?source=feed#comment-14673931</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14673931</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Ouch you guys are really passionate about Questcor.  I'll address a few things you guys have said and try to explain what I was trying to say<br/>-I agree the article title was a bit sensationalist I appologize <br/>-I also agree my writing can be disorganized, I just do this for a hobby<br/>-pharmaman I agree with you that many biotech companies only have one drug in their pipeline but those biotech companies also have patent protection<br/>-Drdon I never said I was a Questcor expert, you say I am rehashing the Citron report.  The Citron report said Questcor was partaking in questionable marketing and a generic could be produced rather easily.  I said neither of these so I'm not sure where you are coming from. <br/>-All I was trying to say with this article is that as Questcor continues to grow its sales it  becomes more likely that a company might attempt to manufacture a generic, however I think it will be very hard  and expensive to do this.<br/>-I think you all can agree that if a generic is approved it would be devastating to Questcors stock price<br/>-If no one ever comes out with a generic you will all make a lot of money]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 21:31:46 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Ouch you guys are really passionate about Questcor.  I'll address a few things you guys have said and try to explain what I was trying to say<br/>-I agree the article title was a bit sensationalist I appologize <br/>-I also agree my writing can be disorganized, I just do this for a hobby<br/>-pharmaman I agree with you that many biotech companies only have one drug in their pipeline but those biotech companies also have patent protection<br/>-Drdon I never said I was a Questcor expert, you say I am rehashing the Citron report.  The Citron report said Questcor was partaking in questionable marketing and a generic could be produced rather easily.  I said neither of these so I'm not sure where you are coming from. <br/>-All I was trying to say with this article is that as Questcor continues to grow its sales it  becomes more likely that a company might attempt to manufacture a generic, however I think it will be very hard  and expensive to do this.<br/>-I think you all can agree that if a generic is approved it would be devastating to Questcors stock price<br/>-If no one ever comes out with a generic you will all make a lot of money]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Detailed Look At Abbvie</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1135561/comments?source=feed#comment-14252841</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14252841</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[poortorich,  <br/><br/>This is what I wrote a few months ago about ABT-450 in another article.<br/><br/>Hepatitis C has become a hot disease state in the last few years for drug manufactures. With a projected market of 12 billion by 2015, many pharma companies are coming out with their own treatments to capture a piece of the pie. This means ABT-450 will be entering a crowded and competitive market place. What makes ABT-450 special is that it is taken orally while many of the new Hepatitis C drugs are given as injectables. This will lead to ease of administration for patients and possibly decreased manufacturing costs for AbbVie.<br/><br/>So far ABT-450 has completed 2 small phase II trials. The first trial, called Co-Pilot, treated 50 patients with a cocktail of medications that included ABT-450. Cure rates were over 90% for patients with no previous treatment and cure rates approached 50% for patients that had failed previous treatments. Although no serious side effects were reported, this was an extremely small trial so it is difficult to determine how ABT-450 will be tolerated in the long run. The second study was even smaller, testing only 11 patients that had not been treated before. These patients had a specific type of Hepatitis C that responds well to Interferon. Once again ABT-450 was given as a cocktail and 10 of the 11 patients were cured. If phase III trials are successful, a cocktail including ABT-450 could be on the market by 2014. What percentage of the 12 billion dollar Hepatitis C market ABT-450 will capture it difficult to estimate. However given that ABT-450 is given orally and Abbott has a couple other Hepatitis C compounds in its pipeline that could be included in part of a cocktail, sales approaching a billion are certainly achievable.<br/><br/>Since I wrote that article Abbvie has started phase III trials.  Like I mentioned above there will be lots of competition but since ABT-450 is orally taken it will set it apart from the competition.  Here are some links for trials that are ongoing or starting soon. The second one I have listed is a phase III trial.  I hope that answered your question.   <br/>1. <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://1.usa.gov/VKMT2W'>http://1.usa.gov/VKMT2W</a><br/>2. <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://1.usa.gov/Yzgy3A'>http://1.usa.gov/Yzgy3A</a><br/>3. <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://1.usa.gov/VKMRbi'>http://1.usa.gov/VKMRbi</a><br/>4. <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://1.usa.gov/YzgAsl'>http://1.usa.gov/YzgAsl</a>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 09:44:25 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[poortorich,  <br/><br/>This is what I wrote a few months ago about ABT-450 in another article.<br/><br/>Hepatitis C has become a hot disease state in the last few years for drug manufactures. With a projected market of 12 billion by 2015, many pharma companies are coming out with their own treatments to capture a piece of the pie. This means ABT-450 will be entering a crowded and competitive market place. What makes ABT-450 special is that it is taken orally while many of the new Hepatitis C drugs are given as injectables. This will lead to ease of administration for patients and possibly decreased manufacturing costs for AbbVie.<br/><br/>So far ABT-450 has completed 2 small phase II trials. The first trial, called Co-Pilot, treated 50 patients with a cocktail of medications that included ABT-450. Cure rates were over 90% for patients with no previous treatment and cure rates approached 50% for patients that had failed previous treatments. Although no serious side effects were reported, this was an extremely small trial so it is difficult to determine how ABT-450 will be tolerated in the long run. The second study was even smaller, testing only 11 patients that had not been treated before. These patients had a specific type of Hepatitis C that responds well to Interferon. Once again ABT-450 was given as a cocktail and 10 of the 11 patients were cured. If phase III trials are successful, a cocktail including ABT-450 could be on the market by 2014. What percentage of the 12 billion dollar Hepatitis C market ABT-450 will capture it difficult to estimate. However given that ABT-450 is given orally and Abbott has a couple other Hepatitis C compounds in its pipeline that could be included in part of a cocktail, sales approaching a billion are certainly achievable.<br/><br/>Since I wrote that article Abbvie has started phase III trials.  Like I mentioned above there will be lots of competition but since ABT-450 is orally taken it will set it apart from the competition.  Here are some links for trials that are ongoing or starting soon. The second one I have listed is a phase III trial.  I hope that answered your question.   <br/>1. <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://1.usa.gov/VKMT2W'>http://1.usa.gov/VKMT2W</a><br/>2. <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://1.usa.gov/Yzgy3A'>http://1.usa.gov/Yzgy3A</a><br/>3. <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://1.usa.gov/VKMRbi'>http://1.usa.gov/VKMRbi</a><br/>4. <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://1.usa.gov/YzgAsl'>http://1.usa.gov/YzgAsl</a>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Detailed Look At Abbvie</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1135561/comments?source=feed#comment-14235221</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14235221</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Basically everything Pharmaguy said.  The only things I would add is that when an oral compound goes generic its fairly easy for a large number of manufactures to produce a generic which obviously drives the price down a lot.  Biologics are extremely complex to manufacture so you are going to have fewer competitors.  Also these companies are going to have to prove their version of the drug is effective, so they will have to conduct trials of their own which are expensive and generic manufactures don't have much experience in.  This is why I think even when Humira loses its patent you won't see its price completely collapse.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 20:56:45 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Basically everything Pharmaguy said.  The only things I would add is that when an oral compound goes generic its fairly easy for a large number of manufactures to produce a generic which obviously drives the price down a lot.  Biologics are extremely complex to manufacture so you are going to have fewer competitors.  Also these companies are going to have to prove their version of the drug is effective, so they will have to conduct trials of their own which are expensive and generic manufactures don't have much experience in.  This is why I think even when Humira loses its patent you won't see its price completely collapse.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pfizer: 2012 Review And 2013 Outlook</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1088591/comments?source=feed#comment-13169991</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13169991</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Pfizer didn't lose patent protection on Enbrel or Lyrica.  Enbrel was a marketing agreement with Amgen that ended, and Lyrica's patent doesn't end until 2018.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2012 20:03:11 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Pfizer didn't lose patent protection on Enbrel or Lyrica.  Enbrel was a marketing agreement with Amgen that ended, and Lyrica's patent doesn't end until 2018.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>It's Time To Be Optimistic About AstraZeneca</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/821641/comments?source=feed#comment-8657361</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8657361</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[2 things to consider before investing in AZN <br/>1. Peak sales of 12 billion for Bydureon seems out of reach considering the market leader Victoza only had 700 million in sales<br/>2.  Also Victoza is still capturing 60% of the new scripts while Bydureon is getting a little less than 40%]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2012 12:55:52 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[2 things to consider before investing in AZN <br/>1. Peak sales of 12 billion for Bydureon seems out of reach considering the market leader Victoza only had 700 million in sales<br/>2.  Also Victoza is still capturing 60% of the new scripts while Bydureon is getting a little less than 40%]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Jim Cramer Pumps Alkermes - Is He Right?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/729391/comments?source=feed#comment-7513651</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7513651</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Marmadukemark,<br/>You are correct, thanks for the correction.  When I first looked up Vivitrol I wrote down Naloxone instead of Naltrexone and went from there.  I will edit the article, thanks for the catch.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 13:45:31 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Marmadukemark,<br/>You are correct, thanks for the correction.  When I first looked up Vivitrol I wrote down Naloxone instead of Naltrexone and went from there.  I will edit the article, thanks for the catch.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AbbVie Beyond Humira</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/660981/comments?source=feed#comment-7028971</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7028971</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[pharmaguy,<br/><br/>Regarding Abbott's claim of having greater than 20 compounds in Phase II or Phase III, you are correct they don't have nearly that many novel compounds.  All drug companies do this and it is frustrating.  As far as Abbott's pipeline it is really tilted towards Phase 1 and II development, which makes it really difficult to determine how much potential they have.  It will be interesting to see what AbbVie P/E will be when it becomes a standalone company.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 10:18:24 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[pharmaguy,<br/><br/>Regarding Abbott's claim of having greater than 20 compounds in Phase II or Phase III, you are correct they don't have nearly that many novel compounds.  All drug companies do this and it is frustrating.  As far as Abbott's pipeline it is really tilted towards Phase 1 and II development, which makes it really difficult to determine how much potential they have.  It will be interesting to see what AbbVie P/E will be when it becomes a standalone company.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AbbVie Beyond Humira</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/660981/comments?source=feed#comment-7028731</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7028731</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Poortorich,<br/>Regarding bardoxolone's GFR I did link some letters to the editor in the NEJM that discusses this.  In case you didn't see it here is the link again, <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/LMYH1m'>http://bit.ly/LMYH1m</a>.  As you said if it can be shown to delay and/or prevent people going on dialysis it will be a big seller.  Everything pretty much hinges on the phase III trial.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 10:13:18 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Poortorich,<br/>Regarding bardoxolone's GFR I did link some letters to the editor in the NEJM that discusses this.  In case you didn't see it here is the link again, <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/LMYH1m'>http://bit.ly/LMYH1m</a>.  As you said if it can be shown to delay and/or prevent people going on dialysis it will be a big seller.  Everything pretty much hinges on the phase III trial.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AbbVie Beyond Humira</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/660981/comments?source=feed#comment-6541601</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6541601</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Paul,<br/><br/>Regarding Bardoxolone I think you are right that it isn't another Humira, but not many companies have a Humira in their pipelines.  There is no magic bullet to replace Humira, AbbVie is going to have to multiple successful new compounds.   About future competition, I think this is a good thing as it signifies that other companies see a large market to profit from.  Look how many ACE inhibitors and ARB's are on the market, that hasn't stopped Novartis from raking in Billions in sales with Diovan. <br/><br/>Your concerns about Elotuzumab are warranted.  While I agree that it probably won't become a first line agent, it could still generate significant sales if phase III data is positive.  Oncologist's love to have as many tools as possible so there will most likely be a place for Elotuzumab.  <br/><br/>Of the compounds in development you mentioned I really like GLPG0634,  it has potential to have less side effects then Tofacitinib and is only taken once a day compared to twice daily for Tofacitinib.  Of course Tofacitinib will have the advantage of being on the market first.  <br/><br/>If I were to guess what AbbVie will look like in 2018.  I would say Humira would still have 15-20 percent market share.   If Bardoxolone has good phase III data it would have blockbuster like sales.  And I think 2 or 3 of the compounds I listed above will have sales in the hundreds of millions, approaching a billion.  The thing about AbbVie is that their pipeline is so loaded toward Phase I and II trails so it makes it difficult to project how much potential they have.   ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 16:02:15 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Paul,<br/><br/>Regarding Bardoxolone I think you are right that it isn't another Humira, but not many companies have a Humira in their pipelines.  There is no magic bullet to replace Humira, AbbVie is going to have to multiple successful new compounds.   About future competition, I think this is a good thing as it signifies that other companies see a large market to profit from.  Look how many ACE inhibitors and ARB's are on the market, that hasn't stopped Novartis from raking in Billions in sales with Diovan. <br/><br/>Your concerns about Elotuzumab are warranted.  While I agree that it probably won't become a first line agent, it could still generate significant sales if phase III data is positive.  Oncologist's love to have as many tools as possible so there will most likely be a place for Elotuzumab.  <br/><br/>Of the compounds in development you mentioned I really like GLPG0634,  it has potential to have less side effects then Tofacitinib and is only taken once a day compared to twice daily for Tofacitinib.  Of course Tofacitinib will have the advantage of being on the market first.  <br/><br/>If I were to guess what AbbVie will look like in 2018.  I would say Humira would still have 15-20 percent market share.   If Bardoxolone has good phase III data it would have blockbuster like sales.  And I think 2 or 3 of the compounds I listed above will have sales in the hundreds of millions, approaching a billion.  The thing about AbbVie is that their pipeline is so loaded toward Phase I and II trails so it makes it difficult to project how much potential they have.   ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AbbVie Beyond Humira</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/660981/comments?source=feed#comment-6460591</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6460591</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[richjoy and berninvestor,<br/><br/>Thanks for the kind comments! I'm glad you found the article(s) helpful.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 11:11:42 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[richjoy and berninvestor,<br/><br/>Thanks for the kind comments! I'm glad you found the article(s) helpful.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AbbVie Beyond Humira</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/660981/comments?source=feed#comment-6452551</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6452551</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thanks I hope they are informative for you. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 08:34:58 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thanks I hope they are informative for you. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AbbVie Beyond Humira</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/660981/comments?source=feed#comment-6452531</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6452531</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[trapper132,<br/><br/>If Bardoxolone actually increases kidney function like the phase II trail indicated then the benefits absolutely outweigh the risks.  Hypomagnesemia is just low magnesium levels, which might be the cause of the spasms.  GFR stands for Glomerular filtration rate and it is a tool physicians use to estimate kidney function.   ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 08:34:06 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[trapper132,<br/><br/>If Bardoxolone actually increases kidney function like the phase II trail indicated then the benefits absolutely outweigh the risks.  Hypomagnesemia is just low magnesium levels, which might be the cause of the spasms.  GFR stands for Glomerular filtration rate and it is a tool physicians use to estimate kidney function.   ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Who Will Conquer The Oral Multiple Sclerosis Market?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/628221/comments?source=feed#comment-6014771</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6014771</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I'm not a surgeon so I'm not familiar with the procedure you mention but I don't believe that any insurance companies in the United States currently cover the procedure you are describing. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 12:46:40 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I'm not a surgeon so I'm not familiar with the procedure you mention but I don't believe that any insurance companies in the United States currently cover the procedure you are describing. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>FDA Recommendations Bode Well For Pfizer</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/577981/comments?source=feed#comment-5344791</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5344791</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Walkwithalimp,<br/><br/>Thanks for the compliment. More good news should be on the way.  On June 28th the FDA will decide on apixaban's new drug application.  Apixaban has true blockbuster potential, I wrote an article about its potential if you would like to read it. <br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/7rcz'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 12:48:26 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Walkwithalimp,<br/><br/>Thanks for the compliment. More good news should be on the way.  On June 28th the FDA will decide on apixaban's new drug application.  Apixaban has true blockbuster potential, I wrote an article about its potential if you would like to read it. <br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/7rcz'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Use Snail Mail To Place Your FedEx Order</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/568971/comments?source=feed#comment-5310581</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5310581</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[In this article you mention FDX having a PE of over 18 therefore putting it out of the value range, but everywhere else has the PE more in the 13 range. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 15:26:24 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[In this article you mention FDX having a PE of over 18 therefore putting it out of the value range, but everywhere else has the PE more in the 13 range. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Novartis: What Will Be Gilenya's Fate?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/509501/comments?source=feed#comment-4709511</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4709511</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[bobo,<br/><br/>Yeah I have seen numerous analysts estimates from 1.5 billion to 3 billion so its quite a range.  I agree that with you that this isn't a major blow to Novartis they have a good pipeline and are well diversified.  As far as other drugs that have been stymied by side effects there are a ton.  A few that are well known Cellebrex (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hf' title='HFF, Inc.'>HF</a>), Januvia (pancreatitis), Avandia (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hf' title='HFF, Inc.'>HF</a>).  As far as how it effects sales a lot of it has to do with if there is another drug out there that works in a similar fashion but without the risk (see Avandia being replaced by Actos) and is the risk worth the benefit (see Tysarbi)]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 21:18:09 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[bobo,<br/><br/>Yeah I have seen numerous analysts estimates from 1.5 billion to 3 billion so its quite a range.  I agree that with you that this isn't a major blow to Novartis they have a good pipeline and are well diversified.  As far as other drugs that have been stymied by side effects there are a ton.  A few that are well known Cellebrex (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hf' title='HFF, Inc.'>HF</a>), Januvia (pancreatitis), Avandia (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hf' title='HFF, Inc.'>HF</a>).  As far as how it effects sales a lot of it has to do with if there is another drug out there that works in a similar fashion but without the risk (see Avandia being replaced by Actos) and is the risk worth the benefit (see Tysarbi)]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Does Novo Nordisk's Pipeline Justify Its Premium?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/481971/comments?source=feed#comment-4221101</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4221101</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Paul,<br/>I think your right about people underestimating Bydureon.  Considering how quickly Victoza overtook Byetta based on its once daily administration its not far fetched to think Bydureon could surpass Victoza rather quickly.  2 things that Victoza does have in its favor are that it doesn't require reconstitution before administration, also Bydureon didn't show non inferiority in lowering A1C compared to Victoza in the DURATION-6 trial.  <br/><br/>As far as the mixed results in treating weight loss, you might be on to something. Amylin still hasn't initiated a weight loss trial with Exenatide which surprises me. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 07:21:50 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Paul,<br/>I think your right about people underestimating Bydureon.  Considering how quickly Victoza overtook Byetta based on its once daily administration its not far fetched to think Bydureon could surpass Victoza rather quickly.  2 things that Victoza does have in its favor are that it doesn't require reconstitution before administration, also Bydureon didn't show non inferiority in lowering A1C compared to Victoza in the DURATION-6 trial.  <br/><br/>As far as the mixed results in treating weight loss, you might be on to something. Amylin still hasn't initiated a weight loss trial with Exenatide which surprises me. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Novartis Is The Safest Stock In The Pharmaceutical Sector</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/473251/comments?source=feed#comment-4109831</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4109831</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[cpa, <br/>I agree completely, I recently wrote an article about Pfizer selling off their divisions left and right.   They better hope their R and D is significantly more successful then it has been in the past]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 16:01:47 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[cpa, <br/>I agree completely, I recently wrote an article about Pfizer selling off their divisions left and right.   They better hope their R and D is significantly more successful then it has been in the past]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Novartis Is The Safest Stock In The Pharmaceutical Sector</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/473251/comments?source=feed#comment-4109451</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4109451</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[hornucopia, <br/>I do agree Novo Nordisk is a great company, they concern me though because 1. as you mentioned they have a low dividend 2. their P/E is high compared to other drug companies 3. Almost all their products have to do with diabetes so they are not as diversified as I would like]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 15:56:21 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[hornucopia, <br/>I do agree Novo Nordisk is a great company, they concern me though because 1. as you mentioned they have a low dividend 2. their P/E is high compared to other drug companies 3. Almost all their products have to do with diabetes so they are not as diversified as I would like]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Novartis Is The Safest Stock In The Pharmaceutical Sector</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/473251/comments?source=feed#comment-4090641</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4090641</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Guraaf, just to give you a couple. <br/><br/>Pfizer-had over 2 billion in sales with Prevnar 13 and it grew its sales by over 50% compared to last year.  Prevnar also was just approved for prevention of  pneumococcal pneumonia for patients over 50 late last year also.  They also have PF-06290510(Staph), ACC-001(Alzheimer's), MnB rLP2086  (Meningitis) all in Phase II trials. <br/><br/>Merck- has Gardasil and Zostavax which are decent sellers, they have V419(Bordetella, Polio, H.Flu) in Phase III as well as a Vaccine for Pnuemonia in Phase II<br/><br/><br/> ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 09:19:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Guraaf, just to give you a couple. <br/><br/>Pfizer-had over 2 billion in sales with Prevnar 13 and it grew its sales by over 50% compared to last year.  Prevnar also was just approved for prevention of  pneumococcal pneumonia for patients over 50 late last year also.  They also have PF-06290510(Staph), ACC-001(Alzheimer's), MnB rLP2086  (Meningitis) all in Phase II trials. <br/><br/>Merck- has Gardasil and Zostavax which are decent sellers, they have V419(Bordetella, Polio, H.Flu) in Phase III as well as a Vaccine for Pnuemonia in Phase II<br/><br/><br/> ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Novartis Is The Safest Stock In The Pharmaceutical Sector</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/473251/comments?source=feed#comment-4080281</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4080281</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Guraaf,<br/>Thanks for the comment, your right i forgot to include it Novartis' vaccines and diagnostics business.  Last year it was over 3 billion and growing, the only negative is that there will be lots of competition as lots of drug companies are investing heavily in the vaccine business. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 22:09:27 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Guraaf,<br/>Thanks for the comment, your right i forgot to include it Novartis' vaccines and diagnostics business.  Last year it was over 3 billion and growing, the only negative is that there will be lots of competition as lots of drug companies are investing heavily in the vaccine business. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Novartis Is The Safest Stock In The Pharmaceutical Sector</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/473251/comments?source=feed#comment-4080151</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4080151</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Tom,  <br/>Unless Google finance is wrong their last five years of dividends have been 1.54, 1.72, 1.95, 2.36, and 2.48 so they have been steadily increasing the dividend the last few years.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 22:03:32 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Tom,  <br/>Unless Google finance is wrong their last five years of dividends have been 1.54, 1.72, 1.95, 2.36, and 2.48 so they have been steadily increasing the dividend the last few years.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>For Sale: Pfizer's Growth Prospects</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/443071/comments?source=feed#comment-3640131</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3640131</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The genomics boom might be a ways off, also the problem with genomics is that you limit your potential customer base because the drugs are for such a specific population.  Pfizer sells Crizotinib which is extremely successful treating ALK positive lung cancer but it will probably never top 1 billion in sales. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 09:10:35 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The genomics boom might be a ways off, also the problem with genomics is that you limit your potential customer base because the drugs are for such a specific population.  Pfizer sells Crizotinib which is extremely successful treating ALK positive lung cancer but it will probably never top 1 billion in sales. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>For Sale: Pfizer's Growth Prospects</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/443071/comments?source=feed#comment-3639811</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3639811</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I'm in the same position as you, I've owned Pfizer for about 5 or 6 years and have been very frustrated.  The only acquisition that really made sense was Warner-Lambert because they got Lipitor. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 09:03:19 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I'm in the same position as you, I've owned Pfizer for about 5 or 6 years and have been very frustrated.  The only acquisition that really made sense was Warner-Lambert because they got Lipitor. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>For Sale: Pfizer's Growth Prospects</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/443071/comments?source=feed#comment-3639691</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3639691</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[That is a good point about only looking for the trends of the last year.  The problem I ran into was that the Wyeth acquisition increased revenues so much I felt it didn't provide a clear assessment.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 08:59:04 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[That is a good point about only looking for the trends of the last year.  The problem I ran into was that the Wyeth acquisition increased revenues so much I felt it didn't provide a clear assessment.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Generic Competition: The $100 Billion Biologics Arena</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/414781/comments?source=feed#comment-3244821</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3244821</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Good article ScriptVolume,<br/><br/>Don't forget Novartis' generic unit Sandoz though, they already have a few biosimilar's available in Europe and one here in the US<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/yZ18i3'>http://bit.ly/yZ18i3</a>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 08:26:20 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Good article ScriptVolume,<br/><br/>Don't forget Novartis' generic unit Sandoz though, they already have a few biosimilar's available in Europe and one here in the US<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/yZ18i3'>http://bit.ly/yZ18i3</a>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Replacing Coumadin: A $10 Billion Opportunity</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/362051/comments?source=feed#comment-2634831</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2634831</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The Clinic has a hospital in Weston<br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/zyDoTf'>http://bit.ly/zyDoTf</a>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:36:41 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The Clinic has a hospital in Weston<br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/zyDoTf'>http://bit.ly/zyDoTf</a>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
