LiquidSoapDispenser

Profit from the Peak: An Enjoyable Read About Our Energy Problems

I've recently learned about the biological vs. abiogenic debate (after wondering about similar arguments I've read). It is without question that the majority of geologists and scientists reject the abiogenic theory. So, my questions to anyone who makes a lot of clamor about the existence of virtually unlimited abiogenic oil:

1) When will this start having a major impact on what most of us see as a limited world oil supply? 10 years? 100 years? Ever?
2) What do you hope to gain by constantly challenging the majority view? Seems like you statements just cause a lot of arguing rather than producing any productive results.
3) How are you specifically attempting to capitalize on your minority viewpoint?