<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Coudriet's Comments</title>
    <description>Coudriet's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/1101253/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>4 Reasons To Sell Alpine Total Dynamic CEF</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/316706/comments?source=feed#comment-7929961</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7929961</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I have just become aware (from data published by the CEFconnect.com website) that while AOD maintains their $0.055 monthly DISTRIBUTION, that $0.0219 of that payout is a return of shareholder's capital.  For those of you unfamiliar with the terminology, this means that a portion of AOD's monthly payout (some 40% in this case) is a return of your money, your investment.  This action will lower the NAV of the fund accordingly.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 16:54:14 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I have just become aware (from data published by the CEFconnect.com website) that while AOD maintains their $0.055 monthly DISTRIBUTION, that $0.0219 of that payout is a return of shareholder's capital.  For those of you unfamiliar with the terminology, this means that a portion of AOD's monthly payout (some 40% in this case) is a return of your money, your investment.  This action will lower the NAV of the fund accordingly.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>StonMor's Distributions Are Sustainable</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/316630/comments?source=feed#comment-7036171</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7036171</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[JPL:  Good point: pipeline companies have a fixed asset of long term life that creates a revenue stream.  This comparison concerns me as well. STON is somewhat similar as their real estate can accommodate more burials. Management (In the NAPTP conference in late May), indicated that they have some 250 years worth of burial capacity remaining.  At one level the pipeline provides a more &quot;regular&quot; income stream and, say a 50 year asset life.  STON, on the other hand, has a longer -lived asset (land), with lower maintenance, but with discrete &quot;bursts&quot; of income at sale.  I am trying to wrap my head around comparing a pipeline asset to a burial plot.  One gets leased; the other (a cemetery plot) get sold incrementally.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 13:02:39 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[JPL:  Good point: pipeline companies have a fixed asset of long term life that creates a revenue stream.  This comparison concerns me as well. STON is somewhat similar as their real estate can accommodate more burials. Management (In the NAPTP conference in late May), indicated that they have some 250 years worth of burial capacity remaining.  At one level the pipeline provides a more &quot;regular&quot; income stream and, say a 50 year asset life.  STON, on the other hand, has a longer -lived asset (land), with lower maintenance, but with discrete &quot;bursts&quot; of income at sale.  I am trying to wrap my head around comparing a pipeline asset to a burial plot.  One gets leased; the other (a cemetery plot) get sold incrementally.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
