Seeking Alpha

Fred Swartz » Comments |

Sort by:
Latest | Highest rated
  • How the Stock Market Is Like a Dog on a Leash [View article]
    What's wrong with just showing the usual superimposed moving average, where we can see the distance between the price and the average? Your display removes the useful information about price movement. Bollinger bands give even more info. Sorry, but I see only disadvantages to this kind of display.
    May 03 15:26 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Achieving Outperformance in a Low Return World [View article]
    Thanks for mentioning "Mission Impossible", but it might also be interesting to tell us what you thought about it (good, bad, ...).
    Apr 28 14:14 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Top 5 Country ETFs from the Motley Fool CAPS Survey [View article]
    Picking a starting point for comparison makes all the difference. If you plot comparisons for the last three months, EEB comes in at the BOTTOM, about 15% below EWD.
    Apr 14 15:22 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • The (Abandoned) Uptick Rule and Blaming the Shorts [View article]
    I fail to see how shorting and removal of the uptick rule are a problem.

    However, the unknown extent of naked shorts used to manipulate low-float stocks is a little scary. The interesting and well-narrated presentation at businessjive.com (as mentioned above) is really worth a look if you want to understand terms like NTCC, BD, SHO, and the "death spiral convert".
    Apr 05 16:59 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • How Much Can We Blame the Uptick Rule? [View article]
    Partly out of ignorance and because I like to be short-long I've had no objection to the uptick rule. But I hadn't realized that "naked shorting" was being so widely tolerated -- that does seem criminal, and worth fixing.

    What was the result of the 1000-stock pilot study? Did these stocks behave differently as a result of removing the uptick rule? Goggling "uptick rule pilot study" will get you to relevant articles, eg,
    www.helium.com/items/5... . The general conclusion seems to be that neither volatility nor return were changed.

    However, "Unfortunately, the study did not examine the consequences for low float stocks (stocks with few number of shares traded daily) and small cap stocks, which are targets for manipulation."

    I don't know my away around stock manipulation, but it seems quite possible to manipulate on the upside too. Why not have a "downtick" rule to prevent manipulation on the upside? Just kidding in a way, but perhaps a "tick" rule is the wrong way to solve these problems.


    Apr 05 09:41 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Argentina’s Merval Index: An Overview  [View article]
    Helpful summary. The "farm crisis" and falling confidence in Kirchner bring up memories of past Argentine economic problems. How much of a concern should these be to an investor?
    Apr 04 17:02 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Merrill Lynch: Per Capita Recession Began in Q4 [View article]
    Excellent point. Thanks. You've used Gross Domestic "Purchases". Typo for Product?
    Apr 04 13:43 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Bracing for a 'Lost Decade' [View article]
    What these "esoteric asset classes" that we should be wary of "this late in the performance cycle"? I can make some guesses, but why not name them?
    Mar 26 11:31 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • CFOs: Recession Has Already Started [View article]
    Interesting graph, thanks. Although some noted the decline in optimism over a longer period, it only moved into negative territory for their own firms (where one presumes they are experts) in 2008.
    Mar 14 01:50 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Take a Piece of PowerShares' Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Pie  [View article]
    Thanks for pointing this out and it will be interesting to watch it. However, despite the good story it hasn't done better than EEM.
    Mar 10 10:25 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Asset Allocation: Investing by the Numbers [View article]
    Ahh, old school asset allocation without commodities.
    Mar 08 17:12 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Two Explanations for Surging Oil Prices [View article]
    @ User 161473
    That's an impressive list of famous people. BUT it raises some questions. First, what is the source of this list. Second, you've omitted the list of the nay-sayers - could it be even larger? And finally, the judgment of some is quite suspect (eg, Rick Wagoner seems to build cars as if he believed otherwise).

    Not that it's wrong, but this list without documentation or balance feels like hype rather than help.
    Mar 07 14:13 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • David Swensen On Keeping It Simple [View article]
    This is a typical "don't dream of doing what we're doing" article by professional investors. It contains the usual mix of "you don't know what you're doing" along with contradictory advice of the "stick to your long-term goals", be "disciplined", and "rebalance ever quarter". Having just said that mortals are unable to do any of these things intelligently without advisers, it seems strange to demand this kind of behavior. And remember "don't have fun"!
    Feb 18 11:10 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Can't Short XHB? Create Your Own Homebuilders ETF to Short [View article]
    Although XHB wasn't available for shorting, you might try ITB (iShares DJ US Home Construction index), which I was able to short.
    Feb 07 08:52 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Sharpe Ratios on 2007 ETF Returns [View article]
    The line is supposed to slope that way (greater risk - greater return), so I'm not surprised larger amounts of data would support it. These small data sets allow one to get whatever result is desired, which is very nice if you want to "prove" something. :-) Thanks for the clarification on larger data sets, and Happy New Year.
    Dec 29 12:00 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
Comments by Ticker
Fred Swartz's
Comments Stats
48 comments
Rating: 16 (28 - 12 )