<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Justin Kuepper's Comments</title>
    <description>Justin Kuepper's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/1106481/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>Trading Raptor Pharmaceuticals' RP 103 FDA Decision</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1147471/comments?source=feed#comment-14446561</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14446561</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[If you model out the sales over the treatment's lifespan and discount it to today including the E.U.'s sales (approval there is likely, if the U.S. approves), and include the rest of its pipeline in the valuation, then the $286mm market cap looks a little less shocking. But, I agree that the $200k treatments may be a tough pill to swallow and, long-term, I think the company may have an uphill battle with payors to realize those sales levels (although patient demand seems it would be robust).]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 10:02:40 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[If you model out the sales over the treatment's lifespan and discount it to today including the E.U.'s sales (approval there is likely, if the U.S. approves), and include the rest of its pipeline in the valuation, then the $286mm market cap looks a little less shocking. But, I agree that the $200k treatments may be a tough pill to swallow and, long-term, I think the company may have an uphill battle with payors to realize those sales levels (although patient demand seems it would be robust).]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>3 Reasons Delcath Systems Appears Undervalued</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1129091/comments?source=feed#comment-14146271</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14146271</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[You're right about the melphalan sales- I will request an edit right now and apologize for the error. The source was a conference call transcript that was strangely worded, and I see now that he was referencing the total market opportunity for CHEMOSAT where melphalan is used (e.g. the E.U., U.S. and APAC combined).<br/><br/>Again, I'm not an owner of the stock yet and everything written (minus the error above) was based on information from the company, who based their figures on their own figures (e.g. for ASP costs), LEK Consulting and GLOBOCAN. Moreover, I see this as a short-term opportunity with upcoming catalysts than a long-term play.<br/><br/>Finally, if the stock goes bankrupt, as many have suggested, there's obviously an opportunity to double your money by shorting the stock. Price has very little to do with anything when short selling a company, just short more shares to make up for the dollar difference.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 09:26:36 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[You're right about the melphalan sales- I will request an edit right now and apologize for the error. The source was a conference call transcript that was strangely worded, and I see now that he was referencing the total market opportunity for CHEMOSAT where melphalan is used (e.g. the E.U., U.S. and APAC combined).<br/><br/>Again, I'm not an owner of the stock yet and everything written (minus the error above) was based on information from the company, who based their figures on their own figures (e.g. for ASP costs), LEK Consulting and GLOBOCAN. Moreover, I see this as a short-term opportunity with upcoming catalysts than a long-term play.<br/><br/>Finally, if the stock goes bankrupt, as many have suggested, there's obviously an opportunity to double your money by shorting the stock. Price has very little to do with anything when short selling a company, just short more shares to make up for the dollar difference.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>3 Reasons Delcath Systems Appears Undervalued</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1129091/comments?source=feed#comment-14107661</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14107661</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[It seems that a lot of people have commented on my estimates above (mostly via personal messages).<br/><br/>I sourced all of the data from the company's presentation that you can download in PDF form here: <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/Witish'>http://bit.ly/Witish</a> (page 16).<br/><br/>The E.U. market constitutes the bulk of the $2.3 billion estimate (as I mention in the article saying &quot;driven by multi-histology opportunities in the European Union&quot;). The presentation lists the E.U. market as $2.2 billion and the U.S. initial market as $100 million in 2013, if approved.<br/><br/>The reference to multi-billion opportunity at the end is implying a long-term time horizon and not an immediate market (as indicated, again, by &quot;could eventually see&quot;). This would obviously include more than the ocular melanoma market to include the same indications being targeted in the E.U. The presentation estimates this opportunity to be $2.6 billion, if approved, over the long-term.<br/><br/>I apologize for the confusion, but it appears there are a lot of shorts in this stock getting very angry at me for writing the article. I am not long yet, and if so for the short-term, just writing on a company that I was researching and found interesting...]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 13:28:10 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[It seems that a lot of people have commented on my estimates above (mostly via personal messages).<br/><br/>I sourced all of the data from the company's presentation that you can download in PDF form here: <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/Witish'>http://bit.ly/Witish</a> (page 16).<br/><br/>The E.U. market constitutes the bulk of the $2.3 billion estimate (as I mention in the article saying &quot;driven by multi-histology opportunities in the European Union&quot;). The presentation lists the E.U. market as $2.2 billion and the U.S. initial market as $100 million in 2013, if approved.<br/><br/>The reference to multi-billion opportunity at the end is implying a long-term time horizon and not an immediate market (as indicated, again, by &quot;could eventually see&quot;). This would obviously include more than the ocular melanoma market to include the same indications being targeted in the E.U. The presentation estimates this opportunity to be $2.6 billion, if approved, over the long-term.<br/><br/>I apologize for the confusion, but it appears there are a lot of shorts in this stock getting very angry at me for writing the article. I am not long yet, and if so for the short-term, just writing on a company that I was researching and found interesting...]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>3 Reasons Delcath Systems Appears Undervalued</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1129091/comments?source=feed#comment-14091821</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14091821</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thanks for the comment.<br/><br/>I don't own the shares yet, but I'm primarily considering it for the short-term opportunity. I think the PDUFA in June and ADCOM in May will provide some catalysts, while the commercialization efforts in the E.U. could produce some upside, if they're successful.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 08:28:43 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thanks for the comment.<br/><br/>I don't own the shares yet, but I'm primarily considering it for the short-term opportunity. I think the PDUFA in June and ADCOM in May will provide some catalysts, while the commercialization efforts in the E.U. could produce some upside, if they're successful.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How And Why To Invest In Abbott And AbbVie</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1120131/comments?source=feed#comment-13996671</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13996671</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The transaction can be good for both parties because, even though AbbVie receives a capital intensive business that's riskier, it's still operating in the same market as many other pharma companies (same risk profile) but with a higher dividend yield. As mentioned in the article, I think high dividend yields are preferable in today's rate environment, which makes it a stock worth holding all else equal.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 08:17:26 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The transaction can be good for both parties because, even though AbbVie receives a capital intensive business that's riskier, it's still operating in the same market as many other pharma companies (same risk profile) but with a higher dividend yield. As mentioned in the article, I think high dividend yields are preferable in today's rate environment, which makes it a stock worth holding all else equal.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How And Why To Invest In Abbott And AbbVie</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1120131/comments?source=feed#comment-13996611</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13996611</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Acquisitions rarely increase value in reality and there have been many studies showing this over the years. For instance, check out this study: <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/V3YVm0'>http://bit.ly/V3YVm0</a>. Large firms in their study destroyed $226 billion in shareholder value over 20 years.<br/><br/>One point in my article is that spin offs differ in that most spin offs increase shareholder value (see the studies mentioned in the article). Spin offs allow two business entities to be valued separately, which typically results in a higher market valuation when adding them.<br/><br/>There are indeed many situations where spin offs don't work out, but the article focused on this particular situation and why I think it will work out in the end. I think the split made a lot of sense for the reasons listed above and it will be mutually beneficial to both companies.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 08:15:07 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Acquisitions rarely increase value in reality and there have been many studies showing this over the years. For instance, check out this study: <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/V3YVm0'>http://bit.ly/V3YVm0</a>. Large firms in their study destroyed $226 billion in shareholder value over 20 years.<br/><br/>One point in my article is that spin offs differ in that most spin offs increase shareholder value (see the studies mentioned in the article). Spin offs allow two business entities to be valued separately, which typically results in a higher market valuation when adding them.<br/><br/>There are indeed many situations where spin offs don't work out, but the article focused on this particular situation and why I think it will work out in the end. I think the split made a lot of sense for the reasons listed above and it will be mutually beneficial to both companies.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How And Why To Invest In Abbott And AbbVie</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1120131/comments?source=feed#comment-13877211</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13877211</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Agreed. Sometimes spin-offs are simply vehicles for parent companies to unload undesirable assets or debt. In this case, I think the resulting company remains attractive and the aggregate spin off statistics are just an added bonus.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 11:12:32 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Agreed. Sometimes spin-offs are simply vehicles for parent companies to unload undesirable assets or debt. In this case, I think the resulting company remains attractive and the aggregate spin off statistics are just an added bonus.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NuPathe And Its Upcoming PDUFA Decision</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1090851/comments?source=feed#comment-13389581</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13389581</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I think everyone is in a wait-and-see mode right now, although there could be some volatility within a few days of the PDUFA date on January 17th. Again, I think there are some risks both with the decision and with the commercialization, but my personal belief is that the decision will be a positive one based on the data.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 09:08:55 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I think everyone is in a wait-and-see mode right now, although there could be some volatility within a few days of the PDUFA date on January 17th. Again, I think there are some risks both with the decision and with the commercialization, but my personal belief is that the decision will be a positive one based on the data.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NuPathe And Its Upcoming PDUFA Decision</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1090851/comments?source=feed#comment-13230061</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13230061</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Hi Mike,<br/><br/>1. The number of migraines varies a lot based on the person with some people experiencing only one in their life and others experiencing several per week. On average, I have read that sufferers experience 3-4 per month.<br/><br/>2/3. I wasn't able to find exact data on Imitrex(<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/r' title='Ryder System, Inc.'>R</a>) Injectable sales (the most popular injectable sumatriptan). But, there are needle-less versions of the injection that make it easier to digest, compared to diabetics that are forced to deal with needles regularly. I think this is a major potential risk for NuPathe, but they are banking on the convenience and stability (application over time) of the patch versus an injection. As a result, I'm a short-term trader until after the potential approval in order to wait and see the market response.<br/><br/>4. You can see a picture on their website. It's battery operated and can be put on the upper arm in order to hide it. <br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/WeOews'>http://bit.ly/WeOews</a>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 15:16:06 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Hi Mike,<br/><br/>1. The number of migraines varies a lot based on the person with some people experiencing only one in their life and others experiencing several per week. On average, I have read that sufferers experience 3-4 per month.<br/><br/>2/3. I wasn't able to find exact data on Imitrex(<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/r' title='Ryder System, Inc.'>R</a>) Injectable sales (the most popular injectable sumatriptan). But, there are needle-less versions of the injection that make it easier to digest, compared to diabetics that are forced to deal with needles regularly. I think this is a major potential risk for NuPathe, but they are banking on the convenience and stability (application over time) of the patch versus an injection. As a result, I'm a short-term trader until after the potential approval in order to wait and see the market response.<br/><br/>4. You can see a picture on their website. It's battery operated and can be put on the upper arm in order to hide it. <br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/WeOews'>http://bit.ly/WeOews</a>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Molson Coors: The Perfect Play For A Downturn</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/768991/comments?source=feed#comment-7996951</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7996951</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I definitely agree with these concerns. Mismanagement is a leading cause of persistent discounts in valuation. And in this case, management has made some decisions that have hurt the share price and investor confidence in the stock.<br/><br/>But, I would have to say that some of their capital ratios don't signal *that* much mismanagement to justify this discount. For instance, a five-year 8%+ ROI is enviable for many companies and shows that management is still making a decent return with shareholder money.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 15:40:23 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I definitely agree with these concerns. Mismanagement is a leading cause of persistent discounts in valuation. And in this case, management has made some decisions that have hurt the share price and investor confidence in the stock.<br/><br/>But, I would have to say that some of their capital ratios don't signal *that* much mismanagement to justify this discount. For instance, a five-year 8%+ ROI is enviable for many companies and shows that management is still making a decent return with shareholder money.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Evidence Mounts That Deflation Is A Greater Risk Than Inflation</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/642581/comments?source=feed#comment-6184091</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6184091</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[There are three supposed reasons that deflation is a bad thing:<br/><br/>1. Consumers expecting prices to fall tend to hold off on making purchases, which affects the demand side of the economy.<br/><br/>2. Those in debt become more in debt when deflation takes place, since the value of the base currency increases.<br/><br/>3. Deflation means wages fall (or stay stagnant) along with the prices of consumer goods. No free lunch!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 23:52:18 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[There are three supposed reasons that deflation is a bad thing:<br/><br/>1. Consumers expecting prices to fall tend to hold off on making purchases, which affects the demand side of the economy.<br/><br/>2. Those in debt become more in debt when deflation takes place, since the value of the base currency increases.<br/><br/>3. Deflation means wages fall (or stay stagnant) along with the prices of consumer goods. No free lunch!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>3 Cheap, Cash-Rich Stocks For 2012</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/497111/comments?source=feed#comment-6084251</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6084251</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I try and write about three pieces per week covering a wide variety of stocks, so I can't invest in all of them. But in some cases, it says that I don't have plans for the next 72 hours, so I just wait until the next week to buy, if that's the case.<br/><br/>As for writing about stocks that I own, I am a writer for other financial publications and that's a practice that's generally frowned upon because it's considered a conflict of interest. So, by habit, I usually don't write about those stocks, although I may reconsider for this website, since it's allowed.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 08:15:29 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I try and write about three pieces per week covering a wide variety of stocks, so I can't invest in all of them. But in some cases, it says that I don't have plans for the next 72 hours, so I just wait until the next week to buy, if that's the case.<br/><br/>As for writing about stocks that I own, I am a writer for other financial publications and that's a practice that's generally frowned upon because it's considered a conflict of interest. So, by habit, I usually don't write about those stocks, although I may reconsider for this website, since it's allowed.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Generac Holdings: Potentially Undervalued Play On Backup Power</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/629131/comments?source=feed#comment-5987741</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5987741</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thanks for the great comments!<br/><br/>I forgot to mention the special dividend (wrote this article late at night), but completely agree with your analysis. It was indeed interesting that they issued the dividend despite the debt load, but comforting that insiders hold such a large stake in the company.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 17:05:49 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thanks for the great comments!<br/><br/>I forgot to mention the special dividend (wrote this article late at night), but completely agree with your analysis. It was indeed interesting that they issued the dividend despite the debt load, but comforting that insiders hold such a large stake in the company.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rare Earth Metals: How To Capitalize On The Recovery</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/474431/comments?source=feed#comment-4107421</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4107421</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I had just included the stocks in Tickerspy's index in this article, but yes, Great Western is another company in the sector that's certainly worth mentioning.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 14:56:50 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I had just included the stocks in Tickerspy's index in this article, but yes, Great Western is another company in the sector that's certainly worth mentioning.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rare Earth Metals: How To Capitalize On The Recovery</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/474431/comments?source=feed#comment-4088001</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4088001</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thank you for your comment.<br/><br/>The P/E multiple was taken from here: <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://www.multpl.com'>http://www.multpl.com</a>. They track the current P/E ratio of the index and various averages.<br/><br/>I never said in the article that the acquisition has closed, but mentioned in in the past tense, because a definitive agreement was signed between the two companies. But yes, it's possible that the deal could fall through like any deal.<br/><br/>I fully explained REE price trends in the article and definitely made it clear that they fell sharply in 2011. I don't think I was misleading that it's just an early sign, particularly after noting in the first paragraph that prices &quot;rose last week for the first time in four months&quot;.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 08:24:34 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thank you for your comment.<br/><br/>The P/E multiple was taken from here: <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://www.multpl.com'>http://www.multpl.com</a>. They track the current P/E ratio of the index and various averages.<br/><br/>I never said in the article that the acquisition has closed, but mentioned in in the past tense, because a definitive agreement was signed between the two companies. But yes, it's possible that the deal could fall through like any deal.<br/><br/>I fully explained REE price trends in the article and definitely made it clear that they fell sharply in 2011. I don't think I was misleading that it's just an early sign, particularly after noting in the first paragraph that prices &quot;rose last week for the first time in four months&quot;.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Demographically Diminishing Case For Retribution Will Lower Demand For Prison Industry</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/462431/comments?source=feed#comment-3901881</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3901881</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Yes, wrong ticker: CXW is Corrections Corp of America, CXM is Cardium Therapeutics Ltd.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:20:42 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Yes, wrong ticker: CXW is Corrections Corp of America, CXM is Cardium Therapeutics Ltd.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>2 Great Ways To Play The Growth In Precision Manufacturing</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/368421/comments?source=feed#comment-3134641</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3134641</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Hi Tim- Sorry for the late reply- I didn't see the notification when your comment came in on this article.<br/><br/>I took a look at SmartHeat today and here are my thoughts: The company took quite a hit over the past year. Last quarter, their sales dropped 62% YoY and most of that was due to lower volumes. But the other thing to consider is the fact that they were burning cash (negative operating cash flow) even last year when they were profitable on a net income basis. But as for survival, they have a great balance sheet, so I think they'll make for at least the medium-term.<br/><br/>If China gets back on track, the entire sector should benefit, including this company. But I think there are some better plays in the industry. And China's recovery is on unstable grounds right now, so I wouldn't bet on that anytime in the very near future. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 11:33:12 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Hi Tim- Sorry for the late reply- I didn't see the notification when your comment came in on this article.<br/><br/>I took a look at SmartHeat today and here are my thoughts: The company took quite a hit over the past year. Last quarter, their sales dropped 62% YoY and most of that was due to lower volumes. But the other thing to consider is the fact that they were burning cash (negative operating cash flow) even last year when they were profitable on a net income basis. But as for survival, they have a great balance sheet, so I think they'll make for at least the medium-term.<br/><br/>If China gets back on track, the entire sector should benefit, including this company. But I think there are some better plays in the industry. And China's recovery is on unstable grounds right now, so I wouldn't bet on that anytime in the very near future. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Restaurant Stocks: Some Food For Thought</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/405711/comments?source=feed#comment-3097851</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3097851</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thanks for the comment.<br/><br/>I don't know why you think it's a poor write-up when I largely agree with you. ARKR is a great dividend play, and yes, it would have been good to add that they have no long-term debt.<br/><br/>However, I don't think I'm wrong about the risk. Look at the last 10-Q they filed with the SEC (see below). If you go down to the cash flow statement, they did generate $698,000 in operating cash during the 13-weeks ended December 31st, but it had a net decrease in cash (after investment and financing) of $4,316,000. This is not due to D&amp;A, but rather investment in fixed assets and even repurchasing shares. Not bad things, but a negative cash flow none-the-less.<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://1.usa.gov/wUwE2p'>http://1.usa.gov/wUwE2p</a>. <br/><br/>I don't think it's a big risk by any means, but it's worth mentioning and something any investor should be aware of, in my opinion.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 10:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thanks for the comment.<br/><br/>I don't know why you think it's a poor write-up when I largely agree with you. ARKR is a great dividend play, and yes, it would have been good to add that they have no long-term debt.<br/><br/>However, I don't think I'm wrong about the risk. Look at the last 10-Q they filed with the SEC (see below). If you go down to the cash flow statement, they did generate $698,000 in operating cash during the 13-weeks ended December 31st, but it had a net decrease in cash (after investment and financing) of $4,316,000. This is not due to D&amp;A, but rather investment in fixed assets and even repurchasing shares. Not bad things, but a negative cash flow none-the-less.<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://1.usa.gov/wUwE2p'>http://1.usa.gov/wUwE2p</a>. <br/><br/>I don't think it's a big risk by any means, but it's worth mentioning and something any investor should be aware of, in my opinion.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fuel Cells: Driving Towards A Cleaner Future?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/393241/comments?source=feed#comment-3097501</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3097501</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[First, I'm against any subsidies being provided at all and agree that the national debt is a problem. I think that alternative energies will eventually become economical on their own, which will probably happen when gas prices rise to an unacceptable level. Why not let the market push change rather than the government?<br/><br/>Second, the term subsidies can be ambiguous. The vast majority of oil subsidies are foreign tax credits that enables companies to generate credits that offset their income taxes when drilling new wells. And the second largest is a tax credit for the production of non-conventional fuels (to get away from dependence on the Middle East for crude oil). Alternative energy subsidies get those same tax credits (alcohol credit and electricity production credit), as well as access to cheap loans and grants (more of what I would call a &quot;subsidy&quot; because it's money given not just less money owed).]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 09:53:32 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[First, I'm against any subsidies being provided at all and agree that the national debt is a problem. I think that alternative energies will eventually become economical on their own, which will probably happen when gas prices rise to an unacceptable level. Why not let the market push change rather than the government?<br/><br/>Second, the term subsidies can be ambiguous. The vast majority of oil subsidies are foreign tax credits that enables companies to generate credits that offset their income taxes when drilling new wells. And the second largest is a tax credit for the production of non-conventional fuels (to get away from dependence on the Middle East for crude oil). Alternative energy subsidies get those same tax credits (alcohol credit and electricity production credit), as well as access to cheap loans and grants (more of what I would call a &quot;subsidy&quot; because it's money given not just less money owed).]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fuel Cells: Driving Towards A Cleaner Future?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/393241/comments?source=feed#comment-3074051</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3074051</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[As mentioned in the article, FCEL's margins improved by more than 40% year. You can check for yourself looking at their latest 10-K.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 15:30:43 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[As mentioned in the article, FCEL's margins improved by more than 40% year. You can check for yourself looking at their latest 10-K.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fuel Cells: Driving Towards A Cleaner Future?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/393241/comments?source=feed#comment-3074001</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3074001</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[You're suggesting that I don't know economics, yet say that &quot;only the government can mandate&quot; things in order for them to change? Free markets drive real change... governments only mess it up.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 15:29:14 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[You're suggesting that I don't know economics, yet say that &quot;only the government can mandate&quot; things in order for them to change? Free markets drive real change... governments only mess it up.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fuel Cells: Driving Towards A Cleaner Future?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/393241/comments?source=feed#comment-3012121</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3012121</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I completely agree that it's an infrastructure problem, but it's also a consumer problem. Most people could probably use an electric car to commute to work every day without needing a recharge. But they stick to gas powered cars anyway, because everyone else has one.<br/><br/>However, I don't agree with your generalization that &quot;Americans are ignorant&quot; any more than I could point to a few Greek people and say that all Europeans are lazy and dependent on a welfare state...]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:28:04 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I completely agree that it's an infrastructure problem, but it's also a consumer problem. Most people could probably use an electric car to commute to work every day without needing a recharge. But they stick to gas powered cars anyway, because everyone else has one.<br/><br/>However, I don't agree with your generalization that &quot;Americans are ignorant&quot; any more than I could point to a few Greek people and say that all Europeans are lazy and dependent on a welfare state...]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fuel Cells: Driving Towards A Cleaner Future?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/393241/comments?source=feed#comment-2961191</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2961191</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The scale that hydrocarbons have makes them far less likely to see government support cut than new alternative energies. Put another way, a dollar rise in gas prices is far more catastrophic than the removal of a $1,000 subsidy on new electric vehicle purchases. Therefore, governments will spend a lot more money defending oil interests than supporting alternative energy, despite what they may say on podiums or on television. Wouldn't you agree?<br/><br/>And I realize that alternative energies can be economical (that's the entire point of this article, if you've read it). Scale is keeping it back. Certainly, if we had embraced the electric car instead of the gas-powered car in the late 1800s and 1900s, it would be a different story today. Fossil fuels would be prohibitively expensive without the infrastructure and supply that we have today. Obviously. But that's simply not the case YET.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 08:50:46 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The scale that hydrocarbons have makes them far less likely to see government support cut than new alternative energies. Put another way, a dollar rise in gas prices is far more catastrophic than the removal of a $1,000 subsidy on new electric vehicle purchases. Therefore, governments will spend a lot more money defending oil interests than supporting alternative energy, despite what they may say on podiums or on television. Wouldn't you agree?<br/><br/>And I realize that alternative energies can be economical (that's the entire point of this article, if you've read it). Scale is keeping it back. Certainly, if we had embraced the electric car instead of the gas-powered car in the late 1800s and 1900s, it would be a different story today. Fossil fuels would be prohibitively expensive without the infrastructure and supply that we have today. Obviously. But that's simply not the case YET.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fuel Cells: Driving Towards A Cleaner Future?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/393241/comments?source=feed#comment-2955991</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2955991</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[As mentioned in the article, there are some companies, like FCEL, that are seeing higher revenues and narrowing net losses. If those trends continue, they will become profitable. Of course, that &quot;if&quot; depends on their ability to reach positive operating margins and then just leave the rest to scaling. They are speculative, no doubt, but trading at 2x revenues is rather cheap, if they can pull it off and realize the growth projections some analysts expect long-term.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 23:07:12 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[As mentioned in the article, there are some companies, like FCEL, that are seeing higher revenues and narrowing net losses. If those trends continue, they will become profitable. Of course, that &quot;if&quot; depends on their ability to reach positive operating margins and then just leave the rest to scaling. They are speculative, no doubt, but trading at 2x revenues is rather cheap, if they can pull it off and realize the growth projections some analysts expect long-term.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fuel Cells: Driving Towards A Cleaner Future?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/393241/comments?source=feed#comment-2954331</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2954331</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[It's a fallacy of cause and effect thinking that just because wars happen in the Middle East and the Middle East happens to have oil that the wars happen because of the oil. There are other factors at play, such as terrorism, oppression, politics, etc. However, I do agree that it's likely that oil is ONE of the reasons, since energy is considered a matter of national security and a lot of terrorism arises due to prior intervention (it probably doesn't happen for no reason).<br/><br/>But regardless, there's little doubt right now that it's cheaper for a PERSON to own a gas-powered car than an all-electric car. Therefore, those economics will dominate the market for the time being. As I mentioned in the article, this is largely due to scaling, but that doesn't make it not true at the moment. It's my hope that alternative energies do achieve scale to a point where they can replace fossil fuels. And that point is coming sooner than later.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 20:32:05 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[It's a fallacy of cause and effect thinking that just because wars happen in the Middle East and the Middle East happens to have oil that the wars happen because of the oil. There are other factors at play, such as terrorism, oppression, politics, etc. However, I do agree that it's likely that oil is ONE of the reasons, since energy is considered a matter of national security and a lot of terrorism arises due to prior intervention (it probably doesn't happen for no reason).<br/><br/>But regardless, there's little doubt right now that it's cheaper for a PERSON to own a gas-powered car than an all-electric car. Therefore, those economics will dominate the market for the time being. As I mentioned in the article, this is largely due to scaling, but that doesn't make it not true at the moment. It's my hope that alternative energies do achieve scale to a point where they can replace fossil fuels. And that point is coming sooner than later.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How To Get Monthly Dividends From Blue Chips And Retire Abroad</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/389431/comments?source=feed#comment-2931851</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2931851</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I like this article and agree it's possible to retire abroad on $600 a month, but I would have added the following even though it goes beyond the scope of the article (after having lived abroad in many places)...<br/><br/>Retirement abroad is not retirement in the U.S. Costa Rica sounds great until your Internet goes down and it takes weeks for ICE (their nationalized telecom company) to come fix it. Brazil's oceanfront Rio properties seem amazing until you walk the street and get pick pocketed. SE Asia is great until you get terribly sick from some food-borne pathogen.<br/><br/>Don't get my wrong, I absolutely loved living abroad and will definitely do it in the future. But, it's not for everyone... especially elderly people who've never traveled looking to take it easy and relax.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 15:43:55 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I like this article and agree it's possible to retire abroad on $600 a month, but I would have added the following even though it goes beyond the scope of the article (after having lived abroad in many places)...<br/><br/>Retirement abroad is not retirement in the U.S. Costa Rica sounds great until your Internet goes down and it takes weeks for ICE (their nationalized telecom company) to come fix it. Brazil's oceanfront Rio properties seem amazing until you walk the street and get pick pocketed. SE Asia is great until you get terribly sick from some food-borne pathogen.<br/><br/>Don't get my wrong, I absolutely loved living abroad and will definitely do it in the future. But, it's not for everyone... especially elderly people who've never traveled looking to take it easy and relax.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is It Time To Buy Dry Shippers?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/379091/comments?source=feed#comment-2875991</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2875991</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I apologize for the late reply. I took a brief look at OSG and, you're right, they have a reasonable debt load with favorable debt ratios. But they were still burning cash during the 9-month period ending Sept 30th. As a result, I would say that they are safer than the rest, but it'll be a lot more safe when they generate some positive operating cash to ensure their positive balance sheet remains in tact.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 16:08:31 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I apologize for the late reply. I took a brief look at OSG and, you're right, they have a reasonable debt load with favorable debt ratios. But they were still burning cash during the 9-month period ending Sept 30th. As a result, I would say that they are safer than the rest, but it'll be a lot more safe when they generate some positive operating cash to ensure their positive balance sheet remains in tact.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Will Tobacco Stock Gains Go Up In Smoke?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/387561/comments?source=feed#comment-2875801</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2875801</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I try to write a combination of general interest articles on sector movements and more specific articles on individual stocks. The point of this article was to concisely point out what's driving tobacco stocks higher and address if trends are continuing. But thank you for your feedback, regardless, I will try to include more supporting material in future articles.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 16:04:02 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I try to write a combination of general interest articles on sector movements and more specific articles on individual stocks. The point of this article was to concisely point out what's driving tobacco stocks higher and address if trends are continuing. But thank you for your feedback, regardless, I will try to include more supporting material in future articles.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is It Time To Buy Dry Shippers?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/379091/comments?source=feed#comment-2859291</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2859291</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I personally think there are better investments than dry shipping companies in the market these days. But again, that's my opinion and you should consider your own situation when making decisions (e.g. your risk tolerance and timeframe).]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 09:30:59 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I personally think there are better investments than dry shipping companies in the market these days. But again, that's my opinion and you should consider your own situation when making decisions (e.g. your risk tolerance and timeframe).]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>When Boring Is Beautiful: A Low-Volatility Strategy In A Single ETF</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/382921/comments?source=feed#comment-2828761</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2828761</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Good article. Too few people take into account risk when making investment decisions... *risk adjusted* returns are far more important than overall returns and beta coefficients are a great way to determine risk by looking at volatility.<br/><br/>But, I'm not sure that an entirely low risk portfolio is necessary, since risk makes sense in some cases. In my own portfolio, one of the other things that I use is the Kelly Criterion, which tells you how much allocation to give something given its risk to fully optimize your portfolio.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 09:59:48 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Good article. Too few people take into account risk when making investment decisions... *risk adjusted* returns are far more important than overall returns and beta coefficients are a great way to determine risk by looking at volatility.<br/><br/>But, I'm not sure that an entirely low risk portfolio is necessary, since risk makes sense in some cases. In my own portfolio, one of the other things that I use is the Kelly Criterion, which tells you how much allocation to give something given its risk to fully optimize your portfolio.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
