Seeking Alpha

Jim888 » Comments » FXI

  • China’s August Data Confirms Both Optimists and Pessimists  [View article]
    I also think Alphameister is a bit off base by thinking Retail Sales IS consumption, while Mr. Pettis is correct in his discarding of it as a partial and perhaps irrelevant value except at a gross level over a period of time. I remember that consumption is the amount the entire economy consumed - of which Retail Sales is a component of - but not the end all - of that value (I hope the US learns this, but fear it is groveling for the consumer to spurge more instead). As for any spin here - you can read it many ways, and Mr Pettis allows us to make up our own mind, while making clear his own viewpoint - judge that from the last several articles - a review of this past work will show he is consistant.


    On Sep 12 04:55 AM Michael Pettis wrote:

    > CautiousInv, I am not sure China should be looking for new export
    > markets to replace the US. Europe for structural and political reasons
    > cannot absorb anywhere close to the deficit levels of the US and
    > no other market is big enough. At any rate, a continental sized economy,
    > and soon to be the second biggest in the world, should not rely so
    > heavily on foreign consumptionj for its growth.
    >
    > Alphameister, I wonder if you are old enough to remember the same
    > nonsense that was said during the credit-fueled bubble in Japan in
    > 1988 and 1989. And if you really do look closely at Chinese data
    > you may be one of the few who do who nonetheless accepts retail sales
    > as a measure of consumption growth. For the past five years retail
    > sales have always been higher than GDP growth, and yet consumption
    > as a share of GDP has declined, which at the very least is mathematically
    > curious.
    Sep 14 18:29 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Just How Big is the China Bubble? [View article]
    Not trying to hide my head in the sand - but these charts have nothing to do with each other. Why not overlay the 1920-1933 market on the FXI - has as much meaning as the above? Focus on reality (growth numbers - ForeX rates - China's new investment group CIC - etc...) - not the speculation.
    Oct 03 22:44 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
More on FXI by Jim888
Comments by Ticker
Jim888's
Comments Stats
4 comments
Rating: 1 (1 is - 0 )