Six Companies Poised to Gain from a Natural Gas Auto Mandate [View article]
Yes but------We havent solved the problem of nuculear waste as yet.
On Jan 19 09:33 PM Michael B. Krause wrote:
> Actually, y/y natural gas production and consumption is relatively > unchanged. Demand is down a little bit, but it appears producers > have shut in a bit of production to compensate for what could potentially > be in the market. > > Natural gas' cost of production does not enable it to be anywhere > as efficient as nuclear power. > > Like I always say, the solution is simple: We need to build 100-200 > nuclear power plants, spend 500B to subsidize all/most new cars purchased > as electric or plugin hybrid cars (and give trade-in incentives to > move the fleet over). These nuclear plants need to be breeder reactors > that can make best use of fuel. We can use all of the to-be unemployed > troops now positioned in Iraq to set up property security around > this new infrastructure. > > This would stop the status quo and get us into the new paradigm effectively. > If you like this idea, write a letter to Obama and suggest it. This > is the only way to affect change. >
I agree and have done about what you state, regulated pipelines and utillities, that pay a dividend, TRP, SE, EP, DUK, TE, I also like, cash loaded chemicals, MEOH, DOW. Oils and natural gas producers, APA, OXY, insured CD's. Inflation will be the big problem, in order for the U.S. treasury to pay off its debt, with cheap dollars. My biggest problem is----How the unions will react to the big money guys that are out to bust up the unions, which started back when Regan fired all the airport tower union people and these past 8 year of illegals being hired and some were imported by big corporate farms and related industries, to bust up the farm workers union, started by Chaves. In other words, big money and their greed. "BUY AMERICAN"
On Dec 20 12:10 PM Bobco23 wrote:
> My approach has been to barbell my portfolio. I have 55% in CDs and > treasuries (bought a while ago) and 25% in safe yield stocks (PM, > MO, pipelines and regulated electric utilities) in the event we deflate; > and 20% in commodities that pay distributions, TNH, BPT, SJT, PCU, > ARLP, etc. I probably could do better being more agressive, but I > want to preserve capital, get a modest cash flow, and gain some inflation > protection in the event my view that deflation is the likely outcome > is wrong.
Government's Ponzi Scheme: 1000 Times Worse than Madoff's [View article]
We have all been Bushwacked for the second time. The more I read between the lines and fine print, the madder I become. The Republicans and big business, are out to bust the Unions, started when Regan fired the air port control towers firing. The Senate didnt pass the automotive bail out, letting Georgy boy do it with certain resolutions, make the unions lower their wages. WHY did Bushwacker agree? Republicans are looking way ahead, for if the unions refuse to lower wages, and no more bailouts for the autos accurs, the republicans hope the unions will turn against the democrats, an republican ploy like everything they do, fine print artist, our used car salesmen, they are FAKES, money hungry leaches.
6 Natural Investments in Natural Gas [View article]
How about the natural gas pipelines, even though their delivery cost is fixed, the more they deliver, the more they make. Most have large storage compounds, fill in Summer and sell in Winter.
Sort by:
Latest | Highest ratedEl Paso Debt Deal Shows High Yield Market Is Not Dead, Just Expensive [View article]
Six Companies Poised to Gain from a Natural Gas Auto Mandate [View article]
On Jan 19 09:33 PM Michael B. Krause wrote:
> Actually, y/y natural gas production and consumption is relatively
> unchanged. Demand is down a little bit, but it appears producers
> have shut in a bit of production to compensate for what could potentially
> be in the market.
>
> Natural gas' cost of production does not enable it to be anywhere
> as efficient as nuclear power.
>
> Like I always say, the solution is simple: We need to build 100-200
> nuclear power plants, spend 500B to subsidize all/most new cars purchased
> as electric or plugin hybrid cars (and give trade-in incentives to
> move the fleet over). These nuclear plants need to be breeder reactors
> that can make best use of fuel. We can use all of the to-be unemployed
> troops now positioned in Iraq to set up property security around
> this new infrastructure.
>
> This would stop the status quo and get us into the new paradigm effectively.
> If you like this idea, write a letter to Obama and suggest it. This
> is the only way to affect change.
>
Are California Muni Bonds Safe? [View article]
The Deflation Scam [View article]
My biggest problem is----How the unions will react to the big money guys that are out to bust up the unions, which started back when Regan fired all the airport tower union people and these past 8 year of illegals being hired and some were imported by big corporate farms and related industries, to bust up the farm workers union, started by Chaves.
In other words, big money and their greed.
"BUY AMERICAN"
On Dec 20 12:10 PM Bobco23 wrote:
> My approach has been to barbell my portfolio. I have 55% in CDs and
> treasuries (bought a while ago) and 25% in safe yield stocks (PM,
> MO, pipelines and regulated electric utilities) in the event we deflate;
> and 20% in commodities that pay distributions, TNH, BPT, SJT, PCU,
> ARLP, etc. I probably could do better being more agressive, but I
> want to preserve capital, get a modest cash flow, and gain some inflation
> protection in the event my view that deflation is the likely outcome
> is wrong.
Government's Ponzi Scheme: 1000 Times Worse than Madoff's [View article]
6 Natural Investments in Natural Gas [View article]
Does the Auto Industry Deserve To Be Bailed Out? [View article]