Yes, NAT just lowered their dividend within the past week.
On Dec 18 07:41 AM redbaron wrote:
> NAT is no longer paying 7%+. Yahoo Finance shows them paying 1.3%, > or 40 cents per share. The NAT link above within the article shows > them paying the same 40 cents per share, so apparently your data > is not current. One has to question how helpful such information > might be, if it isn't current and isn't correct. One also begins > to question the other data as well, as result. I am no financial > genius, but I can check facts better than this. IMHO
2009: Already a Record Year for MLPs [View article]
But isn't AMJ an ETN, not an ETF, which means it has the risk of becoming worthless if JPMorgan should go the way of Lehman Brothers? Also, can anyone explain the difference between NRGY and NRGP as far as any payouts and tax consequences? Are either appropriate for an IRA/non-IRA account?
Can you tell me if NRGY and NRGP payout their distributions similarly? I have heard that some MLPs pay out their distributions in stock shares instead of in cash (KMP vs KMR and EEP vs EEQ).
6 Dividend Stocks for Current Income [View article]
On some stocks, CEFs, and/or ETFs the Summary page will not show a dividend rate, but the Historical Prices page will show dividend payouts. AOD is a perfect example.
On Oct 21 08:37 PM MJJP wrote:
> I checked some of your suggestions and Yahoo shows no data on dividends > being disbursed on many of those mentioned and also they are in the > PK category.
BPT and PBT are both yielding less than 10%, not 10 to 15%. Where is Cramer getting his information? Also, he should have mentioned that MLP's are not best for IRA accounts, due to tax concerns if dividends are over $1,000. On the other hand, AGNC is yielding 25% and definitely worth considering for any portfolio.
Alternatives to the iShares Australia ETF, and How to Invest in New Zealand (EWA, CNZLX) [View article]
Over the long term EWA and IAF have been performing equally, but IAF has a 9% dividend versus EWA's 5% dividend. And over the past 10 days IAF is >6% higher than EWA, but I do not know why such a difference. If you like high international dividends paid quarterly, then IAF is worth a look.
Sort by:
Latest | Highest ratedSeven Foreign Stocks Paying 7%+ Dividends [View article]
On Dec 18 07:41 AM redbaron wrote:
> NAT is no longer paying 7%+. Yahoo Finance shows them paying 1.3%,
> or 40 cents per share. The NAT link above within the article shows
> them paying the same 40 cents per share, so apparently your data
> is not current. One has to question how helpful such information
> might be, if it isn't current and isn't correct. One also begins
> to question the other data as well, as result. I am no financial
> genius, but I can check facts better than this. IMHO
2009: Already a Record Year for MLPs [View article]
Also, can anyone explain the difference between NRGY and NRGP as far as any payouts and tax consequences? Are either appropriate for an IRA/non-IRA account?
Inergy: A Winning Income Stock [View article]
PDL BioPharma: High Dividend Biotech Stock [View article]
What are the other four dividend paying stocks?
Complete List of Chilean ADR Stocks [View article]
6 Dividend Stocks for Current Income [View article]
On Oct 21 08:37 PM MJJP wrote:
> I checked some of your suggestions and Yahoo shows no data on dividends
> being disbursed on many of those mentioned and also they are in the
> PK category.
Search for Yield, Momentum, and Value [View instapost]
Inergy: A Winning Income Stock [View article]
Kinder Morgan's Dividend Payout Rate Is Unsustainable [View article]
Cramer's Mad Money - Who Needs Mutual Funds? (7/17/09) [View article]
Alternatives to the iShares Australia ETF, and How to Invest in New Zealand (EWA, CNZLX) [View article]
Why I'm Buying Citigroup Stock [View article]
5 Companies Ready and Able to Raise Dividends [View article]
Was Milton Friedman Right About the Euro? [View article]
Betting Against the U.S. Dollar [View article]