Dan Harris's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com http://seekingalpha.comuser/1133/comments http://seekingalpha.com/article/173453/comments?source=feed#comment-761514 761514 Mon, 16 Nov 2009 00:15:55 -0500 http://seekingalpha.com/article/115438/comments?source=feed#comment-361055 361055
Yes, some companies left China due to increased labor rates, but almost all of those companies were manufacturers of very low quality items like socks, and rubber duckies. Most of these companies were Chinese, HK or Taiwan owned. Very very few Western companies left for lower wages elsewhere. This article is also late because wages in China are now on a downslide and the government has been spreading the word that enforcement of its new labor laws will be less than rigorous, so long as companies retain their employees. ]]> Tue, 20 Jan 2009 13:48:50 -0500
Yes, some companies left China due to increased labor rates, but almost all of those companies were manufacturers of very low quality items like socks, and rubber duckies. Most of these companies were Chinese, HK or Taiwan owned. Very very few Western companies left for lower wages elsewhere. This article is also late because wages in China are now on a downslide and the government has been spreading the word that enforcement of its new labor laws will be less than rigorous, so long as companies retain their employees. ]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/81603/comments?source=feed#comment-187774 187774
I suspect that is the role HK plays for the ultra-rich Chinese today.

To badly paraphrase Groucho Marx, the risk luxury goods makers face by going into China is that the ultra-rich Chinese would not want to buy from any such producer that would have China as a member. ]]> Wed, 18 Jun 2008 12:31:37 -0400
I suspect that is the role HK plays for the ultra-rich Chinese today.

To badly paraphrase Groucho Marx, the risk luxury goods makers face by going into China is that the ultra-rich Chinese would not want to buy from any such producer that would have China as a member. ]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/80829/comments?source=feed#comment-184667 184667 Fri, 13 Jun 2008 02:06:13 -0400 http://seekingalpha.com/article/71896/comments?source=feed#comment-148966 148966 Fri, 11 Apr 2008 10:40:55 -0400 http://seekingalpha.com/article/48274/comments?source=feed#comment-97882 97882
Great post. Always difficult to recover from a loss of trust.]]> Sat, 06 Oct 2007 18:13:45 -0400
Great post. Always difficult to recover from a loss of trust.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/36457/comments?source=feed#comment-87104 87104 Sun, 27 May 2007 00:45:21 -0400 http://seekingalpha.com/article/31502/comments?source=feed#comment-83638 83638 Wed, 04 Apr 2007 10:09:01 -0400 http://seekingalpha.com/article/29320/comments?source=feed#comment-82402 82402

chinalawblog.com]]> Tue, 13 Mar 2007 23:03:46 -0400

chinalawblog.com]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/28673/comments?source=feed#comment-82068 82068 Mon, 05 Mar 2007 08:38:27 -0500 http://seekingalpha.com/article/26855/comments?source=feed#comment-81390 81390
chinalawblog.com]]> Tue, 13 Feb 2007 09:47:03 -0500
chinalawblog.com]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/26758/comments?source=feed#comment-81358 81358 Mon, 12 Feb 2007 13:25:21 -0500 http://seekingalpha.com/article/25769/comments?source=feed#comment-80993 80993
chinalawblog.com]]> Sat, 03 Feb 2007 10:42:37 -0500
chinalawblog.com]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/16354/comments?source=feed#comment-62210 62210
chinalawblog.com]]> Wed, 06 Sep 2006 00:14:10 -0400
chinalawblog.com]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/12368/comments?source=feed#comment-52401 52401 Wed, 21 Jun 2006 23:39:11 -0400 http://seekingalpha.com/article/12261/comments?source=feed#comment-52337 52337 Mon, 19 Jun 2006 22:06:15 -0400 http://seekingalpha.com/article/12049/comments?source=feed#comment-52306 52306 Sun, 18 Jun 2006 09:50:18 -0400