<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Marty2019's Comments</title>
    <description>Marty2019's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/1133263/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>Sense And Nonsense About Climate Change. What Do Investors Need To Know?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1101351/comments?source=feed#comment-13677861</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13677861</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Climate change denial is like religion.   You start with a conclusion, then you gather some facts to support your conclusion.  <br/><br/>Science is the opposite of religion.  In science, you gather all the facts you can get and then come to a conclusion.  <br/><br/><br/>    ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 08:25:12 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Climate change denial is like religion.   You start with a conclusion, then you gather some facts to support your conclusion.  <br/><br/>Science is the opposite of religion.  In science, you gather all the facts you can get and then come to a conclusion.  <br/><br/><br/>    ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sense And Nonsense About Climate Change. What Do Investors Need To Know?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1101351/comments?source=feed#comment-13487131</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13487131</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Fantastic article.  Well done.  I've been wondering for a long time why opinions on climate change split along political lines.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 10:23:06 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Fantastic article.  Well done.  I've been wondering for a long time why opinions on climate change split along political lines.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fiscal Cliff: Let's Call Their Bluff</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1074251/comments?source=feed#comment-12870571</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12870571</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[So what you are saying is, basically, you'd like to go ahead and destroy the country.  Nice.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 14:03:07 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[So what you are saying is, basically, you'd like to go ahead and destroy the country.  Nice.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fiscal Cliff: Let's Call Their Bluff</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1074251/comments?source=feed#comment-12870111</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12870111</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[That downgrade would cost us trillions of dollars in increased interest payments.   <br/>Last year's downgrade cost us a trillion dollars.   That's why I think the tea party people are not very smart.  They held the debt ceiling hostage and as a result, it cost us a trillion dollars.  Exactly the opposite of what they were trying to do.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 13:56:26 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[That downgrade would cost us trillions of dollars in increased interest payments.   <br/>Last year's downgrade cost us a trillion dollars.   That's why I think the tea party people are not very smart.  They held the debt ceiling hostage and as a result, it cost us a trillion dollars.  Exactly the opposite of what they were trying to do.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fiscal Cliff: Let's Call Their Bluff</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1074251/comments?source=feed#comment-12858411</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12858411</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[If the congress is stupid enough to force a default on the debt, then I favor the president doing whatever is necessary to assure our creditors that we will pay our bills on time.  Even if it's the trillion dollar coin trick.  Do it and fight it out in court if necessary.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:47:49 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[If the congress is stupid enough to force a default on the debt, then I favor the president doing whatever is necessary to assure our creditors that we will pay our bills on time.  Even if it's the trillion dollar coin trick.  Do it and fight it out in court if necessary.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fiscal Cliff: Let's Call Their Bluff</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1074251/comments?source=feed#comment-12831001</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12831001</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[It seems to me that we have reached the point where we have to thread the needle to get out of this situation.  We have to cut the growth of the debt, but if we cut too fast, we will make the deficits worse.   That should be a warning sign for all of us: this is it and we have to do something now or there will be no solution.   <br/>We have a narrow window: we can still get out of it, but if we do it too quickly, we will make the situation worse.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 14:58:45 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[It seems to me that we have reached the point where we have to thread the needle to get out of this situation.  We have to cut the growth of the debt, but if we cut too fast, we will make the deficits worse.   That should be a warning sign for all of us: this is it and we have to do something now or there will be no solution.   <br/>We have a narrow window: we can still get out of it, but if we do it too quickly, we will make the situation worse.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fiscal Cliff: Let's Call Their Bluff</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1074251/comments?source=feed#comment-12817911</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12817911</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Read the preamble to the Constitution.   That explains why we have a government.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 10:58:13 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Read the preamble to the Constitution.   That explains why we have a government.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fiscal Cliff: Let's Call Their Bluff</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1074251/comments?source=feed#comment-12813011</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12813011</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Going over the fiscal cliff would not be pleasant, but it wouldn't kill us.   <br/>On the other hand, it pales in comparison to defaulting on the debt by refusing to raise the debt ceiling.   Defaulting on our debt would be an unmitigated disaster.  And that's why, if the congress refuses to raise the debt ceiling, I would favor the president taking whatever steps he can to get around it.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 09:36:31 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Going over the fiscal cliff would not be pleasant, but it wouldn't kill us.   <br/>On the other hand, it pales in comparison to defaulting on the debt by refusing to raise the debt ceiling.   Defaulting on our debt would be an unmitigated disaster.  And that's why, if the congress refuses to raise the debt ceiling, I would favor the president taking whatever steps he can to get around it.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How To Reduce Risk With Dividend ETFs</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1069581/comments?source=feed#comment-12724611</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12724611</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[&quot;For example, the SPDR S&amp;P Dividend ETF (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sdy' title='SPDR Dividend ETF'>SDY</a>) follows companies of the S&amp;P 1500 that have increased dividends for the last 25 consecutive years.&quot;<br/><br/>Correction: it's 20 years, not 25.  <br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/ZfLAyi'>http://bit.ly/ZfLAyi</a><br/>  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 09:23:30 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[&quot;For example, the SPDR S&amp;P Dividend ETF (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sdy' title='SPDR Dividend ETF'>SDY</a>) follows companies of the S&amp;P 1500 that have increased dividends for the last 25 consecutive years.&quot;<br/><br/>Correction: it's 20 years, not 25.  <br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/ZfLAyi'>http://bit.ly/ZfLAyi</a><br/>  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Good, The Bad, And The Ugly</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1061631/comments?source=feed#comment-12555851</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12555851</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I don't understand why the author says QE is done.  I thought the Fed announced yesterday that they intend to keep buying about 40 to 50 billion per month of federal debt.<br/>Interesting article, though.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 08:49:47 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I don't understand why the author says QE is done.  I thought the Fed announced yesterday that they intend to keep buying about 40 to 50 billion per month of federal debt.<br/>Interesting article, though.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>All I Want For Christmas Are A Few Good REITs</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1056701/comments?source=feed#comment-12513261</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12513261</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I looked at UHT, one of the dividend champions, who have not cut their dividend in 25 years, and it appears from reading their annual report for 2011, that they used borrowed money to maintain their dividend.   Is this normal?  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 08:16:49 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I looked at UHT, one of the dividend champions, who have not cut their dividend in 25 years, and it appears from reading their annual report for 2011, that they used borrowed money to maintain their dividend.   Is this normal?  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why REITs Should Become More Attractive In 2013</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1054641/comments?source=feed#comment-12460621</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12460621</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[If company A pays a 4% dividend, which is growing at 4% a year, and company B pays a 2.37% dividend, which is growing at 10% a year, it takes 10 years for company B's dividend to exceed company A's dividend.   And in that time, company A will have paid out 23% more in dividends.   I'd rather not wait on company B in that situation.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 18:51:02 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[If company A pays a 4% dividend, which is growing at 4% a year, and company B pays a 2.37% dividend, which is growing at 10% a year, it takes 10 years for company B's dividend to exceed company A's dividend.   And in that time, company A will have paid out 23% more in dividends.   I'd rather not wait on company B in that situation.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why REITs Should Become More Attractive In 2013</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1054641/comments?source=feed#comment-12439621</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12439621</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Excellent article.  Thanks a lot.   <br/><br/>Maybe you can answer this in your next article, but my question is, from that list of blue chip REITs, why wouldn't I simply choose the one(s) with the highest payout?  Why wouldn't everyone choose NNN since it has the highest payout ratio?  What makes TCO attractive in spite of its 2.37% dividend yield?  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 09:46:24 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Excellent article.  Thanks a lot.   <br/><br/>Maybe you can answer this in your next article, but my question is, from that list of blue chip REITs, why wouldn't I simply choose the one(s) with the highest payout?  Why wouldn't everyone choose NNN since it has the highest payout ratio?  What makes TCO attractive in spite of its 2.37% dividend yield?  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Prepare To Short Gold</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1050481/comments?source=feed#comment-12359481</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12359481</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[GLD actually owns the physical gold.   Although you cannot cash out in gold, the ETF does actually own the gold in a vault.   ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 10:24:49 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[GLD actually owns the physical gold.   Although you cannot cash out in gold, the ETF does actually own the gold in a vault.   ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fear Higher Taxes? Then Buy These Tax-Free High Yielders</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1047321/comments?source=feed#comment-12327581</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12327581</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I have been looking at muni bonds lately, and I am a little baffled as to why high grade municipal bonds can yield as much or more than high grade TAXABLE corporate bonds.  There has to be a catch somewhere, and I'm not finding it.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 13:49:30 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I have been looking at muni bonds lately, and I am a little baffled as to why high grade municipal bonds can yield as much or more than high grade TAXABLE corporate bonds.  There has to be a catch somewhere, and I'm not finding it.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>REITs To Hold Forever, Most Likely</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/940601/comments?source=feed#comment-12087421</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12087421</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[dreadlordnaf,<br/>If interest rates return to historical norms, couldn't it be because the overall economic environment changed for the better?  Wouldn't that mean that rents could go up, mitigating the damage from rising interest rates?   There are lot of moving parts in an economy, not just interest rates and interest rates don't move absent something causing them to move.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 16:08:22 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[dreadlordnaf,<br/>If interest rates return to historical norms, couldn't it be because the overall economic environment changed for the better?  Wouldn't that mean that rents could go up, mitigating the damage from rising interest rates?   There are lot of moving parts in an economy, not just interest rates and interest rates don't move absent something causing them to move.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Big 4 Economic Indicators: Real Personal Income Less Transfer Payments</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/960551/comments?source=feed#comment-11037251</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11037251</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[&quot;Average of Big 4 Indicators Since 2000, Percent off most recent high, recessions in gray&quot;<br/>Take a look at that chart.   Find inauguration day, 2009 and plot that date on that chart.  <br/>Regardless of how you intend to vote, that shows you the mess Obama inherited.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 08:51:45 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[&quot;Average of Big 4 Indicators Since 2000, Percent off most recent high, recessions in gray&quot;<br/>Take a look at that chart.   Find inauguration day, 2009 and plot that date on that chart.  <br/>Regardless of how you intend to vote, that shows you the mess Obama inherited.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The 6 Most Popular Stocks Owned By Congress</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/814212/comments?source=feed#comment-8507961</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8507961</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[That's a good article.   Very interesting and well written.   ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 13:35:49 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[That's a good article.   Very interesting and well written.   ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GlaxoSmithKline: Don't Pass On This Long-Term Gem</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/805221/comments?source=feed#comment-8422441</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8422441</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[It would be nice, I think, if the authors would say, &quot;I don't own this stock..[that I just wrote a long glowing article about]... because...&quot;<br/><br/>And then tell us WHY they don't own it.   Maybe they have other stocks that they prefer.   What stocks do they prefer?  <br/><br/>It's just mystifying to me when an article says &quot;Don't Pass On This Long Term Gem&quot; and then the author says he is passing on it.  <br/><br/>I think it's a reasonable question.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 10:31:35 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[It would be nice, I think, if the authors would say, &quot;I don't own this stock..[that I just wrote a long glowing article about]... because...&quot;<br/><br/>And then tell us WHY they don't own it.   Maybe they have other stocks that they prefer.   What stocks do they prefer?  <br/><br/>It's just mystifying to me when an article says &quot;Don't Pass On This Long Term Gem&quot; and then the author says he is passing on it.  <br/><br/>I think it's a reasonable question.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GlaxoSmithKline: Don't Pass On This Long-Term Gem</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/805221/comments?source=feed#comment-8381251</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8381251</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I am wondering why someone would write such a glowing article and then say he has no position in the stock and no plans to initiate a position within the next 72 hours.   ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:08:44 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I am wondering why someone would write such a glowing article and then say he has no position in the stock and no plans to initiate a position within the next 72 hours.   ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dividend And Income Stocks Are Being Valued Based On Treasury Yields, Not Fundamentals</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/687711/comments?source=feed#comment-6859171</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6859171</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I think it's a very good article.  It's something I have noticed, too.  In particular, Kimberly-Clark seems to keep increasing its dividend without increasing its earnings or its cash flow.  It doesn't seem sustainable.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 16:48:29 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I think it's a very good article.  It's something I have noticed, too.  In particular, Kimberly-Clark seems to keep increasing its dividend without increasing its earnings or its cash flow.  It doesn't seem sustainable.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Buffett's Favorite Valuation Metric Goes Bullish</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/668541/comments?source=feed#comment-6563361</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6563361</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The thing is, what would drive that metric into the bullish range would be some really scary news.   And that's when we find out if we have the cajones to do what we say we would do.  Because when the world is collapsing, it's really really scary to go buy stock.   ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 09:41:33 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The thing is, what would drive that metric into the bullish range would be some really scary news.   And that's when we find out if we have the cajones to do what we say we would do.  Because when the world is collapsing, it's really really scary to go buy stock.   ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Benefits Of Averaging Down</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/660801/comments?source=feed#comment-6501801</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6501801</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[User 388887, I don't understand.  Why would you have gone bankrupt following his advice?   It seems to me he gave you some very good advice.    When stocks crash, that's when people like Warren Buffett back up the truck and buy stock.   That's why they make money.   If you want to buy low and sell high, you have to be willing to buy low.   Was it a particular stock he was telling you to buy?   ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2012 09:09:37 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[User 388887, I don't understand.  Why would you have gone bankrupt following his advice?   It seems to me he gave you some very good advice.    When stocks crash, that's when people like Warren Buffett back up the truck and buy stock.   That's why they make money.   If you want to buy low and sell high, you have to be willing to buy low.   Was it a particular stock he was telling you to buy?   ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Benefits Of Averaging Down</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/660801/comments?source=feed#comment-6473121</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6473121</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Paul, I don't believe in stop loss orders.  I'm a long-term, value type of investor.   It's not my style to jump in and out every time the market fluctuates.   In my opinion, stop loss orders are nothing but automated panic selling.  Maybe that removes your fear, but it's no way to make money.  Just my humble opinion, of course.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 15:58:30 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Paul, I don't believe in stop loss orders.  I'm a long-term, value type of investor.   It's not my style to jump in and out every time the market fluctuates.   In my opinion, stop loss orders are nothing but automated panic selling.  Maybe that removes your fear, but it's no way to make money.  Just my humble opinion, of course.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Benefits Of Averaging Down</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/660801/comments?source=feed#comment-6472441</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6472441</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[And that includes me.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 15:38:01 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[And that includes me.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Benefits Of Averaging Down</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/660801/comments?source=feed#comment-6472351</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6472351</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[&quot;Isn't it harder to miss something you never had then miss something you lost?&quot;<br/><br/>For most people, it is.  That's why they make lousy investors.   Fear.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 15:35:12 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[&quot;Isn't it harder to miss something you never had then miss something you lost?&quot;<br/><br/>For most people, it is.  That's why they make lousy investors.   Fear.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Benefits Of Averaging Down</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/660801/comments?source=feed#comment-6470551</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6470551</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The decision to buy or not buy a stock involves two different risks: the risk of incurring a loss if you are holding the stock, and the risk of missing a gain if you are not holding the stock.  But the only reason to buy a stock is that you think it is more likely to go up than to go down.  And if you think the stock is more likely to go up than to go down, then the greater risk is in not holding the stock.  This is why, when faced with the choice of going all in on a stock or averaging your way in, the correct thing to do is go all in at once.   When you average your way in, you may be avoiding the risk of loss, but you are incurring a greater risk: the risk of missing a gain.  And a gain is more likely than a loss, otherwise, you would not be thinking of buying the stock.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:47:43 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The decision to buy or not buy a stock involves two different risks: the risk of incurring a loss if you are holding the stock, and the risk of missing a gain if you are not holding the stock.  But the only reason to buy a stock is that you think it is more likely to go up than to go down.  And if you think the stock is more likely to go up than to go down, then the greater risk is in not holding the stock.  This is why, when faced with the choice of going all in on a stock or averaging your way in, the correct thing to do is go all in at once.   When you average your way in, you may be avoiding the risk of loss, but you are incurring a greater risk: the risk of missing a gain.  And a gain is more likely than a loss, otherwise, you would not be thinking of buying the stock.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Benefits Of Averaging Down</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/660801/comments?source=feed#comment-6449831</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6449831</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[It seems to me that, if you say &quot;I intend to average down in this stock,&quot; then you are saying you expect the stock to go down.  If so, why are you buying now?  Why not wait for it to go down?  Why buy a stock now if you expect it to be a better investment later?  <br/><br/>In practice I find it very hard to plunge completely into the market or an individual stock.  But speaking from what I think is pure logic, if you think that there will be a better entry point, you should wait, and if you don't think there will be a better entry point, you should go ahead and go all in.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 06:12:05 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[It seems to me that, if you say &quot;I intend to average down in this stock,&quot; then you are saying you expect the stock to go down.  If so, why are you buying now?  Why not wait for it to go down?  Why buy a stock now if you expect it to be a better investment later?  <br/><br/>In practice I find it very hard to plunge completely into the market or an individual stock.  But speaking from what I think is pure logic, if you think that there will be a better entry point, you should wait, and if you don't think there will be a better entry point, you should go ahead and go all in.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How Much Will Microsoft Raise Its Dividend?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/657271/comments?source=feed#comment-6394751</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6394751</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Spring Apple, comparing cash per share between Apple and MSFT is kind of misleading since Apple's shares cost 20 times as much as MSFT's shares cost.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 16:28:28 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Spring Apple, comparing cash per share between Apple and MSFT is kind of misleading since Apple's shares cost 20 times as much as MSFT's shares cost.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Vale SA: Is A Bottom In Place?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/657461/comments?source=feed#comment-6394531</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6394531</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I have always wondered about that.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 16:24:06 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I have always wondered about that.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
