Seeking Alpha

Smart1 » Comments » IGW

  • Intel: Is AMD's Foundry a Subsidiary or Not? [View article]
    Then you certainly should know better.....
    Jan 27 19:02 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Intel: Is AMD's Foundry a Subsidiary or Not? [View article]
    I have had hundreds of millions of dollars worth of parts fabricated in foundries. You will never understand.....Go ahead and buy some AMD stock....!!!
    Jan 27 11:26 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Intel: Is AMD's Foundry a Subsidiary or Not? [View article]
    Building your own stuff is far different than building somebody else's at a competitive cost....By the way, AMD is also the only semiconductor company in history to lose $6.5Bn (with a B) in two years. I don't call that competing....Their losses in Q4 were greater than their revenue. What customer company in their right mind would put a critical design into a company in that much trouble (who has never done foundry work before)...?
    Jan 26 20:32 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Intel: Is AMD's Foundry a Subsidiary or Not? [View article]
    When that deal started, oil was $150/barrel. The Abu Dhabi people are not stupid, they will realize the problems of this deal eventually, if not already. You don't find customers for a semiconductor foundry by advertising. You find them by demonstrating reliability and competence in that business, neither of which AMD or their partners have. I can't believe anyone still believes that fab in NY will be built any time soon, if ever.
    Jan 26 15:57 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Intel: Is AMD's Foundry a Subsidiary or Not? [View article]
    I will ask the same question I have asked on other forums. Even if "The Foundry Company" is allowed to go ahead with the X86 stuff (which does not sound likely), how do they hope to compete with the likes of TSMC, Chartered etc.....????. That would be almost impossible even if they were on a level playing field with those companies but they are not. First, their fabs are in Germany and potentially New York (no way that will ever happen). Second, being in the 3rd party semiconductor manufacturing business requires an extensive and complex customer interface infrastructure which "The Foundry Co" appears to lack completely. Thirdly, and perhaps most important, it requires customer confidence. Customers know how difficult some of this stuff is and will take years to build confidence in a brand new supplier (especially one also building their own [AMD's] product in the same fabs).
    Jan 26 12:23 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
More on IGW by Smart1
Comments by Ticker
Smart1's
Comments Stats
55 comments
Rating: 14 (37 - 23 )