Cal-Maine Foods: Buy This Golden Egg [View article]
That last remark makes me think that you work for Cal-Maine. I've been watching and trading this stock for several years and it's P/E ratio is always very low, yet the stock still seems to fluctuate between 18 and 26. So, for me, CALM is a trade, not an investment. But one good thing about it is that if I ever get stuck holding it for a while, I know that the dividends are decent. So, I'm with you on buying this stock. I actually think I bought it on Friday afternoon after having sold it early that morning.
Due to simply looking at it's 52 week chart and having traded it many times, when I was checking it out a couple of weeks ago and noticing it was down to around 20, I just knew it was due for a rebound. Either I was just lucky or maybe looking at the 52 week chart helped. But it went up to 26. I thought it would only go up to 24 though, and then drop back down to around 22 or so. It did drop back down. That's just the nature of this stock!
Anyway, one can make a nice living just trading the fairly even ebb and flow of this stock's price, and do it in the safety of knowing dividends will continue. As you said, Mr. Adams has 1/3 of the shares, so I could assume that he wants those dividends to keep coming his way.
Along with that, the whole idea of people eating eggs is in itself a good topic for much discussion, including the influences you mentioned such as population growth, fertilizer prices, etc... But all things considered, the egg business is in my opinion a rather stable business.
If Marie Antoinette had said, "Let them eat eggs." maybe she wouldn't have lost her head. Hey, it's Saturday and I'm just having my coffee before heading out on the trails.
6 Dividend Stocks for Those the Rally Left Behind [View article]
Very good point David! I know that SO hasn't come up because it's an electric utility. So are PGN and DUK. And with all of this talk of clean coal burning and the environment from the Obama administration, it's normal that these 3 would suffer, along with the fact that they are regulated utilities. So, sure they are safe stocks, and when other stocks suffer and people get scared, these type generally go up.
So, I agree with you. This article is rather useless. I would like to have known why those other 3 stocks might do well, as I'm not familiar with them. I certainly won't be following THIS author! Dave Morrison
On May 26 08:15 AM David Van Knapp wrote:
> What good is an unexplained, unanalyzed list of 6 stocks that pay > dividends? What makes them stand out from the other thousand or so > stocks that pay dividends? What makes them "non-cyclical"? Why have > their price gains "considerably lagged the advance"? What are the > risks behind a pink-sheet stock? Why might these stocks "regain some > popularity"?
I forwarded this good list on to a trading group to which I belong, but with the same warning to do one's own research. But this is a good list from which to start if we are looking for dividends. I own PCU, and am very happy about that fact as they paid the usual dividend even though their earnings were down this quarter. I don't know why they did that, but it made me happy!
Safe Haven Investments: Imminent Danger and Opportunities
[View article]
Though I am also heavily invested in commodities, I must agree with the other people commenting. I came away from this article with a feeling of someone pumping stocks that they own, mostly due to the fact that the article is simply way too long. "Methinks she doth protest too much" comes to mind.
Having said that, I will keep in mind what was written anyway and remain hopeful that Mark is at least correct in a general way, though I also believe prices won't jump tenfold. As Mark likes to say, "Hello!" We are in a recession, which we all know means lower demand for just about everything! I see commodities, hopefully copper, coming up gradually, very gradually. And I do believe there are some great deals in commodities now, but I wouldn't expect any quick profits, just some solid, long term investments.
Three Reasons the Stock Market Rally Won't Last [View article]
I believe this is a well thought out article. Apparently I just read an entirely different one than "smarty pants" who bashed you. Or perhaps he just read the top of each paragraph rather than the whole thing! I didn't read anything in your article suggesting that we use credit cards to buy stock!!!
Anyway, I really agree that though this could well not be the bottom, there are some good buys out there, and using the averaging down method is clearly the wisest way to go. I think that if I were to pick one, I'd split my buys into 6th's.
Great article! Way too much of my portfolio is in PCU and add to that I have some FCX. It was at least good to see that PCU is lower than 2002 levels. So, maybe it won't go down much further. Now if I had more money to spend, I certainly think this would be a good time to buy these commodity stocks. They might not be quite at their bottom, but I would think that they are almost there.
I guess with all stocks now, those who can wait a while have the advantage.
About CPVC: I used to sell it and thought it was wonderful, but when I went to put new plumbing in my old house, I used copper. Copper does have that nice feature of cutting down on germs as water flows through it. And I would think that right now, it's about as cheap as CPVC! Lol.
Good to read an article and comment on this, since I in my lack of wisdom become way to heavy in FCX and PCU alone. It's like I suddenly became ravenous towards copper. Anyway, I do believe that China will someday have to buy more copper and these stocks will regain their former prices. In the meantime, PCU has pretty good dividends. I just hope their rise is sooner than later. I think that all of this recent desire and rationalization that everything is getting better now in the U.S. will diminish when future reports of increased national debt, more job losses, etc.... come out in the news. Then people will come back to reality. It might hurt copper some, but I think China has reached the point to where it's copper needs aren't really dependent upon the U.S. economy. And when people start getting really scared from bad reports, they'll start buying up gold again.
Opportunities in Energy Storage Stocks [View article]
Great article!!! It's the only one I have ever saved to my computer for future reading, since I can't possibly take it all in at once. I sent it to others too for them to read if they wish. Thanks!
Oh, and thanks to Jim too, for telling us about Valence. I'll be watching that company too.
Due to trading in a few solar stocks over the past year, I'll say that I noticed that oil prices affected solar stocks. So, I'd have to agree with Dru. I also agree that it seems that solar stock prices are being a little bit less affected by oil prices as time goes on. So, I think that he's on the right track here.
I'm not so sure about the correctness of the chart since it compares stock prices to "peak oil". That seems a little to vague, but still it's a nice chart to compare how each one has moved. I have owned WFR, along with FSLR, SOL, ESLR, and YGE. Made some money on each of them except for WFR. I now think that WFR has a great potential to perhaps move up the most.
I sometimes try to figure out what the mindset of the average U.S. person is like. As this is an election year, it seems that people who are for "change", regardless of whether they are for Obama or McCain, might at this time be more excited about purchasing the various solar or battery powered things than they would be when there is less talk of other sources of energy depletion. Are more people building with solar panels this year? It is obvious that more people are buying cars that in part use batteries.
I think that we'll get going with solar sooner than most people realize. It seems to me that our addiction to being able to drive around a lot will create a good market for solar power. So many people in the future will be willing to have a little less power in their cars to get the battery powered car market really strong. Later on, with the money from the first battery cars, they'll work on making these more efficient and faster. This is the way of any new type of technology. I'm not worried and I plan to get back into solar stocks as soon as I make some more money on FCX, which is still gradually going up, though it went down in the last session.
The New Energy Cold War: The Warsaw-Tehran Connection [View article]
Nice, thoughtful article, but it would have been much better if you had edited it down to less words. Or maybe my ADD kicked when you decided "to recap". I felt like I was reading a school paper. Most readers on here don't need a recap.
Otherwise, I like reading about geopolitical strategies.
I'm all for taxing gas to keep it high. I would want to ensure that these taxes could only go towards subsidizing solar and a few other renewable energy resources. However, that's harder than it seems. As one person commented, some politicians would probably find ways to divert the taxes to other things. Even if they didn't, these politicians would see that they have more money overall to spend. But I still think it's worth a try, or maybe we should just make sure that our representatives promise to use a certain amount of money for alternative energy, and also tax gas to keep it high, but make these two acts independent of each other.
I liked Obama's idea of using 150 billion dollars to get us off of dependence on foreign oil. It's probably not enough money but it's a start. I just wish we had not spent all of that money and a lot more on a war. We could have used it as Obama is planning to do.
Although I own FCX and PCU, I thought that this article might have more information in it. But it seems to simply be an advertisement for Arizona and a waste of my time.
So, why did prices go down the other day for FCX and PCU? I'm not saying that I disagree at all with the article. Just asking a question. I own wayyy too much PCU and FCX , or hopefully I don't own too much. I have felt the same way about the future of copper. Population growth worldwide, along with the idea that many of these greater numbers of people now have a little bit more money to buy things that require copper. I know that the U.S. economy will have something to do with copper demand, but I think it's not as much a factor as some might think it is. The U.S. is gradually becoming less important to the world, IMHO.
Banking Sector: Band-Aids Just Won't Do It [View article]
The way I see it is this: If I loan a lot of people money, and have to borrow money to loan it out, then I stand the chance of losing everything I have. And that's the choice I make. If they don't pay me back, then I'm out of business. And so people will have to get loans from someone else. Perhaps that next person will be more careful with loaning out money. In the meantime, I should be able to take strong measures to retrieve as much money as possible from those who defaulted on their loans. And if I tricked them into taking loans that they couldn't really afford, then we both lose, but ultimately it is up to everyone to know the details and risks of any contract they sign.
Now I still owe money to those to whom I borrowed money. And it's too bad for them too, since I can't pay them. So, they lose too, and perhaps they will make the next person who wants to use their money to make loans to others go through a much more stringent examination of how they plan to make loans.
So, those people who took out loans they couldn't afford, whether it be individuals or banks, and for those who loaned out money, whether it be the banks and the stockholders of the banks, or the government, it's just too bad for them. They should feel the pain of irresponsibility. And since the government is you and me, then we need to make our representatives know how we feel about this. I write mine a lot about many issues. I don't know if it does any good or not, but I try. My district just got through kicking out one of the bums 2 years ago. And we'll do it again if needed.
MEMC Electronic: Glass Half Empty or Half Full? [View article]
I feel better now. I listened to the conference call yesterday and it all seemed fine to me! But I still was totally confused as to why the stock had plummeted. Your statements of Quants? dumping it helped me understand it better. I hope some good, decent people have been able to take advantage of the quants dumping this stock, as it is bound to rise back to over 50 dollars, and even more over the year. Just wait until the next oil crisis occurs, and people wake up to the fact that we are going to HAVE to move much faster to solar. I can't wait for that day to come. Solar energy, charging batteries for our cars. Solar power heating and cooling our homes. And much quieter roads maybe.
Anyway, it's good for me to hear others say something that I suspected, that there was a horrific over reaction to the earnings report. It makes me wonder if anyone actually read the report or listened to the conference call. I noticed two analysts at least upgraded the stock afterwards.
Sort by:
Latest | Highest ratedCal-Maine Foods: Buy This Golden Egg [View article]
Due to simply looking at it's 52 week chart and having traded it many times, when I was checking it out a couple of weeks ago and noticing it was down to around 20, I just knew it was due for a rebound. Either I was just lucky or maybe looking at the 52 week chart helped. But it went up to 26. I thought it would only go up to 24 though, and then drop back down to around 22 or so. It did drop back down. That's just the nature of this stock!
Anyway, one can make a nice living just trading the fairly even ebb and flow of this stock's price, and do it in the safety of knowing dividends will continue. As you said, Mr. Adams has 1/3 of the shares, so I could assume that he wants those dividends to keep coming his way.
Along with that, the whole idea of people eating eggs is in itself a good topic for much discussion, including the influences you mentioned such as population growth, fertilizer prices, etc... But all things considered, the egg business is in my opinion a rather stable business.
If Marie Antoinette had said, "Let them eat eggs." maybe she wouldn't have lost her head. Hey, it's Saturday and I'm just having my coffee before heading out on the trails.
6 Dividend Stocks for Those the Rally Left Behind [View article]
Very good point David! I know that SO hasn't come up because it's an electric utility. So are PGN and DUK. And with all of this talk of clean coal burning and the environment from the Obama administration, it's normal that these 3 would suffer, along with the fact that they are regulated utilities. So, sure they are safe stocks, and when other stocks suffer and people get scared, these type generally go up.
So, I agree with you. This article is rather useless. I would like to have known why those other 3 stocks might do well, as I'm not familiar with them. I certainly won't be following THIS author! Dave Morrison
On May 26 08:15 AM David Van Knapp wrote:
> What good is an unexplained, unanalyzed list of 6 stocks that pay
> dividends? What makes them stand out from the other thousand or so
> stocks that pay dividends? What makes them "non-cyclical"? Why have
> their price gains "considerably lagged the advance"? What are the
> risks behind a pink-sheet stock? Why might these stocks "regain some
> popularity"?
Top Global Dividend Stocks [View article]
Safe Haven Investments: Imminent Danger and Opportunities [View article]
Having said that, I will keep in mind what was written anyway and remain hopeful that Mark is at least correct in a general way, though I also believe prices won't jump tenfold. As Mark likes to say, "Hello!" We are in a recession, which we all know means lower demand for just about everything! I see commodities, hopefully copper, coming up gradually, very gradually. And I do believe there are some great deals in commodities now, but I wouldn't expect any quick profits, just some solid, long term investments.
Three Reasons the Stock Market Rally Won't Last [View article]
Anyway, I really agree that though this could well not be the bottom, there are some good buys out there, and using the averaging down method is clearly the wisest way to go. I think that if I were to pick one, I'd split my buys into 6th's.
How Low Can Mining Stocks Go? [View article]
I guess with all stocks now, those who can wait a while have the advantage.
About CPVC: I used to sell it and thought it was wonderful, but when I went to put new plumbing in my old house, I used copper. Copper does have that nice feature of cutting down on germs as water flows through it. And I would think that right now, it's about as cheap as CPVC! Lol.
Wake Up Copper Consuming Dragon [View article]
I just hope their rise is sooner than later. I think that all of this recent desire and rationalization that everything is getting better now in the U.S. will diminish when future reports of increased national debt, more job losses, etc.... come out in the news. Then people will come back to reality. It might hurt copper some, but I think China has reached the point to where it's copper needs aren't really dependent upon the U.S. economy. And when people start getting really scared from bad reports, they'll start buying up gold again.
Opportunities in Energy Storage Stocks [View article]
Oh, and thanks to Jim too, for telling us about Valence. I'll be watching that company too.
Solar Breaks Oil Price Dependence [View article]
I'm not so sure about the correctness of the chart since it compares stock prices to "peak oil". That seems a little to vague, but still it's a nice chart to compare how each one has moved. I have owned WFR, along with FSLR, SOL, ESLR, and YGE. Made some money on each of them except for WFR. I now think that WFR has a great potential to perhaps move up the most.
I sometimes try to figure out what the mindset of the average U.S. person is like. As this is an election year, it seems that people who are for "change", regardless of whether they are for Obama or McCain, might at this time be more excited about purchasing the various solar or battery powered things than they would be when there is less talk of other sources of energy depletion. Are more people building with solar panels this year? It is obvious that more people are buying cars that in part use batteries.
I think that we'll get going with solar sooner than most people realize. It seems to me that our addiction to being able to drive around a lot will create a good market for solar power. So many people in the future will be willing to have a little less power in their cars to get the battery powered car market really strong. Later on, with the money from the first battery cars, they'll work on making these more efficient and faster. This is the way of any new type of technology. I'm not worried and I plan to get back into solar stocks as soon as I make some more money on FCX, which is still gradually going up, though it went down in the last session.
The New Energy Cold War: The Warsaw-Tehran Connection [View article]
Otherwise, I like reading about geopolitical strategies.
Obama's Green Promise [View article]
I liked Obama's idea of using 150 billion dollars to get us off of dependence on foreign oil. It's probably not enough money but it's a start. I just wish we had not spent all of that money and a lot more on a war. We could have used it as Obama is planning to do.
Anyway, I think it's a good article.
Ten Shining Arizona Stocks [View article]
The Case for Copper [View article]
I own wayyy too much PCU and FCX , or hopefully I don't own too much. I have felt the same way about the future of copper. Population growth worldwide, along with the idea that many of these greater numbers of people now have a little bit more money to buy things that require copper. I know that the U.S. economy will have something to do with copper demand, but I think it's not as much a factor as some might think it is. The U.S. is gradually becoming less important to the world, IMHO.
Banking Sector: Band-Aids Just Won't Do It [View article]
Now I still owe money to those to whom I borrowed money. And it's too bad for them too, since I can't pay them. So, they lose too, and perhaps they will make the next person who wants to use their money to make loans to others go through a much more stringent examination of how they plan to make loans.
So, those people who took out loans they couldn't afford, whether it be individuals or banks, and for those who loaned out money, whether it be the banks and the stockholders of the banks, or the government, it's just too bad for them. They should feel the pain of irresponsibility. And since the government is you and me, then we need to make our representatives know how we feel about this. I write mine a lot about many issues. I don't know if it does any good or not, but I try. My district just got through kicking out one of the bums 2 years ago. And we'll do it again if needed.
MEMC Electronic: Glass Half Empty or Half Full? [View article]
Anyway, it's good for me to hear others say something that I suspected, that there was a horrific over reaction to the earnings report. It makes me wonder if anyone actually read the report or listened to the conference call. I noticed two analysts at least upgraded the stock afterwards.