<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Peter_Do's Comments</title>
    <description>Peter_Do's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/1191321/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>Add Brian White to the growing list of Apple (AAPL -1.3%) fans who think a bigger iPhone is needed. "We are being told that the minimum size needed by Apple is a 4.5-inch display on the iPhone; however, a 5-inch to 5.5-inch would be optimal," writes the Topeka analyst after talking with Chinese/Taiwanese suppliers. Also: Cowen sees more room for iPad growth in the U.S., citing encouraging survey data, and BTIG's Walter Piecyk, who recently upgraded Apple, thinks a new capital-allocation plan will be timed to coincide with a downbeat FQ2 report (results are due on April 23).</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/928711?source=feed#comment-17276181</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17276181</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Mr. White needs a reason to explain why AAPL did not hit the $1,111 price target that he predicted.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 14:13:47 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Mr. White needs a reason to explain why AAPL did not hit the $1,111 price target that he predicted.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bank Of America Has Failed Shareholders</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1281111/comments?source=feed#comment-16403721</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16403721</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[If you want dividend, you should not have bought BAC (or C).  JPM, WFC are where you should invest.  BAC and C are turnaround stories that were heavily discounted by the investment community who left them for dead.  BAC is a story of cleaning up balance sheet and increasing capital efficiency, which is what management is doing.  Can't be happier that they bought back the preferred and stocks.  I rather they keep on buying back as long as the stock price is below tangible book.<br/><br/>Also, not sure how the anger about &quot;our tax payer money&quot; rant comes about.  They got capital injection from the government and they paid it back with whatever interest that the government demanded at the time.  Contract fulfilled.  Got nothing to do with paying dividend to stockholders as a mandate of heaven.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Mar 2013 13:53:27 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[If you want dividend, you should not have bought BAC (or C).  JPM, WFC are where you should invest.  BAC and C are turnaround stories that were heavily discounted by the investment community who left them for dead.  BAC is a story of cleaning up balance sheet and increasing capital efficiency, which is what management is doing.  Can't be happier that they bought back the preferred and stocks.  I rather they keep on buying back as long as the stock price is below tangible book.<br/><br/>Also, not sure how the anger about &quot;our tax payer money&quot; rant comes about.  They got capital injection from the government and they paid it back with whatever interest that the government demanded at the time.  Contract fulfilled.  Got nothing to do with paying dividend to stockholders as a mandate of heaven.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Attorney General Holder puts a $5B-plus target on how much S&amp;amp;P (MHP -6.5%) defrauded investors through faulty ratings on MBS, and says the DOJ is going after all of it. "S&amp;amp;P misled investors ... causing them to lose billions of dollars." S&amp;amp;P alone? (earlier: Even $3B seems far too high)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/804801?source=feed#comment-14618361</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14618361</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[But that's not the product that they sell.  The way the language of the ratings are worded, it is nothing more than an opinion.  People choose to take those ratings and make it more than an opinion/assessment.  Why is that their fault?  Plenty of regulated (and respectable) investment houses issue upgraded to AAPL at $750 and downgraded to NFLX at $60.  All worthy of having their heads cut off by the same standards.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 17:22:56 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[But that's not the product that they sell.  The way the language of the ratings are worded, it is nothing more than an opinion.  People choose to take those ratings and make it more than an opinion/assessment.  Why is that their fault?  Plenty of regulated (and respectable) investment houses issue upgraded to AAPL at $750 and downgraded to NFLX at $60.  All worthy of having their heads cut off by the same standards.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Attorney General Holder puts a $5B-plus target on how much S&amp;amp;P (MHP -6.5%) defrauded investors through faulty ratings on MBS, and says the DOJ is going after all of it. "S&amp;amp;P misled investors ... causing them to lose billions of dollars." S&amp;amp;P alone? (earlier: Even $3B seems far too high)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/804801?source=feed#comment-14596851</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14596851</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[But that is not what they are selling - their approval that you can invest based on their ratings.  They are just selling a personal assessment.  What you choose to do with it is your own decision.  When people buy a house, they can bring along someone to assess the value of the home.  But there is no guarantee that the home is worth that much.  Stop condoning laziness and irresponsibility.  It's ok to buy research to support your own work and personal research.  But you still should do your own homework and have the character to stand behind your own decision.  Everyone makes mistakes.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 12:28:57 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[But that is not what they are selling - their approval that you can invest based on their ratings.  They are just selling a personal assessment.  What you choose to do with it is your own decision.  When people buy a house, they can bring along someone to assess the value of the home.  But there is no guarantee that the home is worth that much.  Stop condoning laziness and irresponsibility.  It's ok to buy research to support your own work and personal research.  But you still should do your own homework and have the character to stand behind your own decision.  Everyone makes mistakes.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Attorney General Holder puts a $5B-plus target on how much S&amp;amp;P (MHP -6.5%) defrauded investors through faulty ratings on MBS, and says the DOJ is going after all of it. "S&amp;amp;P misled investors ... causing them to lose billions of dollars." S&amp;amp;P alone? (earlier: Even $3B seems far too high)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/804801?source=feed#comment-14596641</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14596641</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[This is ridiculous.  The rating agencies did not ask people to rely on the ratings for the investment decisions.  Many people (and funds) put in place the rating requirements as an additional way to tell people that their investment choices are supported.  How is this different than I like a stock and then C or BAC analysts came out with upgrade and then I purchase but it turned sour.  I can't go and sue them for that.  Hind sight is 20/20.  If the MBS is so &quot;obviously&quot; terrible why are we not suing all the analysts, managers and everyone person, including public pension fund managers, who bought them?  It's obvious and they did not look.  Just as guilty as the rating agencies.  The exception is that they rating agencies just express their opinions, just like many of us here on SA.  They do not have the burden of investing (and due diligence as a result) of a portfolio manager.  The information that is provided to the rating agencies are also available to all money managers who bought them.  Unless sometime tells me that rating agencies have access to additional information that investors do not have.<br/><br/>Everyone is at fault for greed and laziness.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 12:24:31 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[This is ridiculous.  The rating agencies did not ask people to rely on the ratings for the investment decisions.  Many people (and funds) put in place the rating requirements as an additional way to tell people that their investment choices are supported.  How is this different than I like a stock and then C or BAC analysts came out with upgrade and then I purchase but it turned sour.  I can't go and sue them for that.  Hind sight is 20/20.  If the MBS is so &quot;obviously&quot; terrible why are we not suing all the analysts, managers and everyone person, including public pension fund managers, who bought them?  It's obvious and they did not look.  Just as guilty as the rating agencies.  The exception is that they rating agencies just express their opinions, just like many of us here on SA.  They do not have the burden of investing (and due diligence as a result) of a portfolio manager.  The information that is provided to the rating agencies are also available to all money managers who bought them.  Unless sometime tells me that rating agencies have access to additional information that investors do not have.<br/><br/>Everyone is at fault for greed and laziness.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Treasury violated its rules on executive pay as it went 18 for 18 in approving raises for AIG and GM execs over the past few years, according to SIGTARP. Treasury was warned of this a year ago, but disputes the report's findings.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/786051?source=feed#comment-14272091</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14272091</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[@Ted Bear: any data regarding the comments on BAC or just a random negative rant and assumption?  I cannot find any info online regarding why they did it. However, the way I understand it, many banks set up subsidiaries in these offshore havens (Ireland, Luxembourg, Cayman etc...) because of the less regulated nature (and also less sophisticated regulation) of these jurisdictions which allow them to take more risks as well.  So by moving it to London, it is actually a more conservative move and shine more light on these trades.  So more transparent.  Not obscuring like you suggest.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:54:16 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[@Ted Bear: any data regarding the comments on BAC or just a random negative rant and assumption?  I cannot find any info online regarding why they did it. However, the way I understand it, many banks set up subsidiaries in these offshore havens (Ireland, Luxembourg, Cayman etc...) because of the less regulated nature (and also less sophisticated regulation) of these jurisdictions which allow them to take more risks as well.  So by moving it to London, it is actually a more conservative move and shine more light on these trades.  So more transparent.  Not obscuring like you suggest.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Nokia (NOK) reverses course sharply after being higher earlier and is now -5.2% following its Q4 release. Despite net earnings of &amp;euro;202M - the company's first profit in six straight quarters - sales of &amp;euro;8.04B missed expectations of &amp;euro;8.12B and the company suspended its dividend.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/779161?source=feed#comment-14094021</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14094021</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Actually, not sure if that is legal tho.  Bordering on insider-trading/manipu... no?  I am sure someone would sue if that is the case.  Just to employ some lawyers.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 09:21:30 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Actually, not sure if that is legal tho.  Bordering on insider-trading/manipu... no?  I am sure someone would sue if that is the case.  Just to employ some lawyers.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Nokia: Positive News Followed By What?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1112901/comments?source=feed#comment-13774271</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13774271</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Not sure I understand you.  You want to know why they do not have their own OS?  Like what they used to have with Symbian and was planning with Meego?  Their decision to abandon it was because they do not have the resources to create a competitive platform to compete with iOS, Android and WP.  They could not catch up with the competition and so they have to let it go and consolidate their resources around their strength as a premiere hardware company.  They strategically allied with WP (and get paid for supporting the new ecosystem).  Or if you are referring to creating apps for different ecosystem - they sort of doing that with the HERE app in iOS, the stripped down version of Nokia Maps.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 09:23:36 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Not sure I understand you.  You want to know why they do not have their own OS?  Like what they used to have with Symbian and was planning with Meego?  Their decision to abandon it was because they do not have the resources to create a competitive platform to compete with iOS, Android and WP.  They could not catch up with the competition and so they have to let it go and consolidate their resources around their strength as a premiere hardware company.  They strategically allied with WP (and get paid for supporting the new ecosystem).  Or if you are referring to creating apps for different ecosystem - they sort of doing that with the HERE app in iOS, the stripped down version of Nokia Maps.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Nokia: Positive News Followed By What?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1112901/comments?source=feed#comment-13741911</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13741911</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[They do write their own apps.  Nokia collection such as Nokia Pulse, Nokia Music, Nokia Transit, City Lense etc....]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 14:55:31 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[They do write their own apps.  Nokia collection such as Nokia Pulse, Nokia Music, Nokia Transit, City Lense etc....]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More on Nokia: Lumia shipments totaled 4.4M, up from Q3's 2.9M and generally above forecasts. Stephen Elop says Lumia 920 sales were supply-constrained. Total smart devices sales were 6.6M, -64% Y/Y (withering Symbian base), but thanks to a higher Lumia mix, ASP jumped to &amp;euro;182 from Q3's &amp;euro;155. Mobile phone units were 79.6M, -15% Y/Y, ASP roughly even Q/Q at &amp;euro;31. 9.3M Asha phones sold, up from 6.5M in Q3. NOK +17.6%. (PR)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/755191?source=feed#comment-13537391</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13537391</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I guess Elop saw your article about don't expecting any surprise and he says &quot;surprise!&quot;]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 10:22:33 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I guess Elop saw your article about don't expecting any surprise and he says &quot;surprise!&quot;]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Treasury announces an offering for its remaining stake in AIG. The government currently holds a 16% stake in the company - 234M shares - and will continue to hold some warrants following the sale. Shares -0.8% AH.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/711481?source=feed#comment-12457851</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12457851</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[You must have missed the news the Maiden Lane has been unwounded.  And Fed made money on them.  <br/><br/>&quot;August 23, 2012: Maiden Lane III LLC sold all remaining securities. Subsequent to the repayment of ML III LLC’s liabilities to the New York Fed and AIG, net proceeds from sales of the securities, as well as cash flow the securities generated while held by ML III LLC, provided a net gain of approximately $6.6 billion for the benefit of the U.S. public.&quot;<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/zklcD1'>http://bit.ly/zklcD1</a>#]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 17:13:06 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[You must have missed the news the Maiden Lane has been unwounded.  And Fed made money on them.  <br/><br/>&quot;August 23, 2012: Maiden Lane III LLC sold all remaining securities. Subsequent to the repayment of ML III LLC’s liabilities to the New York Fed and AIG, net proceeds from sales of the securities, as well as cash flow the securities generated while held by ML III LLC, provided a net gain of approximately $6.6 billion for the benefit of the U.S. public.&quot;<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/zklcD1'>http://bit.ly/zklcD1</a>#]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Qihoo (QIHU -1.1%) and Nokia (NOK +2.1%) will partner to offer a custom phone for the Chinese market, a source tells Marbridge Consulting. Qihoo, which could integrate its browser, antivirus software, and search engine with the phone, is no stranger to partnerships with phone OEMs. Neither is rival Baidu, which is teaming up with Lenovo to offer a phone leveraging its Android-based OS. Nokia, whose Chinese sales have plunged, just launched the Lumia 920T and 620 for China Mobile.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/707731?source=feed#comment-12378351</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12378351</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Lumia 900 has handwriting input in Chinese.  Both simplified and traditional character.  I just checked again to make sure that I am not crazy.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 16:53:11 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Lumia 900 has handwriting input in Chinese.  Both simplified and traditional character.  I just checked again to make sure that I am not crazy.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Nokia (NOK) signs a deal to sell its headquarters in Finland to scrounge up more cash. The home for Nokia's top execs sold for $221.9M. A statement from the company acknowledges it needs to continue to sell non-core assets as opportunities arise.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/697831?source=feed#comment-12228631</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12228631</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[My favorite comment on SA so far!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 09:12:45 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[My favorite comment on SA so far!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Initial reports of sellouts for Nokia's (NOK) Windows Phone 8 Lumia hardware are "misleading," thinks Deutsche's Kai Korschelt, since they have much to do with supply issues. "Anecdotal evidence suggests that many stores have only received 5-20 devices/store with wider carrier distribution delayed in some countries," Korschelt writes, while speculating 28nm chip shortages are to blame. He also claims U.K. retail survey and Google search interest data for the Lumia line is underwhelming. (Raymond James)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/692371?source=feed#comment-12110411</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12110411</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[My guess is that they becausse none of them have ready inventory and need to compete with Walmart and other competitors to book revenue by locking in new contract customers.  So even tho there are high demand, if they can lock in these contract, send the order into AT&amp;T (and the customers can wait for however long to get their phones due to shortages), they can recognize their referral fees.  It's a game of chicken.  <br/><br/>Further, if the price is the same as AT&amp;T, why should people buy from Amazon or Walmart when they can buy from AT&amp;T.  Especially if the wait time to get the phone is the same?  They can probably charge the same price if the wait time is shorter, which I do not think is the case (can be wrong on this).  Further, if Amazon holds out and not give discount, and Walmart decides to give the $30 discounts, Amazon would lose the sales to Walmart.  The reason why AAPL is able to keep the iPhone undiscounted is by controlling the distribution of the subsidized contracts.  You can only get the iPhone with contract price from AAPL store or ATT/Verizon etc...(believe this is still the case).<br/><br/>In short, the current available stock of Lumia phones may be short versus current demand (hence the required wait).  But when compared to what they can produce in the future, obviously you can have infinite supply.  And this is the case here.  You are locking in current demand and meet them with future supply.  Those who must have the phone now can go on craiglists or eBay and last I check they are only available off contract and more expensive than price charge by AT&amp;T (which is $450).]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 09:35:06 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[My guess is that they becausse none of them have ready inventory and need to compete with Walmart and other competitors to book revenue by locking in new contract customers.  So even tho there are high demand, if they can lock in these contract, send the order into AT&amp;T (and the customers can wait for however long to get their phones due to shortages), they can recognize their referral fees.  It's a game of chicken.  <br/><br/>Further, if the price is the same as AT&amp;T, why should people buy from Amazon or Walmart when they can buy from AT&amp;T.  Especially if the wait time to get the phone is the same?  They can probably charge the same price if the wait time is shorter, which I do not think is the case (can be wrong on this).  Further, if Amazon holds out and not give discount, and Walmart decides to give the $30 discounts, Amazon would lose the sales to Walmart.  The reason why AAPL is able to keep the iPhone undiscounted is by controlling the distribution of the subsidized contracts.  You can only get the iPhone with contract price from AAPL store or ATT/Verizon etc...(believe this is still the case).<br/><br/>In short, the current available stock of Lumia phones may be short versus current demand (hence the required wait).  But when compared to what they can produce in the future, obviously you can have infinite supply.  And this is the case here.  You are locking in current demand and meet them with future supply.  Those who must have the phone now can go on craiglists or eBay and last I check they are only available off contract and more expensive than price charge by AT&amp;T (which is $450).]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>After ten years in the wind industry, GE (GE -3.3%) celebrates with its 20,000th wind turbine installation. Altogether, GE's 20K-turbine fleet has the capacity to power the cities of Hong Kong and London for an entire year. In the U.S. and  Europe over the past four years, nearly 40% of new power generation installations have been wind.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/665741?source=feed#comment-11609901</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11609901</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thank you for pointing out the silliness of the statement.  Does it takes 20k turbines 10 yrs to generate the equivalent of 1 yr power consumption of London and HK?  100 yrs?  or 1 yr?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 16:47:23 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thank you for pointing out the silliness of the statement.  Does it takes 20k turbines 10 yrs to generate the equivalent of 1 yr power consumption of London and HK?  100 yrs?  or 1 yr?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Listening to Dimon, one almost feels sorry for bank executives and their shareholders given the regulatory foot they're under. Asked about share repurchases, Dimon wants to get back to them in 2013. Though little changed in the bank's underlying business or capital strength, JPM was forced to suspend buybacks at $32 share in wake of the London Whale, and now will resume them at a far higher price.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/583581?source=feed#comment-10473161</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10473161</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The London Whale story sunk their stock to $32.  They were trading around $46 before it hit or rumor of it hitting.  So no, they did not suspend their stock repurchase at $32 only to buy it at much higher.  If the London Whale story did not happen they would be buying it around $46.  Distortion.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 14:18:36 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The London Whale story sunk their stock to $32.  They were trading around $46 before it hit or rumor of it hitting.  So no, they did not suspend their stock repurchase at $32 only to buy it at much higher.  If the London Whale story did not happen they would be buying it around $46.  Distortion.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Legal settlements often ease investors&amp;rsquo; minds, but the size of BofA's (BAC -1.5%) $2.34B tab for settling claims it misled investors about Merrill Lynch&amp;rsquo;s financial health before its purchase was an unwelcome surprise. Some analysts worry BofA&amp;rsquo;s legal exposure doesn&amp;rsquo;t seem to be tapering off; it's the bank's 11th settlement totaling $29B since the start of the financial crisis.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/563031?source=feed#comment-10002871</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10002871</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[So what is the benefit of this implied guarantee?  Prop up the equity?  Cheap debt financing?  Take more risks?  If equity, FNMA actual operates with an implied guarantee of the government, not a suggested theory perpetuated by the media like the big banks.  And their stocks are trading at 0.28 last I look.  Cheaper debt?  You said they can borrow at zero - &quot;interest free loan&quot; - and I am pretty sure Bank of America bond rates are higher than zero.  Take more risks?  The way I understand it, banks are now requiring more down payments and toughening up lending criteria and the reserves keep going up despite being encouraged to lend more with zero interest rate by the fed.  So they are taking less risks.  The people who bought Merril, Countrywide have been booted out.  Not people who are running it.  So how is the supposed implied guarantee are being abused?  Not that I agree there is an implied guarantee.  Go rant at people like Ken Lewis if you want to but this constant righteous hectoring of the banks by regurgitating the clueless and hostility fanning media is getting old.  <br/><br/>As to the zero interest rate policy, you may believe it is to help the bank but I am proned to believe that it is driven more to prop up the real estate market which benefits most home owners as well FNMA, Freddie and the local government who will have to deal with a housing blights.  There are more beneficiaries here than just the banks.  Whether I think it is fair is an entirely different opinion.  But no, I don't think the tax payers are actively bailing out BAC right now.<br/><br/>Disclosure: I do not work for BAC or any of the big banks.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2012 13:36:19 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[So what is the benefit of this implied guarantee?  Prop up the equity?  Cheap debt financing?  Take more risks?  If equity, FNMA actual operates with an implied guarantee of the government, not a suggested theory perpetuated by the media like the big banks.  And their stocks are trading at 0.28 last I look.  Cheaper debt?  You said they can borrow at zero - &quot;interest free loan&quot; - and I am pretty sure Bank of America bond rates are higher than zero.  Take more risks?  The way I understand it, banks are now requiring more down payments and toughening up lending criteria and the reserves keep going up despite being encouraged to lend more with zero interest rate by the fed.  So they are taking less risks.  The people who bought Merril, Countrywide have been booted out.  Not people who are running it.  So how is the supposed implied guarantee are being abused?  Not that I agree there is an implied guarantee.  Go rant at people like Ken Lewis if you want to but this constant righteous hectoring of the banks by regurgitating the clueless and hostility fanning media is getting old.  <br/><br/>As to the zero interest rate policy, you may believe it is to help the bank but I am proned to believe that it is driven more to prop up the real estate market which benefits most home owners as well FNMA, Freddie and the local government who will have to deal with a housing blights.  There are more beneficiaries here than just the banks.  Whether I think it is fair is an entirely different opinion.  But no, I don't think the tax payers are actively bailing out BAC right now.<br/><br/>Disclosure: I do not work for BAC or any of the big banks.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Legal settlements often ease investors&amp;rsquo; minds, but the size of BofA's (BAC -1.5%) $2.34B tab for settling claims it misled investors about Merrill Lynch&amp;rsquo;s financial health before its purchase was an unwelcome surprise. Some analysts worry BofA&amp;rsquo;s legal exposure doesn&amp;rsquo;t seem to be tapering off; it's the bank's 11th settlement totaling $29B since the start of the financial crisis.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/563031?source=feed#comment-9997651</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9997651</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Why tax payers have anything to do with this?  the bank is not currentlty a burden of the government as far as I am aware.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2012 09:30:39 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Why tax payers have anything to do with this?  the bank is not currentlty a burden of the government as far as I am aware.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stephen Elop has until early to mid 2013 for Nokia's (NOK) fortunes to reverse, otherwise his job will be at risk, analysts and investors say. However, they're not holding out much hope that Nokia will have a particularly good Christmas, especially with Apple and Samsung dominating.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/545391?source=feed#comment-9618991</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9618991</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Nothing in the article said someone will come along and do anything to Elop.  Just people reiterating the same thing over and over again.  <br/><br/>Disclosure.  I am long NOK (and MSFT) and think Elop is doing a great job.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 10:53:20 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Nothing in the article said someone will come along and do anything to Elop.  Just people reiterating the same thing over and over again.  <br/><br/>Disclosure.  I am long NOK (and MSFT) and think Elop is doing a great job.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Intel's Q3 Revenue Miss: A Fire Sale For Long-Term Investors</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/853581/comments?source=feed#comment-9253961</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9253961</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[You may have a long wait because they just increased it last quarter and the trend seems to be raising it every 4 quarters.  To raise it now would smack of desperation.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2012 18:14:24 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[You may have a long wait because they just increased it last quarter and the trend seems to be raising it every 4 quarters.  To raise it now would smack of desperation.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Intel's Q3 Revenue Miss: A Fire Sale For Long-Term Investors</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/853581/comments?source=feed#comment-9253801</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9253801</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[It's not about being cute.  It's about using your opinion, your two buddies and the three people you spoke to and decide that that is factual of the whole market.  Secondly, if people are put off by Win8, they can always buy Win7 PCs that use MSFT's windows and INTC's chips.  Unless we have 100% adoption of android/iOS and ARM chips.  While I do not think I am the norm, but the arrival of the tablet and my desire to own and use one just means that I have 1 more gadget to buy.  It does not negate my desire to own a laptop/pc.   Tablet to use in bed and on the road while pc/laptop for more serious work like gaming and work-work, which a larger screen real estate will be better appreciated.  Maybe the surface pro or equivalent product will solve the dual-need, but I will need to get my hand on one and test it out first.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2012 18:05:56 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[It's not about being cute.  It's about using your opinion, your two buddies and the three people you spoke to and decide that that is factual of the whole market.  Secondly, if people are put off by Win8, they can always buy Win7 PCs that use MSFT's windows and INTC's chips.  Unless we have 100% adoption of android/iOS and ARM chips.  While I do not think I am the norm, but the arrival of the tablet and my desire to own and use one just means that I have 1 more gadget to buy.  It does not negate my desire to own a laptop/pc.   Tablet to use in bed and on the road while pc/laptop for more serious work like gaming and work-work, which a larger screen real estate will be better appreciated.  Maybe the surface pro or equivalent product will solve the dual-need, but I will need to get my hand on one and test it out first.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Intel's Q3 Revenue Miss: A Fire Sale For Long-Term Investors</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/853581/comments?source=feed#comment-9198191</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9198191</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I am waiting as well.  For a tablet and a laptop.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 14:51:44 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I am waiting as well.  For a tablet and a laptop.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Short Johnson &amp; Johnson</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/813642/comments?source=feed#comment-8502281</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8502281</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[You do realize that the &quot;recession&quot; that we are in started in 2008 right?  Why select this period to point out the slow growth?  Considering the severity of the recession, the consistently high unemployment rate and the additional recall issues that they have, the (slow) growth seems like a pretty good feat.  Just a thought.  Also, it's silly to say that they loss $2bn by spending it on interest payment.  They borrowed money and deploy it elsewhere (presumably investments, acquisitions and R&amp;D.  You should look at the returns of their cash deployment vs. the interest RATE (not amount) that they are paying.  Look at how much the US gov't is paying in interest each year!  Are they wasting all that money because that can be used to give everyone a free house and healthcare?  In the one hand you complain that they do not invest in their business.  On the other hand you complain that they borrow money (because they are wasting money on servicing debt) to invest in their business.  Please make up your mind.  Confused enough to decide to leave a comment.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 11:16:16 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[You do realize that the &quot;recession&quot; that we are in started in 2008 right?  Why select this period to point out the slow growth?  Considering the severity of the recession, the consistently high unemployment rate and the additional recall issues that they have, the (slow) growth seems like a pretty good feat.  Just a thought.  Also, it's silly to say that they loss $2bn by spending it on interest payment.  They borrowed money and deploy it elsewhere (presumably investments, acquisitions and R&amp;D.  You should look at the returns of their cash deployment vs. the interest RATE (not amount) that they are paying.  Look at how much the US gov't is paying in interest each year!  Are they wasting all that money because that can be used to give everyone a free house and healthcare?  In the one hand you complain that they do not invest in their business.  On the other hand you complain that they borrow money (because they are wasting money on servicing debt) to invest in their business.  Please make up your mind.  Confused enough to decide to leave a comment.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More Misery In Store For Nokia</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/768451/comments?source=feed#comment-7981531</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7981531</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Rumor was dismissed as silly by Lenovo before market open.  And stock still running up on strong volume.  Then again, nothing said it won't end up being down for the day.  It's a hated stock.  Disclosure: I am long NOK.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 10:02:11 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Rumor was dismissed as silly by Lenovo before market open.  And stock still running up on strong volume.  Then again, nothing said it won't end up being down for the day.  It's a hated stock.  Disclosure: I am long NOK.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> Wells Fargo (WFC) joins the list of banks adding fees where they can to make up for fee reductions mandated by Dodd-Frank. The bank plans to implement a $5/month fee for those checking accounts not maintaining a $1,500 balance or otherwise behaving as the bank wishes them to. </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/395901?source=feed#comment-6990491</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6990491</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[But because it is not BAC, they will get a free pass.  Only fees from BAC are attacked and derided.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 10:03:45 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[But because it is not BAC, they will get a free pass.  Only fees from BAC are attacked and derided.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Microsoft May Have Just Hurt Lumia 900 Sales</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/672701/comments?source=feed#comment-6617751</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6617751</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Wait so all android devices are running on the latest version?  Will the iPhone 3GS run on, and get all the features of, iOS6?  Is the 3GS not selling at all because it does not have Siri?  Aren't Aapl and all the other android manufacturers screwed since they do not have the latest OS version because only the latest version sells?  Will the 4S stop selling because 5 is coming out in a few months?  Will NOK stop making new phones when when WP8 comes out because their products stop at the 900?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 15:16:48 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Wait so all android devices are running on the latest version?  Will the iPhone 3GS run on, and get all the features of, iOS6?  Is the 3GS not selling at all because it does not have Siri?  Aren't Aapl and all the other android manufacturers screwed since they do not have the latest OS version because only the latest version sells?  Will the 4S stop selling because 5 is coming out in a few months?  Will NOK stop making new phones when when WP8 comes out because their products stop at the 900?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Avoid AT&amp;T's 2012 Dividend</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/599291/comments?source=feed#comment-5583711</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5583711</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Then what do you think of IBM?  It has a pretty lousy revenue growth rate too over the last 10 years (up and down but overall flattish).  Buffet thinks it good enough to buy.  As to debt, telecoms by their nature is very capital intensive.  And because of the high cost of the business (constant need for build out and upgrade), that creates a huge moat to competition.  You need very deep pockets to get into this space and willing to lose money for many many years.  Look at what happened to Lightsquared, Clearwire and their other weaker competitors.  Again, the fact that they are able to spend to maintain their leadership in the industry without adding debts is a testament to a strong management team and business model.  And as to underperformance to S&amp;P, it just means how much value investors are willing to pay for their business.  Not the businesses intrinsic value.  If you believe in the longevity of the business model, health of balance sheet, then maybe their underperformance is a sign of value.  Anyway, personally, I do not think T is &quot;screaming cheap&quot; here.  However, I am obviously a huge fan of their business model and the critical role the telecoms play the mobile/wireless boom cycle.<br/><br/>waltunkel, thanks for the compliment!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 14:10:06 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Then what do you think of IBM?  It has a pretty lousy revenue growth rate too over the last 10 years (up and down but overall flattish).  Buffet thinks it good enough to buy.  As to debt, telecoms by their nature is very capital intensive.  And because of the high cost of the business (constant need for build out and upgrade), that creates a huge moat to competition.  You need very deep pockets to get into this space and willing to lose money for many many years.  Look at what happened to Lightsquared, Clearwire and their other weaker competitors.  Again, the fact that they are able to spend to maintain their leadership in the industry without adding debts is a testament to a strong management team and business model.  And as to underperformance to S&amp;P, it just means how much value investors are willing to pay for their business.  Not the businesses intrinsic value.  If you believe in the longevity of the business model, health of balance sheet, then maybe their underperformance is a sign of value.  Anyway, personally, I do not think T is &quot;screaming cheap&quot; here.  However, I am obviously a huge fan of their business model and the critical role the telecoms play the mobile/wireless boom cycle.<br/><br/>waltunkel, thanks for the compliment!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Avoid AT&amp;T's 2012 Dividend</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/599291/comments?source=feed#comment-5561421</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5561421</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I am long both T and MSFT (and VZ also). However, I am confused about your arguments. Debt is not necessarily a bad thing if liquidity is properly managed and their businesses are throwing off tons of cash (so no liquidity issue). It is actually comforting to see that they did not have to issue new debt to finance their high dividend while investing in building out their networks. This is a plus. Not a minus. Secondly, their (and VZ also) utility-like characteristics lie in their owning the infrastructure to mobile internet. Yes, they will lose revenues and fees from international calls, text messaging etc...but they make them back on more people using data hence their top line is still growing. And the trend of data usage looks to keep on rising. Not sure how you will &quot;subsidize&quot; that. Unless someone comes along to provide free national internet access. That's not to say that MSFT is not cheap or cheaper. However, T and VZ are still very good investment options as well. Steady slow growth is not a bad thing. You get the benefit of slow and stable appreciation over long period of time and a healthy dividend in addition.  What's there not to like?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 22:49:50 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I am long both T and MSFT (and VZ also). However, I am confused about your arguments. Debt is not necessarily a bad thing if liquidity is properly managed and their businesses are throwing off tons of cash (so no liquidity issue). It is actually comforting to see that they did not have to issue new debt to finance their high dividend while investing in building out their networks. This is a plus. Not a minus. Secondly, their (and VZ also) utility-like characteristics lie in their owning the infrastructure to mobile internet. Yes, they will lose revenues and fees from international calls, text messaging etc...but they make them back on more people using data hence their top line is still growing. And the trend of data usage looks to keep on rising. Not sure how you will &quot;subsidize&quot; that. Unless someone comes along to provide free national internet access. That's not to say that MSFT is not cheap or cheaper. However, T and VZ are still very good investment options as well. Steady slow growth is not a bad thing. You get the benefit of slow and stable appreciation over long period of time and a healthy dividend in addition.  What's there not to like?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
