Seeking Alpha

(Dis)stressed investor » Comments |

Sort by:
Latest | Highest rated
  • The Complete Failure of Owners' Equivalent Rent [View article]
    I have lived in & owned the same house for the last seven years. I fail to see how the gyrations of the Case-Schiller index had any impact on my cost of living.

    Despite the press, the majority of households in the US did not buy a new house recently. The gyrations of home-prices, at the margin, are not a good indicator for the cost-of-living for the overall population.

    CPI is meant to measure the cost of living for the general population NOT 'the cost of living for those who happened to buy a house that year'.

    Get a clue.
    Aug 15 09:56 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Housing Prices Projected to Fall Through End of Decade [View article]
    Make that 154.6 * (1.045^4) = $184.4, -11% (not -26%).
    Nov 01 17:31 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Housing Prices Projected to Fall Through End of Decade [View article]
    What discount rate/cost of capital did you apply? It's been a while, but I don't think you're interpreting the futures prices correctly, double check by someone who trades futures would be appreciated.

    If you believe that the index a year from now should be $104.50, the future would trade at $100 today (to account for the opportunity cost of capital, here just using the 4.5% fed funds rate).

    So you need to inflate TODAYs price for the future by the remaining duration. San Fran is the worst market, shown as -26% by your analysis. The Nov-11 future is trading at 154.60 now, so the current market expectation is that the future is will trade at $154.6 * (1.045^3) = $176.4, -15% (not -26%).

    Still negative in most cases, but not as bad as you portray. Of course even a flat market is below the everyman's expectations.

    Nov 01 17:27 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Housing Prices Projected to Fall Through End of Decade [View article]
    What discount rate/cost of capital did you apply? It's been a while, but I don't think you're interpreting the futures prices correctly, double check by someone who trades futures would be appreciated.

    If you believe that the index a year from now should be $104.50, the future would trade at $100 today (to account for the opportunity cost of capital, here just using the 4.5% fed funds rate).

    So you need to inflate TODAYs price for the future by the remaining duration. San Fran is the worst market, shown as -26% by your analysis. The Nov-11 future is trading at 154.60 now, so the current market expectation is that the future is will trade at $154.6 * (1.045^3) = $176.4, -15% (not -26%).

    Still negative in most cases, but not as bad as you portray. Of course even a flat market in nominal prices is painful.

    Nov 01 16:52 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
Comments by Ticker
(Dis)stressed investor's
Comments Stats
4 comments
Rating: 0 (0 - 0 )