The Complete Failure of Owners' Equivalent Rent [View article]
I have lived in & owned the same house for the last seven years. I fail to see how the gyrations of the Case-Schiller index had any impact on my cost of living.
Despite the press, the majority of households in the US did not buy a new house recently. The gyrations of home-prices, at the margin, are not a good indicator for the cost-of-living for the overall population.
CPI is meant to measure the cost of living for the general population NOT 'the cost of living for those who happened to buy a house that year'.
Housing Prices Projected to Fall Through End of Decade [View article]
What discount rate/cost of capital did you apply? It's been a while, but I don't think you're interpreting the futures prices correctly, double check by someone who trades futures would be appreciated.
If you believe that the index a year from now should be $104.50, the future would trade at $100 today (to account for the opportunity cost of capital, here just using the 4.5% fed funds rate).
So you need to inflate TODAYs price for the future by the remaining duration. San Fran is the worst market, shown as -26% by your analysis. The Nov-11 future is trading at 154.60 now, so the current market expectation is that the future is will trade at $154.6 * (1.045^3) = $176.4, -15% (not -26%).
Still negative in most cases, but not as bad as you portray. Of course even a flat market is below the everyman's expectations.
Housing Prices Projected to Fall Through End of Decade [View article]
What discount rate/cost of capital did you apply? It's been a while, but I don't think you're interpreting the futures prices correctly, double check by someone who trades futures would be appreciated.
If you believe that the index a year from now should be $104.50, the future would trade at $100 today (to account for the opportunity cost of capital, here just using the 4.5% fed funds rate).
So you need to inflate TODAYs price for the future by the remaining duration. San Fran is the worst market, shown as -26% by your analysis. The Nov-11 future is trading at 154.60 now, so the current market expectation is that the future is will trade at $154.6 * (1.045^3) = $176.4, -15% (not -26%).
Still negative in most cases, but not as bad as you portray. Of course even a flat market in nominal prices is painful.
Sort by:
Latest | Highest ratedThe Complete Failure of Owners' Equivalent Rent [View article]
Despite the press, the majority of households in the US did not buy a new house recently. The gyrations of home-prices, at the margin, are not a good indicator for the cost-of-living for the overall population.
CPI is meant to measure the cost of living for the general population NOT 'the cost of living for those who happened to buy a house that year'.
Get a clue.
Housing Prices Projected to Fall Through End of Decade [View article]
Housing Prices Projected to Fall Through End of Decade [View article]
If you believe that the index a year from now should be $104.50, the future would trade at $100 today (to account for the opportunity cost of capital, here just using the 4.5% fed funds rate).
So you need to inflate TODAYs price for the future by the remaining duration. San Fran is the worst market, shown as -26% by your analysis. The Nov-11 future is trading at 154.60 now, so the current market expectation is that the future is will trade at $154.6 * (1.045^3) = $176.4, -15% (not -26%).
Still negative in most cases, but not as bad as you portray. Of course even a flat market is below the everyman's expectations.
Housing Prices Projected to Fall Through End of Decade [View article]
If you believe that the index a year from now should be $104.50, the future would trade at $100 today (to account for the opportunity cost of capital, here just using the 4.5% fed funds rate).
So you need to inflate TODAYs price for the future by the remaining duration. San Fran is the worst market, shown as -26% by your analysis. The Nov-11 future is trading at 154.60 now, so the current market expectation is that the future is will trade at $154.6 * (1.045^3) = $176.4, -15% (not -26%).
Still negative in most cases, but not as bad as you portray. Of course even a flat market in nominal prices is painful.