WealthTrack: Why Jim Grant Is Bullish on the Recovery [View article]
Prieur -- Please consider first verifying there is a transcript to be read before recommending it. I'm broken-hearted it isn't there to be read but will assume you'll let us know when it is available. Thanks, John
Bruce Berkowitz Adds to Hertz, Trims American Express Holding [View article]
I personally can't imagine why anyone would be interested in Bruce Berkowitz and his picks. His reputation hinged on his decent bear market performance during 2000-2003 when his fund Fairholm first started. He became reputedly the master of conservative value investing with Berkshire Hathaway as his largest holding and up to 20% liquid cash.
All of that went to pot when his fund lost more than 50% in this latest bear market, Berkshire and cash not withstanding.
Five Reasons the Market Could Crash This Fall [View article]
One reason it might not - The Bernanke Bubble blown up by near zero interest rates, lousy MM and CD returns and huge liquidity stimulus. How could the stock market be happier.
Health Care Bill: Prescription for Disaster [View article]
This I agree with and I would hope will be part of the reform.
"The simplest (but by no means fullest) explanation of why health care costs so much is that demand exceeds supply. Demand is a function of how much people are prepared to pay. Insuring more people will drive demand for health care services even higher. (To truly get a handle on out-of-control health care costs, we need more people paying for routine medical care out of pocket, and tort reform for medical malpractice."
Health Care Bill: Prescription for Disaster [View article]
How many times Peter have I heard this baloney in the past 50 years? It hasn't happened yet and never will because the more tax you pay the harder you have to work to maintain your standard of living and loving.
"many business owners might simply choose not to put in the extra effort necessary to expand their businesses."
Filtering Through Today's Economic News [View article]
It's a mystery to me "playing" MFD or MGU for suffering airlines. For that matter neither is an ETF.
“Airlines, Already Suffering, Brace for Further Woes” – Some analysts say if conditions continue to deteriorate, several airlines may not survive. (NYT) ATA showing passenger rev. down 26% over past year on 9.5% slide in traffic & 18% drop in fares per traveler. With businesses aggressively cutting costs and consumers unlikely to open their wallets anytime soon, there is a long runway ahead for the airline industry. Ways-to-Play: FAA, MGU, MFD
Freddie Mac Sub Debt Buy-Back: Heinous and Grossly Unfair [View article]
Interesting post but Krasting is comparing apples to oranges. Subordinated debt is nevertheless debt and preferred shares are equity with zero rights to recompense in bankruptcy. Any consideration a bankruptcy judge may give to preferred holders is a GIFT.
15 Stocks You May Want to Keep Out of Your Portfolio [View article]
Without question I agree the z-score is close to worthless for most companies. I've carefully and painfully used it in the past for several companies, most recently e.g., for Goodrich (GR) - the result according to z-score is that this solid credit (Moody - Baa2 stable) is already bankrupt! I've no doubt that including TWX on this list is equally baseless.
On Jul 10 02:22 AM billddrummer wrote:
> I began to discount the impact of the Z-score 25 years ago when I > first began analyzing companies for commercial banks. > > The Z-score was developed to determine the likelihood of bankruptcy > based on analysis of small manufacturing companies based in the Midwest. > My assessment of the statistic showed that it didn't properly identify > the likelihood of bankruptcy for service companies, real estate investment > firms, technology companies, telecommunications firms, airlines, > transportation companies, or a myriad of other firms that are part > of the business landscape now, but didn't exist when the formula > was devised. > > I agree with Infinitus: Despite the hits, I believe the Z score is > obsolete when identifying the risk of bankruptcy for all but a narrow > band of companies that are true vertically integrated manufacturing > entities. > > As we know, most of those companies have moved to China.
Sort by:
Latest | Highest ratedThe FSB's Big, Bad 30 [View article]
Video: Why Obamacare Will Be a Budget Buster [View article]
WealthTrack: Why Jim Grant Is Bullish on the Recovery [View article]
Bond Expert: Monday Wrap [View article]
'First-Time Homebuyer' Credit May Cost Government up to $96,000 Per Home [View article]
Bruce Berkowitz Adds to Hertz, Trims American Express Holding [View article]
All of that went to pot when his fund lost more than 50% in this latest bear market, Berkshire and cash not withstanding.
Five Reasons the Market Could Crash This Fall [View article]
A Week of Superstar Bears Moving the Market [View article]
Health Care Bill: Prescription for Disaster [View article]
"The simplest (but by no means fullest) explanation of why health care costs so much is that demand exceeds supply. Demand is a function of how much people are prepared to pay. Insuring more people will drive demand for health care services even higher. (To truly get a handle on out-of-control health care costs, we need more people paying for routine medical care out of pocket, and tort reform for medical malpractice."
Health Care Bill: Prescription for Disaster [View article]
"many business owners might simply choose not to put in the extra effort necessary to expand their businesses."
Filtering Through Today's Economic News [View article]
“Airlines, Already Suffering, Brace for Further Woes” – Some analysts say if conditions continue to deteriorate, several airlines may not survive. (NYT)
ATA showing passenger rev. down 26% over past year on 9.5% slide in traffic & 18% drop in fares per traveler. With businesses aggressively cutting costs and consumers unlikely to open their wallets anytime soon, there is a long runway ahead for the airline industry.
Ways-to-Play: FAA, MGU, MFD
Freddie Mac Sub Debt Buy-Back: Heinous and Grossly Unfair [View article]
15 Stocks You May Want to Keep Out of Your Portfolio [View article]
On Jul 10 02:22 AM billddrummer wrote:
> I began to discount the impact of the Z-score 25 years ago when I
> first began analyzing companies for commercial banks.
>
> The Z-score was developed to determine the likelihood of bankruptcy
> based on analysis of small manufacturing companies based in the Midwest.
> My assessment of the statistic showed that it didn't properly identify
> the likelihood of bankruptcy for service companies, real estate investment
> firms, technology companies, telecommunications firms, airlines,
> transportation companies, or a myriad of other firms that are part
> of the business landscape now, but didn't exist when the formula
> was devised.
>
> I agree with Infinitus: Despite the hits, I believe the Z score is
> obsolete when identifying the risk of bankruptcy for all but a narrow
> band of companies that are true vertically integrated manufacturing
> entities.
>
> As we know, most of those companies have moved to China.
A Plea for Better Balance (Sheets) [View article]
Back in the U.S.S.A. [View article]