frflyer

Green Investments: Lots of Alternatives, with Big Names for Safety

The funny thing is, that Socialism Can't Compete probably doesn't consider himself an extremist, yet people like him have no problem branding the entire world scientific community as in some vast dark conspiracy to bring about world socialism. Get real.

They'll trot out their lists of hundreds or thousands of skeptical scientists, (which lists are all phony, every one of them), thinking this is evidence of a lack of consensus on climate change.
It might help if they went to the websites of actual climate scientists like realclimate, skepticalscience,logic... science, grist,climate progress etc. The only reason they ever go to these sites is to repeat arguments, in the comments section, that have long been disproven, some as long as 20 years ago. But they repeat this drivel endlessly. Some still cling to some wacko theory that the whole greenhouse effect is wrong because of a law of thermodynamics, even though real scientists have pointed out endlessly that this is a wrong application of that law.
Many of the deniers are just blinded by their ideology and are largely beyond hope.

Next he'll tell us about the Oregon Petition with it's supposed 19,000 skeptic scientists. It was a hoax perpetrated by a group in Oregon that contains ZERO climate scientists. They basically forged National Academy of Science stationary to make it seem it was a document from NAS that fooled some scienitsts into signing.
Their founder believes that the industrial revolution has brought increased biodiverstiy to earth and the more CO2 we pump into the atmoshphere, the more lush and eden like earth will become.
OK right.

www.sourcewatch.org/in...

Here's Sen Inhofe's list of 413 "prominent scientists" who disagree with the IPCC.
20 economists
44 television weathermen
70 scientists with no expertise in climate study
84 scientists who are either connected with the oil industry or are paid by it.
Scientists who were included against their will, and who agree with the IPCC

Inhofe and Morano misinterpreted a paper published in Geophysical Research Letters.
They claimed that it showed proof that the sun was responsible for the warming that's been observed in the last 100 years. The paper they quote says exactly the opposite from what they claim. This has been verified by the author of the paper.

climateprogress.org/20...

There have been several instances of deniers misusing or using out of context the words of climate scientists to make it seem they are disagreeing with the IPCC.

Heartland Institute, a leading oil funded denier propaganda mill, issued their list of skeptical scientists in Texas. There are dozens if not hundreds of climate scientists in Texas. Are you ready? Here's the list.
Robert Bradley, energy expert.
H.Sterling Burnett, policy analyst
Dr. John Dale Dunn, emergency physician
Michael Economides, petroleum engineer

NOT ONE CLIMATE SCIENTIST

These are not isolated cases. All their lists and their gatherings of skeptics which are advertised as scientific conferences(which they are not) are like this. It's all complete BS
These conferences are the ones where they basically offer bribes to give speeches ($1,000) or write papers ($10,000) denying man made global warming, all paid for by the oil and coal industries.
These are all expense paid propaganda events and nothing more.

And this is what they hang their hat on as proof against the overwhelming body of evidence and overwhelming scientific consensus.

They offer up these totally implausible conspiracy theories about the world scientific community scamming us or hoaxing us to raise taxes, create a one world socialist govt., take away your SUV, make you buy green products, and on and on. And then they call the scientists alarmists.
Is the dumbing down of America ever going to stop? I sure hope so.