<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Akram's Razor's Comments</title>
    <description>Akram's Razor's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/123608/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>Short The Lemon</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1281271/comments?source=feed#comment-19993912</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19993912</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I always find it interesting that lots of investors think there is this p\erfect correlation between a stock and what the compa\ny is doing. If anything markets tend to overp\ay early and underp\ay later. Which typ\ically means if you spot a lulu esque brand early on...ride it longer than you think is rationally justified....but also be ready to short it once you are comfortable with their story and p\osition as that tends to be when the rerating occurs. Before the lule pa\nts issue kors was trading a 14x ev/ebitda and lulu at 29x. Kors as a brand is a lot hotter and infinitely more well recognized outside of NA as well as in the luxury sweet spot of womens bags. And to add insult to injury it was still growing same store sales as 4x lulu's clip.....sorry but in such an environment i short lulu...and to hedge if need be i long kors. There is nothing absolute about investing let alone stock investing...goal should always be to find best relative value]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 15:30:19 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I always find it interesting that lots of investors think there is this p\erfect correlation between a stock and what the compa\ny is doing. If anything markets tend to overp\ay early and underp\ay later. Which typ\ically means if you spot a lulu esque brand early on...ride it longer than you think is rationally justified....but also be ready to short it once you are comfortable with their story and p\osition as that tends to be when the rerating occurs. Before the lule pa\nts issue kors was trading a 14x ev/ebitda and lulu at 29x. Kors as a brand is a lot hotter and infinitely more well recognized outside of NA as well as in the luxury sweet spot of womens bags. And to add insult to injury it was still growing same store sales as 4x lulu's clip.....sorry but in such an environment i short lulu...and to hedge if need be i long kors. There is nothing absolute about investing let alone stock investing...goal should always be to find best relative value]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Short The Lemon</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1281271/comments?source=feed#comment-19891812</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19891812</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I'm good. Busy with set up and deep in Ent Soft/ SAAS land research as i'm working on something comprehensive to coincide with launch. Will be writing regularly again soon. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 12:39:36 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I'm good. Busy with set up and deep in Ent Soft/ SAAS land research as i'm working on something comprehensive to coincide with launch. Will be writing regularly again soon. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Short The Lemon</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1281271/comments?source=feed#comment-19890542</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19890542</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[30x EV/ebitda was a significant discount to whom......]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 12:13:48 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[30x EV/ebitda was a significant discount to whom......]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Short The Lemon</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1281271/comments?source=feed#comment-19887442</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19887442</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Lulu is such an amusing stock. Anyway, anyone who believes the stock dropped simply because Day resigned needs a little more experience investing. Lulu last bounce was more about a leaked short gone wrong which happens pretty often in the market, and a resoundingly strong tape for anything non industrial commodities or named facebook, vmware, or rackspace. I'd comment on Bill's geniusness, but with him now bullish on deckers after hearing nothing but reasons on why we should be shorting every pop under the sun from 30 to 60 I can't comment on such rationale and have decided to throw in the towel on the SA know it alls.(On a side note bill i've actually been shorting deck though rather cautiously as m&amp;a mania needs to be respected....however i think the brand may be tiring now and they are super leveraged via the ramp in retail vs old p\ure wholesale to the whims of shoppers this coming winter) Anyway, short sellers in lulu will be the long-\term winners until the stock is cut in half......the sweet spot has passed and until the valuation mitigates that this a bad place to be a buy and holder.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 11:15:12 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Lulu is such an amusing stock. Anyway, anyone who believes the stock dropped simply because Day resigned needs a little more experience investing. Lulu last bounce was more about a leaked short gone wrong which happens pretty often in the market, and a resoundingly strong tape for anything non industrial commodities or named facebook, vmware, or rackspace. I'd comment on Bill's geniusness, but with him now bullish on deckers after hearing nothing but reasons on why we should be shorting every pop under the sun from 30 to 60 I can't comment on such rationale and have decided to throw in the towel on the SA know it alls.(On a side note bill i've actually been shorting deck though rather cautiously as m&amp;a mania needs to be respected....however i think the brand may be tiring now and they are super leveraged via the ramp in retail vs old p\ure wholesale to the whims of shoppers this coming winter) Anyway, short sellers in lulu will be the long-\term winners until the stock is cut in half......the sweet spot has passed and until the valuation mitigates that this a bad place to be a buy and holder.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Akram's Razor: Short CommVault Now</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1409041/comments?source=feed#comment-19255451</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19255451</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I really don't care what the stock has done as the market as a measuring stick for your logic are a definitive way to go crazy. All I care is whether the argument is robust. Simply put yours is not.<br/>I've thought cvlt was expensive since $40, but the point is I have been waiting for mgmt to shift their tone. This cc was important within the context of the last 8 cc's and not on a stand alone basis. If you knew that, you'd understand why I am being so dismissive of your 'mgmt could low ball...don't want to be sued ' etc. Then there are simple things to factor in like their need to ramp up direct sales investment to replace dell, the fact that on a long-term basis their difference between effective tax rate and actual taxes paid is signficant enough to be a major headwind on the bottom line, and that rev growth can best be described as solid and not gangbusters for a company of this size. I assure you without a shadow of a doubt that this year is an investment year which at best is a major drag for a momentum stock like this after the op levg driven results  they had last yr, and which at worse can result in a total collapse if any weakness no matter how temporary emerges on the demand side. <br/>But this quote is a gem &quot;In the end you cannot know for sure, and to a large extent you are taking credit for partially random events&quot;<br/><br/>I can assure you that I knew for sure that when Lehman was at 35$ that it faced bk risk, and that the stock was a short. At 18$ i was much less confident as I felt there was a very good chance they could raise signficant capital or sell the whole company. The x factor there was a delusional dick fuld getting in the way of everything that could have saved lehman. My point is investing is about degrees of confidence and the structure of your thesis and not whether or not you were right or wrong. A rational thesis can produce a horrific short term outcome and a fantastic long term return, while a flimsy thesis can produce the type of short term results that make the long-term investor look silly. Of course over a few years that flimsy thesis will be exposed and the skeptics will be proven right. So please i don't need lessons about how the market is unpredicatible, irrational, and for the most part at times no better than a casino. These assumptions are at the core of how i run money, but i am not going to tell my investors i am long cvlt because 'it demand could pick up and that's a wild card' or because i think a mgmt team that has been uber bullish for 8 quarters was simply low balling the street with their more conservative nature this quarter. And i wont even bother repeating the points on investment, oem relationship loss/cmpt, and the tax rate.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 06:03:22 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I really don't care what the stock has done as the market as a measuring stick for your logic are a definitive way to go crazy. All I care is whether the argument is robust. Simply put yours is not.<br/>I've thought cvlt was expensive since $40, but the point is I have been waiting for mgmt to shift their tone. This cc was important within the context of the last 8 cc's and not on a stand alone basis. If you knew that, you'd understand why I am being so dismissive of your 'mgmt could low ball...don't want to be sued ' etc. Then there are simple things to factor in like their need to ramp up direct sales investment to replace dell, the fact that on a long-term basis their difference between effective tax rate and actual taxes paid is signficant enough to be a major headwind on the bottom line, and that rev growth can best be described as solid and not gangbusters for a company of this size. I assure you without a shadow of a doubt that this year is an investment year which at best is a major drag for a momentum stock like this after the op levg driven results  they had last yr, and which at worse can result in a total collapse if any weakness no matter how temporary emerges on the demand side. <br/>But this quote is a gem &quot;In the end you cannot know for sure, and to a large extent you are taking credit for partially random events&quot;<br/><br/>I can assure you that I knew for sure that when Lehman was at 35$ that it faced bk risk, and that the stock was a short. At 18$ i was much less confident as I felt there was a very good chance they could raise signficant capital or sell the whole company. The x factor there was a delusional dick fuld getting in the way of everything that could have saved lehman. My point is investing is about degrees of confidence and the structure of your thesis and not whether or not you were right or wrong. A rational thesis can produce a horrific short term outcome and a fantastic long term return, while a flimsy thesis can produce the type of short term results that make the long-term investor look silly. Of course over a few years that flimsy thesis will be exposed and the skeptics will be proven right. So please i don't need lessons about how the market is unpredicatible, irrational, and for the most part at times no better than a casino. These assumptions are at the core of how i run money, but i am not going to tell my investors i am long cvlt because 'it demand could pick up and that's a wild card' or because i think a mgmt team that has been uber bullish for 8 quarters was simply low balling the street with their more conservative nature this quarter. And i wont even bother repeating the points on investment, oem relationship loss/cmpt, and the tax rate.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Open Sesame</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1428631/comments?source=feed#comment-18966901</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18966901</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Yeah, I am getting sick of this stock. I should just be buying crap solar instead or busted european banks and making 20% a day.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 18:56:23 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Yeah, I am getting sick of this stock. I should just be buying crap solar instead or busted european banks and making 20% a day.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBS upgrades global financials to Overweight from Underweight on a healing global economy, rebuilt capital, and the sector's shift "from being a net issuer to a net distributor of cash." Furthermore, the U.S. banking sector (XLF) is taken to Overweight as balance sheet strength and attractive valuations play well with the housing market recovery to create compelling opportunities. European banks (EUFN) are lifted to Neutral "with a preference towards Nordic and U.K. banks." Financials respond in London with LLoyds Banking Group (LYG) +2.3%, Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) +3.3%, and Barclays (BCS) up 0.5%.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1031451?source=feed#comment-18937831</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18937831</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Is this a joke? <br/><br/>They downgrade the whole sector last may, and they are now upgrading them after the avg global financial stock probably doubled.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 08:56:14 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Is this a joke? <br/><br/>They downgrade the whole sector last may, and they are now upgrading them after the avg global financial stock probably doubled.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Akram's Razor: Short CommVault Now</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1409041/comments?source=feed#comment-18908931</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18908931</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[To be frank statements like 'i wouldn't count them out' are not very substantitive. Management has already warned you on the call the margins will be flat this year, and the way they mapped it out that is more like a 'flat at best'. 66% of ebitda growth last year can be attributed to margin expansion. Furthermore, this company's actual tax expense has been running well below their long-term rate and after this year you should start to see that revert. 2000 bps of reversion will wipe out a lot of net income growth. This wont be the first or last stock to witness a crazy multiple expansion because of a one time splurge in the bottom line that is out of line with their growth trajectory. Like i said in the article, you are buying 70% trailing growth ahead of 10-15% growth at best....this quarter was the warning sign....the next one will complete the drop....now the question is do you risk waiting till then when you can do very well without event risk in between.....]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 14:29:57 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[To be frank statements like 'i wouldn't count them out' are not very substantitive. Management has already warned you on the call the margins will be flat this year, and the way they mapped it out that is more like a 'flat at best'. 66% of ebitda growth last year can be attributed to margin expansion. Furthermore, this company's actual tax expense has been running well below their long-term rate and after this year you should start to see that revert. 2000 bps of reversion will wipe out a lot of net income growth. This wont be the first or last stock to witness a crazy multiple expansion because of a one time splurge in the bottom line that is out of line with their growth trajectory. Like i said in the article, you are buying 70% trailing growth ahead of 10-15% growth at best....this quarter was the warning sign....the next one will complete the drop....now the question is do you risk waiting till then when you can do very well without event risk in between.....]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How To Play The Sina Corporation Earnings Announcement</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1428171/comments?source=feed#comment-18823922</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18823922</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[This is an unbelievably dangerous stock to play a calendar spread on. It has been a perennial underperformer for a good six months now, and on a relative valuation scale looks about as cheap as you are going to get for a prime web asset. This stock is waiting for an excuse for a 20% rerating higher, and while i see no reason to think earnings will provide a surprise the event might just be the catalyst. We pretty much now know revenue guidance for weibo is going much higher courtesy of the alibaba deal, so why you would wait for mgmt to make that official on a cc with the way the crappier chinese net names have been moving is beyond me. If i wanted to play an options strategy here id be selling puts as the alibaba deal puts a nice floor under the name. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 16:42:33 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[This is an unbelievably dangerous stock to play a calendar spread on. It has been a perennial underperformer for a good six months now, and on a relative valuation scale looks about as cheap as you are going to get for a prime web asset. This stock is waiting for an excuse for a 20% rerating higher, and while i see no reason to think earnings will provide a surprise the event might just be the catalyst. We pretty much now know revenue guidance for weibo is going much higher courtesy of the alibaba deal, so why you would wait for mgmt to make that official on a cc with the way the crappier chinese net names have been moving is beyond me. If i wanted to play an options strategy here id be selling puts as the alibaba deal puts a nice floor under the name. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Akram's Razor: Short CommVault Now</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1409041/comments?source=feed#comment-18559401</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18559401</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Umm the point is the recent conference call just gave you that. The next call could stabilize it or lead it to bounce, but as it hasnt even started falling yet that shouldnt be your focus. Hence the short it now mantra. Listening to the call i really expected the stock to fall on the open as its not really a liquid name so i put little stock in the 4-5k it traded pre mkt. I chose to write the piece when i saw it open and hold its ground. I could write a much more detailed piece on the name getting into what actifio is doing and veeam as well as why fundamentally speaking it is ludicrously priced based on past m&amp;a deals in this space going back almost a decade. But really i wrote this because if you listen to that call and go back and listen to the previous calls you should pickup on what i picked up on which was a soft warning. A soft warning for a company that has been firing on all cyclinders for two years with a perfecto priced stock is a dream come true for someone like me. I even punted on some may 10c options on the open which are now over a buck. You dont have to get into scenarios until this has fallen 20% plus at which point you have the sector, the rest of the market, and of course their performance to factor in. We can't predict all those variables...what we can do is on a risk/reward basis take the best possible positions we can find and reasses later....and in this case its not time to ponder whats the next catalyst as most longs in the name are still trying to figure out what the hell happened today. On a side note, when stocks peak permenantely; they tend to do it in the manner cvlt exhibited today. Big gap ups that get reversed just like big ones down that do the same are great indicators for long term price direction changes. What do you think attracted me to deckers?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 20:28:39 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Umm the point is the recent conference call just gave you that. The next call could stabilize it or lead it to bounce, but as it hasnt even started falling yet that shouldnt be your focus. Hence the short it now mantra. Listening to the call i really expected the stock to fall on the open as its not really a liquid name so i put little stock in the 4-5k it traded pre mkt. I chose to write the piece when i saw it open and hold its ground. I could write a much more detailed piece on the name getting into what actifio is doing and veeam as well as why fundamentally speaking it is ludicrously priced based on past m&amp;a deals in this space going back almost a decade. But really i wrote this because if you listen to that call and go back and listen to the previous calls you should pickup on what i picked up on which was a soft warning. A soft warning for a company that has been firing on all cyclinders for two years with a perfecto priced stock is a dream come true for someone like me. I even punted on some may 10c options on the open which are now over a buck. You dont have to get into scenarios until this has fallen 20% plus at which point you have the sector, the rest of the market, and of course their performance to factor in. We can't predict all those variables...what we can do is on a risk/reward basis take the best possible positions we can find and reasses later....and in this case its not time to ponder whats the next catalyst as most longs in the name are still trying to figure out what the hell happened today. On a side note, when stocks peak permenantely; they tend to do it in the manner cvlt exhibited today. Big gap ups that get reversed just like big ones down that do the same are great indicators for long term price direction changes. What do you think attracted me to deckers?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Akram's Razor: Short CommVault Now</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1409041/comments?source=feed#comment-18556201</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18556201</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I wouldn't really focus on a target. This will be a miserable laggard till they shift their tone which basically means you have a holiday to remain short till next earnings. If they can deliver what they have promised i think it can remain a 50-60 stock. If they warn in the next quarter or two we are looking at something closer to 35-40, but at that point takeout risk elevates signficantly. The way I look at it is from here on down to 60 or so should be a stress free ride. But its not like the business model is blowing up. They are executing and in a good position; they just suffer from a grossly unattractive share price that needs to be balanced out relative to their immediate growth trajectory. And i will be frank...it seems actifio will ipo this year which is never a good thing competition wise as they will be aggressively hiring and chasing the same biz ...people seem to forget that a boat load of ipos ultimately ends up being a bad thing for business which btw is something to think about in the SAAS sector for those fishing for other ideas.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 18:19:47 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I wouldn't really focus on a target. This will be a miserable laggard till they shift their tone which basically means you have a holiday to remain short till next earnings. If they can deliver what they have promised i think it can remain a 50-60 stock. If they warn in the next quarter or two we are looking at something closer to 35-40, but at that point takeout risk elevates signficantly. The way I look at it is from here on down to 60 or so should be a stress free ride. But its not like the business model is blowing up. They are executing and in a good position; they just suffer from a grossly unattractive share price that needs to be balanced out relative to their immediate growth trajectory. And i will be frank...it seems actifio will ipo this year which is never a good thing competition wise as they will be aggressively hiring and chasing the same biz ...people seem to forget that a boat load of ipos ultimately ends up being a bad thing for business which btw is something to think about in the SAAS sector for those fishing for other ideas.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Whole Foods Is A Short</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1182981/comments?source=feed#comment-18555721</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18555721</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[On a side note I just took a look at the report and there is nothing in there that changes my view on the stock. The growth is slowing markedly and if anything competition is now on firmer footing so the range of negative outcomes may increase not decrease from here going forward. If you actually are a capable short seller who knows how to manage positions and is not looking for max bang for the buck this is without a doubt reshortable here. I'll read the transcript tmrw am, but all I see here is some slight levg which came back and a guidance tweak. Stock move is more explainable by the general euphoria in equities and its huge underperf then anything company specific]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 18:02:32 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[On a side note I just took a look at the report and there is nothing in there that changes my view on the stock. The growth is slowing markedly and if anything competition is now on firmer footing so the range of negative outcomes may increase not decrease from here going forward. If you actually are a capable short seller who knows how to manage positions and is not looking for max bang for the buck this is without a doubt reshortable here. I'll read the transcript tmrw am, but all I see here is some slight levg which came back and a guidance tweak. Stock move is more explainable by the general euphoria in equities and its huge underperf then anything company specific]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Whole Foods Is A Short</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1182981/comments?source=feed#comment-18555231</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18555231</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Gary you are troll. Nothing more. Reality is you no very little about the markets or investing. I could be a stubborn guy and come on here and say omg its a fantastic short again, but fact of the matter is i have made a good 600% trading whole foods the last two earnings. Did i post something on this one? Have i recommended it to anyone on my newsletter lately? Answer to both those questions is no. And if you follow me you would know Im quite willing to flip sides. Look at lnkd i was recommending shorting it at 120, but second time around I passed and went long after the results. Why? Because the whole sector had reflated. I am always amused when people confuse macro for micro. My long book in groceries has supervalue and krogers . Might want to check out how they have done. Supervalue has doubled and Kroger is up 40%, while your favorite place to shop is -3%. Also starbux which is up 35% since i last shorted wfm at this level. So effectively speaking this is a stock that is flat over 6 months while the sp 500 has rallied 20%. And its not like this is the only name that i have shorted that has reflated lately. Bottom line is people are running out of things to buy and punting on some major laggards. Furthermore, I'm event driven so it is no coincidence i get the timing as right as I do. I had at least three emails asking whether i'd short it into earnings and i told them all the same thing...weather hit from last quarter will reverse this quarter so better to pass especially considering that the amount of more appealing shorts has exponentially increased.  Reality is this multi year run in equities is coming to a close...and for me that is the new opportunity i am focused on  as i see a point where making money short will be like shooting fish in a barrel .....if after the low hanging fruits are gone wfm is still there for the taking i will take a look....but for now i have better things to expend my energy on]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 17:49:34 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Gary you are troll. Nothing more. Reality is you no very little about the markets or investing. I could be a stubborn guy and come on here and say omg its a fantastic short again, but fact of the matter is i have made a good 600% trading whole foods the last two earnings. Did i post something on this one? Have i recommended it to anyone on my newsletter lately? Answer to both those questions is no. And if you follow me you would know Im quite willing to flip sides. Look at lnkd i was recommending shorting it at 120, but second time around I passed and went long after the results. Why? Because the whole sector had reflated. I am always amused when people confuse macro for micro. My long book in groceries has supervalue and krogers . Might want to check out how they have done. Supervalue has doubled and Kroger is up 40%, while your favorite place to shop is -3%. Also starbux which is up 35% since i last shorted wfm at this level. So effectively speaking this is a stock that is flat over 6 months while the sp 500 has rallied 20%. And its not like this is the only name that i have shorted that has reflated lately. Bottom line is people are running out of things to buy and punting on some major laggards. Furthermore, I'm event driven so it is no coincidence i get the timing as right as I do. I had at least three emails asking whether i'd short it into earnings and i told them all the same thing...weather hit from last quarter will reverse this quarter so better to pass especially considering that the amount of more appealing shorts has exponentially increased.  Reality is this multi year run in equities is coming to a close...and for me that is the new opportunity i am focused on  as i see a point where making money short will be like shooting fish in a barrel .....if after the low hanging fruits are gone wfm is still there for the taking i will take a look....but for now i have better things to expend my energy on]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Weibo's Pre-IPO Round</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1384031/comments?source=feed#comment-18270101</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18270101</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Umm i'd settle for 75 at this point:)]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 10:58:19 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Umm i'd settle for 75 at this point:)]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Weibo's Pre-IPO Round</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1384031/comments?source=feed#comment-18269461</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18269461</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[$24-$77 in incremental enterprise value from $55...so 80-132 sina stock if you want to get hypothetical with respect to enterprise value missing. You could take the view that portal is worth 1billion...cash off 1.3billion and 70% weibo between 3.2-10bil gets you 5.5bil- 12.3bil which is a giant range of 84-186 for the stock.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 10:43:54 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[$24-$77 in incremental enterprise value from $55...so 80-132 sina stock if you want to get hypothetical with respect to enterprise value missing. You could take the view that portal is worth 1billion...cash off 1.3billion and 70% weibo between 3.2-10bil gets you 5.5bil- 12.3bil which is a giant range of 84-186 for the stock.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Short The Lemon</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1281271/comments?source=feed#comment-18018831</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18018831</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I'm mostly an event trader. And typically options. So, for example on lulu into last quarter i bagged 220% in precisely 3 days. Ulta 400% in a day. Wfm 190% in 3 days (that one i did two quarters in a row as it came back). Apkt 130% one day...though that was pure luck as oracle bought them the day after i opened the position. Deckers 500-600% but over two months. Rackspace ...almost 900% but very small position. Cmg last july 700%......of course when you are wrong its 100% loss more or less and generally speaking doing this you typically will trader around two quarters with one working and the other not as you try and time it. So how you size is key, and as this is basically prop style trading your p/l plays a big role in sizing. But to sum...yes it is quite lucrative....but it is also not easy.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 03:56:47 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I'm mostly an event trader. And typically options. So, for example on lulu into last quarter i bagged 220% in precisely 3 days. Ulta 400% in a day. Wfm 190% in 3 days (that one i did two quarters in a row as it came back). Apkt 130% one day...though that was pure luck as oracle bought them the day after i opened the position. Deckers 500-600% but over two months. Rackspace ...almost 900% but very small position. Cmg last july 700%......of course when you are wrong its 100% loss more or less and generally speaking doing this you typically will trader around two quarters with one working and the other not as you try and time it. So how you size is key, and as this is basically prop style trading your p/l plays a big role in sizing. But to sum...yes it is quite lucrative....but it is also not easy.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Short The Lemon</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1281271/comments?source=feed#comment-17824051</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17824051</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[This is not a very bubblicious momo stock here so I would not be worried about protective stops. If you are physically short this is not a stock to be losing sleep over, and I would not cover here. I personally had options so it was a different ball game and i bought them over 70 before the news. Exiting for me was easy, but i know a bunch of people have retained some with my 58 target in mind. Moves like this happen about 1/8 times and the main reason for them is short term overcrowding. I do think you got a mini squeeze here and that there were some specialists at work taking advantage of it. I had the same headache in deckers in jan with a big call position ....thought no way it would close below 40 again and lo and behold in two days we went from 42 to 36 as we approached expiration. That nonsense cost me a considerable chunk of change. But all i did that day was rollover into higher strikes for the next month. In lulu's case at these levels you are going to make money shorting it this year, and what you may have to endure along the way is nothing close to what you usually face in a short with similar characteristics. Personally my reasons for being out had less to do with the stock and more to do with the fact that i am simply shifting to a fund structure from a prop/managed account structure and am in the set up process otherwise i'd have started shorting this again when it hit $67.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 05:47:24 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[This is not a very bubblicious momo stock here so I would not be worried about protective stops. If you are physically short this is not a stock to be losing sleep over, and I would not cover here. I personally had options so it was a different ball game and i bought them over 70 before the news. Exiting for me was easy, but i know a bunch of people have retained some with my 58 target in mind. Moves like this happen about 1/8 times and the main reason for them is short term overcrowding. I do think you got a mini squeeze here and that there were some specialists at work taking advantage of it. I had the same headache in deckers in jan with a big call position ....thought no way it would close below 40 again and lo and behold in two days we went from 42 to 36 as we approached expiration. That nonsense cost me a considerable chunk of change. But all i did that day was rollover into higher strikes for the next month. In lulu's case at these levels you are going to make money shorting it this year, and what you may have to endure along the way is nothing close to what you usually face in a short with similar characteristics. Personally my reasons for being out had less to do with the stock and more to do with the fact that i am simply shifting to a fund structure from a prop/managed account structure and am in the set up process otherwise i'd have started shorting this again when it hit $67.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The F5 Analyst Debacle</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1322641/comments?source=feed#comment-17812971</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17812971</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Hmmm........let's see....<br/><br/>I recommended buying acme packet two days before it was taken out...deckers before it rallied 80% and did like four pieces on that...ulta at a peak...whole foods at a peak....shorting the yen at 77...steering clear of gold....shorting mlnx at a peak....crus at a peak....dumping apple..shorting cmg at its peak....buying google....shorting lnkd at 120... before it fell to 90....and then not shorting it at 120 again and actually buying calls at 145.....and of course buying puts on lulue when it was 70 in the front months and two days before it warned and fell to 58......oh and a whole bunch of shiat you have no clue about because well ....you have no clue...but i will admit i am still quite preplexed by sina and pnra. Lulu has bounced on what id say is more  front monthoption/short interest dynamic than anything else.....but frankly speaking i could give a damn if i was 60% with the event driven option trading i do.....my goal is return...nothing else.....i don't dwell on price action....i learn from mistakes....i accept luck when it comes....and i always move on]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 20:02:06 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Hmmm........let's see....<br/><br/>I recommended buying acme packet two days before it was taken out...deckers before it rallied 80% and did like four pieces on that...ulta at a peak...whole foods at a peak....shorting the yen at 77...steering clear of gold....shorting mlnx at a peak....crus at a peak....dumping apple..shorting cmg at its peak....buying google....shorting lnkd at 120... before it fell to 90....and then not shorting it at 120 again and actually buying calls at 145.....and of course buying puts on lulue when it was 70 in the front months and two days before it warned and fell to 58......oh and a whole bunch of shiat you have no clue about because well ....you have no clue...but i will admit i am still quite preplexed by sina and pnra. Lulu has bounced on what id say is more  front monthoption/short interest dynamic than anything else.....but frankly speaking i could give a damn if i was 60% with the event driven option trading i do.....my goal is return...nothing else.....i don't dwell on price action....i learn from mistakes....i accept luck when it comes....and i always move on]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cirrus Logic: Overwhelmingly Undervalued</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1345091/comments?source=feed#comment-17725221</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17725221</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[160 mln is guidance......well below 195 consensus......]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 06:34:02 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[160 mln is guidance......well below 195 consensus......]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The F5 Analyst Debacle</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1322641/comments?source=feed#comment-17305191</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17305191</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[50 articles in 3 years.....not one cent received from SA...yeah its a money grab]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2013 14:10:29 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[50 articles in 3 years.....not one cent received from SA...yeah its a money grab]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The F5 Analyst Debacle</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1322641/comments?source=feed#comment-17275491</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17275491</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Stock is basically dead to me at these levels. I missed the move i have been chasing since december so i basically will ignore it till it gives a reason to take a second look....ie a much lower share price to go long on for a takeout thesis or what not or a bounce back that provides a good rational to try and short again. But that really depends on news flow....obviously will have good volatility on next guidance number which should determine whether its at 60 or 80 but on balance thats a coin flip so why bother....p\lenty of better things to trade now]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 13:58:53 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Stock is basically dead to me at these levels. I missed the move i have been chasing since december so i basically will ignore it till it gives a reason to take a second look....ie a much lower share price to go long on for a takeout thesis or what not or a bounce back that provides a good rational to try and short again. But that really depends on news flow....obviously will have good volatility on next guidance number which should determine whether its at 60 or 80 but on balance thats a coin flip so why bother....p\lenty of better things to trade now]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The F5 Analyst Debacle</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1322641/comments?source=feed#comment-17273141</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17273141</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[It baffles me sometimes how many people don't get it. Why would I write an article about a stock and declare i was not it and that last quarter I lost money on it for any other reason than to illustrate the point that the sell side cheerleading squad on this one did mgmt a favor by buying into that nonsense guidance. I will bet you that it will be years if ever before ffiv sees 110 again if it is not gobbled up. The writing had been on the wall since july on this one. That is what irritates me here.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 13:06:45 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[It baffles me sometimes how many people don't get it. Why would I write an article about a stock and declare i was not it and that last quarter I lost money on it for any other reason than to illustrate the point that the sell side cheerleading squad on this one did mgmt a favor by buying into that nonsense guidance. I will bet you that it will be years if ever before ffiv sees 110 again if it is not gobbled up. The writing had been on the wall since july on this one. That is what irritates me here.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The F5 Analyst Debacle</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1322641/comments?source=feed#comment-17258701</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17258701</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[read my stuff....then come back to me....maybe also get on my distrib list as some sa people are....i could have included some email chains on this to prove it but i'm kind of beyond that at this point....there are some SA guys who were in the convo yesterday...if they feel like attesting they can...as for courage you may not have gotten the jist of the post....if i had the time to write it up....id have already been in....since i didnt even make it to the more important part of taking my position what does courage have to do with writing something....that whole part of your comment makes little sense to me]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 08:51:50 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[read my stuff....then come back to me....maybe also get on my distrib list as some sa people are....i could have included some email chains on this to prove it but i'm kind of beyond that at this point....there are some SA guys who were in the convo yesterday...if they feel like attesting they can...as for courage you may not have gotten the jist of the post....if i had the time to write it up....id have already been in....since i didnt even make it to the more important part of taking my position what does courage have to do with writing something....that whole part of your comment makes little sense to me]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Lululemon Can Certainly Recover</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1302971/comments?source=feed#comment-16870091</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16870091</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[19c impact on intercompa\ny transfer revised agreement tax benefit not a nickel...so effectively speaking 1.76-1.81 would have been guidance....which makes 1.85 pretty damn close and kills the guide conservative and beat handily driver that had been the norm for pr\evious 3 years....anyway if you are a trader you know damn well to steer clear of a momo once the momo juice runs out because repricing down tends to be just as vicious as premium paid on way up. This is now a show me play whose next earnings will be another big event]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 08:40:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[19c impact on intercompa\ny transfer revised agreement tax benefit not a nickel...so effectively speaking 1.76-1.81 would have been guidance....which makes 1.85 pretty damn close and kills the guide conservative and beat handily driver that had been the norm for pr\evious 3 years....anyway if you are a trader you know damn well to steer clear of a momo once the momo juice runs out because repricing down tends to be just as vicious as premium paid on way up. This is now a show me play whose next earnings will be another big event]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Short The Lemon</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1281271/comments?source=feed#comment-16849851</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16849851</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[They are making good money doing these trades......you on the other hand want to talk fashion and don't know how to read a transcript or look up a days to cover ratio on nasdaq.com let alone calculate it yourself]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 18:28:33 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[They are making good money doing these trades......you on the other hand want to talk fashion and don't know how to read a transcript or look up a days to cover ratio on nasdaq.com let alone calculate it yourself]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Short The Lemon</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1281271/comments?source=feed#comment-16691501</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16691501</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Depends on your greed. If you are just short the stock, definitely somewhere below 60 before you start thinking about that. If you bought puts around 70\ as i did too its a bit more about risk/\reward, your portfolio balance, and alternatives. I cans say that for me to be long lulu i need oversold/lucrative price and we are clearly not close to that yet. Now whether it gets to a screaming buy p\oint i don't know , but right now it still looks like a toss up short with a full out the door growth year to worry about. While thats not what i look for to initiaite a p\ositions, its definitely not when I cover an existing short. Mumbo jumbo aside i stand by 58 before april opt\ions exp\ire...]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 07:06:54 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Depends on your greed. If you are just short the stock, definitely somewhere below 60 before you start thinking about that. If you bought puts around 70\ as i did too its a bit more about risk/\reward, your portfolio balance, and alternatives. I cans say that for me to be long lulu i need oversold/lucrative price and we are clearly not close to that yet. Now whether it gets to a screaming buy p\oint i don't know , but right now it still looks like a toss up short with a full out the door growth year to worry about. While thats not what i look for to initiaite a p\ositions, its definitely not when I cover an existing short. Mumbo jumbo aside i stand by 58 before april opt\ions exp\ire...]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Short The Lemon</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1281271/comments?source=feed#comment-16585361</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16585361</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I am short the event but i wouldnt be if i wasnt short already 10% higher.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 00:16:14 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I am short the event but i wouldnt be if i wasnt short already 10% higher.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Short The Lemon</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1281271/comments?source=feed#comment-16577891</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16577891</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Look I don't have the time to try and explain to you why a stock and a company are not the same thing, and that growth can be overpriced and that contractions can be overpriced by the market. Hence, you can double your money in best buy shares and lose 25% in lulu shares in the same time period. I am not shorting the company of 2009-2012. I am shorting the company of 2012-2013. If you can't discern the difference you are no different than the people who lost 40% in apple over the p\ast few months despite it being the most p\rofitable company on earth. What a stock price implies about the future is all that is relevant. If it is priced with the expectation of 100% growth but only capable of delivering 50% it is a better short than a comp\any contracting at 10% a year that is priced for such a contraction. So, I cannot sit here and converse over whether their bottoms are awesome or how much you love iviva or whether or not their showroom in hk was crowded. That is a small piece of the pie for me. Its like saying I will buy apple shares because the nyc store had a line around the block when ip\hone 5 launched. A line around the block was not enough...it needed to run down to wall street for me to  buy the shares at 700. I look at a compa\ny and ask myself if the past rate of growth is set to sharply slow, and then try to figure out whether i caught that before the market did. Thats it. Faulty assumptions is all i care about and margin for error. Nobody knows p\recisely what lulu will do tomorrow, but for me i like being short the stock at this p\rice at this time in the comp\anys life cycle...its that simple. There are thousands of stocks out there to buy all growing or shrinking at different rates....the opportunity is finding the ones that are mispricing the future the most. And to be honest making money on these things would be a lot harder if so many p\eop\le didnt think the way you did and assume crowded stores and nice products were all that mattered for an investment to work. But because of this growth stories get overp\riced and then the minute a downshift hap\p\ens they get rep\riced or underp\riced. This will go on forever....]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 19:21:54 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Look I don't have the time to try and explain to you why a stock and a company are not the same thing, and that growth can be overpriced and that contractions can be overpriced by the market. Hence, you can double your money in best buy shares and lose 25% in lulu shares in the same time period. I am not shorting the company of 2009-2012. I am shorting the company of 2012-2013. If you can't discern the difference you are no different than the people who lost 40% in apple over the p\ast few months despite it being the most p\rofitable company on earth. What a stock price implies about the future is all that is relevant. If it is priced with the expectation of 100% growth but only capable of delivering 50% it is a better short than a comp\any contracting at 10% a year that is priced for such a contraction. So, I cannot sit here and converse over whether their bottoms are awesome or how much you love iviva or whether or not their showroom in hk was crowded. That is a small piece of the pie for me. Its like saying I will buy apple shares because the nyc store had a line around the block when ip\hone 5 launched. A line around the block was not enough...it needed to run down to wall street for me to  buy the shares at 700. I look at a compa\ny and ask myself if the past rate of growth is set to sharply slow, and then try to figure out whether i caught that before the market did. Thats it. Faulty assumptions is all i care about and margin for error. Nobody knows p\recisely what lulu will do tomorrow, but for me i like being short the stock at this p\rice at this time in the comp\anys life cycle...its that simple. There are thousands of stocks out there to buy all growing or shrinking at different rates....the opportunity is finding the ones that are mispricing the future the most. And to be honest making money on these things would be a lot harder if so many p\eop\le didnt think the way you did and assume crowded stores and nice products were all that mattered for an investment to work. But because of this growth stories get overp\riced and then the minute a downshift hap\p\ens they get rep\riced or underp\riced. This will go on forever....]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Short The Lemon</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1281271/comments?source=feed#comment-16475611</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16475611</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I'd be short at this level still as i now think the conference call becomes very interesting. My view was that 2013 guidance would be lackluster and so far the q1 indicator is not enough to say that is in the bag, but as i expect q2/\q3 to be the weaker quarters and as this was more about bottom line drag for me I am pretty confident that will be the case. And that the shares should have been between 55-60 because of that....now that just looks more likely but because this is looking crowded short wise id say it could require tolerating a few bump\s to get there]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 23:27:22 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I'd be short at this level still as i now think the conference call becomes very interesting. My view was that 2013 guidance would be lackluster and so far the q1 indicator is not enough to say that is in the bag, but as i expect q2/\q3 to be the weaker quarters and as this was more about bottom line drag for me I am pretty confident that will be the case. And that the shares should have been between 55-60 because of that....now that just looks more likely but because this is looking crowded short wise id say it could require tolerating a few bump\s to get there]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Short The Lemon</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1281271/comments?source=feed#comment-16474341</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16474341</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Yes, I did not call this, but what I called is transitional year and pointed out that the best companies can have issues. Now this is 100% guaranteed to be a transitional year with the added supply chain issues to go with international build up plans. Your failure to comprehend press releases is impresive.. Q4 numbers are known and the comp is high single...they have guided to 5-8% for q1 versus 11% pre recall target. That to me is in line with what i was looking for as i expect the weaker comps to be in q2/q3 and overall full year to be high single digits. I have a 58$ tgt on the shares on or before april exp\iration which p\retty much is now just about built in. Overall, you can expect sub 20% eps growth this year which means you are paying an insane premium to wait for all this to get sorted and them to execute to perfection just to supp\ort the stock......that is not a very good strategy]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 23:01:33 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Yes, I did not call this, but what I called is transitional year and pointed out that the best companies can have issues. Now this is 100% guaranteed to be a transitional year with the added supply chain issues to go with international build up plans. Your failure to comprehend press releases is impresive.. Q4 numbers are known and the comp is high single...they have guided to 5-8% for q1 versus 11% pre recall target. That to me is in line with what i was looking for as i expect the weaker comps to be in q2/q3 and overall full year to be high single digits. I have a 58$ tgt on the shares on or before april exp\iration which p\retty much is now just about built in. Overall, you can expect sub 20% eps growth this year which means you are paying an insane premium to wait for all this to get sorted and them to execute to perfection just to supp\ort the stock......that is not a very good strategy]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
