Seeking Alpha

pats » Comments |

Sort by:
Latest | Highest rated
  • Apples to Apples: Will History Repeat Itself as Android Gains on the iPhone?  [View article]
    I think it is a bit early to crown Android the winner of the race. There are other big players in the mobile phone market which are not even mentioned. Nokia and Microsoft. If you think either one will just roll over and let Android take over the market and lets not leave off the lowly WebOS and the PRE which was destine to kill the Iphone due to all its superior capabilities. When the market is over a billion units there is plenty of room for multiple providers, OSs, devices. To think everyone wants Android is ludicrous.
    Nov 03 10:50 am |Rating: +1 -1 |Link to Comment
  • 10 Reasons Not to Buy Apple [View article]
    Hao Jin
    If I follow your wisdom who should I invest in? Point 1. The fact that a market is competitive doesn't mean there are not winners and losers. # 2 If you can read a financial statement. Go to Apple's investor web site and calculate the actual margin on the Iphone using the data provided by Apple. If you can't do a basic calculation like that you don't deserve to publish your article on a financial web site. The margin on the Iphone is about 55%. #3 is so what. They were new to the business and did exclusive deals for a few years with a number of carriers. Did this slow sales for the first couple years probably, but they are quite capable of adding these other carriers in the future so I don't get your point. The exclusive deals allowed them to bring a new device to market with great margins provided by the carrier subsidy.

    #4 Gartner projects the smart phone market to grow 26% in 2009 which is the segment the Iphone would be included in. I think you should look at the correct statistics. How fast did the Iphone grow YOY or model over model. If you run those numbers then your picture might look different. Don't forget your deferred revenue accounting which means Apple is still recognizing revenue for every single Iphone sold and only this qtr will have two years of sale.
    #5 Can you tell me how many handhelds Nitendo or Sony sold in the gaming market? Because until the App store opened Apple sold zero Itouches for gaming, but today they probably capture some of the handheld gaming market a new growth area, and what if this year they add a camera/video capability to the touch or a gps will they capture any of the dedicated point and shoot camera sales or PND sales.

    #6 I love your statistics and your short term view of the world. If you expand your horizons past the current recession Apple's MAC growth has been phenomenal but it would ruin the story. By the way how has the rest of the PC world been doing this year? I guess it will never recover and Apple will never grow again.
    #7
    Will not argue that the Apple store was a huge investment, but have you ever compared the revenue per square foot of retail space to any other retailer in any market? You might find that Apple has the most profitable retail operation bar none in any business. Do the research and then tell me Apple made a mistake building their own stores
    #8
    Is a joke. Steve was on medical leave and he is doing great along with the company. As a great leader he has a strong bench and some are more then capable of filling his shoes

    #9
    Where did you read about Apple's future strategy. Do you have a published white paper or something because I follow Apple daily and I have never seen a published strategy but as far as execution they seem to be doing well

    #10
    The SEC investigation was terminated and pretty much any large company battles litigation on a continuous basis.

    Good luck with your investments because with this kind of analysis you are not ready to invest in individual stocks. The QQQQ are probably a wise bet for you because you can't figure out good well run companies with great growth potential.
    Jul 07 17:37 pm |Rating: +12 -1 |Link to Comment
  • Upgrading to the iPhone 3G S May Not Be Worth the Cost [View article]
    Why did you sign a two year contract in the first place. The first gen Iphone was not subsidized by ATT we paid full price and ATT provided a monthly carrier payment back to Apple. When the user switched to the second gen. ATT no longer needed to pay Apple monthly so Apple was the one taking the hit on the first gen to 2nd gen. When you sign up for a two year contract you are taking a loan from ATT to buy the Iphone and then repay the loan over two years. This is not unique to ATT all of the carriers in the US do the same thing. You can buy the phone for full retail or take a subsidized phone. Depending on where you are in the current contract you get the price discounted. Why don't people get it. It a business what should ATT do when Version 4 or 5 comes out.
    Jun 09 11:05 am |Rating: +1 0 |Link to Comment
  • Why Apple Isn't Likely to Change Its Strategy [View article]
    Apple reports units sales every quarter and is available at www.apple.com/investor/. Each report contains a breakout under data sheet . The thing you need to remember is Apple is deferring revenue on the Iphone and recognizing over the following 8 qts. So a key figure is the current deferred revenue which is 5.467B.
    May 28 11:08 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Zune HD: Trying to Compete with Yesterday's iPod Touch [View article]
    Just a clarification. HD radio does not stand for high definition. It is a standard for simulcast of both digital and analog signal, the quality can approach CD quality if the FM station is not multiplexing the data stream.
    May 27 13:14 pm |Rating: +1 -1 |Link to Comment
  • Apple, Internet Radio Will Not Cancel Out Satellite Radio  [View article]
    Gino
    You missed my point. The WIFI standard is fixed point short range. The BCM4329 chip does not exist in any Iphone and your guess is based on a bunch of rumors. If you are going to discuss 802.11 standards, then you are talking fixed location not mobile. The 802.11 standard is more then capable of streaming high fidelity audio and video. Apple does not need to use FM to talk to the radio, most modern car radios have line in which allows the signal to travel via a wired connection. The FM would provide a convenience but I use my line in on my XM equipped car radio. The problem I have with your argument is you seem to have a very limited understanding of the network technologies, but you then conclude that satellite is superior and the other technologies will never close that gap. The reality is ATT network works great where they have decent 3G network coverage but they do not have the coverage of the satellite network. Most users could care less that the signal comes from Satellite or land based cell towers. The time window of opportunity for satellite is limited. The cell phone companies continue to build out their network coverage. Will they ever cover the whole world? No, but if an individual can get a decent cell signal in 95% of the places they travel, then most will skip the $12 per month charge unless the content is unique for the service. SIRI needs to build the user base and with the car market in the dumps and the economy they failed to grow the user base this quarter. I hope they succeed but to say satellite radio will succeed means they need at some point soon turn a profit. They have high fixed costs and need to add users since the marginal user adds very little cost. I wish you luck. I currently have a small position in SIRI 20K and much larger position in AAPL but I can't see myself holding the SIRI long term.
    May 15 09:44 am |Rating: +3 -1 |Link to Comment
  • Apple, Internet Radio Will Not Cancel Out Satellite Radio  [View article]
    Dude
    Do a little better research please before you publish. The Iphone moving in a car would not use 802.11n. That is a wifi fixed location standard. The Iphone uses the ATT 3G HSPA or 2G Edge network to move data. The cost of the data network is 30 per month unlimited data. Don't cloud your discussion with 100$ phone charge. I pay 9.99 for the phone on a family plan but what does that have to do with sat radio. On the current Iphone you can use a line-out via the dock connector. This provides minimal signal loss if your radio supports line-in. The FM you talk about would be for older model radio which are not equipped with line-in. I agree with your issues on buffering and stream quality, but I have listen to streams via Pandora and normally have no issues. The service is free not $12. The $ 30 data plan is a sunk cost if I want to get my email and surf the web so I now get streaming audio from all over the world for free. The quality is professional as I can stream about any station. Satellite may not be dead, but an Iphone can be a suitable replacement in all kinds of situations. As an example avid sports fans might subscribe to XM to get their fix of baseball. The Apple App store has a major league baseball app cost $10 and has streaming home and visit play by play. I can pay 10 for a season or about $70 for XM.
    May 15 08:02 am |Rating: +4 -4 |Link to Comment
  • Does Palm's Pre Have Anything on the iPhone or Storm? [View article]



    On May 12 11:41 AM Aryamehr wrote:

    > Palm's choice of Sprint was brilliant, in that Sprint is the only,
    > and will be the only, carrier for the next two years to have 4G capabilities,
    > hence enhancing the Pre's speed by a factor of at least 10 over the
    > iPhone and Blackberry phones. Other than having a more efficient
    > User Interface and more versatility the Pre will be operating on
    > a super fast highway that ATT won't have available until 2011, that
    > is if they follow through with their 4G plans in a timely manner.
    > Now give me some Spin about the iPhone 4G? ATT again doesn't have
    > 4G, so no matter what Apple does they will be limited to 2.5G to
    > 3G for at least two more years. During this time Palm will be testing
    > a better versions of its WebOS on a fully functioning Sprint 4G network,
    > giving its developers a clear advantage. Now beat that!

    The Pre does not support 4G so how does this help Palm. ATT is upgrading their existing 3G network via software from 3.6 to 7.2 . The Sprint EVDO rev A operates at 3.1 Mbps. So If you buy a new IPhone which will come out about the same time as the Pre your network theoretically will be twice as fast on the Iphone as the Pre. Realize that peak rates and actual device speeds vary by time and location, but the bottom line is the Pre on Sprint's network will be slower then the next Iphone on ATT network.
    May 12 12:20 pm |Rating: +1 -2 |Link to Comment
  • Apple's AT&T Deal Is Costly [View article]
    Todd
    Where do you get the estimates? 1 B in lost revenue? You assume that ATT would sell every Iphone Apple could make, which may or may not be the case. The revenue is for 2 yrs not 4. You have no idea what the future holds and based on all the new carriers for Iphone 2. I think you are grossly exaggerating the financial impact of the ATT contract. ATT has an exclusive for the US and no where else. The contract is good for both companies. It allowed Apple to get started in a new business and ATT to capture new high end customers. Verizon had a chance to sell the iphone
    May 14 20:11 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Apple's Bountiful Revenues Are Bigger Than Ever  [View article]
    T Muller. I agree with you and good analysis. Just a couple small points. A portion of the qtrly sales revenue will be reported on the 1.703M sold in the quarter. I base this on the fact the 5M of Iphone revenue was recognized Q3 07 with only 3 days of sales. It looks like Apple does daily accounting of numbers for revenue calculation although we are analyzing using quarterly accounting. Also Apple has started adding in the ATV revenue which will further muddy the water in determining a actual GM and carrier payment
    Apr 28 07:56 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Apple's Bountiful Revenues Are Bigger Than Ever  [View article]
    Stephen
    The non current line on the deferred revenue is over a year out and would be minimally affected by the rebate, since Apple would have already taken the rebate charge when it was redeemed. The revenue is less because they didn't record the transaction after Mar 6 and until 2.0 software is released
    (2) This is a profound drop in expected deferred income which I suspect has to do with the $100 rebates offered when Apple cut its iPhone price. Adding $816 + $624 from 12/07 gives $1440. Removing 1/8th of this should leave $1260 for non-current 3/08.

    The way you list the calculation is not correct. The non-current deferred would include all the revenue which will not be recognized this year. The new non-current would then add in the amount which is non-current from the current qtrs sales. For 1.7 Mil @ 400 you get 628 M total revenue. 1/8 current qtr 78.5 for Mar 08 1/2 current deferred 314M and 3/8 non- current 235M.
    Apr 27 11:12 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Research in Motion: Unlike Apple, No Slowdown in Subscriber Growth  [View article]
    Todd
    When did Apple say they were experiencing a slowdown in Iphone sales?
    The only data discussed at the CC was 3.704 Mil at end of year and 4 Mil by SJ at Mac World. How does this equate to this big slowdown. What data shows Apple has cutback production of the Iphone? While I agree that a lower price will increase sales, it will also reduce margins and affect profitability. I think Apple's doing great by not having to sell a phone at $99 and hope the carriers give them a large enough payback. Also I don't think Apple wants to set the price artificially low to gain customers because they would cannibalize the IPOD touch sales if the Iphone were cheaper.
    Feb 25 09:48 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Three Reasons I Chose Microsoft over Apple for Home Media [View article]
    Blah123
    The author was talking about using the 360 as a media extender. Not a gaming machine. The 360 rocks as a gaming machine other than two glaring problems. The thing is loud and the hardware fails all too often. The facts are the facts. In my family 7 of 8 have had to return their system to Microsoft. I'm the only one that has not. That sucks for the 3 weeks your without a machine.
    As far as your WII comment it is not a high end gaming machine but has out sold the 360. In my house the 360 gets used more than the WII, but when we travel we take the WII for the social aspect. It's a hoot to have a boxing match against all the relatives and friends.

    If your buying a 360 for gaming and then using as a media extender to save a few bills, more power to you, but to go off and buy three when you don't really play games is crazy.

    I think the idea of cutting the cable bill is interesting. Comcast sucks 7$ of my money every month so I can have the honor of watching HD on my big screen. At least apple doesn't have all the hidden subscription costs. Its pay as you go, which for me is alot better.

    As far as the XPS 420, it looks like a great machine, but I'm confused on how you are using the system. Looks like a classic desktop system. Where are you hiding the box. It looks like a great system to serve up content. Good luck running the ethernet around the house.
    Feb 12 17:11 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Three Reasons I Chose Microsoft over Apple for Home Media [View article]
    Glad you have all that spare $$. My god 3 XBOX 360's. At least you'll have a unit available when you have to return one for repair. I love the on-line game play of the 360 and we use the DVD player, but the thing sounds like a tank when the fan is running. For me it sucks cause I can't close my glass cabinet door. Otherwise the thing overheats. I don't own an Atv but I think the idea is get rid of the DVD and use a digital file. 1358 dell vs 799 mac mini. How it that about the same price.
    Feb 12 10:13 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • A Closer Look at Apple Stock [View article]
    Dan
    I think the growth rates are way understated. The Mac market is on fire growth rates of 40%. Gartner just projected that the US market share would double by CY 11. The Iphone is a whole new market area and is selling well. Apple is accounting for Iphone revenue over 24 months. How are you factoring this into your model. If we assume apple sells 10 Million Iphones in CY08 plus the 4 million already sold. Revenue for the 14 million phones will be recognized in your second year. If we assume a sale price of $400 that becomes 1.4 billion in new revenue. If we assume 75% of the phones carry a monthly carrier payment of $10 we get another 1.26 Billion in new revenue. The numbers for FY 07 understate the revenue stream from the phone because of the deferment. Also why a P/E ratio of 18. Historically Apple has commanded a much higher P/E, I would suggest using 35.
    The other problem I have with the analysis is you try to project a 10 year growth rate. I bought apple stock in 1999 for 9.30 a share. I have a unrealized gain of 1355%. So maybe this is a better guess at 10 year growth rate. For folks looking at the current price and trying to determine whether they can make money on the price. I think the stock is a buy. I am modeling for 6.15 EPS for FY08 with a P/E of 35 give me a $215 price. I am assuming 30% YOY revenue growth in MAC, Software, Music and Peripherals and 10% growth in IPOD revenue and then add in the I phone revenue based on the 3.704 Million already sold and quarterly sales of 1.8M, 2.5M, 3.0M for the remainder of the year. My quarterly EPS numbers 1.76, 1.29, 1.44, 1.66
    Feb 01 10:41 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
Comments by Ticker
pats'
Comments Stats
16 comments
Rating: 13 (23 - 10 )