Seeking Alpha

tkenyon » Comments » BRK.B

  • Why You Don't Need an Informational Advantage, Just an Emotional One [View article]
    Tony - great comments - thanks! I will read the SA article today! You are correct that most of the academic tenants of market dynamics and economics are plain wrong since they do start with the belief that market participants act rationally. If the past few years (not to mention the late 90s) hasn't dispelled that notion permanently, I don't know what will. We hear that "markets are driven by fear and greed" constantly. I doubt you could many market participants who would disagree with that. Neither of those emotions are rational precursors to making economic decisions. There, I just disproved the EMT.
    Jun 30 07:02 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Setting the Record Straight on Buffett and Derivatives [View article]
    This confounds me as well. Surely Kass is is smarter than his statements on Berkshire's "style drift" make him appear. Buffett sold index puts for about $4B if I recall correctly. As long as the indexes in question are at higher levels in 15-20 years (a pretty darn good bet), the puts expire worthless. Meanwhile Buffett gets $4B to play with. Not even in the same universe as the so-called FWMD's. (I'm long BRK)
    May 22 14:50 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Berkshire's Intrinsic Value: Raw and Uncensored! [View article]
    Please email me via my website nobadeercapital.com
    Jan 14 17:05 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Berkshire's Intrinsic Value: Raw and Uncensored! [View article]
    Insurance capital = statutory surplus. This is reported in the SEC filings.
    Dec 28 18:39 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Berkshire's Intrinsic Value: Raw and Uncensored! [View article]
    It's basically a ddm model or dcf. Similar to the way Alice Schroeder did it, I grew the float at 7% for 4 years and 5% for 6 years, which should be conservative. Then, at year 10, I calculate a perpetuity value and discount it back to the present. I used a perpetual growth rate of 4% and required return of 6.5%, a more typical risk free rate than we have currently. You never actually own the float, but if you have the right to invest that $59B at the risk free rate in perpituity, then that privilege is worth $59B. It is worth more if the float grows and/or the returns are greater than the risk free rate. I hope that helps.
    Dec 18 21:01 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
More on BRK.B by tkenyon
Comments by Ticker
tkenyon's
Comments Stats
19 comments
Rating: 0 (0 - 0 )