Seeking Alpha

Pj568 » Comments » BAC

  • Who Owns the Derivatives Market? [View article]
    Open Questions:

    Is it correct that the problems are only (mainly) in the naked CDS positions ?

    If CDS accounts for 15% of the total derivative contracts then that is the maximum naked positions on a notional basis. What then is the net positions? If unknown then what is the estimated net?

    Since this has been prime news since 2007 what has been the progress,if any, by the fed or accountants in ascertaining net positions, recognition of losses and making adequate disclosure?
    Oct 06 10:33 am |Rating: +2 -1 |Link to Comment
  • Bank of America Raises a Whole Lotta Money [View article]
    Premarupa,

    The answer is conflicting news. BAC demonstrated that it could raise needed capital with offering only a 9% discount. You also had a dilutive effect. With a non distressed company one would expect a fall in price to the new issue amount but BAC is a distressed company in a distressed market and who knows what the price will do.

    To interpret, the event the media mavens would just say that the market had already priced in an even greater dilution that what actually occurred or that we know that BAC can obtain the capital needed to go forward. Take your pick.
    May 20 13:16 pm |Rating: +2 0 |Link to Comment
  • Citigroup: Levitate Above the Frenzy [View article]
    Rational reasons for the quoted 22% short position:

    1) Future losses expected
    2) Current dilution not fully recognized
    3) Further dilution expected
    3) No transparency in the sector
    4) Institutional and national deleveraging still occurring
    5) Insolvency
    6) Financial crisis is not over
    7) Still in a recession
    Apr 28 08:19 am |Rating: +3 -1 |Link to Comment
  • Paulson Changes His Tune on BofA and Merrill [View article]
    Where does it say that "when pressured you have to give in". What does pressured really mean anyway, did he believe that the government was going to punish BAC. Lewis got suckered trying to become a JP Morgan. Who really knows, but it appears JP Morgan came out on top with "Bear".
    Apr 24 14:54 pm |Rating: +4 -1 |Link to Comment
  • Blaming Bankers When Government Is Really at Fault [View article]
    I can't agree with any statement that diminishes the role played by the Bankers. Although bankers are trying to deflect their responsibility in this mess, the situation would not even exist if they had demonstrated any type of common sense in their desire to increase ROE though increased leverage and failure to understand the risk of their products and off balance sheet structures.
    Apr 24 12:14 pm |Rating: +2 -2 |Link to Comment
  • Bank Stress Tests: Tangible Common Equity a Critical Metric [View article]
    We know government is not the brightest nor leading edge when it comes to financial analysis.

    My question is where have all the experts, banks execs and other corporate gurus been to have ignored this. Are there really any true experts in our corporate suites?

    Sadly to say, the mega banks didn't want to cut common dividends until the Feds forced them.

    This whole thing is just pathetic.
    Apr 24 11:20 am |Rating: +5 -1 |Link to Comment
  • Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [View article]
    Boston Scientific (BSX): Q1 EPS of $0.19 beats by $0.07. Revenue of $2.0B (-1.8%) in-line. (PR)

    Don't you just hate it when the GAAP loss gets in the way of those good profit numbers?
    Apr 21 08:05 am |Rating: +1 0 |Link to Comment
  • Big Debt and Big Returns Could Be Spurring This Rally [View article]
    It will be difficult for any financial services company to return to prior levels just due to the change in basic fundamentals underway. Several have had to: issue additional stock, are decreasing their own leverage ratio's, decreasing leverage of their customers and eliminated dividends. That's a big load to overcome with their history of settling for ROA's of less than a percent.
    Mar 30 10:56 am |Rating: +1 0 |Link to Comment
  • FASB Unlikely to Suspend Mark to Market  [View article]
    FYI - the discounted cash flow of many of these CDO's were originally computed with assumptions which are signifcantly different today than when originated.

    We now know that home values are down 50%, not growing 3% for eternity; default rates have quadrupled to 5% and increasing; they assumed borrower income was real as opposed to being fabricated; they assumed that the security had legal title to the mortgages which appears to be a misnomer; early payoffs were severely underestimated and who knows what else they missed. These items are permanent and can't be recaptured in future cash flows.

    In other words the discounted cash flow value might not be that far off from the "market value".

    Surely the bankers are not asking to use the original assumptions (historical value)or are they? They have yet to tell us how much what their current estimate of value is and how much it actually varies from the current market value.
    Mar 13 19:48 pm |Rating: +5 0 |Link to Comment
  • Don't Blame Mark-to-Market for This Crisis [View article]
    MTM is part of what the hedge fund staffs have done for years in ascertaining company value. Now that MTM numbers are available to the common investor as part of company reporting, why do away with our free access?
    Mar 12 09:34 am |Rating: +4 -1 |Link to Comment
  • The 'Sell After Dividend Cut/Freeze' Rule, With Exceptions [View article]
    Hasn't anyone ever heard of using that old fashion money management technique, a "stop loss"?
    Mar 12 09:22 am |Rating: +2 -4 |Link to Comment
  • Are U.S. Banks Really Worthless? [View article]
    If the hedge funds and billionaires of the world aren't buying this argument then I'm not either.
    Feb 25 07:28 am |Rating: +2 -3 |Link to Comment
  • Financial Stocks: Playing the Mark-to-Market Suspension [View article]
    Mark to Market isn't going away. It came about due to the investor community representation on the FASB board. It helps align GAAP with international accounting standards. The US system has been moving for more transparency for decades. Country regulators may decide to change their standards for regulatory purposes but to disregard the investor community would be self defeating.
    Feb 14 18:33 pm |Rating: +4 -9 |Link to Comment
  • Ken Lewis on Bank Accounting: Sensible Talk from a Surprising Source [View article]
    It seems quite rational that earning increase in good times and decrease during bad times. Why does Lewis and Brown think otherwise? The twisted squirrel analogy is weak.

    There's nothing in the accounting rules that prevent companies from increasing capital during good times, when available & cheap (fall) and saving it for the bad times, not available and costly (winter). Isn't this really the message behind squirrel analogy?

    What's sad is that the bankers seem to believe that the problem is in the accounting and not in common sense.
    Dec 05 10:53 am |Rating: +1 0 |Link to Comment
  • The Paulson Plan: Compelling Banks to Lend at Bazooka Point [View article]
    Isn't WFC on record saying they were going to raise 20B in new capital to support the Wachovia 7B stock acquisition? This seems cheaper and less dilutive than what their other options were.
    Oct 15 11:02 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
More on BAC by Pj568
Comments by Ticker
Pj568's
Comments Stats
239 comments
Rating: 139 (182 - 43 )