Reinko

Total Rating:
+2 / -3

328 Comments

    • Sun Jan 20th 13:49 PM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Economic Stimulus Plans: The Good, the Hopeful and the Dubious
      After my humble opinion both the Federal Reserve lowering rates and the White House proposing a 140 billion in tax cuts will not do the work because at the root of all problems lays the mountain of debt.

      There is lots of debt in the USA (Americans are even famous for turning debt into securities) and some part of this debt is listed in the Federal Reserve flow of funds sheet. Here is the link:

      www.federalreserve.gov...

      If you add the relevant totals you get 46 trillion or 46 thousand billion in debt, but as stated before; there is a whole lot more debt.

      For example the Federal Agency bonds fit nowhere in the flow of funds release, the Social Security funds are filled with 'AAA rated' government bonds and all Federal emergency spending is also not listed there.

      So we can safely jump to the conclusion that total debt stands over 50 trillion and with a defendable interest rate of 5% there is a staggering 2500 billion US$ needed just for the interest in the year 2008.

      In 2009 an estimated 2700 billion is needed and so on and so on.

      So the increase in only the interest is beyond the present stumilus package, therefore it will not work.

      Another way of viewing at this: At present total debt on the US economy is something like 400% of the gross domestic product. Adding one % more in Federal debt will not make much of a difference because the interest levels are far to high.

      There is only one way out: Pay off the debt...
      View article »
    • Sun Jan 20th 13:24 PM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      The Dow Hates Bush?
      Hello Afthought,

      For doubling your money on a savings account in seven years you need 2^(1/7) = 1.104 thus 10.4% interest on a yearly basis.

      With just five percent you get 1.05^7 = 1.407 or 40.7% more after seven years. Thus the compounded (extra) interest is only 5.7% above the 5% times 7 = 35%.
      When you have low interest rates, the compounding effect isn't very much of a thing.


      __________

      To Eddy: 1.48% a year on the DOW isn't very much and I expect further larger declines this year so it might very well be that in a few months the whole thing needs to be written in red.
      View article »
    • Sun Jan 20th 13:10 PM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Prepare for a Multi-Year Decline in Consumer Spending
      Hello Markham, good article and I really did not know that HELOC's amounted to 20% of spending in some cases.

      I live in Holland and in the nineties we had two years on a row of 4% more 'income' spended on behalf of your house value.

      It took us four years to recover from that...
      View article »
    • Sun Jan 20th 12:25 PM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      The Bush Fiscal Stimulus Plan: Looks Good to Me
      Well Felix, does it look good to you?

      In that case grab your pocket calculator and go to the Federal Reserve website, the 'flow of funds' sheet (some debt is collected there but not all debt)

      Here is the link:

      www.federalreserve.gov...

      Add up the relevant totals, column one plus the one before last and arrive at the conclusion that the US economy has about 46 trillion or 46,000 billion US$ debt on herself.

      Together with the lending against the Social Security funds and the Federal emergency spending we see: Total debt is over 50 trillion.

      So at a reasonable interest level the US economy needs 2500 billion a year just for the interest.

      Another way of looking at this: Total debt is something like 400% of the gross domestic product, adding 1% more debt will not make much of a difference...

      And lets go back in time to 2006: In that year home owners took about 650 billion US$ of value out of there houses, that is about 4 to 5% of GDP yet in 2007 things went sour anyway.


      View article »
    • Sat Jan 19th 17:49 PM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Don't Buy (Sell) The Bear
      I agree most with D36, there can be said a lot more on this detail.

      For the source of my calculations go to the Federal Reserve flow of funds sheet where some debt is collected, here is the link:

      www.federalreserve.gov...

      During the last seven years the debt on the financial sector grew something like 82%, the gross domestic product did not grow that fast. (Just compare Q1 2001 with Q3 2007)

      The same goes for mortgages, according to the flow of funds release we have 111% increase.

      And what about total domestic non financial sectors?
      In Q1 2001 we have 18334.7 billion US$ debt while
      In Q3 2007 we have 30640.9 billion US$ debt.

      That is over 12 thousand billion more debt!

      And the totals are staggering: When you add the debt of the flow of funds sheet together with the Federal emergency spending (not included at that FED sheet) we are over 50 trillion of debt.

      That is over 50 thousand billions!

      And at an interest level of just 5% there is a need every year for 2500 billion just to pay the interest!

      In conditions like this it just makes no sense to compare the present S&P with the 1999 or 2000 S&P.


      View article »
    • Sat Jan 19th 17:28 PM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Citigroup: Buy Today for a Rainy Day
      There is much more reason why not only Citi but large parts of the entire US financial sector will be gone in a few years.

      The most important reason is the gigantic need for new debt, estimates indicate that for the entire US financial sector something like 2500 billion US$ is needed in this year 2008.

      Don't believe me?

      This is easy to proof:

      Go to the Federal Reserve flow of funds sheet, here is the link:

      federalreserve.gov/rel...

      Go to the one before last column (total domestic financial sector debt) and scroll down until you get the last two numbers.
      They say, total debt is

      2007 Q2 = 14855.0
      2007 Q3 = 15435.3 billions of US$.

      Since 15435.3/14835 = 1.039 we have 3.9% Q on Q.

      Thus a yearly estimate of 1.039^4 = 1.166 thus 16.6% Y on Y.

      And 16.6% of the latest known 15435.3 billion is a rough 2500 billion US$.
      View article »
    • Sat Jan 19th 17:24 PM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Bear Gets Bullish on Bank Stocks
      It is hard to imagine that the so called 'professionals' never look at the Federal Reserve flow of funds sheet.

      If you do that you arrive at the conclusion that the entire US financial sector will try to pick up debt in 2008 in the order of magnitude of 2500 billion US$.

      Don't believe me?

      This is easy to proof:

      Go to the Federal Reserve flow of funds sheet, here is the link:

      federalreserve.gov/rel...

      Go to the one before last column (total domestic financial sector debt) and scroll down until you get the last two numbers.
      They say, total debt is

      2007 Q2 = 14855.0
      2007 Q3 = 15435.3 billions of US$.

      Since 15435.3/14835 = 1.039 we have 3.9% Q on Q.

      Thus a yearly estimate of 1.039^4 = 1.166 thus 16.6% Y on Y.

      And 16.6% of the latest known 15435.3 billion is a rough 2500 billion US$.

      Thus with letting this detail out Bear Stearns is just as crazy as that Chicago school of economists that are more an advertisement agency for the US economy.

      No, the likelihood of a severe crash is climbing by the month and very likely it will start with a tidal wave of bankruptcies in the US financial sector. I mean: What can possibly stop this?


      View article »
    • Sat Jan 19th 17:11 PM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Why Sovereigns Are Buying Our Financials - They're Cheap
      This article is not well thought through; foreigners buy US financials because they are stupid. With some months waiting they will get far better deals compared to now.

      And do you know why that is?

      Because the entire US financial sector will try to pick up debt in 2008 in the order of magnitude of 2500 billion US$.

      Don't believe me?

      This is easy to proof:

      Go to the Federal Reserve flow of funds sheet, here is the link:

      www.federalreserve.gov...

      Go to the one before last column (total domestic financial sector debt) and scroll down until you get the last two numbers.
      They say, total debt is

      2007 Q2 = 14855.0
      2007 Q3 = 15435.3 billions of US$.

      Since 15435.3/14835 = 1.039 we have 3.9% Q on Q.

      Thus a yearly estimate of 1.039^4 = 1.166 thus 16.6% Y on Y.

      And 16.6% of the latest known 15435.3 billion is a rough 2500 billion US$.

      So if those foreigners would have done their homework they would have waited a few months.

      I am very sorry Jeff: Try this article once more and include some easy to understand calculations from the flow of funds sheet in it.
      Because now it is crap while it could have been a good article...

      Good luck with it!


      View article »
    • Fri Jan 18th 17:41 PM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Percentage of Stocks Above Their 50-DMAs Finally Oversold
      Interesting, but why name it 'oversold'? Fundamentals indicate more and hefty downwards movements so actually it is 'normal sold' because we are in a declining situation anyway...

      It would only be oversold when we were in a flat environment, but in fact stuff is going downhill.

      Contrary to oversold we also have overbought, it would be nice to make a statistical eveluation in how far the concepts oversold and overbought are equaly distributed (the 50-50 hypothesis).

      Want to bet that the Americans use 'oversold' much more often?
      View article »
    • Fri Jan 18th 11:22 AM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Bernanke Deserves Blame for Sell-Off in Stocks
      Only when taxes are raised feeling what a recession is like? No, it is far more worse: For example in the year 2006 US home owners took out about 650 billion US$ in home equity loans and cash-out refi.

      If you subtract that extra debt from the 2006 GDP, the whole year 2006 was already a recession. So the mechanism is very easy to understand: If we subtract the extra debt from the last years, there is already a multi year recession going on.

      The fact that Americans do not understand that debt driven GDP growth is a waste of money is their problem and not mine (don't forget the interest on the debt is often a multiple of de GDP growth that is generated by that fresh debt driven economical stimulus).

      Thus all those plans to place a bit of money into the pockets of the tax payers will fail once more...

      Recessions, depressions and defaults are Gods way to learn macro economics to the Americans.
      View article »
    • Fri Jan 18th 10:55 AM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      The Oversold U.S. Market Gets Even More Oversold
      I completely agree; try some fundamentals...
      View article »
    • Wed Jan 16th 16:09 PM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      More on Debt Supercycle Control
      Thanks Mark Schoenenberger, I will place those links in my collection of bookmarks!

      By the way, your name Schoenenberger sounds so Dutch. Translated it means Shoesmountener. do you have Dutch or Belgian forefathers?

      You are right on the role of the conventional media; when you see what kind of mess for example CNN makes of the economical news you can only wonder: Why do they do it?

      But here back in Holland also researchers from respected banks can tell deep footed crap, it is always easy to see if they have 'Z1 release or related' information in their head or not.

      If you think the Z1 release contains big numbers, give it a try and go to the Bank for International Settlements. Where the tiny Federal reserve reports in billions, the BIS does the same in trillions...

      Here is a link to some money option pdf:

      www.bis.org/statistics...

      It is amazing how fast those numbers climb...

      But Mark, thanks for the links but I have to go now!
      View article »
    • Wed Jan 16th 15:55 PM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Foreclosures: Coming Soon to a Neighborhood Near You
      Bob K & Exchange3D: Already in the Summer of 2004 I realized what would happen, yet every body thought I was going crazy so I just decided to shut up and simply wait until my elementary insights came out.

      Here in Europe for example even entire organizations like dentists did throw in a lot of pension money and I could talk and talk but they kept on doing it. But if academics fall in the trap, why blame the average US worker who has no clue about financial calculations and financial reasoning whatsoever?

      Even Alan Greenspan still does not get it: He blames the falling prices on all those unsold new houses and says 'those will be sold at a firebrand level and that brings the prices down'.
      So the Alan clown simply does not understand the relation between M3 money supply and the creation of bubbles, no wonder he alsways had to be so vague...
      View article »
    • Wed Jan 16th 15:15 PM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      US Bancorp Is Whistling Through the Graveyard
      Well eponymousLTC, want something more substantial?

      Go to the Federal Reserve website Flow of Funds sheet, here is the link:

      www.federalreserve.gov...

      Go to the one last column (total debt domestic US financial sector) and read the Q2 and Q3 numbers:

      2007 Q2 = 14855.0
      2007 Q3 = 15435.3 billions of dollars

      So the entire US financial sector pick up 580.3 billion US dollars in just one quarter... In the first 3 quarters the financial sector picked up a staggering 934.9 billion and if Q4 is in line with Q3 we are looking at 1.5 trillion US$ in the financial secor only.

      Needless to say that 1.5 trillion is far beyond total profits of the US financial sector (although I do not have an exact number on that, yet it is very hard to imagine that it is beyond).

      So as a whole the US financial sector has so called 'Ponzi status' that means that they need to borrow more just to pay the interest on the outstanding loans:

      2007 Q3 = 15435.3 billion so at an interest rate of 5% they need a rough 600 billion a year just for the interest payments.

      Compare this with the little billions that come from China and the Mid East and arrive at the conclusion that the Wall Street traders are standing lightyears from reality with their rallies on those small billions 'save our banks' news.

      View article »
    • Wed Jan 16th 15:00 PM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      TAF: Temporary Applause for the Fed
      The last time I looked at the European libor rates only the most short termed got down while all others were just as high as before the 500 billion injection.

      Furthermore it has to be taken into account that the US FED only placed a few times 20 billion in the system where the ECB got atomic with 500 billion.

      At the time I already suspected that the large ECB move was in fact for the USA and the European libor rates later confirmed that because right now the ECB is collecting it back.
      View article »
Contribute an Article Become a Seeking Alpha Contributor