Patient's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com http://seekingalpha.comuser/129172/comments http://seekingalpha.com/article/71696-bp-could-lose-20-billion-to-gazprom?source=feed#comment-147798 147798
I still keep smiling and remain a shareholder of the company that instead of paying millions in bonuses to incompetent CEOs and cooking their books pays dividends to millions of shareholders. I guess you prefer privately run Enrons, Bear Sterns etc 
]]> Wed, 09 Apr 2008 14:17:24 -0400
I still keep smiling and remain a shareholder of the company that instead of paying millions in bonuses to incompetent CEOs and cooking their books pays dividends to millions of shareholders. I guess you prefer privately run Enrons, Bear Sterns etc 
]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/71696-bp-could-lose-20-billion-to-gazprom?source=feed#comment-147745 147745
First of all to get credibility an analyst should check the facts before jumping to conclusions. I am both BP and Gazprom shareholder I tend to read the documents and study history of the deals.
1) BP had never owned 51% as stated in the article
2) BP investment was 50% that is a big difference:
• invested $7bln 5 years ago
• received more than $10bln in dividends ca, 28% yields
• sold Kovykta gas field (still undeveloped for $800-1000 mm vs. cumulative investment of ca. $400mm) – not exactly a robbery
• rumors says Gazprom offeres $15-20 bln for 50% stake - that would mean 6 times increase on the initial investment (5 year IRR – 44%) – the best investment BP ever made.
3) Sidanko did use questionable tax optimization schemes and had a ‘reserve” for exactly that purposes.

I understand that is much easier to copy and paste WSJ with catchy title than to perform a real analysis.

BTW how did you come up with $20bln loss?


Sanibel:

It would be nice to know your criteria of corruption.

I am somewhat familiar with Russian goverments and by any standard corruption decreased significantly over last ten years.

As an ethical investor you should have divested Shell in 90’s when they were quite happy to deal with corrupt incompetent Yeltsin government officials rushing to sell the country piecemeal. Shell had a history of relying on corrupt regimes to get cheap access to resources (Shakh in Iran) and totally knew the risk it was taking. And as in the case of BP it didn’t have a loss from the sale of 50% just legal double digit return instead of illegal triple digit.
]]> Wed, 09 Apr 2008 12:58:38 -0400
First of all to get credibility an analyst should check the facts before jumping to conclusions. I am both BP and Gazprom shareholder I tend to read the documents and study history of the deals.
1) BP had never owned 51% as stated in the article
2) BP investment was 50% that is a big difference:
• invested $7bln 5 years ago
• received more than $10bln in dividends ca, 28% yields
• sold Kovykta gas field (still undeveloped for $800-1000 mm vs. cumulative investment of ca. $400mm) – not exactly a robbery
• rumors says Gazprom offeres $15-20 bln for 50% stake - that would mean 6 times increase on the initial investment (5 year IRR – 44%) – the best investment BP ever made.
3) Sidanko did use questionable tax optimization schemes and had a ‘reserve” for exactly that purposes.

I understand that is much easier to copy and paste WSJ with catchy title than to perform a real analysis.

BTW how did you come up with $20bln loss?


Sanibel:

It would be nice to know your criteria of corruption.

I am somewhat familiar with Russian goverments and by any standard corruption decreased significantly over last ten years.

As an ethical investor you should have divested Shell in 90’s when they were quite happy to deal with corrupt incompetent Yeltsin government officials rushing to sell the country piecemeal. Shell had a history of relying on corrupt regimes to get cheap access to resources (Shakh in Iran) and totally knew the risk it was taking. And as in the case of BP it didn’t have a loss from the sale of 50% just legal double digit return instead of illegal triple digit.
]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/66515-gazprom-wins-in-hungary-again?source=feed#comment-120623 120623
Devil in details?]]> Fri, 29 Feb 2008 09:51:12 -0500
Devil in details?]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/61434-putin-backs-shell-into-a-corner?source=feed#comment-112877 112877 LUKoil has to find new opportunities abroad after new Iraq puppets has ripped it West Qurna field it used to legally hold $20 billion interest without ANY compensation]]> Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:13:00 -0500 LUKoil has to find new opportunities abroad after new Iraq puppets has ripped it West Qurna field it used to legally hold $20 billion interest without ANY compensation]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/56649-6-intriguing-asset-classes-available-via-etf?source=feed#comment-104814 104814
Also as one of my favorites Russian strategyst (who is not Russian btw :-) noted - a subscription to Economist (Business Week etc) could cost subscribers millions by telling them to stay away from growing markets. nikitskyfund.com/conte.../

Russia

- election results are real (Putin didn't need Florida like scam)
- GDP growth 1000% over last 8 years - yes 10 times! and less than 30% of the growth is from oil
- FLAT 13% income tax that people are now paying after corrupted "freedom fighters" (read thiefs, murderer and tax avoiders) like Khodorkovsky got what they deserved

Disclosure - long all BRICs



]]> Mon, 10 Dec 2007 17:15:40 -0500
Also as one of my favorites Russian strategyst (who is not Russian btw :-) noted - a subscription to Economist (Business Week etc) could cost subscribers millions by telling them to stay away from growing markets. nikitskyfund.com/conte.../

Russia

- election results are real (Putin didn't need Florida like scam)
- GDP growth 1000% over last 8 years - yes 10 times! and less than 30% of the growth is from oil
- FLAT 13% income tax that people are now paying after corrupted "freedom fighters" (read thiefs, murderer and tax avoiders) like Khodorkovsky got what they deserved

Disclosure - long all BRICs



]]>