yank

Fertilizer Manufacturers Face an Uphill Battle

Good points. And believe it or not there are reports that an Arctic expedition to measure the ice shelf ran into a problem. All of their calibration and testing equipment FROZE. I kid you not. And of course every attempt was made by the left-wing media to either squelch the story or distort and twist it to suit their agenda. We call know how godd they are at doing that. Global warming? What a joke.


On Apr 19 01:42 AM ArtfulDodger wrote:

> grh1212:
>
> You are wrong about the IPCC report.
>
> In part:
> "The truth is very different. Most of the media articles you will
> see refer to reports issued by the IPCC. The IPCC is the Intergovernmental
> Panel on Climate change, a political body appointed by the UN. Many
> of the 3,000 members of this panel are not scientists, but simply
> political appointees. The few real scientists on the panel have disputed
> the panel's findings but have been silenced by having their comments
> deleted from the reports.
>
> Several of these scientists have asked to have their names removed
> from the IPCC report, but have had their requests denied. Several
> have actually sued the panel to have their names removed, but few
> have been successful.
>
> The actual fact regarding consensus on this issue is that there are
> many more scientists who dispute the claims regarding global warming
> than there are who support them."
> See here:
> www.firecongress.org/a...
>
>
> On Apr 18 05:48 PM grh1212 wrote:

The Real Reasons Fertilizer Stocks Are In the Dirt

BX Capricorn hit the bullseye. As long as Wall St runs its Vegas-casino and there is no hedge fund transparency, companies will for sure take a hard look at "dellisting". This is the most corrupt, inept SEC in our history.
Why would anyone want to become a publicly traded company in this chaos? IPOs hitting a 40 year low answers the question. They don't want to play this con game.

People Still Need to Eat: Fertilizer Stocks Oversold

Agree that analysts simply are playing their usual "dirty tricks game". Gee, POT "only" grew EPS several hundred percent Yoy. Why would I own a company generating that kind of cash when I can chase speculative, bankrupt financial companies. Give me a break! The analysts are the referee in a footballl game ordering that the goalposts be moved closer (or further away from) to the kick depending on who's kicking. If it's a commodity company make the kick as long as possible. It's almost as if POT was the kicker getting ready to make a 30 yard field goal to win the game and the referee decided to move the ball out to the 50 yard line. Sorry about that guys. It also works in reverse. With the Financials they simply lower the estimates to dirt cheap and then when they beat, the backslapping begins and the all-clear is sounded to buy Financials again. The whole nauseating process is rigged and rotten to the core. Wall St. really does deserve to go out of business. Financial capitol of the world? My ass.

Commodities: Bubble or Not?

Crossing:
Nicely said. I guess what I would say to those trashing the commodity sector is to listen to Louise Yamada's comments about it. Louise is a technical stock strategist (30 years with Smith Barney) who interprets future sector price action based on past trends. Interestingly, one of her main points is that the longer a sector remains in a downtrend (for commodities see 1980-2000) the LONGER the recovery period when it bounces back. So typically since commodities were down for approximatley 20 years, we will most definitely see at least a 15-20 year bull cycle for this sector. This pretty much confirms what Jim Rogers has been saying all along. The longer the Wall St. community remains in "denial" about commodities as a viable asset class, the longer this uptrend will last. Bunch of whining crybabies. And by the way, Louise remains strongly NEGATIVE about the Financials and Technology sector for the exact opposite of what she said about commodities. Namely, since Financials have boomed for a relatively long period (1982-2000), they will remain in a confirmed downtrend for at least the next 5 years. Sorry CNBC, Cramer, and the other "shills" who can't stop talking about Financials. They are done. Stick a fork in them. Toast.

Yank